FEBRUARY 20 - FEBRUARY 26, 2018
FEATURES
UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA ANCHORAGE
SPORTS
PAGE 7
“We’re All in This Together:” First Friday reception on March 2
THENORTHERNLIGHT.ORG
PAGE 8
UAA gymnasts defeat Louisiana’s Centenary
Bill proposes University advocates for land grant smoke-free workplace
GRAPHIC COURTESY OF UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA
GRAPHIC BY JIAN BAUTISTA
By Mariah DeJesus-Remaklus mremaklus@thenorthernlight.org
Senate Bill 63, a bill that proposes to extend the ban on smoking to workplaces, has made its way to the House Rules Committee. It has already passed through the Senate and is currently sitting in the committee to be considered for the floor vote. Sen. Peter Micciche introduced the bill in February 2017. In his sponsor statement, he writes, “SB 63 seeks to protect Alaskan employees from the adverse health effects of secondhand smoke by providing a statewide smoke-free workplace law for business and public places.” While the bill does not take away a person’s right to smoke, it “simply asks smokers to ‘take it outside.’” Terrence Robbins lives in Ketchikan and has been advocating for the smoking ban for years, even back when the bill was formerly introduced as SB 1 in January 2015. “If you pass this, it’ll save lives,” Robbins said. “No doubt about it. Smoking rates drop in towns that have smoke-free workplaces laws.” According to 2016 tobacco facts released by the Alaska Department of Health and Social Services, about 20 percent of Alaskan adults are smokers. Robbins has lost several family members to health-related complications due to smoking. “I decided that I would try to do something,” Robbins said. He went to the Ketchikan City Council to advocate for a local smoke-free bill but was unsuccessful while facing opposition from the Alaska Cabaret, Hotel, Restaurant and Retailers Assocation. After being contacted by the American Cancer Society, Robbins began testifying for SB 1. CHARR does not support SB 63. Pete
By Cheyenne Mathews cmathews@thenorthernlight.org
Government Relations officials from the University of Alaska are continuing to work with federal institutions to receive the federal land grant. The University of Alaska is a so-called “land grant” institution, meaning that federal laws enacted in 1915 and 1929 set aside land for a university in Alaska. Officials at UA say that the university has not been granted all of the land it was entitled to because the federal land was ceded to state management in 1959, when Alaska was recognized as a state. Associate Vice President of Government Relations, Miles Baker, said he will advocate at the federal level to obtain the total land grant. “That is a huge priority for us, but there is nothing right now that we need from the [state] legislature, but it is our top federal priority,” Baker said. Government Relations professionals at UA have had success at the state legislature advocating for the land grant in the past. In 2005, the legislature enacted a bill that would grant the university 265,000
acres, according to the university’s 2010 memo on the land grant. The Southeast Alaska Conservation Council and the Tongass Conservation Society filled a lawsuit against the State which ended with a 2009 Alaska Supreme Court decision that overturned the land grant law. “As this case illustrates, dedicating funds for a deserving purpose or a worthy institution is an attractive idea. Our constitutional founders were aware of the power of the dedication impulse. They decided that the good that might come from the dedication of funds for a particular purpose was outweighed by the longterm harm to state finances… We enforce the considered judgment of the founders in this case. We do so with full awareness that the University is an important state institution and that it would benefit from the enhanced endowment that the legislature intended to bestow,” wrote Justice Warren Matthews in the majority opinion for the court. Baker said he considers this a federal priority because of a part of the Constitution of Alaska that “dedications,” which were ruled unconstitutional, can be exempted if a federal regulation requires the dedication of land.
“We have to go back to Congress, because there is a small exception in the Alaska constitution that would allow such a dedication if it’s to comply with a federal program,” Baker said. “We are working with the Department of [Natural] Resources and the Governor’s office and our congressional delegation to try and find a solution to this.” UA President, Jim Johnsen, said the land is important to the university’s fiscal future. “[It] could very well be a really important funding source for the university in five years, 10 years,” Johnsen said. Like other land managed by the university, property that is not used for educational purposes is termed as investment property. Some UA land holdings from 2017 were classified as potential timber development, material sales and oil and gas development. “Even if we are successful in getting land, you have to then figure out a way to monetize that land,” Baker said. “It’s not going to be an immediate solution to our financing problems, but it’s an important piece of the puzzle.” It is not clear where in Alaska the land for the land grant would come from.
Hockey down to two games left before playoffs By Lauren Cuddihy
sports2@thenorthernlight.org
After their first meeting in mid-January, UAA and Bowling Green met up again on Feb. 15 - 16. Bowling Green currently sits at No. 3 in the Western Collegiate Hockey Association with only five conference loses on the season and 16 wins, almost the complete opposite of the Seawolves. Their first time meeting, the Seawolves traveled to Ohio to battle out their rivals, only to end up disappointed with a 2-6 and a 2-3 loss. Those losses only PHOTO COURTESY OF SKIP HICKEY
SEE SMOKE-FREE
PAGE 2
thenorthernlight.org
SEE HOCKEY
PAGE 9
facebook.com/northernlightuaa
Olivier Mantha blocks a shot from Bowling Green’s Max Johnson during the Seawolves final home game. Mantha made 20 saves in the game.
@tnl_updates
@tnl_updates
youtube.com/tnlnews