Mamaroneck REVIEW THE
December 16, 2016 | Vol. 4, Number 51 | www.mamaroneckreview.com
Town steps in to fund enrichment camp
KINGS OF THE JUNGLE
By JAMES PERO Staff Writer
Tommy Martin soars past a Suffern defender during a Dec. 9 game. Mamaroneck topped the Mounties 58-52. For story, see page 15. Photo/Mike Smith
Westchester County budget finalized, includes airport deal By JAMES PERO Staff Writer A $1.8 billion budget was passed by both the Westchester County Board of Legislators and County Executive Rob Astorino, a Republican, this week, even despite lawmakers trepidation over the inclusion of $15 million in tentative revenue from a deal privatizing the county airport. The 2017 budget, which was passed by the Board of Legislators on Monday by a slim margin of 10-7, and modifies a previous budget submitted to the legisla-
tive chamber by Astorino last month, will retain the county executive’s proposed flat tax rate, but will also add four additional engineering positions to the county’s depleted Department of Public Works roster, in addition to injecting $1 million to the county’s Title XX child care program as a result of legislators’ amendments. After what was shaping up to be a dead-end deal, legislators also voted to include $15 million in projected revenue derived from a deal privatizing the management of Westchester County
Airport on the condition that the plan undergo a public bidding process. Previously, the $130 million, 40-year agreement, which was sent down to legislators on Nov. 3 by Astorino, a little more than a month before the budget’s final approval deadline, would have given the investment firm Oaktree Management the exclusive bid. After backlash from lawmakers across the board, however, the board voted unanimously to send out a request for proposals, RFP, that could possibly transfer the management of the
county’s airport—which is being processed through an FAA-run privatization program—to another company. Current operator of the county’s airport, AVPorts, has already said it would have bid on the contract if there had been an opportunity to do so. “The feeling on our floor was that there might be real merit to participating in this FAA privatization program,” said Legislator Mary Jane Shimsky, a Hastingson-Hudson Democrat, who had AIRPORT continued on page 8
For the first time in nearly a decade, the Mamaroneck Town Board of Trustees will step in to help fund a summer camp amidst waning financial support from a budget-constrained school district. The 40-year-old camp— called the Mamaroneck Coop Enrichment Camp—serves more than 350 students in the town of Mamaroneck as well as the villages of Larchmont and Mamaroneck, and combines normal summer camp activities with extended academic-year programming. For the first time since 2008, the town plans to allocate $20,000 in funding to help it carry out its services this upcoming summer. “It took us a little while to understand what kind of program it is,” said Town Supervisor Nancy Seligson, a Democrat. “In some ways you think the school should support it, in other ways it could be a more typical camp program. Bottom line is it will help kids be more successful students.” According to the camp’s mission statement, it aims to serve children in the area’s lower socio-economic bracket by extending the academic period into the summer where many students are at risk of falling behind. “A lot of kids fall behind over the summer,” said town Councilman Tom Murphy, a Democrat,
who lobbied his fellow board members to fund the program. “The camp helps those students stay on track,” he said. Over the past several years, however, its services have been increasingly hard to fund as the school district has cut back contributions for the program. “Over the past several years, the camp budget has been dramatically reduced,” said Meg Kaufer, a member of the CO-OP Steering Committee and also the president of the STEM Alliance of Larchmont-Mamaroneck. According to Kaufer, in 2016, due to budget constraints, the Mamaroneck Board of Education proposed cutting all of the funding for the camp, and while the camp eventually received $20,000 compared to its usual $100,000 in funding from the annual school budget, it was saved primarily through fundraising efforts and money from municipalities. Currently, both the town and the village of Mamaroneck are contributing about $20,000 to the program, while the village of Larchmont is not contributing to the program. “Only because individuals coming together and making private donations was anything able to be restored,” Kaufer said. For this year, Kaufer said that even despite increased funding from the school district, the camp—which typically runs ENRICHMENT continued on page 10
Follow us on Twitter @mamaroneckview Like us on facebook.com/mamaroneckreview