theconcordian
arts spoof
Le Patin Libre skates to alt-success P. 11
LOL wut? Check inside for newsprint condoms P. 13
Coverage P. 3-5 Comment P. 24, 26 Tuesday, March 29, 2011
life Con artists breaking hearts and wallets online P. 7
music The 10 must have albums to kickstart your collection P. 20
sports Girls step into the mix martial arts octagon P. 22
Disparaging posters slam Action candidates On the last day of campaigning critical posters appear, with no one aware of who’s behind them Evan LePage News editor The last day of CSU election campaigning turned out to be the dirtiest, as posters appeared overnight on Sunday which singled out certain Action slate members with defamatory comments. What had been a largely calm election campaign turned sour yesterday after two disrespectful posters surfaced at a few locations on the downtown campus. The first, depicting Action candidates associated with the John Molson School of Business, including executive candidates Tanya Ng and Leslie Reifer, reads “Action Candidates stand by the corrupt Board of Governors,” and “Do you want to be represented by corporate whores?” The second, depicting Action candidates who were involved in the Arts and Science Federation of Associations this year, including executive candidates Teresa Seminara and Natasha Launi, reads “This year’s ASFA was only about throwing parties,” and “It’s your money, do you want them to run the CSU like a fraternity?” “This morning it was really a shock to all of us,” Seminara said yesterday. “I really didn’t think it was serious until I came to school and they were postered everywhere.” Seminara also said that a few of the Action slate members were really demoralized upon finding out about the attacks ads, and as a result the
executive had to spend much of the morning on their last day of campaigning improving the morale of their candidates. “We had to give a boost to our councillors because they were sad after what happened,” she said. “That took time away from our campaigning. Instead of going out and doing one-on-ones and visiting classrooms, we had to help our councillors to have faith in themselves and to have faith in the team again.” In addition to the time spent motivating, Action president Khalil Haddad and Seminara spent much of the day with chief electoral officer Oliver Cohen, figuring out how to react to the posters. “He did the best he could to help us out,” Seminara said of Cohen. “He went to go speak to the Dean of Students, filed a complaint there; he went to security and security went to go see him at his office.” According to Seminara, security has launched an investigation into the manner, and tapes will likely be reviewed to see who posted the material on the boards. “I really, really hope that we can get some answers as soon as possible,” she said. “Even if one student saw this, that’s one student who was misled and that’s unfair. Some people say it was up for just a few hours but it doesn’t matter.” Until the footage is reviewed Seminara was not willing to say who she thought was behind the posters, though she did point out “we’re only two teams.” While most of the posters were taken down early Monday morning by candidates from both slates, the news of their existence and photos spread quickly online where supporters from both sides argued and exchanged accusations over who was responsible. Some Action members and sup-
See “Security has laun...” on p.5 Volume 28 Issue 24
The independent option Jacqueline Di Bartolomeo Assistant news editor
Students heading to the polls this week will find the names of three independent candidates squeezed in among the 29 Your Concordia and Action candidates that will grace the ballot for Arts & Science council. Alex Matak, Kelly Pennington and Justin Famili are running to represent the average student at Concordia, those not part of the political climate. “There is the common sentiment that there is a distinct unit of political culture at Concordia [that is] sometimes out of touch with students,” political science major Famili said. He called his approach “responsive representation,” where “my primary goal is to represent students more effectively.” All three of these independents want to see more consultation with students, whether through general meetings or social media. They are also all of the opinion that the affiliation that exists between executive and council isn’t necessarily a good thing. “I felt like the slate politics, especially with council, needs to be challenged,” Pennington said. “I think it’s really important to have people who don’t feel any ties and who will speak up no matter what and don’t have any consequences for what they’re saying [because] they’re not affiliated in any way.” Famili agreed, stating “When you have political parties that encompass both the executive and the council, I feel like the council won’t be able to properly hold the executive accountable
See “Independent..” on p.3
theconcordian.com