business@tribunemedia.net
MONDAY, FEBRUARY 25, 2019
$4.15
$4.19
$4.20
Cruise lines told: ‘Don’t fear’ your bid’s rejection By NEIL HARTNELL Tribune Business Editor nhartnell@tribunemedia.net
A CABINET minister yesterday said he wanted to increase passenger spending in Nassau by at least “20-30 percent”, urging cruise lines “not to be fearful” after their port bid was rejected. Dionisio D’Aguilar, Minister of Tourism, reassured the cruise lines they will not face excessive port fees or berthing/itinerary disruptions as a result of the government selecting Global Ports Holding’s rival $250m bid as Prince George Wharf’s preferred operator/manager. He told Tribune Business that concerns over the potential conflict of interest resulting from the
THE PROPOSED new look. cruise lines owning the Nassau port operator, while also being its main customers, were “the main reason” why the industry’s alliance with the Bahamian investor group, Cruise Ports International, was turned down by the government. Comparing such a situation to
“the airlines running Lynden Pindling International Airport”, Mr D’Aguilar said questions would inevitably arise at times as to whether the cruise lines were acting in their - or the Nassau cruise port’s - “best interests”. He added that selecting the cruise line-backed bid would also have been “unacceptable to the Bahamian people”, given rising concerns about whether it has too much power over The Bahamas given that the majority of the economic benefits appear to be retained by the industry itself. Asked why the government selected Global Ports Holding’s offer, Mr D’Aguilar told this newspaper: “We thought it was far more transformative, far more iconic.
We felt this proposal allowed for, offered the best possibility to as many hard-working Bahamians as possible to become shareholders. “It’s a concern of every Bahamian to have the cruise companies running your port. It’s like the airlines managing the airport. It’s concerning. Are they looking out for their best interests or the best interests of the port? That was the main reason. We don’t think having the cruise lines run the port would be acceptable to the Bahamian people. I don’t think they’d buy into that.” Mr D’Aguilar, though, immediately moved to reassure the cruise industry that he was not trying to SEE PAGE EIGHT
PORT WINNER ‘NOT WORRIED ONE DROP’ BY CRUISE ISLANDS By NEIL HARTNELL Tribune Business Editor nhartnell@tribunemedia.net
THE winning Nassau cruise port bidder’s chairman yesterday said he is “not worried one drop” about the rapid expansion of the industry’s private
destinations, adding: “We’ll see who wins.” Mehmet Kutman, unveiling Global Ports Holding’s ambition to increase annual cruise passenger visitors to Nassau to 5m within five years, promised Dionisio D’Aguilar, minister of tourism, that the port’s $250m
BAHAMAS URGED TO TARGET FATF ESCAPE By NEIL HARTNELL Tribune Business Editor nhartnell@tribunemedia.net THE Bahamas has been urged to “prioritise” escaping the Financial Action Task Force’s (FATF) monitoring list as all its recent woes “flow” from this. Emmanuel Komolafe, a compliance expert, told Tribune Business that the European Union’s (EU) recent listing of this jurisdiction as posing “a high risk” for financial crime, together with previous US and UK government
advisories, all stemmed from the FATF’s assessment that The Bahamas has “strategic deficiencies” in its regulatory regime. “The main thing we should be focusing on is that FATF list because everything flows from that,” he said. “That should be the focus and the priority; getting off that FATF list. It’s unfortunate that everything we’ve done, which the regional CFATF has recognised and acknowledged, has not been recognised by the EU and others. SEE PAGE TEN
‘FRESH IMPETUS’ FOR OIL EXPLORER By NEIL HARTNELL Tribune Business Editor nhartnell@tribunemedia.net
A BAHAMAS-based oil explorer’s search for a joint venture partner has been given “fresh impetus” by the Government’s extension of its four licences until end-2020. Simon Potter, Bahamas Petroleum Company’s (BPC) chief executive, told Tribune Business yesterday that the Minnis administration’s confirmation of the extension had given both
itself and potential joint venture “farm in” partners “a clear line of sight” towards the execution of a first exploratory well in Bahamian waters. Speaking after BPC received “formal notification” from the Government, Mr Potter said it gave the exploration outfit a “level of clarity we’ve not had over the last few years” while providing “a good window” to design “a safe and environmentally responsible” well. SEE PAGE FIVE
transformation will make newspaper headlines “from Cape Town to Europe”. Asked by Tribune Business whether he was concerned about the competitive threat posed to Nassau by the rapid expansion of the cruise industry’s private islands and ports
within The Bahamas, Mr Kutman pledged that Prince George Wharf will be upgraded to an “iconic” destination that the industry cannot afford to ignore. “I’m not worried one drop,” he said. “By the time we get through with this iconic, transformative,
catalyst of a development, we’ll see who wins. I intend to win.... This will be more iconic than anywhere in the world.” Global Ports Holding’s unveiling as the preferred bidder to take over Prince SEE PAGE SEVEN
$4.24 ATLANTIS SALE ‘OFF THE TABLE’ By NEIL HARTNELL Tribune Business Editor nhartnell@tribunemedia.net
THE potential sale of Atlantis to a New Yorkbased real estate investor, which was backed by Qatar’s sovereign wealth fund, has fallen through and will not be revived. Multiple Tribune Business sources confirmed that staff at the iconic Paradise Island resort have been informed that the deal spearheaded by Ashkenazy Acquisition Corporation and its principal, Ben Ashkenazy, is “no longer on the table” and will not be revived. This newspaper understands that Ashkenazy, which was backed by Middle Eastern money principally from Qatar, walked away after it uncovered significant “deferred maintenance” issues when it conducted due diligence on Atlantis’s financials and real estate assets. Had it proceeded with the deal, Ashkenazy and its financiers would have been required to spend significantly more in capital investments than they had initially bargained for, altering the economics and potential return on investment (RoI) they were targeting. SEE PAGE SIX