business@tribunemedia.net
TUESDAY, JULY 16, 2019
$4.75
$4.77
Post Office exposure ‘$17m and something’ By NEIL HARTNELL Tribune Business Editor nhartnell@tribunemedia.net
T
HE government’s first Post Office partner yesterday warned that taxpayers may be exposed to a “$17m something claim” after a proposed settlement failed to proceed at the last minute. Scott Godet, who agreed a public-private partnership (PPP) with the former Christie administration to construct a new main Post Office at the Independence Drive Shopping Plaza, told Tribune Business that the Minnis administration withdrew its offer to purchase the property just three days before the deal was supposed to be finalised. Revealing that he was told during a meeting at the Attorney General’s Office that the government “didn’t have the money to go through with it”, Mr Godet said he had been left with no choice but to initiate legal action before the Supreme Court using the PPP agreement’s “breach of contract” clause. He added that this required the government to pay him “the full value of the PPP” if it reneged on their agreement, which he
• First location owner’s liability warning • Says govt pulled out of settlement late • ‘Rolling with punches’ and headed to court
SCOTT GODET yesterday estimated at “$17 something million”, reinforcing arguments that the Post Office saga will cost the government more than the annual $700,000 rent being paid to the Town Centre Mall owners (Brent Symonette and his brother) over the next five years. “That didn’t happen,” Mr Godet said of the proposed settlement, which would have seen the government acquire the Independence Shopping Centre site from
him. “They changed. They said they didn’t have the money. “On June 28 they called a meeting at the Attorney General’s Office and said they weren’t able to go through with it. I’d been waiting until July 1 when they said they’d be able to settle the matter.” Mr Godet said he was unable to recall the purchase price proposed by the government, adding that it was based on a formula
involving his loss of revenue and the price that the property would have been sold at under the PPP contract. The businessman, who is already a landlord to the government through his leasing of the Public Treasury building over which it has an option to buy, disclosed that he and his attorneys were still calculating the extent of potential losses and damages as they prepare to file the claim with the Supreme Court. “We’ve lost quite a bit,” Mr Godet told Tribune Business, “not to mention the building has been demolished to the point that new construction has to be put in. For us, we’re going to have to reverse that, the new construction, if we rebuild.” He revealed last October that the government’s decision not to proceed with the Independence Shopping Centre location had left him with a near-$4m financial exposure through some
SEE PAGE 4
$4.83
$4.83
BOB: $10m claims were ‘abandoned’ by default pursuers By NEIL HARTNELL Tribune Business Editor nhartnell@tribunemedia.net BANK of The Bahamas has accused companies jointly owned by an ex-Cabinet minister’s family trust of “already abandoning” claims worth $10m in their bid to enforce a default judgment. Callenders & Co, the BISX-listed institution’s attorneys, are arguing that the “vastly inflated” damages claimed by entities controlled by the family trusts of Damian Gomez, former minister of state for legal affairs, and David Jennette are but one reason to stay their enforcement bid. Besides “substantial irregularities” associated with the $6m damages calculation by acting deputy registrar, Stephana Saunders, it was alleged on Bank of The Bahamas’ behalf that there were “extensive” and “good” defences to all the claims against it. Noting that the six companies and persons involved all had liabilities owing to Bahamas Resolve, the vehicle created to facilitate the two Bank of The Bahamas bail-outs, the bank and its attorneys warned it would be “very difficult” to recover any monies paid out if the judgment was enforced as
they would likely be used “to satisfy other creditors.” However, Mr Jennette argued in a May 27, 2019, affidavit that Bank of The Bahamas’ bid to set aside the default judgment and stay the acting deputy registrar’s damages award was “vexatious, frivolous and an abuse of process”. Alleging that Bank of The Bahamas’ failure to comply with the March 9, 2019, damages award was the latest phase of failing to follow court orders and instructions, Mr Jennette urged the Supreme Court to impose a Mareva Injunction to freeze the BISX-listed institution’s assets so that they could be used to settle the judgment. He added that former Philip Galanis, the accountant and former PLP MP; Sir Baltron Bethel, senior policy advisor to former Prime Minister Perry Christie; ex-minister of state for finance, Michael Halkitis; and former Family Guardian president, Patricia Hermanns, had all agreed to act as receivers for Bank of The Bahamas if necessary to help enforce the judgment. However, Callenders & Co is alleging on Bank of The Bahamas’ behalf that
SEE PAGE 5
Abaco’s main port in ‘closure’ crisis By NEIL HARTNELL Tribune Business Editor nhartnell@tribunemedia.net ABACO’S main shipping port faces a “make or break” inspection tomorrow that could result in its closure and derail the island’s economy by halting virtually all cargo trade with the US. Tribune Business can reveal that this blunt warning was delivered by US Coast Guard officials after the government-owned and managed Marsh Harbour port failed its International Ship and Port Security (ISPS) “mock” inspection on June 18, 2019. Captain Troy Mills, the Abaco port administrator, in a “call to action” wrote that Marsh Harbour will be “closed down unless there are some major improvements” made in time for Wednesday’s follow-up
• US demands ‘major improvements’ in security • ‘Make or break’ inspection set for tomorrow • Failure would ‘discontinue’ cargo shipping inspection by US and ISPS code overseers. His letter, which has been obtained by Tribune Business, said: “On June 18, 2019, the ISPS coordinators for the Caribbean along with Lieutenant Commander Justin Matejka of the US coast guard performed a mock inspection of the port facility that resulted in the discovery of a breach in compliance” of both the ISPS code and International Maritime Organisation (IMO) policies. “As a result of the findings of June 18, 2019, ISPS and US coast guard officers have warned that unless there are some major
improvements before the next inspection that is to take place on July 17, 2019, the port of Marsh Harbour will be closed down and ships transporting cargo between Florida and Marsh Harbour would have to discontinue their services,” Captain Mills warned. Such an outcome would likely send Abaco’s economy into a tailspin if it were to occur, given that the island - much like the rest of The Bahamas imports most of what it consumes. With its main port of entry closed, cargo freight would likely have to be sent first to Nassau before being transferred to smaller vessels such as mail
boats for onward shipping to Abaco. This would result in tremendous cost and shipping time increases, with the extra expense passed on to both Abaco businesses and consumers in the absence of direct deliveries, thus undermining one of the most buoyant island economies in The Bahamas. There is also currently no immediate alternative to Marsh Harbour as a main port of entry with the status of the $40m north Abaco port constructed by China Harbour and Engineering Company (CHEC) uncertain.
SEE PAGE 5
Sarkis urges dismissal of ‘moot’ CCA oppression By NEIL HARTNELL Tribune Business Editor nhartnell@tribunemedia.net SARKIS Izmirlian, pictured, yesterday urged that the “shareholder oppression” claim against him by Baha Mar’s main contractor be dismissed because it is “moot” and can only be heard in The Bahamas. The latest legal filings by Baha Mar’s original developer argued that there were multiple grounds for the New York State Supreme Court to reject this aspect of China Construction America’s (CCA) counterclaim as well as its bid for “punitive damages”. Alleging that the latter was “impermissible and should be stricken”, Mr Izmirlian and his BML Properties vehicle said CCA and its affiliates were unable to claim “shareholder oppression” because
• Argues claim can only be heard in Bahamas • Impossible to bring as Baha Mar ‘dissolved’ • Original Baha Mar developer in new legal move BAHA MAR RESORT
its investment in the Baha Mar project - some $150m of preference shares - had no voting rights.
While Bahamian law prevented the New York court from hearing such arguments, they also claimed
that CCA’s case was “moot” and had been rendered
SEE PAGE 3