2/27/2019

Page 1

The

Davidsonian

Independent Student Journalism Since 1914

inside

davidsonian.com

New spaces on campus: Lavender Lounge, the Nest, and Union game room

2

Volume 114, Issue 16

February 27, 2019

Marc Todd ‘20 questions the merits of eliminating early decision program

4

Inside the President’s House: Lucas Weals ‘19 offers an art tour

6

The Microbial Empire threatens war against campus community

8

Students Question Campus Accessibility Accommodations JACK DOWELL ‘21 STAFF WRITER

I

Last week, the Urban Bush Women dance company performed in the Duke Family Performance Hall, and members engaged with the Davidson community throughout their time on campus. Photos by John Crawford ‘20

n the leadup to the recent SGA presidential election, Elif Kaya ‘19 made a post to the unofficial Davidson Facebook group saying that “as a voter, I am looking for a specific initiative on working to accept more students with physical disabilities to Davidson.” Though accessibility has been an ongoing discussion on campus, after the election of Emmitt Sklar ‘21 as SGA president, whose platform included making Davidson “accessible, affordable, and accepting,” the conversation about Davidson’s accessibility has moved further into the spotlight. Kaya’s post to the Facebook group was inspired by a recent visit to MIT’s campus, where she found that “it’s obvious that there’s a greater ratio of people with disability participating in daily life … It was obvious that there’s something we’re not doing well enough based on the daily participation you can observe just walking around on campus.” She emphasizes that while she wants to bring focus to the issue, she does not have all the answers: “that’s why I put it on the group: to find out what’s going on, is anyone paying attention to this?” Representatives from both SGA presidential tickets reached out to her, and both of the winners acknowledge the presence of a problem. Sklar, after his election, told The Davidsonian that “how we make sure this campus is accessible to everyone is something we don’t focus on enough.” He emphasized the importance of going beyond the bare minimum and also making social

spaces more accessible, saying “it doesn’t mean anything unless we’re one community that’s both working and having fun together.” Gina Martinez ‘20, SGA’s vice president, cited Kaya’s Facebook post, saying “I think it’s important to look at what our peer institutions are doing … when the school, the actual layout of the school is not accessible for students, you’re putting up an obstacle. Students will not come here even if they want to because they cannot live here.” One concrete proposal was expanding the Safe Rides program, which currently provides free rides around campus and the surrounding area to students on Thursday, Friday and Saturday nights. Sklar wants to expand those hours “to focus on times when professors have office hours at the Hub ... and make sure those are accessible,” as well as establishing a shuttle between Davidson and the Hub. Kenzie Bell ‘20, a hard of hearing student, thinks that Davidson has a long way to go. “I think Davidson is generally set up to regress to the mean in terms of serving students.” Bell believes the issues are deep set and is skeptical of SGA’s ability to correct them. “I don’t really think that SGA is a solution to a lot of problems at Davidson; I think it’s more an institutional level [change], a change in culture and in students. Because Davidson is also a place where, when students come to visit, it’s very clear the ways in which you might not fit in.”

CONTINUED ON PAGE 2

Commission on Race and Slavery Progresses

O

BETSY SUGAR ‘21 STAFF WRITER

n February 15th, President Carol Quillen sent the Davidson faculty, staff, and student community an email addressing racist material in the college’s old yearbooks. Quillen explained that “Davidson College is committed to a full understanding of the college’s history with respect to slavery and race. The Commission on Race and Slavery is building a framework for such research and for conversations that will enable us to develop and share this understanding.” This is one of the few official statements about the Commission on Race and Slavery from the college since the Commission’s formation last year. On its webpage, the Commission states it intends to “guide the development and launch of research projects and additional teaching and learning initiatives [to] investigate and acknowledge the college’s history with slavery and race.” When the Commission was formed last year in 2018, the President’s Office pledged $25,000 for two years to support the Commission in their research and eventual suggestions to the President’s Office. The Commission only has this year left with pre-approved financial support from the institution. The student body has not been able to see the behind-the-scenes work the Commission has taken this past year.

Commission member and Dean of Students Byron McCrae explained that over the past year the Commission has been answering three questions: “What are the principles that guide this work? What do we feel we owe to the community? And how do we do this?” “The idea of having a Commission on Race and Slavery is so broad, and we’ve been grappling with what exactly we want to be doing with it,” Commission member Saidah Rahman ‘20 added. “So the past year we’ve been trying to hone in on where even to start. So it has limited how far we’ve moved forward in terms of action because we have taken so much time figuring out what to do, but I think it’s an important step nonetheless.” As for concrete action taken by the Commission, Rahman described the Commission’s support of programs and events already happening on campus, such as their sponsorship of the Africana Studies department presentation of Slavery, Violence, and the Archive, a recent conference hosted at Davidson. The Commission and McCrae’s office also facilitated the “Slavery and Class in the American South,” a lecture presented by commission member and UNC Chapel Hill professor Dr. William Andrews ‘68. The Commission on Race and Slavery also hopes to send an interim report and survey out to the student body to update and obtain feedback on what the general student body wants to see from the initiative. However, besides the intended interim

report and aforementioned events on campus, the commission has not taken other direct action on campus. However, it should be noted that the Commission’s current trajectory is thus far congruent with similar committees at other colleges, such as Georgetown and Furman, which took about a year before either school took concrete action. The Commission does have lofty goals for the future. McCrae expanded upon the Commission’s overall aspirations. “This group’s purpose is really to consider how to be accountable in the present, and recommend to the president best practices and the best way to acknowledge our past in thinking about our future in light of what we’ve learned.” While an admirable, and necessary, objective, each Commission member has a different idea on how to go about it. Jan Blodgett, author of One Town, Many Voices: A History of Davidson, North Carolina, wants to see conversations about race at Davidson spread out through all four years. “I think too much has been put on the freshmen, that you’re supposed to absorb it then,” Blodgett explained. “I think moving it up through upper classes and finding opportunities and ways that it can be integrated into the classes and the cultural life on campus.”

CONTINUED ON PAGE 2


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.