Mamaroneck REVIEW THE
February 19, 2016 | Vol. 4, Number 8 | www.mamaroneckreview.com
Developer appeals Larchmont moratorium By JAMES PERO Staff writer
The Mamaroneck Public Library was forced to close its doors on Feb. 12 after a restroom flooded. While the library reopened on Feb. 16, the children’s room, which suffered some damage, remains temporarily closed. For story, see page 7. Photo/Andrew Dapolite
Out of order
Village of Mamaroneck sheds EPA administrative order By JAMES PERO Staff Writer As new proposals for how to best identify and solve issues of fecal contamination in Mamaroneck’s waterways progress, the village has shed an administrative order from the EPA that has loomed overhead since 2010. And while the village may be making strides, Save the Sound—an organization which is currently in the midst of a lawsuit with both Westchester County and Mamaroneck regarding alleged violations of the
EPA Clean Water Act—feels resources are being misallocated. A recent resolution from the village of Mamaroneck indicates that they will no longer be submitting information to the EPA regarding their analysis of bacterial contamination; a stipulation agreed upon, following high bacterial counts found in three sample sites located in various waterways. According to documents issued by the village manager, part of the order—which mandated that the village analyze and plan ways to address contamination related to deficient sewer infra-
structure—was satisfied on Jan. 27, releasing the village from submitting any more information to the federal agency. But, while the EPA’s order has been satisfied, a consent order issued by the New York state Department of Environmental Conservation—relating to the same topic—remains in place, stipulating that the village must carry out a number of comprehensive sewer repair projects over the next three years. At a recent village board meeting, Arcadis—the engineering firm that has worked with the village on such issues since
2012—gave village officials and residents an idea of what the future projects might look like. Proposals from Arcadis will address alarming amounts of fecal contamination found in Mamaroneck’s waterways in a number of different ways; among them are identifying both the source and extent of the village’s problem. Two investigatory projects which will be carried out jointly between Arcadis and the village will examine a number of geographic areas, sewer lines and EPA continued on page 7
After fervent public backlash resulted in the passage of a moratorium on certain residential developments in Larchmont, a formal appeal filed by the developer of an iconic Ocean Avenue property seeks to bypass the village’s timeout. The letter to the village, dated Feb. 3, specifically cites several reasons for the developer’s appeal, including sentiments that the moratorium was designed specifically to hinder the 40 Ocean Ave. project. Now, the developer, KOSL Building Group, who feels that they have been singled out by the moratorium, is asking for the village to waive the moratorium so the project—demolishing the existing home, subdividing the land and constructing four new ones—can proceed. “It is apparent from the community opposition to the project… the media articles regarding the project, and the timing of the moratorium law… that the village board enacted the moratorium law in direct response to the project,” the appeal reads. Additionally, the appeal claims that the developer has experienced “undue hardships” as a result of the moratorium; specifically in regard to financial resources which have gone toward planning. According to Susan Emery, the chairperson of the Century
Homes Club in Larchmont—a group affiliated with the Larchmont Historical Society that protects older homes—Larchmont’s monitoring of the demolition of historic structures is one that predates the movement to save 40 Ocean Ave. “I first met with [the] mayor about this two years ago,” Emery said. “I think that people have been worried about this kind of change, and 40 Ocean [Ave.] is just the tipping point.” Mayor Anne McAndrews, a Democrat, said the moratorium, which was passed by the village board in January, acts as a “timeout,” in which the village will use its time—up to six months—to evaluate its current zoning laws and how they reflect the will of residents and the village board. What the zoning law may look like after the board has had a chance to mull it over, however, remains to be seen. The village has contracted an outside planner, Richard Preiss, who will aid in helping Larchmont’s land use boards develop laws consistent with the wishes of residents and the village. According to McAndrews, in early March, the village will convene a meeting where residents will be able to discuss their thoughts on Larchmont’s zoning code. The clock will also be ticking for the board to render a decision on whether or not it will waive MORATORIUM continued on page 9
Follow us on Twitter @mamaroneckview Like us on facebook.com/mamaroneckreview