February 23, 2015
facebook.com/theutdmercury | @utdmercury
THE MERCURY | UTDMERCURY.COM
FROM BOOBS TO BIGOTRY
A STEADY RECOVERY
Blogger Anita Sarkeesian on unfair portrayals of women in gaming
Club sport returns after ten years, new blood eager to excel
PG 8
PG 6 DANIEL CHOSEN AS POSSIBLE REPLACEMENT AT UT AUSTIN
PLUS +
NEW ATEC SCHOOL APPROVED
GUNS ON CAMPUS? State bill allowing concealed carry for some students reaches Texas Senate
Dallas emerges as vibrant music scene // OPINION, PG 3 Professor helps Dallas students learn math // LIFE&ARTS, PG 7
Firm to bring nanotech research to market // NEWS, PG 4
ESTEBAN BUSTILLOS Managing Editor
The Senate State Affairs Committee passed Senate Bill 17, which would allow licensed holders to carry holstered handguns openly and Senate Bill 11, which would undo a ban of concealed handguns for licensed holders 21 or over at state university campuses on Feb. 12. The committee passed both bills with a 7-2 vote. They will now proceed to the full Senate for debate. SB11 has raised the interest of those on college campuses in particular. Bill McRaven, the chancellor of the University of Texas System, sent a letter to Governor Greg Abbott, Lt. Governor
Student assaulted ESTEBAN BUSTILLOS Managing Editor
Dan Patrick and House Speaker Joe Straus on Jan. 29 speaking out against concealed handguns on campus. In the letter, he said health professionals from the UT System have expressed fear that having guns on campuses will contribute to more shootings at universities. “There is a great concern that the presence of handguns, even if limited to licensed individuals age 21 or older, will lead to an increase in both accidental shootings and self-inflicted wounds,” McRaven said in the statement. John Sharp, the chancellor of the Texas A&M University System, also released a statement to Patrick concerning the bill. In the statement, he
said he didn’t feel any concern that having gun owners with legal weapons on campus would raise safety concerns and that the Texas A&M University System will not oppose campus carry. Students have had varied takes on SB11. Julie Gavran, an Arts and Humanities Ph.D. student and the Southwestern director for The Campaign to Keep Guns Off Campus, said bringing guns on campus poses more risks than benefits. “I think allowing more guns on campus, you have increased chances of suicide, accidental discharges, threats and so forth,” Gavran said.
Richardson Police notified UTD Police on Feb. 12 that a female student was sexually assaulted at Point North Park. According to an email sent out to students, faculty and staff by UTD Police Chief Larry Zacharias, the student reported that she turned into the parking lot at the park, located about a block away from campus on Synergy Park Boulevard, when she heard a strange noise from her car. She got out to check the noise and use the restroom. According to the email, the assault occurred
→ SEE GUNS, PAGE 4
→ SEE ASSAULT, PAGE 5
PHOTO ILLUSTRATION BY IAN LAMARSH & ANDREW GALLEGOS | ASST. GRAPHICS & ASST. PHOTO EDITORS
Board of regents approves ATEC school ANWESHA BHATTACHARJEE Web Editor
The UT System Board of Regents approved the creation of a new Arts, Technology and Emerging Communication school on Feb. 12. The new school, set to start in September, will take with it close to 1,300 students currently in the School of Arts and Humanities and six degree programs associated with ATEC and EMAC. It is expected to help both schools grow in the future, said UTD President David Daniel “ATEC, with its own dean and an even better spotlight on the wonderful work there, will be in a better position to go raise private dollars for scholarships, support
for research and other resources that will benefit our students,” Daniel said. “At the same time, the School of Arts and Humanities in the post-ATEC and -EMAC era, I think, can focus on the things that are important to their future as well — again, raising dollars to support arts and humanities, creating new programs and so forth.” Provost Hobson Wildenthal said the idea of a separate school for these programs emerged in fall 2014. “When a group of individuals becomes reasonably distinct from another group of individuals, in this case, even physical separation to a degree but mainly the social structure of the standards they achieve, diverge, it makes sense to not force them together but to let each group take charge of its own destiny,” he said.
Students, for the most part, have welcomed this new development, said Todd Fechter, interim director for ATEC. Within the next few months, a lot of decisions need to be made about the future of the program, he said. The creation of the new school will allow the ATEC program to develop new courses and concentrations, and provide students with the opportunity to pick from a variety of diverse options, Fechter said. “We’re looking for problem spots that we can improve upon, collaborations within ATEC and also with other schools which is Computer Science Engineering, Brain and Behavioral Sciences and Arts and Humanities,” he said. “So, we’re now just in the evaluation process of what are the opportunities we have in front of us, what new opportunities we’re looking to build within
the university and also with corporate partners and with outside research.” Avenues for collaboration One of the factors that contributed toward the decision to create a new school stemmed from the different nature of research that ATEC programs have in comparison to the more classical humanities courses like history or literature, particularly while evaluating doctoral dissertations, Wildenthal said. Another factor was the level of potential collaborations between research in ATEC and those in computer
→ SEE ATEC, PAGE 5
Daniel shortlisted for UT Austin presidency spot UTD president among three frontrunners selected to replace Bill Powers as head of flagship university, set to interview in early March ESTEBAN BUSTILLOS Managing Editor
UTD President David Daniel has been named as a finalist for the presidency at UT Austin. According to a report by the Austin AmericanStatesman on Feb. 19, Daniel is among the top three candidates to replace current UT Austin President Bill Powers when he steps down in June. They will be interviewed for the job on March 4 by the Board of Regents. Among them are Greg Fenves, UT Austin’s executive vice president and provost, and Andrew Hamilton, vice-chancellor of the University of Oxford in
England. Joseph Steinmetz, executive vice president and provost at The Ohio State University, was also a candidate but dropped out of consideration according to The Dallas Morning News. Daniel, who has had his current position since 2005, is the university’s fourth president. After receiving his bachelor’s, master’s and Ph.D. degrees in engineering from UT Austin, he served as a faculty member there from 1980 to 1996. From there, he moved to the University of Illinois, where he was the dean of engineering from 1996 to 2005 before coming to UTD. “I’m proud to serve The University of Texas System as the president of The University of Texas at
Dallas, which is my immediate and primary focus,” Daniel said in a statement. “It is an honor to serve the system and the state of Texas in any capacity, and I welcome the opportunity to do so. Any success I have had owes to the significant energy and effort of UTD’s highly qualified faculty, our talented, smart students and our dedicated and hardworking staff. I am grateful to, and proud to be a part of this community.” During Daniel’s time at UTD, the university has tripled its spending on research, added 50 new academic programs and has increased enrollment from 13,000 to 23,000 students. Larry Faulkner, who served as UT Austin’s presi-
dent from 1998 to 2006, is leading the committee to find Powers’ replacement. “A highly distinguished group of individuals, led by Dr. Larry Faulkner, was appointed to identify candidates to serve as the next president of UT Austin,” said Executive Vice President and Provost Hobson Wildenthal in a statement. “Given the stature of the committee, I thought it inevitable that David Daniel would be put forward for consideration by the Board of Regents. Everything in his professional history, but most especially the immense progress that The University of Texas at Dallas has enjoyed under his leadership, qualifies him for such consideration.”