LGBT+ History month
Cambridge to Tibet
Why colleges should fly the rainbow flag this February
Bridging the gap through teaching and travel
→ Comment, p.27
www.tcs.cam.ac.uk
Uni ‘strongly opposes’ plans to raise fees University rejects policy to raise fees with inflation
T
Why the very Cambridge band is not yet finished
→ Interviews, p.15
→Part 2, p.5
The
28 January 2016 Vol. 17 Lent Issue 3
Sherilyn Chew News Editor he University of Cambridge has rejected many of the British Government’s Higher Education proposals. The proposals were initially set out last November in a Green Paper, entitled ‘‘Fulfilling our Potential: Teaching Excellence, Social Mobility and Student Choice’’. It outlined the Government’s vision for higher education in England. The University has said that it is “strongly opposed” to a link between teaching quality and the ability to up tuition fees with inflation, as the Green Paper set out. The report states that the policy would force students to choose between high quality and affordability, while discouraging students from lowerincome families from applying to the best universities. Although the University approved of the proposal’s central desire to “recognise teaching excellence” and reaffirmed their shared goals of “encouraging social mobility” and simplifying the “regulatory landscape”, the report argued that the mechanisms to achieve those objectives might be counter-productive. The teaching quality would be assessed through an Ofsted-like ranking, known as the Teaching Excellence Framework (TEF). Universities would also be ranked on student satisfaction rates, drop-out level and graduate job prospects. The University response said that while it welcomed the aim of the TEF to promote excellence in teaching, it did not consider it to be beneficial in
Shooting Suns
decision-making, criticising it as being too “blunt” an instrument to assist students choosing their university. Moreover, they did not have the confidence that the suggested metrics would be fit for the purpose of establishing teaching reputation. The Independent reported last year that the TEF fee proposal received negative response from the National Campaign Against Fees and Cuts, with the group’s James Elliot warning: “It will be a disaster for students and education workers alike.” In an interview with Times Higher Education last year, Jo Johnson, Universities and Science Minister, defended the Green Paper, saying it was about “reforming our higher education so that it’s more effective still at delivering value for money for students…and delivering the pipeline of graduates we need.” The general secretary of the University and College Union, Sally Hunt, had previously condemned the scheme, saying “simply finding a few measures to rank teaching will do nothing to improve quality.” Similarly, Labour’s Gordon Marsden stated that the Government’s plans were a “Trojan Horse for raising fees” and that they risked creating a ‘two-tier’ education system. The University’s report also levelled criticism at the proposal for a new Office for Students. It said that the lack of a single, overarching, independent, regulatory body for universities amounted to a “basic flaw” in the proposals.
Editorial Comment page 15 →
Cambridge Student
Cambridge University Press cuts 45 jobs TCS News Team
The Cambridge University Press (CUP) will be cutting up to 45 editorial and production jobs at its English Language Teaching (ELT) division in Cambridge, as the company relocates more of its operations abroad. The move comes as the publishing company continues to implement changes to its global English Language Teaching group. CUP employs 1,100 people in Cambridge, and the company has a total workforce of 2,400 people spread out across the world, operating in 50 different offices. Globally, CUP employs over 700 people at its ELT division, although it declined to reveal the total number of ELT staff based in Cambridge. Changes to ELT markets have been caused by “new digital learning technologies, developing trends among teachers and students, and shifts in the global economy,” the publisher said. Cambridge will remain its “centre”, although global staffing levels within the ELT group are “likely to increase”. In 2014, in excess of 90% of the company’s total sales originated from outside of the United Kingdom. Peter Phillips, Chief Executive at CUP, told Cambridge News that: “The publishing industry is going through its biggest change in 500 years. Cambridge’s English Language Teaching group is responding by increasing our investment in digital products, focusing our people and products in our key markets and streamlining how we do things. “Overall our global staffing in this area is likely to increase and Cambridge remains our centre.” While he “deeply regrets” cutting jobs across CUP, he says it is the cost of their commitment to being a “truly global digital publisher” and upscaling Regulations on punt touting have opened to public consultation following their efforts to better support English numerous incidents of aggressive behaviour. Image: Amelia Oakley language learners.