B1
SUNDAY, OCTOBER 16, 2016
EDITORIAL
Adelle Chua, Editor / Joyce Pangco Pañares, Issue Editor
Opinion mst.daydesk@gmail.com
‘Cheerleading killings’
L
AST week, President Rodrigo Duterte signed an administrative order that created the Presidential Task Force on Violations of the Right to Life, Liberty and Security of the Members of the Media. According to the order, the duty of the task force is to ensure a safe environment for media workers. Under normal circumstances, this would have been an encouraging development. The practice of journalism in the Philippines is seen as one of the most dangerous in the world, next only to conflict zones. Unfortunately, the President’s antagonism toward members of the media, which he perfectly articulated in the ear-
ly days of his administration, gives us reason to wonder how sincere he is in protecting the lives, liberties and security of media workers. Who would, for instance, be able to brush aside his comments implying that murdered journalists likely had it coming because they were corrupt? A few days later, Mr. Duterte qualified these incendiary statements saying that there were various groups of media workers in the Philippines: the true advocates, the paid hacks and the corrupt. He meant to say that his previous statements applied only to the third group. Media workers and organizations will not deny that some among us do give the profession its bad name. Measures are being done to address this at the core. Nonethe-
less, it does not give anybody any reason to justify their killing—something that has entered a gray area like many other things in this organization. Already international watchdog Human Rights Watch, through a statement by its deputy Asia director Phelim Kine, said journalists have reason to be skeptical about the integrity of a Duterte government inquiry. Kine said: “Not just because Duterte has himself justified the ‘assassination’ of journalists he deems ‘corrupt’ but also because the government has been cheerleading killings without consequence in its so-called ‘war on drugs’...” And indeed since the start of the Duterte administration until the first week of October, more than 3,000 have been killed via
either ‘legitimate’ police operations or vigilante-style assassinations. We can almost hear how the now-notorious presidential mouth will respond to this latest expression of doubt by a representative of an international body—if he has not, already. But Mr. Duterte cannot blame Kine, or anyone for that matter, for thinking that the belated creation of the task force may just be some form of damage control given the earlier damning statements the President has issued on the matter. He may choose to respond to this latest reaction in another way, for a change. We wonder if it is really beyond the President to not take offense and instead assure journalists and the entire public that he respects forthrightness and constructive criticism. POP GOES THE WORLD JENNY ORTUOSTE
Should Bob Dylan have won the Nobel for literature?
you show that you care about results more than your image or ego.” Follow through. Overnight success is not success at all. A 1985 study of 120 world-class pianists, neurologists, swimmers, chess players, mathematicians and sculptors showed that just a few of them were regarded as prodigies by teachers, parents or experts in their younger years. “Rather, accomplished individuals worked day after day, for at least 10 or 15 years, to reach the top of their fields.” This is akin to the minimumrequirement rule described by Malcolm Gladwell in his book Outliers. To be really good at something, he posited, you have to work on what you do for no less than 10,000 hours. Resilience. Author Andrew Zolli defines resilience as “the ability of people, communities and systems to maintain their core purpose and integrity among unforeseen
THERE is no doubt that Bob Dylan has had tremendous impact on the development of music and musicians over the years. His plain style of folk music that melds lyrics sympathetic to the common man with melodies plucked from an acoustic guitar was an inspiration to activists in the 1960s who took some of his songs as rallying anthems, and to subsequent generations who read messages of hope and encouragement in his music. Dylan has received many accolades over five decades, including 12 Grammys, an Oscar, and a special Pulitzer in 2008 for “his profound impact on popular music and American culture, marked by lyrical compositions of extraordinary poetic power.” On Oct. 13, the Swedish Academy bestowed the Nobel prize for literature on the musician for “having created new poetic expressions within the great American song tradition.” This is the first time in 112 years that a songwriter has been so honored. The last American to win a Nobel for literature was novelist Toni Morrison (The Bluest Eye, Beloved) in 1993. This is not the only Swedish prize Dylan has received. In May 2000, King Carl XVI of Sweden gave him the Polar Music Prize. The announcement of Dylan as the Nobel winner was a shock to many. A week before, on Oct. 6, New Republic news editor Alex Shephard wrote a piece with the head “Who Will Win The 2016 Nobel Prize for Literature?” The subhead was, “Not Bob Dylan, that’s for sure.” Shephard shared Ladbrokes’ list of personalities in the betting. Syrian poet Adonis drew odds of 6/1, Haruki Murakami 4/1, Joyce Carol Oates weighed in at 14/1, and our own F. Sionil Jose was at 100/1. Dylan was another longshot at 50/1. The furor erupted immediately. Critics debate whether song lyrics can be considered as poetry of a literary nature. That’s going to be discussed far into the future by ivory tower academics, but putting poetry and lyrics side by side on paper, it’s clear the lyrics take the form of poetry, albeit intended to be set to music and sung. This was the
Turn to next page
Turn to next page
Scan this icon to view the PDF
Hail the gritty LONG STORY SHORT ADELLE CHUA ALL parents want their children to be successful in their chosen field. This is why we work hard —so we can create an environment and give them the tools we think they need to achieve just that. We want to know what exactly what predicts success. Is it talent? IQ? Being born in a certain socioeconomic class? Attending a good (expensive) school? Having a conventional, relatively peaceful, family life? All these do bear on how children eventually turn out, but recent research shows there is something else that is a far better predictor of whether children will actually find meaning and happiness in what they do. It is called grit.
Grit is defined as perseverance and passion for long-term goals. It is carrying on despite distraction, temptation and failure. “Grit entails working strenuously toward challenges, maintaining effort and interest over the years despite failures, adversity and plateaus in progress. The gritty individual approaches achievement as a marathon; his or her advatage is stamina. Whereas disappointment or boredom signals to others that it is time to change trajectory and cut losses, the gritty individual stays the course,” so say Angela Duckworth, Christopher Peterson, Michael Matthews and Dennis Kelly in their paper “Grit: Perseverance and Passion for Long-term Goals” published in the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology in 2007. One of the authors, Duckworth, has gone on to become a more vocal advocate, publishing her own book, Grit, and becoming a famous TED Talk speaker.
*** So why do different people, of generally equal intelligence or talent, achieve different levels of success? The answer lies on good old grit, which characteristics are summarized by Forbes Magazine’s Margaret Perlis as courage, conscientiousness, follow through,
Grit predicts success more than talent or IQ can. resilience and excellence. Courage. Courage, we say, is not the absence of fear. It is pushing ahead despite it. Fear of failure, for instance, is debilitating— many would rather not try than risk trying and thereafter failing. But gritty people know that we
are all bound to fail at one point, or several. They acknowledge that failure is part of the learning process and that the important thing is, as the song goes, is to “pick [themselves] up, dust [themselves] off and start all over again.” As parents, we often try to shield our kids from the consequences of their actions or omissions. We don’t want them to feel pain or frustration. What this tells us is that we just might want to adopt the “let them fail” approach, not so that we can punish them and say “I told you so!” but so that they can learn to deal with failure which is, they will eventually find, inevitable. Conscientiousness. To be conscientious means to be careful, painstaking and meticulous, and being accountable for one’s actions no matter what. Travis Bradberry writes for The Huffington Post: “By holding yourself accountable, even when making excuses is an option,
Rolando G. Estabillo Publisher can be accessed at: thestandard.com.ph
Benjamin Philip G. Romualdez Former Chief Justice Reynato S. Puno
Philippine Press Institute The National Association of Philippine Newspapers
Anita F. Grefal Baldwin R. Felipe Edgar M. Valmorida
ManilaStandard
Published Monday to Sunday by Philippine Manila Standard Publishing Inc. at 6/F Universal Re Building, 106 Paseo de Roxas, corner Perea St., Legaspi Village, Makati City. Telephone numbers 832-5554, 832-5556, 832-5558 (connecting all departments), (Editorial) 832-5554, (Advertising) 832-5550. P.O. Box 2933, Manila Central Post Office, Manila. Website: www.thestandard. com.ph; e-mail: contact@thestandard.com.ph
ONLINE MEMBER
PPI
Chairman Board Member & Chief Legal Adviser Treasury Manager OIC-Ad Solutions Circulation Manager
Ramonchito L. Tomeldan Chin Wong/Ray S. Eñano Francis Lagniton Joyce Pangco Pañares
Managing Editor Associate Editors News Editor City Editor
Emil P. Jurado
Adelle Chua Honor B. Cabie Romel J. Mendez Roberto Cabrera
Chairman Emeritus, Editorial Board
Opinion Editor Night Editor Art Director Chief Photographer