OPINION • 17
WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 23, 2016
Learning from the 2000’s The Gilmore Girls reboot brings opportunity for growth
BETHANY BOWLES EDITOR-IN-CHIEF
Gilmore Girls first aired on TV in 2000 and was a fan favourite for seven years, wrapping up in 2007. Not only did this show provide a heart-warming, quirky narrative, but on the surface, the show is a bildungsroman — a coming of age story — for two characters: mother-daughter duo, Rory and Lorelai. Everyone loves a bildungsroman. There’s a reason why S.E Hinton’s The Outsiders, is still taught in high school and university classes nearly 60 years after it was published. Western culture has an obsession with dissolving innocence. Gilmore Girls, however, has a bit more depth than the typical bildungsroman. This is mainly because it is women that are coming of age, while the traditional bildungsroman is generally geared towards male protagonists. I’m looking at you, Holden Caulfield. Gilmore Girls tells the story of a girl who gets pregnant at 16 and must raise a child before she’s become an adult herself. The show
starts up when Rory, the daughter, is 16 and Lorelai, her mother, is 32. The audience is subjected to this bizarre mother-daughter relationship, where both parties are, essentially, at the same level of maturity.
All of these homophobic jokes are made to be lighthearted ... TV today celebrates diverse sexualities, while Gilmore Girls revolved aound heternormativity.
I love Gilmore Girls, mainly because it presents some interesting issues regarding feminism and female independence. Lorelai struggles to find a balance between taking care of herself and her daughter without the help of a man, while also yearning for a male companion. During the first five seasons, before Lorelai ends up with Luke, Lorelai’s love life is somewhat destructive. She fears commitment,
but also sticks to her guns when someone mistreats her (Digger could never win her back, the asshole). Although her parenting tactics can be a bit questionable — regarding Rory as her best friend first and her daughter second — Gilmore Girls was desperately trying to be progressive in the early 2000’s. And for that, I applaud them. There still lies a problem, however. While Lorelai and Rory were trying hard to maintain the “I don’t need a man” mentality, several other issues in the series seemed to overshadow the positive feminist approach. Let’s talk about Lane’s mom, Mrs. Kim, and the blatant racism that coincided with her character. Mrs. Kim’s character upholds the stereotypical Asian parent trope — strict, oppressive, controlling and only concerned with her daughter’s educational success. The majority of their mother-daughter relationship consists of Mrs. Kim trying to fine Lane a “good, Korean husband.” In general, the show really only featured white characters, with the exception of Michele. Even then, he was consistently “othered” and also made to be the source of many jokes, quite frankly, because his French accent was hard to under-
CONTRIBUTED IMAGE
stand. Let’s also talk about the gay jokes. In the beginning of the series, Lorelai accuses Dean of being gay in a lighthearted tongue-andcheek kind of way. Luke also calls Kirk gay for holding his girlfriend’s purse. Any time a male character displayed any stereotypically feminine qualities, they were subjected to teasing or having their sexuality questioned. All of these homophobic jokes are made to be lighthearted, but that just doesn’t exist in TV anymore. TV today celebrates diverse sexualities, while Gilmore Girls revolved around heteronormativity. The point is, watching this series in 2016 can be painful to anyone who respects political correctness, or to anyone who celebrates Hollywood’s newer approach to tell the stories of characters who aren’t straight, white, cisgendered people.
Now, fans are gearing up for the revival, which is set to air on Netflix this Friday. I’m also one of those fans that’s bursting with excitement. I love the story of Lorelai and Rory. I love their friendship. I love the feminist ideology that lies in telling the story of a successful single mom who owns her own business. But what I’m most excited for is to see this story told in 2016, a time where making gay jokes and being racist on TV isn’t as acceptable as it was in the early 2000’s. I acknowledge that Gilmore Girls existed in a time when the majority of people thought this was okay and that this was acceptable humour. I’m hopeful that the revival will still feature several cups of coffee, fast-paced dialogue, Miss Patty’s town gossip, Luke’s pessimism and jokes that don’t uphold the marginalization of certain groups.
Stop being offended by jokes that are lighthearted Now I would be a hypocrite to say that I was not pampered and spoiled. I had my parents pay for my schooling. The difference was, I was raised to live life and not to worry about little micro-aggressions like “being offended”.
JOSH GOEREE OPINION COLUMNIST
When I was growing up, I was the class clown. I would do and say funny things for a laugh. Even to this day, when I go to work at the Wilmot Recreation Complex in Baden, I waltz in with a comedic smile and banter to make our shifts go by more smoothly. But in recent years, especially at university, I’ve noticed that when I make a joke, people look at me the wrong way for using a certain word. Political correctness has turned from a good idea, when you are not mean to those who can’t defend themselves, to a point where no one wants to offend anyone anymore. This has effectively made our generation a bunch of super-sensitive, ignorant dolts that do not know how to take a joke. How did university turn into a time when you could explore and learn about yourself, to a time when pampered, spoiled, entitled brats get mad because of a joke? It’s as if those kinds of people have something shoved where the sun doesn’t shine. It’s time for a reality check:
How did university turn into a time when you could explore and learn about yourself, to a time when pampered, spoiled, entitled brats get mad because of a joke?
SERENA TRUONG/CORD GRAPHICS
everyone gets made fun of for something and it is never 100 per cent fair. I should know: I was bullied from elementary school to high school by morons using the same jokes and kicked me when I was down, figuratively and physically speaking. That’s not to say that jokes aimed at hurting people are okay — racist, homophobic and misogynistic jokes, as well as jokes that marginalize certain groups, shouldn’t be the norm. But getting offended by every joke is a waste of energy for everyone involved.
The point of comedy and humour isn’t, as the PC police will tell you, to be cruel or nasty. The whole point of comedy is that it is critical and it over-exaggerates. All jokes, in some fashion or other, are going to be critical. It points out the humanity in ourselves and helps in getting over tragedy. When you take away the ability to be critical and unwillingness to offend anyone, humor is gone. To comedian John Cleese, if that is the case, we might as well be living in 1984, George Orwell’s totalitarian nightmare.
The whole notion of being politically correct is that it is trying to protect everyone from anything uncomfortable. Robin Skynner, a psychiatrist from London, once said, “If people can’t control their own emotions, then they have to start trying to control other people’s behavior.” Once you start to control people’s behaviour, language, or opinion just because you don’t like it or find it uncomfortable, then you have started a dictatorship. If all of society is like that, it will become the totalitarian nightmare like in 1984 and being pampered and spoiled started it all.
We have two choices: either get the politically correct stick out of our rear ends, or continue to live in a world where if speech isn’t sanitized or censored, you get in trouble. To again quote my favourite comedian George Carlin: “Political Correctness is fascism pretending to be manners.” So, if you like telling people to control what they say, cannot take a joke and are a fan of fascism or dictatorship, then go move to United States. I believe they just elected a guy who kept a copy of Hitler’s speeches at his bedside.