business@tribunemedia.net
WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 24, 2024
$5.30
$5.31
$5.30
‘Absolute frenzy’ on VAT over tax portal struggles t 'JSNT GFBS mOFT PWFS POMJOF QBZNFOU XPFT t #VU *OMBOE 3FWFOVF TBZT AOPU HPPE FYDVTF t 0UIFS PQUJPOT NBOZ MFBWF 7"5 MBTU NJOVUF
By NEIL HARTNELL Tribune Business Editor nhartnell@tribunemedia.net BUSINESSES endured “an absolute frenzy” to meet Monday’s VAT payment deadline due to continued “growing pains” with the Department of Inland Revenue’s tax portal, it was revealed yesterday. Accountants and the private sector disclosed to Tribune Business that some companies struggled to comply with the stipulated timeline for filing and
paying December’s VAT collection because the new tax administration portal was not accepting electronic payments via the likes of credit and debit cards. Besides leaving many businesses fearing they could be hit with financial sanctions or penalties for not meeting Monday’s deadline, concerns were also voiced by service providers that the situation is delaying the collection of due taxes by the Public Treasury and thus disrupting the Government’s cash flow and ability to meet its own obligations in a timely manner.
A BID to develop a $1.3m “state-of-the-art” propane gas plant off Tonique Williams Highway was yesterday withdrawn before residents could seek to overturn the initial planning approvals it obtained. Warren Davis, Nassau Propane’s general manager, informed the Planning and Subdivisions Appeals Board via an attorney’s letter that he agreed to the “immediate quashing” of the original site plan approval so that
t /BTTBV 1SPQBOF XJUIESBXT CFGPSF BQQFBMT IFBSJOH t 1MBOT UP TVCNJU AGSFTI BQQMJDBUJPO GPS JUT SFMPDBUJPO he could prepare a fresh application. Alexander Christie, partner with the McKinney, Bancroft and Hughes law firm, wrote: “We have received instructions to act on behalf of the respondent, Nassau Propane Ltd, in the captioned matter. “Without admission to the various grounds of appeal contained in the
appellant’s submissions, our client proposes to agree to the Appeal Board proceeding to immediately quashing the Town Planning Committee’s decision made on August 8, 2023, to enable the respondent to instruct its attorneys to submit without prejudice a fresh formal application for site plan approval for
relocation of its propane plant.” Neither Mr Davis nor any member of the Blue Hills Estates Homeowners Association, which was seeking to overturn the original approval at yesterday’s hearing, could be reached for comment prior to press time. The residents had previously been backed by Mario Bowleg, their MP and minster of youth, sports and culture, who said then: “There’s rules and regulations that govern these communities, and we just hope that the rules and regulations that
SEE PAGE B4
Attorney loses challenge to overturn disbarment By NEIL HARTNELL Tribune Business Editor nhartnell@tribunemedia.net A BAHAMIAN attorney yesterday lost his challenge to the process that saw him disbarred over real estate transactions where he twice represented both parties in deals for the same property. Troy Kellman’s bid to overturn last year’s verdict by the Bar Council’s disciplinary tribunal, which ruled he “be struck from the roll” and forbidden to practice as an attorney, was branded “a bit hollow” and found to have “no merit” by a unanimous Court of Appeal judgment. Sir Michael Barnett, the appeal court’s president, in a written ruling dismissed the now-former attorney’s arguments that he was denied “due process” and that the Bar Council’s ethics committee was not properly constituted when it decided to refer the complaints against him to the disciplinary tribunal. The events that led to Mr Kellman being disbarred occurred more than a decade ago when he was instructed by the state-owned Bahamas Mortgage Corporation to prepare a mortgage for its borrower clients, Caleb Dorsett and Shamene Bain, in 2013. Mr Kellman gave an opinion that title to the property, on which the mortgage was to be secured, was “good and marketable”. However, the Bahamas Mortgage Corporation accused him of “negligence” for failing to disclose that he was also representing Lion Management Company, which was the company selling the property to Mr Dorsett and Ms Bain.
SEE PAGE B5
BALMORAL CONDO HOTEL RENDERING
Balmoral condo hotel appeals may be joined By YOURI KEMP Tribune Business Reporter ykemp@tribunemedia.net THE planning authorities will decide on February 15 whether to combine two appeals over the Balmoral Club’s plans to develop a condo hotel into one hearing. The Sanford Drive community’s residents and the Balmoral Club’s developer were yesterday divided over the issue at the Subdivision and Development Appeal Board (SDAB) hearing. While the residents wanted to consolidate the two appeals into one, the developer objected. Balmoral residents are seeking to overturn earlier approvals granted to the club for a four-storey condo hotel proposal, which they argue “threatens the integrity of the community” due to noncompliance with legal processes. However, the Club developers are - via a separate appeal - attempting to overturn the Town Planning Committee’s (TPC) “baffling” rejection of their present $25m, eight-storey condo hotel expansion. The Committee
PRETINO P. ALBURY
Dexter Fernander, the Department of Inland Revenue’s operations manager, conceded to this newspaper that the new tax portal is suffering “growing pains” and experiencing “infrastructure issues at peak times” such as the 21st of each month when VAT payments are due. While the Government’s main revenue agency is asking the system’s developer to provide “more bandwidth”, so that it can better cope with use and demand at
Controversial $1.3m propane plant agrees approval ‘quash’ By YOURI KEMP Tribune Business Reporter ykemp@tribunemedia.net
$5.30
rejected the 50-unit project on the grounds it was “incompatible” with land use development trends in the western New Providence community. Khalil Parker KC, representing the homeowners and residents, told yesterday’s hearing that there was a “prospect for consolidation” of the various appeals and that he wished to exercise that option. “For the record I would be making reference to the record in 18, even though that’s not the one we’re discussing,” he added. “Because, when we’re talking about case management as the Town Planning meeting was conceived, it appears that they were treating - and are treating - with the current application, the subject of 18 and the rejection as a completely separate issue from the 15 decision that was made two years ago.” But Dwayne Mortimer, the Balmoral’s Club president, said he was not prepared to deal with the homeowners action and wished to
SEE PAGE B6
SEE PAGE B4
CRAIG A. GOMEZ
Gov’t ‘on target’ for 60-day contract unveiling by March By NEIL HARTNELL Tribune Business Editor nhartnell@tribunemedia.net THE Government’s top procurement official yesterday predicted that it will be “on target” to disclose all contract awards within 60 days - as required by law come March 2024. Carl Oliver, the acting chief procurement officer and Ministry of Finance’s deputy director of economic planning, told Tribune Business that the Government plans to disclose all contract awarded via the Go Bonfire online portal for October and November 2023 by February. Given that the current Public Procurement Act requires that details on government contract awards be published within 60 days of issuance, he explained that hitting this publication deadline will bring the Davis administration into compliance with the law’s demands. “We’re not far away,” Mr Oliver told this newspaper of the 60-day disclosure requirement. “The information that was just published was from September 1, 2022, to September 30, 2023. The next submission will be for October and November. The deadline for November is the end of January. “In February we will be providing information for October 2023 and
November 2023. After that, we will be on target. We’re moving in the right direction, and myself, the financial secretary [Simon Wilson] and the minister [Michael Halkitis] are quite pleased with the results we are getting. We are on schedule for March.” The original Public Procurement Act, which came into effect on September 1, 2021, but has now been repealed and replaced, required from that moment on that all government contracts be disclosed within 60 days of their issuance. The Government was supposed to disclose the name and address of winning bidders, the procuring entity, the procurement selection method and the value of the contract. The revised Public Procurement Act took effect on July 1 this year. The Government’s initial release of contracts awarded via the Go Bonfire portal provides the value of the awards, identifies the procuring entity and procurement vendor, plus the winning bidder, but provided no address for the latter or any further details. That first release, which came in mid-October 2023, covered the nine months to end-June that year and detailed 843 contracts worth a total $140m. Yesterday’s release, which covers
SEE PAGE B6