Issue 1 2017-2018

Page 1

**New Diversity Section** page 13

The Student Voice OCTOBER 17, 2017 | ISSUE 1, VOLUME 33 | THE BUCKLEY SCHOOL | 3900 STANSBURY AVENUE | SHERMAN OAKS, CA 91423

INSIDE 03

CAMPUS: Quinn Martin Building renovated

07

OFF-CAMPUS: Advisories begin Council program

12

DIVERSITY: Director visits campus

19

SPORTS: Girls tennis strives to “improve power and consistency”

STUDENT

PU SE Do you think that locker searches are an invasion of privacy?

YES NO 56% 44% 167 responses collected Oct. 12-16

. un lock.ed

ColetteKanbarian ’19 campus editor When a parent signs the dotted line enrolling their child as a student, do either of them read the fine print? As Head of Upper School Deborah Monroe and Dean of Student Life George Russo stated at the Upper School assemblies earlier this month, the searching of students’ private property is a right of the school, whether the students know it or not. The privacy policy, which has been clearly stated in the handbook for nearly a decade, claims that “students have no reasonable expectation of privacy on campus.” Russo justifies this policy by saying that “anything you bring on campus is Buckley possession.” As a result, the school can search “your car, your locker, your bag, your person, and anything at Fashion Square, because that’s a satellite site.” Assistant Head of School Peter Reinke maintains that the school’s ability to encroach on student privacy by looking through lockers, backpacks, and devices is enforced

in order to ensure the safety and well-being of students and aid those who seek to hurt themselves or others. The school reserves the right to search personal property on campus or at satellites sites like the Fashion Square parking lot. Reinke further said that he believes they will go through a phone or other electronic devices “not for willy-nilly reasons, but when the administration has substantial evidence to believe that something in violation of the rules has happened, is happening, or is about to happen.” The administration has access to personal possessions such as lockers and backpacks at any time, and to search electronic devices such as phones and laptops “when there is suspicion that a device may have been used in violation of the law or school policies,” as stated in the Family Handbook. But, Reinke adds, as defined by the law, is unnecessary at Buckley. “Of course people have certain rights as an American, but they become more truncated in an independent school environment. Any decisions made, and how we make

No privacy for private school students

CelineFarhadi ’19 campus editor United States citizens are entitled to certain privacy rights regarding their person and their property; Buckley students are not. When students and their families sign the Buckley Family Handbook at the start of each year, they are waiving their rights to privacy each time they step onto campus or park at Fashion Square. The Fourth Amendment pro-

sure the campus remains safe, and how we move to consistently make the school safer is a decision that will be made with thorough consultation with all parts of the administrative team,” Reinke said. Students and faculty members, upon reading the handbook, are left doubtless about the school’s legal ability to seize and search private property on campus, but doubtful about its moral basis. “It is definitely an invasion of your privacy, but that does not mean they shouldn’t do it,” Sophomore Ryan Halperin said. “I think it’s a violation of privacy. It’s our private property. It’s annoying that just because some kids do something that’s messed up we all have to be penalized and have our stuff searched. As the school deals with the fallout, students are left to decide for themselves whether property searches are ethical, despite their lack of power in the situation. It breaks the trust between students and the administration,” Senior Sofia Russell said.

tects a person’s house, papers, and property against “unreasonable searches and seizures.” A warrant to search someone or their belongings, only granted if “probable cause” is proven, must be presented prior to the search. By scribbling your name above the line that says signature, you sign away this basic, American right. According to the handbook, “school officials reserve the right to search the contents of lockers and continued on page 1

“The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” - Constitution of the United States of America (1789, rev. 1992)

other school property at any time. Personal items, such as backpacks or purses, are subject to search if the school suspects the student may have violated school policy.” No warrant necessary, just reasonable suspicion, explained Assistant Head of School Peter Reinke. At its core, an entity’s ability to infringe on the privacy of its constituents, whether it be a government on its citizens or a school on its students, comes down to who


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.
Issue 1 2017-2018 by The Student Voice - Issuu