The Silhouette

Page 1

McMASTER UNIVERSITY'S STUDENT NEWSPAPER

www.thesil.ca

THURSDAY, JANUARY 27, 2011

EST. 1930

FROM CAMPUS TO YOU AND BACK AGAIN

VOLUME 81, NO. 17

CHOOSE

PHOTOS BY JONATHON FAIRCLOUGH, CHRIS ERL AND MICHELLE NG

Their campaigns already in full swing, MSU presidential contenders Alicia Ali, Matthew Dillon-Leitch, James Lim, Steve Running and Matt Wright vied for students’ support at the Jan. 25 debate. For candidate profiles see pgs. A4- A5. SAM COLBERT SENIOR NEWS EDITOR In the days leading up to the MSU Presidential Debate, students may have only heard of the three most visible candidates: Alicia Ali, Matthew Dillon-Leitch and Matt Wright. Five names, though, appeared on the placards at the table in front of the fireplace in the MUSC atrium. James Lim and Steve Running, the other two, quickly set to work on turning the debate into a mockery while Wright, who sat immediately to their left, looked annoyed each time he had to bring the discussion back to a more serious tone. Despite the distractions, the three-hour event on Jan. 25 offered plenty of opportunity for candidates to make their arguments. There was some backand-forth between Dillon-Leitch and Wright, who both currently sit on the SRA. The pair quibbled over Wright’s idea of incentivebased student surveys, as well as

the possibility of short-term gains in getting more quiet study space on campus. As the debate went on, a clear difference in ideology emerged between the two candidates. DillonLeitch expressed a passion for the MSU’s role in funding student ideas, while Wright warned that his plan wasn’t reasonable. “I would like to make all students aware of the financial downfall the MSU had last year, where we had close to a one-million dollar loss, and I just want to ask the student body if they think it’s wise to be allocating one-million dollars toward student body projects,” said Wright, in reference to his opponent’s enthusiasm to spend reserves on student ideas. Wright stressed the importance of a pragmatic approach to leadership, free of “fluff” and naive ambitions. He wishes to do what’s realistic while restoring financial stability to the MSU, which will include consolidation of some services. By using one of his seven

allocated rebuttals for the first half of the debate, Dillon-Leitch argued that his allocation of resources would be more strategic than Wright made it seem. He was the first of the five to run out of rebuttals close to the half’s conclusion. Dillon-Leitch opted for a more inspiring and emotive approach than Wright. “We can’t be okay with the status-quo. Whether it’s me or whether it’s no one as the MSU president, the MSU is going to get better because they’ve started to fix the underlying problems. What we need to do is focus on the things that you [students] care about, and you need a president who’s going to do that.” At one point, Running asked Dillon-Leitch to stop yelling. Though Ali didn’t stand out by getting involved in some of the debate’s moments of contention, she spoke clearly about her priorities. By reaching out to all areas of campus life, she hopes to connect students through the MSU. “There are so many pockets, so many crevasses of campus

that remain untapped.” One of her main platform points is a campus-wide mentorship program for incoming students, which she hopes will contribute to this goal. “It engages the unengaged and it reaches out to those students who may not normally take up a leadership role within the organization.” She was pleased about the work already being done on campus, and eager to further some of its areas of strength. She, along with the other candidates, made multiple references to the MSU State of the Union, recently published by the Union’s current Board of Directors. No one presented any significant challenges to the document, which outlines much of the work done so far this year by the MSU, as well as plans for the future. Though Lim and Running worked in tandem for much of the debate, they did distinguish themselves from one another. On the subject of community engagement, Lim broke character to offer a more

thoughtful perspective. “I think too many of our students take such an elitist view of some of the townies here, and I don’t mean that in a pejorative way,” he said. “There’s so much more going on in Hamilton than Jackson Square and Lime Ridge Mall.” True to form, Running followed with an opposing sentiment about his “terrifying” experiences with downtown Hamilton. Looking for an audience reaction at other points during the afternoon, Running paid similar disrespect to a former psychology professor of his, and was at one point reminded by the moderator of the difference between humour and decorum after saying Lim looked like he was “looking into the sun.” Running had the chance to mention some of his many platform points, which included bringing an NHL team to Hamilton, turning the arts quad basements into a paintball facility and permitting the killing of deer on campus, provided that all • PLEASE SEE KEY, A3

[This Week in the Sil] Women End 7 Game Slide Women’s basketball team snaps seven-game losing streak with 67-48 win over Waterloo. Pg. B3

A Wealth of Experience

Oscar Night Preview

Simon Granat talks to Dean Bates about his newly released, best selling business book. Pg. C10

ANDY highlights the highs and lows from Tuesday’s Oscar nominations. Pg. D2


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.