The
Are single-use coffee cups contaminating the country?
Silhouette
page
B11
McMASTER UNIVERSITY’S STUDENT NEWSPAPER
Thursday, March 27, 2014 VOL. 84 NO. 27
Setting the agenda
STUDENT POLITICS
Healthcare referendum to rerun in 2015 Failed motion sent back to drawing board to clarify details Rachel Faber Assistant News Editor
JEMMA WOLFE / EXECUTIVE EDITOR
5:08 p.m.
JEMMA WOLFE / EXECUTIVE EDITOR
6:04 p.m.
JEMMA WOLFE / EXECUTIVE EDITOR
6:30 p.m.
General Assembly hit an attendance peak of 630 people at roughly 6:15 p.m., three people short of quorum. Not soon after, many students against BDS left the gym.
ELIZA POPE / ASSISTANT PHOTO EDITOR
McMaster BDS was the sole business item voted on at the General Assembly despite six others proposed. Quorum of 633 was not reached and attendance peaked at 630.
This year’s MSU General Assembly proved the venue can be both effective and inefficient in providing a democratic forum for the student membership to “show up and speak out.” Attendance at the Assembly peaked at 630, three members from quorum. Compared to last year’s peak attendance of 60 students and to a string of non-quorate assemblies from 1996 to 2011, this year’s turnout was impressive. But even though seven motions were on the original agenda, none were voted on until the two-hour Assembly was slotted to end due to time restrictions for Burridge Gym. The gym is the only building on campus that can accommodate more than 600 students. None of the motions were debated in a substantive way despite an engaged-and politically divided-student audience. Amendments to the agenda were discussed for more than an hour, with numerous motions to call the Assembly to question (where members vote on whether to vote). At the beginning of the meeting, Salah Abdelrahman, who submitted the McMaster BDS motion, moved to have his placed ahead of the broader motion on the ‘MSU stance on international crises’ motion. The former was approved before the latter, prompting
some to feel the agenda should be re-ordered. “Many of us are here to discuss the McMaster BDS motion. Let’s discuss this motion and proceed,” Abdelrahman said. “I think the motions on the agenda should be ordered in the order they were submitted,” said Sarah Jama, who had submitted four motions on improved accessibility. “I put a lot of work into my motions and they were moved down, so I agree with him.” A motion was then brought forward, though not by Jama, to have the motions regarding accessibility moved up. “The two top motions are not student issues. We should focus on things that directly affect students,” one student argued. After more discussion, Sarah Silverberg, who submitted the motion that the MSU not take a stance on international crises, moved to strike both hers and the McMaster BDS motion off the agenda. “There are other forums and maybe the GA is not the assembly to be discussing such motions. I think it’s important for us to take a lot of time to think about these motions and having an on-thespot vote at the GA is not the appropriate forum to be able to do that,” Silverberg said, adding that committees could be set up to discuss BDS and Israeli-Palestinian conflict over a longer period of time.
At around 6:30 p.m., just before the Assembly voted to adopt the agenda and attendance was announced to be 621, many students against BDS got up to leave the gym, ensuring that quorum would not be reached. “The problem is that many students feel uncomfortable and should have the right to leave and not be counted in the vote,” said an anti-BDS student after a call to question was announced and the chair ordered the doors to be sealed for voting. The tension in the room was most palpable at that point. By 6:40 p.m., the number of voting members in the gym was reduced to 520. About 20 minutes were spent on condensed reports from MSU president David Campbell and Engineering Without Borders President Kathryn Chan. The motion for the MSU to endorse BDS against Israel was up for discussion 10 minutes before adjournment was scheduled. It was passed by a simple majority (360 in favour, 23 opposed and 135 abstentions) and is not binding on the MSU because quorum was not reached. However, the Student Representative Assembly will consider the McMaster BDS motion and any motions brought to the SRA that were not discussed at the General Assembly. A policy has also recently been passed by the SRA to strike a committee to discuss how the
Is celebrity culture distorting our idea of influence? PAGE A9
Triathlon Mac athletes form a dynastic legacy PAGE B1
The Sil sits down with a BBQ bonanza PAGE B8
Anqi Shen Online Editor
GENERAL ASSEMBLY AGENDA (Original order)
1. MSU Stance on International Crises, Conflicts, and Concerns The MSU should refrain from taking political and polarizing stances on international conflicts. 2. McMaster BDS The MSU should endorse Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions gainst Israel and commit to ethical purchasing policies. 3. Accessibility of the Pulse The MSU should lobby for accessibility services at the Athletic and Recreation Centre to be covered under the student fee for students with SAS. 4. Priority Clearing of Ramps on Campus The MSU should lobby the University to make ramp-clearing in the winter a priority. 5. MSU Accessibility Survey to Students Registered with SAS An MSU survey should be sent out to assess the Student Accessibility Service. 6. BSB Ramp The MSU should lobby the university to build a ramp at the front entrance of BSB. 7. Increased Inclusivity of Bridges The MSU should advocate for Bridges Café to adhere to major religious dietary laws and obtain Halal and Kosher certifications.
General Assembly should be run and promoted. The policy will be enacted in 2014-15. The full video of the General Assembly is available at thesil.ca. @anqi_shen
ANDY reviews Wes Anderson’s latest showing PAGE C6
During the recent MSU Presidential Elections for the 2014-15 academic year, a health care referendum was put forward regarding expanding McMaster health plan coverage. There were three different questions set forth in the referendum, asking students to take a yes or no stance on extended coverage to include eye doctor visits, prescription contraception, and other services like psychology and vaccines. None of these three referenda passed. The elections committee made an appeal to the SRA to recommend that the referenda be rerun the following year, which was accepted by the SRA. The subject was brought forward at the SRA meeting on Sunday, March 23. Regarding the appeal that was brought forward, Ryan Sparrow, SRA Social Science, stated that the main issue was a lack of information around the referendum. “Information on the ballot confused a lot of people,” said Sparrow. Some SRA members argued that this confusion made it difficult for voters to take a firm side on the issue. There were clarity issues regarding the language used, such as a misunderstanding of what prescription contraceptives entail. As well, the breakdown of the extended health plan was never publicized. These concerns were brought to the attention of the SRA and they agreed that it makes sense to run another referendum during the 2015 MSU Presidential elections. MSU president David Campbell stated that the most important thing for the future is to publicize the issue more effectively so that students can publicly take a yes or no stance. At the meeting, Chris Harper, SRA Health Science, pointed out the challenges that the SRA faced as an organization went beyond the motion, and feels that in general, the way that referendums are administered need improvement and more discussion. Vice President (Finance) Jeffrey Doucet stated that one of the difficulties with the referendum is that there were a lot of questions and they were all asking drastically different things. “My advice to next year’s SRA is to look at what services need to be enhanced and look at it one issue at a time,” stated Doucet. Doucet suggested changes such as increasing the health plan incrementally as opposed to attempting to increase coverage by almost double, feeling that this could be a more effective way to communicate to students and grow the plan. Anna D’Angela, Vice President (Administration), suggested that the individual caucuses of the SRA should each brainstorm how they will promote the information next year so that students can be aware and ask questions if needed. Daniel D’Angela, SRA Social Science, stated the importance of next year’s SRA to bring forth the issue at the beginning of the school year, as opposed to into second term. This resulted in a motion passing recommending that the SRA have a decision in place by Nov. 1 2014, which passed unanimously. This referendum was recommended by the SRA last year, and continued to be unsuccessful this year. The recommendation will again pass the responsibility along to the 2014-15 SRA in the hopes of fixing the issues that caused the referenda failure this year. @rachfaber