The
Davidsonian
Independent Student Journalism Since 1914
inside
davidsonian.com
College raises student wages by $3 effective July 2022
Volume 120, Issue 13
March 2nd, 2022
2
PPGA perspective: Administration blocks efforts for easier access to Plan B
5
New crossword by Victor Fleming ‘73 in Living Davidson
6
The Yowl suggests alternate names for the new football field
8
College Responds to Title IX Petition’s Demands
National Administration Changes Continue to Fuel Policy Shifts 183
186 174 146
150
132
50
0
community
100
seniors
Title IX In the White House Title IX was signed by Richard Nixon in 1972, as part of a series of Educational Amendments. The law read, “No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any education program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.” The law proclaims that all schools receiving federal funding are held accountable for encounters their students have with sex-based discrimination. Over the years, Title IX has faced various lawsuits and revisions attempting to undercut its impact or render it unconstitutional. The amendment has received the greatest backlash related to its implications regarding the athletic opportunities available for male, female, and gender-nonconforming students. The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) challenged the legality of Title IX four years after it was passed, in a 1976 lawsuit which was eventually dismissed. In 1984, Grove City v. Bell temporarily limited the scope of Title IX by reducing its protections against discrimination to specific pro-
200
juniors
A
ccording to the Rape, Abuse, and Incest National Network (RAINN), 2327% of female and 18-20% of genderqueer and transgender students report sexual assault during their undergrad college experience, compared to only 6-8% of male students. Title IX seeks to address this discrepancy between male and non-male encounters with unwanted sexual activity, and other forms of discrimination based on sex. The rocky political history of this protective amendment reveals both its controversial implications at a national level as well as the direct consequences for students on college campuses across the country, including Davidson College.
Petition Signatures by Class Year
sophomores
SAMANTHA EWING ‘23 (SHE/HER) FEATURES EDITOR
grams receiving federal funding, rather than holding the institution as a whole accountable. This meant that many athletic departments, which are typically school-funded, were now exempt from Title IX, and were no longer required to provide equal opportunities for mens’ and womens’ athletic options. However, this restriction was reversed by the Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987. Despite these setbacks, the amendment has prevailed and continues to be modified. Various “Dear Colleague” letters have offered informal descriptions of the practical applications of Title IX since its passage, yet they are often repealed and reinstated based on which political party is in power. For example, the Obama Administration issued a Dear Colleague letter in 2011, which laid out the procedure for reporting sexual harrassment, yet the recommendations of this letter were rescinded under the Trump Administration. The Trump Administration made significant revisions to Title IX legislation. In 2020, Trump issued several new regulations, under which educational facilities are no longer held accountable for sexual assaults they “should have known” about, and are instead only accountable for reported incidents. Additionally, schools are now instructed not to respond to accusations with excessive consequences, encouraging more lenient repurcussions for perpetrators; victims are required to submit to live hearings to be cross examined, a measure expected to discourage reporting; and schools are no longer accountable for incidents of sexual assault which occur off-campus. The legal definition of what constitutes sexual assault was narrowed as well. In response to these revisions, eighteen state attorneys general filed lawsuits against the changes. In opposition to the Trump Administration’s choices, Joe Biden campaigned with promises to reverse these revisions. Since his 2021 inauguration, President Biden has issued two executive orders intended to secure the protections of Title IX. On March 8, 2021, he issued an Executive Order opening Title IX to review, and the Education Department has been holding hearings and working to revise the current Title IX. They are expected to release a new
first years
ISA DEGUZMAN ‘25 (SHE/HER) STAFF WRITER
signatures
Signatures for the Petition to Increase Support for Survivors of Sexual Violence. Infographic by Hope Anderson ‘22 rule in May 2022. In the meantime, Biden issued another Executive Order which clarified the language of Title IX to include protections against discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender
identity, rather than simply sex. This is a critical step to decreasing rates of sexual assault on college campuses.
CONTINUED ON PAGE 2
Placement Day Mishap Leaves Students Out of Houses ABBY TRUE ‘25 (SHE/HER) STAFF WRITER
N
ine students failed to click the second required button. Nine students were left without a brown t-shirt inside a paper bag and an accompanying house assignment on the morning of Saturday, February 19th. Isabelle Polgar ‘25, one of the students who wasn’t placed, explained what happened to her cluster. “The form said ‘Thank you for submitting’ but [my friend] did not scroll down,” Polgar said. “There were around 35-40 girls on the email chain that said we had not filled out the form.” Most of these students went on to finish
the survey, but Polgar’s cluster did not. On the morning of Sunday, February 20th, the grass behind Vail Commons wore a blanket of silly string and shaving cream. The weeks leading up to the annual Patterson Court Council (PCC) event, Placement Day, were full of anticipation and excitement—feelings that permeated the entire campus. The campus’s four eating houses are Rusk House, Warner Hall House, Connor House, and Turner House. As the Rusk website establishes, the houses exist to create a space for members “to congregate and build relationships with one another.” Unlike traditional Greek Life, the unique placement method allows prospective members to choose their own house instead of being chosen by current members. The process
emphasizes equity and fairness; admittees are currently able to rank their choices, giving them a degree of autonomy. Ultimately, the decision is made by an algorithm, originally applied to the placement process by Anthony Albert ‘01, Tim Valdes ‘01, Mary Wylie ‘02, and Mathematics and Computer Science professor Dr. Laurie Heyer. In the week leading up to Placement Day, those who wished to join an Eating House were asked to first fill out a Bill of Rights, due on Monday, Feb. 14th at 5:00 P.M. Once completed, students were required to rank their preferences and submit them through WildcatSync. The form could be completed alone or with a group of up to four individuals: a practice termed “clustering.” After ranking their choic-
es and inputting identifying information, students had to click two submission buttons for their choices to be recorded. Grace Hall ‘22, the president of PCC, mentioned that the process does not reveal much information until the day of the event. “Those in charge of placement day have no way of seeing if a form is in progress,” she said. “[They] can only see those forms that are submitted.” This meant that those working behind the scenes were being asked to rectify a problem caused by human error. Polgar expressed her feelings of disappointment on Saturday morning. “We walked out at 6:55 A.M. to find our
CONTINUED ON PAGE 3