The Pitt News
The independent student newspaper of the University of Pittsburgh | PIttnews.com | January 23, 2018 | Volume 108 | Issue 95
Faculty show support for unionization
PITT DEMS AND LIBS DEBATE HEALTH CARE Sid Lingala Staff Writer
Paul Johnson, a faculty union organizer and Pitt communication professor, gives information about the union’s progress to about 50 people in the William Pitt Union Ballroom. John Hamilton | CONTRIBUTING EDITOR
Madelina Gavatorta Staff Writer
Jennifer Lee, a senior English lecturer at Pitt for the last two decades, said it was luck and allies in the tenure faculty that got her the job she currently holds — and she remembers realizing how privileged she was compared to faculty who don’t have those benefits. “My very good friend and colleague — who I worked with almost that whole 20 years, who did the same work that I did — had trouble getting promoted, had trouble rising to the same rank that I am even though we had done exactly the same work,” Lee said. Lee spoke about her experiences at the faculty union’s Card Campaign Kickoff Monday, which took place from noon to 1 p.m. in the William Pitt Union Ballroom. Assistant professor Paul Johnson of the communication department said the union initiative was born in August 2015, a few months after the grad
students had started organizing, and has since advanced. “We don’t end up where we end up necessarily solely based on our talents and merit. There’s a lot of fortune and a lot of chance that goes into it,” Johnson said. “Unionization seems like a good way to help make sure that everybody deserves a good, reliable, steadypaying job.” Card signing was important to get a sense of how much support the group has. If the faculty union gets 30 percent of the approximately 4,000 full- and part-time faculty across all five of Pitt’s campuses’ support, it can hold an election to vote on the union. If it gets 50 percent, then Pitt has the chance to voluntarily recognize them as a union. The union has one year to get enough votes. As part of the effort to gain more support, doctoral candidate Beth Shaaban of Pitt’s epidemiology department, adjunct lecturer Carl Redwood in the School of Social Work and
Pitt Progressives co-chair Sean Bailey, a sophomore computer science and philosophy major, all joined Lee in speaking at the event. The event was intended to rally faculty support and resulted in approximately 65 signed union authorization cards, according to the Academic Workers Association of the United Steelworkers. “I also have lots of friends and colleagues — who have doctoral degrees, who are extremely talented teachers and are wonderful people — and they struggle to make ends meet in the economy of higher education,” Johnson said. If the union gets enough votes in the yearlong time frame, then faculty can send letters of support for the union to Harrisburg. “Our slogan is that ‘the University works because we do.’ But this slogan undersells things a bit,” Johnson said during his speech. See Union on page 2
Char Goldbach recounted leaving school early one semester because she could not get proper health care for her depression. “There are millions of Americans like me who suffer from depression and don’t get the care they deserve,” Goldbach said. “I am not afraid to share my story because I want people to be aware of the shortcomings of the current health care system.” Goldbach, a senior majoring in political science and communication, represented the Pitt Democrats opposite the Pitt Libertarians at the Healthcare Debate hosted by Pitt Health Occupations Students of America Monday night in the William Pitt Union. Pranav Murthy, president of Pitt HOSA and a junior majoring in biology and economics, said the debate was a follow-up to an event last year, regarding President Donald Trump’s policies on universal health care, to see how views have changed since his inauguration. “As young voters, we hear a lot of things from the news that may not be true or that we don’t understand,” Murthy said. “It is important that we learn about the health care system in an engaging form of a debate.” The event started with the presentation of the debate’s resolution, “The United States government should ensure that all Americans receive adequate health care,” followed by the Pitt Democrats’ affirmation and the Pitt Libertarians’ repudiation of the resolution. The Pitt Democrats then presented their argument for universal health care. Grace Dubois, a first year majoring in political science and biology also representing the Pitt Democrats, began her side’s case by describing See Debate on page 2