R22.80 THE LOERIES ISSUE August 2011 www.thecallsheet.co.za
pg11
pg13
pg16
NFVF PROPOSES CHANGING DEFINITION OF SA FILM GENERAL INDUSTRY
Mawande Seti
The NFVF started their countrywide consultation on the proposed South African Film Criteria to the film industry in Cape Town.
T
he Cape Town leg of the consultation is the first of four sessions planned to be conducted around the country with visits scheduled for Port Elizabeth, Durban and Johannesburg. NFVF council member and the former Cape Film Commissioner and director at Waterfront Studios, Laurence Mitchell, welcomed the guests and outlined the goals of the proposal. Mawande Seti started with the NFVF presentation explaining the importance of clearly defining South African Film Criteria. Included in the presentation were the changes that have been made since the last proposal published in December 2010. Only one submission, from the Independent Producers’ Organisation (IPO), was made to the NFVF after the proposal was initially released, which raises concerns over how well it was communicated or how apathetic the industry uptake is. The low response to the last submissions was one of the reasons the NFVF decided to open the proposal to a countrywide consultation. After the presentation delegates were
offered the opportunity to engage with the NFVF panel, and the big debate surrounded the question “What makes a South African film?” According to the proposed point system a film that doesn’t obtain a minimum 52 points of a possible 73 points can’t quality as a local production. Official co-productions require 36 points of the possible 73 points. The general feeling among the delegates was that a structured point system is a good
method of determining if a film fits into either criteria, but where it lacks is how the points are allocated for certain categories, also the lack of points being awarded for co-writers. Other issues of concern raised by the delegates included Pan African co-operation, job creation, regional funding, and percentages of language. Percentages of language sparked concern among delegates; more than 50% of the script needs to be in any of-
ficial South African language other than English to qualify for the points in the first category of assessment. After tea, industry presentations were conducted by Glenn Gillis from Animation South Africa (ASA), highlighting the importance of animation to the South African film industry and how the proposed points system does not take into account animated productions. Glenn added that he felt it would be important to have separate
policies for co-productions and local content. Selona Reddy from the IPO outlined the issues of economic growth, job creation and skills development already being offered by the film industry and the implications the proposed system would have had on past projects. Izidore Codron, Vlokkie Gordon and Glenn all said this points system will have an effect on co-production changes. Several delegates felt the NFVF were on the right track in many regards, but that the proposed system required more work and closer consideration. Afterwards, Izidore added that he believed the NFVF was conflating the definition of coproductions and Indigenous films, TV films and TV shows. He stressed it is imperative they understand international best practice. Izi was impressed with the unity showed by the industry, with a conciliatory tone from the NFVF and a warm welcome and support from the industry in Cape Town. In closing Terrence Khumalo of the NFVF informed the delegates that issues discussed will be taken into consideration and an updated version will be published at a later stage for further discussion before being tabled in parliament. Charl Fourie