Vol. CXXXV, No. 6
6 October, 2014
The University of Toronto’s Student Newspaper Since 1880
UTSU faces criticism for “undemocratic behaviour” Several motions defeated at UTSU board meetings, will not proceed to AGM Alex Verman and Iris Robin VARSITY STAFF
Several motions were defeated at meetings of the University of Toronto Student Union’s (utsu) Board of Directors on September 29 and October 1. These motions will not be put before utsu members for a vote at the Annual General Meeting (agm). The defeated motions included amendments to the Elections Procedure Code (epc), an alternative Board of Directors structure, a proposal to create a Student Commons Management Committee, and a motion to investigate the relationship between divisional societies and the utsu.
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN UTSU AND DIVISIONS
Curating the city The Varsity explores a night of interactive art at Nuit Blanche pg.14
INSIDE COMMENT
FEATURES
SCIENCE
SPORTS
The hangover games
Mental health on campus
Guide to selfdefence classes
Considering the dangers of party culture
Exploring the shifting conversation
In conversation with Stephen Scherera U of T professor talks career journey
U of T offers programs over all three campuses
The investigation motion, moved by Pierre Harfouche, utsu vice-president, university affairs, was aimed at improving the relationship between the utsu and divisional societies on the St. George campus. Harfouche identified a positive relationship between the utsu and the University of Toronto Mississauga Students’ Union (utmsu) and proposed that a report be drawn to examine the feasibility of replicating the utsu-utmsu relationship with divisions on the St. George campus. The motion proposed that the utsu executive committee carry out the examination, and requested that a report be drafted by Harfouche and Yolen Bollo-Kamara, utsu president. However, Bollo-Kamara spoke against Harfouche’s motion, noting that the existing armslength relationship between the utsu and the utmsu evolved under different historical circumstances. Bollo-Kamara attributed the arrangement, which includes stipulations in the utsu’s bylaws about fee collection and utmsu representation in the utsu, to logistical demands from the distance between campuses, which made access to utsu services difficult for utm students. Ella Henry, director for the Faculty of Law, put forth an amendment to the motion that would hand over responsibility for the investigation from the executive to the Policies and Procedures committee, which she considered more suitable to conduct the investigation due to its knowledge of structural changes. “I proposed amendments because, in general, I prefer to delegate substantive decisions to committees of board members rather than the executive,” said Henry. Bollo-Kamara supported Henry’s amendment, while representatives of student societies seeking fee diversion from the utsu to their respective student councils — Engineering Society, Trinity College, and Victoria University Student Administrative Council (vusac) — expressed dissatisfaction with the proposed changes. “The intention of the original amendment was to make it bipartisan,” said Ryan Gomes, director for the Faculty of Engineering, adding: “To take it to a different committee with a more
CONTINUED ON PG 5