2012 CAMPUS ELECTION ISSUE
www.thecrusaderpublication.com
The
Crusader
The official student publication of Xavier University - Ateneo de Cagayan Vol. 38 No. 9 | February 2012
THE UNCONTESTED Moment of reckoning: The Tero admin report card By Ryan Louie G. Madrid and Bianca Nathalie Y. Llamis
T
he ten months are up, and the moment of reckoning has arrived. Central Student Government (CSG) President Mario Tero II started out with the platform FIDES, meaning “trust” in Latin. To win the students’ trust this academic year, Tero, thencandidate for the presidency, proposed Focus, Inclusive, Development and Sustainability as his platform. Has the Tero administration fulfilled its promises in the campaign trail? Did it make an impact? Has the CSG served the students—or did it sadly fall apart? Read on for our grade and our take on the various highlights and lowlights of the administration that was. Student representation: BTero stated in his campaign that he will fight for students’ rights and their awareness of the Magna Carta. And while that has indeed been communicated in the University-wide General Assembly, further reminders have been few and far in between. The Office of Research and Constituent Rights (ORCI) has fared better in this regard. ORCI has, according to Tero, looked into the many issues affecting the students this academic year. Among them, and perhaps the most saturated of them all, is the Wednesday scheme. In the first semester, the CSG has conducted surveys and consultations with the students regarding the Wednesday scheme, and indeed, these have yielded results that can prove useful for the next academic year. But the CSG’s intense research on the Wednesday scheme has waned in the second semester. More than that, we have yet to see published consolidated data on the research findings, and learn of concrete actions on how the Tero administration will lobby for or against the Wednesday scheme in behalf of the students. On financial transparency: AThe campaign for transparency and accountability inside the CSG could perhaps be considered one of the highlights of Tero’s administration. For too long, the CSG and the college councils have been riddled with
continue on p. 6
Gone solo: why no one else is running By Lyle Justin A. Egay and Ma. Rosetti G. Villamor
I
n what’s considered by some as the loneliest election in years, Dean Cris Acabo and Sean Jared Lastimoso are running uncontested for Central Student Government President and Vice President respectively, under the banner of Alyansang Atenista (AA). It is the same with student councils— only five of the eight colleges have uncontested candidates in all positions. Only the councils for the Center for Integrated Technology (CIT), College of Computer Studies (CSSC), and the School of Business and Management have non-Alyansa candidates, and the few that are not from AA are running independently. Not qualified Not anyone can run for office. There are requirements and conditions that a student should present to Xavier University - Central Student Government Elections Committee (XU-CSG ELECOM) before one can become an official candidate. “Ang ga-sala lang jud kay ang grades,” acknowledged Jonnas Tristan Porminal, Chief Commissioner of the ELECOM. “... Usually man gud, kung dili nimo ma-reach ang 2.0 na grade, we cannot accept you---unless muingon ang dean [of the applicant’s respective college] nga ‘okay, ipa-exempt nalang ni siya’... Dapat man gud dili ka on academic probation while nag-file ka ug candidacy.” This requirement would bring about complications that prevent students from running. “Naa gali mi problem anang karun sa CSSC,” Porminal pointed out. “Kay supposedly mu-run siya for president. Pagkuha niya sa iyang grades, didto mi nagka-problem... kay irregular student man gud siya so naglibog mi aha i-base iyang QPI...Then gi-approve sa dean na ‘okay, i-approve namo ni siya’ so we cannot do anything. Amo na siyang dawatun.” Besides the 2.0 QPI requirement, qualifications for candidacy include, among others: no bad records noted by the Office of Student Affairs, a one-year residence in XU prior to elections, and to have no position held in other school organizations. These
prerequisites might also hinder interested students from running. Not a successful one Just recently, there was an outburst of sentiment around the campus regarding the election. There was even talk of an imminent failure of election. For this year’s Botar Atenista to be successful, 25% of the total student population has to take part, whether or not they vote for the candidates. If not, a failure of elections will be declared, and a snap election will be held 30 days after, with different candidates. And with a total student population of roughly 10,000, ELECOM needs at least 2,500 votes. As for the student councils, an uncontested candidate has to earn the vote of more than half the voting population in his/her college. In a snap election, however, there is no need to meet a voter count. Not a priority According to Porminal, other potential candidates, specifically those from Buhat Estudyante, who had volunteered in the Sendong relief operations had been too caught up to meet the requirements for candidacy in time. “Medyo na-busy sila sa KKP [Kristohanong Katilingban sa Pagpakabana - Social Involvement Office] karon kay tungod anang sa ‘Sendong’. Wala na dayon sila nakakuha dayon ug time to prepare for the elections. Naabtan nalang dayon sila sa deadline.” Mario Alejandro Jacinto Neri, AA Election Commissioner also admitted, “I guess daghan jud student leaders [in Xavier]... though we also understand that they also want to go to [non-CSG] extracurricular [organizations]. They want to focus on their own groups.” Another thing, many people aren’t willing to run simply because CSG is not their first priority. “Ang reason nganong nagschool ko kay para magtuon. Ngano muapil pa lugar ko?” expressed Alvin Amores*, CIT Elex Tech - 2.
It is true that being part of the student government would eat most of a student’s free time---such time might as well be used for studies. Still, such thinking contradicts an Atenean core value: MAGIS. Not encouraged “The main reason why I really decided to run [last year] was because of the support [and] the influence of everyone around me,” related Mario Tero II, CSG President. “If it hadn’t been [for] the support of my family and friends, from SACDEV [Student Activities and Leadership Development Office] and KKP-SIO...I wouldn’t have continued [running].” Tero admitted that the encouragement of these people pushed him to run for president. He believes that it is not enough to know that you are ready. When people push you to be someone, it means they see something in you: an assurance that you are capable of not only winning in the elections, but handling the position well. Unfortunately, not much encouragement is provided to majority of the students. Not everybody is aware of the specific duties of CSG and its members. Knowing what you’re getting into might excite students to be more active in student governance. But whose responsibility should this be? The ELECOM washes its hands off this burden. Porminal explained that ELECOM must not recruit anyone to run. “Kay kanang candidates dayon na among gina-recruit [will be] represented by ELECOM na dayon, which is not good... Ma-break namo ang [code] na nonpartisan mi. Kay [recruiting anyone] murag there is a bias na dayon with that candidate... Dili jud namo na scope.” The ELECOM’s responsibility is simply to facilitate the filing of candidacy and protect the sanctity of the students’ votes.
continue on p. 5