April 1, 2016

Page 1

Mamaroneck REVIEW THE

April 1, 2016 | Vol. 4, Number 14 | www.mamaroneckreview.com

Former funeral home location proposed for apartments By KILEY STEVENS Staff Writer A Rye-based rental agency has proposed a site plan for a four-story apartment building located on the site of a former funeral home. Elk Homes originally proposed the new apartment building in November 2015. O’Neill Funeral Home used to occupy the site dating back to 1945. The apartment building would include 13 units, comprised of one-, two- and three-bedroom apartments, in addition to an exercise room.

Although this apartment building is not being marketed as an affordable housing complex, two of the apartment units will be rented at a below-market rate. According to Assistant Village Planner Greg Cutler, this means that the apartments will be rented at a rate of 30 percent of 80 percent of the area median income, but the housing is not considered Section 8 or public housing. For example, in 2013, the area median income for Mamaroneck was $88,184. Eighty percent of that number is $70,547. Thirty percent of $70,547 is $21,164,

Paws of

love

A dog mingles with attendees during the 12th annual Pet Rescue Gala, held on March 4 in New Rochelle. For more, see page 10. Photo/Louis Vaccaro

and that figure is what the below-market rate would be for an apartment. The plan for the apartment building is currently in the site plan review stage. According to Cutler, the village of Mamaroneck Planning Board is requiring Elk Homes LLC to prepare additional renderings that show the proposed apartment building from different sides of the street before they move forward and near approval of the plan. Cutler added that some members of the Planning Board are concerned with the height of the building and how it would look from

a street level viewpoint. Bibbo Associates LLP, an engineering firm out of Somers, will spearhead the land development and site planning, if the project is approved. Also included in the plan were six parking spaces to be located on the site of the apartment building. Going forward, Elk Homes will, at least temporarily, remove those six spaces from their revisions to allow for more green space, according to Cutler. Cutler added that any revisions made will also have to APARTMENTS continued on page 9

Town allows building moratorium to lapse By JAMES PERO Staff Writer Officials in the town of Mamaroneck will exceed the deadline to revamp their residential site plan laws after the clock runs out on a three-month moratorium barring tear downs. According to Supervisor Nancy Seligson, a Democrat, although the town board initially planned to have a revamped site plan law in place before the moratorium lapsed, the process turned out to be more complex than expected. “We thought initially that we could change the law and pass a new law within the timeframe,” Seligson said. “But we recognized some of the requirements from the site plan law put too much of a burden on the singlefamily home.” The process, she said, may continue into late April or early May, as a recent public hearing necessitated a new draft of the law that will lead to another public hearing, tentatively scheduled for April 20. According to the supervisor, the board will continue to tinker with the law, tailoring it to affect only developments that they claim are endangering the character of their community; namely ones that regrade land, tear down trees, and add multiple homes to lots where there was previously only one. And while the current moratorium prevented such occurrences in theory, according

to Town Administrator Steve Altieri, there were no projects actually being prevented by the ban. As a result, Seligson said that she doesn’t expect any influx of projects now that the moratorium has ended. Going forward, Seligson said, part of the discussion will center on making the revamped law less burdensome on renovations to single-family homes. Current changes to the site plan law that the board has reviewed so far would require what Seligson described as a “burdensome amount” of documentation for residential construction; an amount she thinks residents shouldn’t have to undergo for a simple home addition. Therefore, she said, as part of its review process, the town will examine what threshold will trigger more stringent site plan laws. “We have to capture the community interest,” she said, “and not saddle them with too many requirements that wouldn’t have an impact.” The moratorium, which was passed on Dec. 22, 2015, was instituted as a response to what residents and town board members considered a concerning trend of residential development in the town of Mamaroneck. According to Altieri, the town has seen 23 tear downs of residential homes in the past three years. TOWN continued on page 8

Follow us on Twitter @mamaroneckview Like us on facebook.com/mamaroneckreview


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.