January 15, 2016

Page 1

Mamaroneck REVIEW THE

January 15, 2016 | Vol. 4, Number 3 | www.mamaroneckreview.com

Mamaroneck Reservoir Dam fate uncertain By James Pero Staff Writer

Stop!

A historic home on Ocean Avenue in the village of Larchmont has been the center of controversy due to a developer’s plan to tear the structure down; concerned residents have turned to village officials for answers. As a result, the Board of Trustees has passed a villagewide building moratorium while it decides what to do. For story, see page 6. Photo/Andrew Dapolite

Mamaroneck passes $9.3M school bond with 87% of vote As expected, on Jan. 12, Mamaroneck voters gave a thumbs up to a $9.3 million bond that will refurbish and renovate sports and reclaim physical education spaces for modern gym classes at the district’s seven schools. The final tally was not close, with 988 ‘yes’ votes and just 146 ‘no’ votes. Enthusiasm for the bond was likely encouraged by the low cost of its debt service. It is projected to cost homeowners with property valued at $1.1 million or higher $106 to $108 each year for 15 years. The district has $32 million coming

off the books this year and another $9 million to be paid off around the 2019-2020 school year. Superintendent Dr. Robert Shaps expressed his gratitude to the community for their support. “I’m happy that the community showed that it believes in us,” he said. For Bari Suman, director of physical education, health and athletics, reconstruction to physical education spaces will be particularly sweet. Her department has waited a long time for bond funds to go toward renovations. Currently the boys’ and girls’

locker rooms at Mamaroneck High School are rundown and don’t have working showers. Space for gym classes at the elementary schools is crowded or even nonexistent, administrators said late last year in advance of the vote. They added that physical education teachers for the younger students have been foiled in their efforts to incorporate modern curricula, too. “It will be exciting for us not to be limited to big equipment [such as Nautilus machines],” Suman said. Current physical education is geared toward educating stu-

dents for a lifetime of fitness, she added. Dodgeball is out and yoga is in. The athletic director stressed that the modern gym curriculum that will be implemented has been created with the input of all of the instructors on her staff. Suman oversees a department with 25 health and physical education instructors and is one of only eight female athletic directors in the state. Unfortunately, the wait isn’t quite over. Construction work won’t begin until the spring of 2017, Suman said. -Reporting by Sarah Varney

As the Mamaroneck Reservoir Dam continues to deteriorate, the village Board of Trustees will grapple with a decision to either renovate the structure or see to its decommissioning. The dam is deemed Class CHigh Hazard, the same rating as the Kensico Dam, and was constructed around 1900 out of rock and timber in order to provide the village with a steady water supply. Since then, however, the dam, which was renovated in 1970 to control storm runoff, has fallen into disrepair. Now, the structure, which Village Manager Richard Slingerland explained could cost the village anywhere from $1.9 million to $2.8 million to repair, could be partially removed. This would not have a direct impact on village taxes, but could have an impact on water rates in the following years, the exact details of which Slingerland said is unclear considering how many variables go into setting water rates. According to Slingerland, although the dam has not yet been decommissioned because of concerns over its role in flood mitigation voiced by some residents, it currently provides only a small benefit to the community in regard to mitigating storm runoff, and for that reason, some village officials aren’t concerned with the dam’s effect on

flood mitigation. “The dam itself only provides a 3-to 5-meter storm protection,” said Slingerland in a recent work session. “And once the water goes over the top of the dam, it provides no further benefit.” Furthermore, he said, the cost-to-benefit ratio of fixing the ailing structure is tilted much more heavily in favor of cost. The money used to remediate the dam could instead be used for projects along both the Mamaroneck and Sheldrake rivers, Slingerland added. In March 2015, as a result of an inspection by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation, the village of Mamaroneck was issued a notice of violation and must now determine whether to refurbish or decommission the dam. Among the deficiencies noted were clogged conduits for storm runoff, superficial cracking of the concrete and excessive vegetation surrounding its filter house. Although the dam is currently owned by Westchester Joint Water Works, an organization which provide water services to the town and village of Mamaroneck, and the town/ village of Harrison, the village is contractually responsible for maintaining it, so if it were kept in commission, the village would be mandated to pay for its improvement. DAM continued on page 11

Follow us on Twitter @mamaroneckview Like us on facebook.com/mamaroneckreview


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.