The Pitt News T h e in de p e n d e n t st ude nt ne w spap e r of t he University of Pittsburgh
SENATE TALKS DIVERSITY, ASSAULTS
Online: Interactive breakdown of fossil fuel investments
Sports: On the fence Page 8
February 18, 2016 | Issue 108 | Volume 106
Leo Dornan Staff Writer
Pitt’s graduate and undergraduate student governments have called on the University Senate Council to commit to focusing on diversity and inclusion in the 2016-2017 school year. At Wednesday’s monthly Senate Council meeting, council members listened and responded to the proposition, where Student Government Board and the Graduate and Professional Student Government outlined four concrete initiatives focusing on diversity and inclusion. Chancellor Patrick Gallagher and Frank Wilson, president of the University Senate Council, called on students, faculty and staff to urge state legislators to pass a budget, as well. Here are three takeaways from the meeting: SGB and GPSG propose Year of Diversity and Inclusion for 2016-2017 SGB and GPSG presented four potential courses of action to make Pitt more diverse and inclusive. As a foundation for the initiatives, SGB president Nasreen Harun, SGB members Everett Green, Meghan Murphy and Natalie Dall and the president of GPSG, Joseph Kozak, suggested revamping The Pitt Promise. The Pitt Promise is currently an ethical conduct code for Pitt students. Students, faculty and staff would have the opportunity to sign the contract, promising to adhere to new standards of ethical guidelines. “People need to know [The Pitt Promise] exists and know that it clearly states who we are and our values,” Kozak said. “The Promise needs to be a major part of the University.” Dominique Johnson, a communication graduate student and head of the GPSG Sexual Assault Task Force, said the Promise will introduce a system for when people act counter to it that includes a way to reinforce it as a part of Pitt community.
Free the Planet performed a “waste audit” in the Quad Wednesday afternoon to kick off Recyclemania. Jordan Mondell | Staff Photographer
PITT RELEASES FOSSIL FUEL INVESTMENTS Students call on University to divest the $26 million it has directly invested in fossil fuel companies. | by Dale Shoemaker, Zoe Hannah and Lauren Rosenblatt | The Pitt News Staff
Nine months after they promised to do so, Pitt administrators revealed that the school invests $26 million in the fossil fuel industry — information requested by a student group that wants Pitt to divest such holdings. The group, the Fossil Free Pitt Coalition, requested the information last year and will present the investment information to the Student Affairs committee of the Pitt Board of Trustees, 9:45 a.m. Feb. 25, according to a press release FFPC sent Thursday, Feb. 11. At the meeting, FFPC plans to ask the committee to recommend that the Board of Trustees divest the money and invest it See Senate on page 2 elsewhere.
FFPC representatives will present their case for divestment and propose two plans for the University to divest all direct investments in the large coal, oil and gas companies within three years. The group will also ask the University to screen the remainder of the endowment’s direct holdings and commingled funds and cease all investments in the fossil fuel industry within five years. “It’s a critical time because it’s a very time-sensitive issue,” FFPC core organizer Sage Lincoln said. “Climate change is the biggest threat to all current issues.” Kenyon Bonner, Pitt’s interim vice provost and dean of students, granted the students the meeting when he and other ad-
ministrators met with the students Feb. 9, the release said. University spokesperson Ken Service confirmed in an email that the group is “being given an opportunity” to meet with the committee. Lincoln said the University did not release the information in April because it had not purchased the Carbon Underground 200 list — which details the 200 largest coal, oil and gas companies based on their reserves. FFPC — which consists of 32 Pitt-recognized student organizations — spent nine months raising $600 to buy the list and give it to the University. The University then used the list to analyze its direct investments and come See Divestment on page 2