Blue Ballot 2017 SANGGUNIAN ELECTIONS SPECIAL COVERAGE
Leading the charge ILLUSTRATION BY INYA DE VERA
BY MANUEL M. ALDEGUER AND THEA A. SISCAR
THE COINCIDENCE of the Sanggunian’s post-Constitutional Convention (ConCon) renewal and the Philippine public sphere’s increasing turbulence is not exactly the most ideal turn of events. However, Atenean student activism has indeed enjoyed a resurgence in the past few months, witnessing a significant increase in interest and participation, as well as visibility from both within and without the university. It has become clear that the Ateneo’s student leaders have embraced the role of directing the student body’s political fervor.
student body in protest of the Aurora Pacific Economic Zone and Freeport (APECO), the irregularities on the Disbursement Acceleration Program (DAP), and the Mamasapano clash. According to Lagonera, the only difference now is that Ateneans are more critical of certain policies of the Duterte administration. He explained that since time immemorial, the Ateneo has placed a premium on the respect for human rights. Given the blatant disregard of these policies for human rights, Ateneans feel the need to respond all the more.
SANGGUNIAN’S RESPONSE
Following the massive antiMarcos burial mobilizations of Ateneans in November, the idea of a task force that would streamline efforts in responding to the national situation was conceived during the Ateneo Student Leaders’ Mid-Year Summit last December 10 to 12. Sanggunian President Carmela Vinzon assigned development studies junior Luis Enriquez as the coordinator of Task Force SIKHAY. Enriquez said that SIKHAY has officially been running since the beginning of the second semester
NEWFOUND ACTIVISM?
Economics lecturer Marvin Lagonera, who served as School of Social Sciences SecretaryTreasurer from 2013 to 2014, believes that the Sanggunian has been successful in representing the student body’s sentiments on certain policies of the Duterte administration. Citing the current administration’s moves on the Marcos burial, the war on drugs, the lowering of minimum age of criminal liability, and the death penalty, Lagonera praises the Sanggunian for how “quickly and passionately” it mobilized the student body to express disapproval. However, he says that the recent development of political consciousness is nothing new. “I believe this activism is a role that Ateneans have been taking, stretching out to the Marcos resistance in the 1980s. And even during my stint in the Sanggunian, there were some constructive opposition against the Aquino administration,” he said. The Sanggunian had mobilized the
“...in this process of actually building itself as an institution, the Sanggunian is actually also reaching out to students and allowing students to actually define and determine the role and the purpose of Sanggunian in the context especially of all these national issues.” — MARVIN LAGONERA ECONOMICS DEPARTMENT LECTURER
last January 18. As of press time, it is focused on lobbying against the bills on death penalty and lowering of minimum age of criminal liability in the legislature; it has also been organizing prayer vigils and rallies against these bills. Having observed that some Ateneans are still acclimatizing to the national situation, Vinzon emphasizes that it is not the intention of the Sanggunian to “pressure” them into attending rallies. For her, it is more of “encouraging and challenging” them to deepen the discussion and step out of their comfort zones. “I’m actually very proud of the student body. I’m very thankful that they’re very open. We, as the Sanggunian, realize that they have their limitations, but we also recognize and applaud their personal efforts in trying to be involved.” Despite the traction SIKHAY has gained from the student body and its gradual consolidation over the past few months, it is undeniable that the task force was met with doubts and objections in the process of its formation. PROBING THE TASK FORCE
Before SIKHAY was launched, the student movement Kilos Kabataan (KK) was established w it h t he sa me pur pose of consolidat ing student engagement in the public sphere. The movement’s formation was met with a fair amount of criticism, with some saying it created a larger divide within the Atenean community as opposed to uniting it. De facto KK leader and Union of Students for the Advancement of Democracy (USAD) Premier Lanz Espacio conceded the movement’s “spaces for dialogue and engagement” to the Sanggunian.
Shortly after the Sanggunian proposed the creation of a task force following KK’s concession, the Council of Organizations of the Ateneo (COA) released a Statement of Demands regarding the goals of the task force and how they should be pursued. Enriquez says he replied to COA and outlined their concerns, and hopes they continue to be supportive towards the task force’s efforts like they have been with the mobilizations against the death penalty. Furthermore, Committee on Socio-Political Engagements Head and USAD vice presidential candidate Benjamin Alvero III called out Vinzon through a public memorandum for the “undemocratic process of forming the Task Force and deliberately setting the Sanggunian’s policy.” Alvero questioned the lack of transparency in the formation of the task force’s structure, core values, and priority areas, as well as in the appointment of its Head. While Alvero lamented that Vinzon is guilty of sidelining the transition of KK into the task force, Vinzon nevertheless maintained that SIKHAY was created to dispense her function as President in mobilizing the student body. In the face of all the backlash the student government and its initiatives have received, Lagonera thinks it is still in the middle of reorienting post-ConCon. He sees this transition period as an opportunity to reengage the student body, citing political apathy as a constant issue the Sanggunian has dealt with throughout the years. “I think it’s very important in this process of actually building itself as an institution, the Sanggunian is actually also reaching out to students and allowing students to actually define and de-
termine the role and the purpose of Sanggunian in the context especially of all these national issues.” Regarding the future of SIKHAY, Enriquez points out that all task forces and departments are coterminous with the President. Although he is hoping that next year’s Sanggunian would maintain the task force, he is more concerned that the efforts by the student government to move its constituents to act will not wane. MOVING FORWARD
As the 2017 Sanggunian General Elections draw near, the student government’s capacity to communicate and interact with its constituents regarding national issues is one of the main issues the student body must consider. Vinzon believes that both presidential candidates Regis Andanar and Ia Marañon have the desire to continue nurturing the Atenean community’s concern towards socio-political issues: “I expect the new President to make sure to empower the students with enough knowledge and confidence in asserting what they believe in,” she says. While Vinzon recognizes that the willingness to get involved in the public sphere varies among the student body, she sees how crucial it is for the Sanggunian President “to exhaust all means” to ensure that all students have the means to become more engaged with and aware of the national situation. Ateneans must therefore ensure their future student leaders are capable of performing this constitutionally-delegated duty. Likewise, Ateneo’s student leaders must embrace the uphill battle that is leading their constituents down from the hill.