theconcordian Tuesday, October 19, 2010
music Polydactyl Hearts: making the most of two mediums P. 14
sports life
Stingers defend title at this weekend s championships. P. 17
New chefs heat up the kitchen P. 8-9
Photo by Sarah Deshaies
Camera-shy CSU says No to CUTV
CSU councillors question clarity of opinions proposed student centre fee levy SPHR shouldn’t misappropriate Elie Wiesel’s visit P. 22
arts Possible Worlds pushes Uncalled For’s boundaries P. 11
Volume 28 Issue 8
Councillors pass levy that will see future students ultimately paying $4.50 per credit for the centre project Evan LePage News editor Despite the serious concern expressed by multiple councillors on the proposal’s wording, the Concordia Student Union’s council passed a motion to put a feelevy increase for the student centre project to referendum in Nov. Students will be voting yes or no on the question “Do you agree to contribute $0.50 per credit through the CSU for a student centre project while allowing a $0.50 (per credit) extension per semester for the following (4) semesters?” While a slightly different question may appear on the ballot, at the discretion of the chief electoral officer Oliver Cohen, this wording was ultimately approved in a motion by council. Confusion over the wording was the subject of serious debate at last week’s council meeting, prompting discussion that lasted over an hour and a half before councillors finally passed a motion to include the question on the ballot.
Many councillors expressed concerns that it would be unclear to students that the levy would rise on a staggering system before ultimately stopping at $2.50, and that students are already paying a $2 levy for the student centre. Independent councillor Ethan Cox expressed the greatest opposition to the wording. “First of all, that question is totally misleading. I’m opposed to it on principle on the basis of that question because that’s not telling students the truth and that’s inviting students to misunderstand,” he said. “It’s worded in a way that seems to me very tricky and to be perfectly honest with you it’s the exact same way the Charest government raises tuition.” Consequently, Cox proposed a motion to amend the wording. He motioned to add “for a total of $2.50/cr at the end of 4 semesters,” in order to clarify what students would ultimately be paying. Cox then amended his own motion, adding the statement “on top of the $2.00/cr for a total of $4.50/cr,” so that the existing levy was referred to in the question. Councillors voted down both of Cox’s amendments, however, the former in a tight 8 to 12 vote. In response, an angered Cox said “so to be clear, everybody wants to mislead students,” before leaving the meeting and not returning.
See “‘The majority of...” on p.3
Council turns down invitation for CUTV to film meetings Question to be put back up for debate Sarah Deshaies Editor-in-chief A motion to invite Concordia’s television station CUTV to film and make available the recording at last Wednesday’s Concordia Student Union council meeting was struck down last week as the monthly meeting started.
See “‘Councillors vote...” on p.5
theconcordian.com