The National Newspaper of St. Vincent and the Grenadines
; (52; :25.&(175( ;(52; :25.&(175( '1, 0)3 35,17(5 '1, 0)3 35,17(5 Monochrome Multifunction Multi function Printer: Printer: Copy, Print, Print, Scan, Email. Fax & Emai l.
PRICE: RICE: EC $1250.00 $12 or r $72.00 monthly mo
FRIDAY,
MAY 20, 2016
VOLUME 110, No.21
www.thevincentian.com
EC$1.50
NDP TO CALL OAS: ‘DISQUIETING FOR CRIMINAL ISSUES’ IN PROCEEDINGS CENTRAL LEEWARD SEAT by DAYLE DA SILVA
Arhnim Eustace has indicated that lawyers for the NDP, which he leads, will be initiating action that calls for criminal charges to be laid against certain election officers.
LAWYERS REPRESENTING THE NEW DEMOCRATIC PARTY (NDP) are expected to make formal requests to the Director of Public Prosecution (DPP), Colin Williams to issue fiats for the institution of criminal proceedings committed by certain election officials responsible for the counting of votes contrary to section 48 of the Representation of the People’s Act (RPA). So said the Leader of the NDP Arnhim Eustace during an address to the nation on Wednesday, following the publication of the final report from the team of observers from the Organisation of American States (OAS) to the December 9, 2015 general elections. “We remain highly vigilant as the petitions go through the courts,” Eustace said. This is the latest twist in the electoral impasse that has followed the December 2015 general elections in which the
Winston Gaymes, Returning Officer in the Central Leeward constituency during the December 9, 2015 general elections, has found himself at the centre of the controversy.
NDP has since filed petitions in the court, contending that the conduct of the polls in two constituencies, Central Leeward and North Windward, was fraught with irregularities, and the results should be overturned in favour of its candidates. Eustace explained that in the sworn affidavits by the returning officer for Central Leeward, Winston Gaymes, he acknowledged that he had not followed the rules guiding the elections that are found in the Representation of the Peoples Act (RPA). And according to Eustace, the OAS report suggests that the observers themselves witnessed first-hand the behaviour of Gaymes, and suggested that he was biased. Eustace proceeded to read from the report saying that the OAS’ observers were present at the final count in Central Leeward and noted, among other irregularities, the incorrect application of the seals on several ballot boxes.
by NELSON A. KING naking@verizon.net; kingnaking210@yahoo.com US CORRESPONDENT
Colin Williams, DPP, will have to decide, when he gets the request, whether there is any ground to take the action. “While tie locks had been placed, the seal was not placed correctly,” the report said. As a result of this, the report explained that the agents representing the NDP expressed the concern that they were unable to ascertain whether or not tampering had occurred and reported on it. The absence of the presiding officers’ initial and stamp was also of some concern to the observers, and according to the report, Continued on Page 3.
AMID CONTINUING OPPOSITION protest and the filing of petitions in court over the results of last December’s general elections in St. Vincent and the Grenadines, the Organization of American States (OAS) has identified what it regarded as “disquieting issues” in one particular constituency — Central Leeward. While stating that the final report on the December 9 general elections has “reiterated Jacinth Henry-Martin, concerns and former St. Kitts and achievements of the Nevis Ambassador to process,” the Washington, the OAS, headed the D.C.-based hemispheric OAS Observer team body said last Friday that to the December 9, its Electoral Observation 2015 general Mission (EOM) “identified elections in SVG. some areas in which the election process could have been improved.” “Specifically, when it refers to the final count of votes witnessed in one constituency–Central Leeward–where they identified some challenges, the observers noted some disquieting issues at this particular constituency, mainly referred to the incorrect application of seals, the absence of the Presiding Officer’s stamp and initials on some ballots, and the possible partiality of the returning officer who conducted this recount,” the OAS said. Continued on Page 3.