The Honorable Judge L. Clifford Davis Passes February 2025
Tributes and respect for his hard work and decation to his community from officals and and civil rights organizations
Commissioner Roderick Miles, Jr. Issues Statement on the Passing of the Honorable Judge Clifford Davis
FORT WORTH, TX – With the news this morning on the passing of the Honorable Judge L. Clifford Davis, Tarrant County Commissioner Roderick Miles, Jr issued the following statement:
"Today, our community, our state, and our nation have lost a giant in the struggle for justice. Judge Clifford Davis did not merely practice law, he wielded it as a tool to bend the arc of history toward righteousness. With unshakable courage and conviction, he stood in the face of segregation, inequality, and injustice, ensuring that the words 'life, liberty, and justice for all' were not just ideals, but realities for generations to come.
Judge Davis believed in the true meaning of our nation’s promise, ‘liberty and justice for all. His work was more than legal victories; it was a moral calling. He dismantled barriers not just in the courtroom but in the very fabric of our society, pushing our institutions to honor their highest principles. Through his
tireless fight to desegregate schools, his groundbreaking service on the bench, and his mentorship of young lawyers, Judge Davis ensured that the doors he opened would never be closed again. His life is a testament to what is possible when one leads with faith, purpose, and an unwavering belief in justice.
The measure of a great life is not just in the battles fought, but in the lives changed. Every Black student who walked through onceclosed school doors, every individual who found justice in a system that too often denied it, and every young person who dared to dream of a career in law because of his example, these are the echoes of his legacy.
Judge Davis’ impact was deeply personal to me. He was more than a historical figure, he was a living, breathing example of what it means to serve with purpose and integrity. He was a fellow Philander Smith College alumnus, a fellow member of Saint
Black Chamber Mourns the Death of
a
Giant
Statement of the Chamber on the Passing of Judge L. Clifford Davis
It is with a deep sense of sadness that the Fort Worth Metropolitan Black Chamber of Commerce mourns the death of an authentic American hero, Judge L. Clifford Davis.
This legendary figure was a giant pillar of our community – one who was on the battlefield fighting for justice for more than 70 years. He leaves behind a body of work that shall forever be a part of this city’s and this country’s history.
Judge Davis, an Arkansas native, was a change agent before ever arriving in Fort Worth, but his work in breaking down the walls of segregation North Texas has left an indelible mark on our community. And for that we are eternally grateful.
Even after turning 100 last year, this remarkable man was still at his battle station, prepared to fight to the very end.
He was a great supporter of our Chamber, as he was of many other organizations. This iconic figure will be sorely missed.
Andrews United Methodist Church, and a guiding presence in my journey. His wisdom and his relentless commitment to community uplift helped shape my understanding of leadership. His work was a reflection of his deep conviction that justice and equity are the foundations of a thriving society, and he modeled these ideals for us all. He showed all of us that authentic leadership is not about titles or power, but about the courage to do what is right, even when it is difficult. His life journey instilled in me the responsibility we all have to give back, to open doors for others, and to lead with a servant’s heart.
Judge Davis’ legacy is a call to action. His life teaches us that justice is not something we inherit, it is something we fight for, build upon, and pass forward. As we reflect on his extraordinary impact, I am reminded of Galatians 6:9, ‘Let us not grow weary in doing good, for at the proper time we will reap a harvest if we
The
do not give up.’ Judge Davis never gave up. He never wavered. He showed us that justice is a lifelong commitment, and now it is our duty to carry the torch forward.
On behalf of the people of Tarrant County, I extend my
Fort Worth
Judge L. Clifford Davis
deepest condolences to his family, his loved ones, and the countless lives he touched. May we honor him not only in words but in action, by continuing his work, standing up for the vulnerable, and never ceasing in the pursuit of justice.
His light will never be dimmed. Judge Davis’ legacy is woven into the progress we see today, and his impact will endure far beyond his lifetime. Tarrant County, Texas, and the nation are better because he walked among us.”
Tarrant County Branch NAACP Mourns the Passing of Life Member Judge L. Clifford Davis
Fort Worth, TX (2/16/2025) - It is with great sadness that the Fort Worth Tarrant County Branch NAACP join our city, county, state and nation in mourning the passing of a Civil Rights legend, Judge L. Clifford Davis.
Judge Davis was an active Life Member of the NAACP who believed in fighting for the civil rights of others in education, housing, employment and public accommodations. It was his work in education that had a lasting impact on the Tarrant County community. His work as an NAACP lawyer to help desegregate both the Mansfield & Fort Worth Independent School Districts was significant. He was a man of integrity that was faithful to one
guiding principle: To treat all people with decency, courte-
sy, dignity and respect without regard to that person’s race, their color, culture, education, age, sexual orientation, religion or non-religious experience, political affiliation, economic status, or any other socio-economic factor. He believed it was everyone’s civil responsibility to do the same.
On behalf of the Officers and members of the Fort Worth Tarrant County Branch NAACP, we extend our deepest condolences to his family, his loved ones, and the countless lives he touched. May we remember his charge to all of us to stand up for the civil rights of others and to always be willing to be a beacon of change.
Stories of Black Excellence in Fort Worth ISD
Dr. Theophlous Aron Sims, Sr. made significant contributions to Fort Worth’s education system over his 35 years of service. His journey in public service began in 1983 when he was elected to the school board in a special election, where he won with 74% of the vote. His concern for the well-being of his children, who were attending elementary and middle schools in Fort Worth at the time, motivated him to run. He focused on enhancing vocational education, improving support for average
and below-average students, and fostering community involvement in schools.
Dr. Sims was a pharmacist by trade and also the owner of Sims Enterprises. He was deeply committed to his role as a public servant, known for his unwavering dedication to both education and the citizens of Fort Worth. He graduated from Texas Southern University’s College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences. One of his proudest accomplishments was the creation of the FWISD Scholar Athlete Award pro-
gram.
In 1989, T. A. Sims Elementary was named in his honor, a testament to his influence on the community. Throughout his tenure, Dr. Sims held multiple leadership positions on the Board, including President, Vice-President, and Secretary. His family, especially his wife Nancy W. Sims, also a registered pharmacist, played an important role in his success, and he remained dedicated to his work in public education for decades.
Cold Weather Resources and Shelters for the Homeless
Another round of very cold temperatures are rolling in Tuesday night, and the City of Fort Worth is reminding the community about resources to support and protect those experiencing homelessness. City of Fort Worth works collaboratively with multiple City departments, regular emergency shelter operators, public safety and emergency management, overflow shelter operator When We Love, and Trinity Metro to imple-
ment a plan that ensures shelter demand will not exceed capacity during a cold weather activation.
Regular emergency shelters Individuals seeking shelter should first report to existing emergency shelters. For individuals, go to:
• Presbyterian Night Shelter: 2400 Cypress St.
• Union Gospel Mission: 1321 E. Lancaster Ave. For families, go to:
• The Salvation Army: 1855 E. Lancaster Ave. (Eligible households to stay at this location must include at least one parent and one child.)
Emergency cold weather overflow shelter
When weather triggers are met, staff activates additional locations with overflow beds as needed. If individuals arrive at regular emergency shelters and beds are full, they
will be relocated to available overflow beds at one of the available additional emergency shelter locations. So far this winter, there have been 24 nights that met cold weather triggers for overflow shelter operations. On nights that the overflow shelter was activated, the overflow shelter averaged 90 guests per night. The peak night of shelter usage
Judge Davis stands under recognition sign at school named after him.
Tips for First-Time Homebuyers in 2025 Navigating the Path to Homeownership
Buying your first home is an exciting milestone, but it can also be an overwhelming process, especially in a competitive housing market like the Dallas-Fort Worth area. With rising home prices and changing interest rates, being well-prepared is crucial.
The Dallas-Fort Worth (DFW) area is projected to see substantial growth in 2025, outpacing most other cities and potentially emerging as the nation’s leading real estate market. This growth is driven by a strong job market, a rising population, and relative affordability, positioning DFW as a prime hub for economic and real estate development
Talking R eal e s TaT e
with Stephanie Spann
among major metropolitan areas.
Before starting your home search, take a close look at your financial situation. Review your credit score, it’s important to know a higher score can help you secure a better mortgage rate. Pay down debts and avoid large purchases that could impact your credit. It’s also essential to save for a down payment and closing costs. While some loans require as little as 3% down, a larger down payment can reduce your monthly payments and interest costs.
Understand Your Mortgage Options
There are various mortgage options available, and
choosing the right one depends on your financial situation and longterm goals. Common types include:
Conventional Loans – Require a higher credit score but offer competitive rates.
• FHA Loans – Allow lower credit scores and smaller down payments, ideal for first-time buyers.
• VA Loans – Available to eligible veterans and service members, with no down payment required. USDA Loans – For buyers in rural or suburban areas with lower income requirements. Consult a mortgage lender to get pre-approved, which will give you a clear idea of your budget and make your offer more
Proposed SNAP Cuts Would Hurt Texas Families and Weaken
New data shows SNAP’s
By Wesley Story
TEXAS – As Congress considers sweeping cuts to SNAP and other critical nutrition programs, Feeding Texas releases county and state level data to show SNAP’s economic impact in Texas. In the 2024 calendar year, Texas issued $6.97 billion in total SNAP payments to Texas families participating in the program. These SNAP payments generated an estimated $10.73 billion in economic activity for the state — a 54% return on investment.
“SNAP is more than a nutrition program, it is a smart investment in our local, state and national economies,” said Celia Cole, CEO of Feeding Texas, the state association of food banks. “SNAP has a high return on investment that fuels economic activity across the nation. The program generates more than 10 billion dollars in economic activity for Texas; any significant cuts to SNAP would have far-reaching economic consequences for our state.”
According to USDA’s SNAP Multiplier report, $1 billion in SNAP benefits generates around $1.54 billion in gross domestic product (GDP), which supports 13,560 new jobs—including $32 million in added income going to agricultural industries that support 480 agricultural jobs. Using this USDA
report, the Texas Health and Human Service Commission’s SNAP enrollment data,
the table would not be the only Texans harmed by the steep cuts that are being pro-
and average meal cost estimates, Feeding Texas calculated the economic impact of SNAP payments in Texas and the number of jobs and meals supported. In addition to $10.73 billion in economic activity that Texas can attribute to SNAP, the program is responsible for supporting more than 94,000 jobs and more than 2 billion meals for Texas families in need in 2024.
“Families who participate in SNAP to put food on
posed,” Cole said. “Retailers, farmers, workers, and communities across our state all participate in a highly interconnected economic ecosystem and would feel the impact of SNAP cuts. If current proposals move forward, hungry families will suffer, food businesses will suffer, and our overall economy will be weaker.”
Texas economist Dr. Ray Perryman estimated the "cost of hunger" in Texas as part of a national analysis conducted
in 2014. The Perryman Group quantified the total annual burden on the Texas economy from hunger-related health and educational expenses (and associated lost earnings due to health and educational deficiencies). They estimated these annual costs to equal $44.2 billion in expenditures, $21.3 billion in gross product and almost 239,500 jobs. In a separate 2019 study, the CDC estimated that food insecurity costs the U.S. healthcare system an additional $53 billion annually by triggering or exacerbating chronic diseases and fueling emergency room visits, hospitalizations and readmissions.
“SNAP is our nation’s first line of defense against hunger,” Cole said. “If we hinder the program‘s ability to do what it was designed to do, hunger will not simply dis-
appear. Instead, hunger will persist and grow, becoming an even more costly problem to be addressed in the future. Our state and nation cannot afford massive cuts to SNAP — and we cannot afford to ignore hunger.”
Beyond the economic impact, any cuts to nutrition programs in the budget reconciliation process could pose a threat to passing a strong, bipartisan Farm Bill later this year. Reauthorization of a Farm Bill is critical to ensure our nation’s growers and producers can continue to provide abundant, affordable food to nourish our nation and nutrition programs can continue to provide for families in need.
“In the last year, Texas food banks have witnessed a surge in demand for food assistance, reaching levels not
appealing to sellers. Set a Realistic Budget Just because you qualify for a certain loan amount doesn’t mean you should borrow the maximum. Consider your monthly expenses, future financial goals, and potential home maintenance costs. The DallasFort Worth market can be competitive, so understanding what you can afford will prevent financial strain down the road.
Work with a Local Real Estate Agent
An experienced real estate agent who knows the DFW market can be invaluable. They can help you find homes that fit your needs, guide you through negotiations, and ensure you don’t overpay. Agents also have
Continued on page 6
seen since the height of the pandemic,” Cole said. “This increase in demand is largely driven by higher grocery prices. Fully funding SNAP and maintaining the adequacy of benefits is good for everyone. It provides critical nutrition support for families, supports local economies, creates jobs, and has a proven long-term return on investment. Cutting benefits would undermine SNAP’s ability to prevent hunger, make it harder for food banks to meet the needs in our communities, weaken our nation’s economy, and threaten to derail Farm Bill negotiations. It’s a choice between a win-win-win and lose-lose-lose scenario.”
The Feeding Texas network strongly urges both the U.S. House and Senate to refrain from cutting SNAP or other critical nutrition programs.
Corporate America Abandons DE&I, But Black-Owned Brands Are the Future
By Stacy M. Brown NNPA Newswire Senior
Correspondent
While corporations retreat, Black entrepreneurs continue to build, innovate, and thrive. According to NBC Select, over three million Blackowned brands are in the U.S., spanning every industry imaginable. As corporate America abandons its DE&I commitments, the power shifts to conscious consumers who invest in businesses that uplift and sustain marginalized communities.
Here are just a few standout Black-owned brands leading the charge:
Clothing & Accessories
• Telfar – The brand that revolutionized luxury fashion with its motto: “Not for you—for everyone.”
Hanifa – A trailblazing womenswear brand founded by Anifa Mvuemba, known for its stunning digital fashion shows.
Pyer Moss – Founded by Kerby Jean-Raymond, this label merges activism and high fashion.
• Grayscale – A streetwear brand bringing bold aesthetics and social commentary to the forefront.
• Sassy Jones – A standout accessories brand built on bold, unapologetic self-expression.
Beauty & Skincare
• Fenty Beauty – Rihanna’s globally inclusive beauty empire that set a new standard for shade diversity.
• Mented Cosmetics –Beauty products created specifically for deeper skin tones.
• The Lip Bar – A Black-woman-owned brand disrupting the beauty industry with bold, non-toxic lipstick shades.
• Pattern Beauty –Founded by Tracee Ellis Ross, specializing in products for textured hair.
• Alikay Naturals –Natural haircare products with a devoted following.
Home & Lifestyle
Estelle Colored Glass – Hand-blown glassware that brings Black excellence to fine dining.
• Jungalow – A home décor brand from designer Justina Blakeney, blending culture and bohemian flair.
• Linoto – Luxury linen bedding made with sustainability in mind.
• Yowie – A modern design studio curating unique home goods from independent artists.
Food & Beverage
• Partake Foods – A Black-owned snack company offering allergen-friendly cookies and treats.
• McBride Sisters Wine Collection – The largest Black-owned wine company in the U.S., run by two sisters redefining the industry.
• Uncle Nearest Whiskey – Honoring Nathan
“Nearest” Green, the Black distiller behind Jack Daniel’s original recipe.
• Capital City Mambo Sauce – The D.C. favorite taking over the condiment industry.
Meanwhile, corporate America’s performative commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion (DE&I) is unraveling at an alarming rate. In the years following the murder of George Floyd, corporations made bold promises to support marginalized communities, pledging billions in investments to level the playing field. But as the political landscape shifts and accountability wanes, those commitments are being discarded. A staggering number of major corporations have scaled back or eliminated DE&I programs: Amazon, Target, Amtrak, Goldman Sachs, Disney, Deloitte, PBS, Google, Pepsi, General Motors (GM), GE, Intel, PayPal, Chipotle, Comcast, Accenture, The Smithsonian Institution, the FBI, Meta, Walmart, Boeing, Molson Coors, Ford Motor Co., Harley-Davidson, and John Deere have all abandoned or severely reduced their diversity efforts.
The very companies that once paraded their commitment to racial equity in multimilliondollar ad campaigns are now quietly erasing those initiatives from their bottom lines.
Not everyone is staying silent. Dr. Jamal Bryant, the influential pastor of New Birth Missionary Baptist Church in metro Atlanta, is leading a 40-day economic fast—or boycott—of Target in direct response to the retailer’s decision to phase out its DE&I
initiatives. Target, headquartered in Minneapolis—the city where George Floyd was murdered in 2020—originally pledged $2 billion in investments toward Blackowned businesses. That commitment was due in December 2025, but on January 24, Target announced it would end its DE&I efforts, effectively abandoning that financial commitment. Bryant, appearing on the Black Press’ Let It Be Known news program, condemned the move.
“After the murder of George Floyd, they made a $2 billion commitment to invest in Black businesses,” he said.
“When they pulled out of the DE&I agreement in January, they also canceled that $2 billion commitment.”
Target is just the beginning. Bryant calls for 100,000 people to halt their spending at the retail giant as a direct challenge to corporate America’s retreat from racial equity.
“Black people spend $12 million a day at Target,” he said.
“Because of how many dollars are spent there and the ab-
sence of commitment to our community, we are focusing on Target first.” The boycott, designed to coincide with Lent, aims to leverage Black economic power to hold corporations accountable. Within just one week, 50,000 people had already signed the petition at targetfast.org, signaling the growing momentum behind the movement.
Bryant’s demands go beyond reinstating DE&I.
“White women are the number one beneficiary of DE&I,” he noted. “What I am asking for is a quarter of a billion dollars to be invested in Black banks so that our Black businesses can scale.”
He also called for Target to partner with HBCUs by integrating their business departments into its supply chain infrastructure. Meanwhile, the National Newspaper Publishers Association (NNPA)—the nation’s largest Black-owned media organization—has announced its own national public education and selective buying campaign in response to corporate Ameri-
ca’s retreat from DE&I. “We are the trusted voice of Black America, and we will not be silent or nonresponsive to the rapid rise of renewed Jim Crow racist policies in corporate America,” said NNPA Chairman Bobby R. Henry Sr. NNPA President and CEO Dr. Benjamin F. Chavis Jr. reinforced the need for financial realignment. “Black Americans spend $2 trillion annually. We must evaluate and realign to question why we continue to spend our money with companies that do not respect us. These contradictions will not go unchal-
lenged.” In response, Bryant has partnered with Ron Busby, president and CEO of the U.S. Black Chambers, to provide consumers with a directory of 300,000 Black-owned businesses. “You can’t tell people what not to do without showing them what to do,” Bryant said. “If you’re not going to Target or Walmart but need essentials like toilet paper, soap, or detergent, we’ll show you where to get them and reinvest in Black businesses.”
And the impact of the boycott is already felt. Since Black consumers began boycotting Target, the company’s stock has dropped by $11, Bryant noted. Stockholders are now suing Target due to the adverse effects of the boycott on its stock value. Bryant said the question is no longer whether corporate America will keep its promises—it’s clear that it won’t. He said the same companies that plastered Black squares on social media and made grand statements about inclusion are now proving where their true priorities lie. “America has shown us time and time again: if it doesn’t make dollars, it doesn’t make sense," Bryant stated.
Photo Caption: YouTube Screengrab
Sunday School Lesson Sunday School Lesson
Ministering Mightily
Matthew 25:31–46
Key Text: Then shall the King say unto them on his right hand, Come, ye blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world. For I was an hungred, and ye gave me meat, I was thirsty, and ye gave me drink, I was a stranger, and ye took me in.
—Matthew 25:34–35
Introduction: Not for the World A businessman traveled to India to represent his company at an important meeting. After the day’s sessions ended, the man walked through a part of the city where lepers were being cared for. He watched as a woman tenderly washed the feet of an older man suffering from leprosy. The businessman watched for a moment, shook his head, and then said, with disdain, “Miss, I wouldn’t do that for the world.” Without looking up, the woman replied, “Mister, for the world, I wouldn’t do it either.”
To minister to others in Jesus’ name often means going where most others would not. Those who do so may wonder at times whether their efforts are significant. Today’s lesson reveals the answer.
The setting of our lesson is during a busy day of teaching during the final week of Jesus’ earthly ministry. As part of His “Olivet Discourse” of Matthew 24:3–25:46, Jesus taught the truth of today’s lesson, probably on Wednesday of what is often called Passion Week.
The Olivet Discourse was set in motion when the disciples asked Jesus about the sign of His coming and of the end of the world (Matthew 24:3). Jesus began His reply by warning against deceptive signs and predictions of persecution (24:4–26). Then, He shifted to specifying genuine signs (24:27–35). This was followed immediately by a lengthy challenge to be ready to expect the unexpected (24:36–51).
Jesus went on to illustrate with two parables all that He had been saying: the parable of the 10 virgins (Matthew 25:1–13) and the parable of the talents (25:14–30; in Luke 19:12–27 this is the parable of pounds).
The chapter closes with a dramatic picture of the final judgment—today’s lesson of Matthew 25:31–46. Some students think this is a parable, while others do not. Parables usually compare something earthly to “the kingdom of heaven” (Matthew 13:24, 31–34; 25:1, 14; etc.), but Matthew 25:31–46 does not have this feature. The only comparison that could result in this being considered a parable is Matthew 25:32, where the final judgment is compared with a shepherd’s separation of “sheep” from “goats.” However, this fits
better the idea of metaphor (figurative or symbolic language) rather than a parable.
I. The Judge (Matthew 25:31–33)
Glorious Moment (v. 31)
When the Son of man shall come in his glory, and all the holy angels with him, then shall he sit upon the throne of his glory.
With this declaration, Jesus was still answering the disciples’ question in Matthew 24:3: “What shall be the sign of thy coming, and of the end of the world?” The word when reinforces the certainty of Jesus’ return (compare Matthew 16:27). That word also anticipates a time factor as part of the declaration. But during Jesus’ earthly ministry, no one except God the Father knew the specific day of Jesus’ return (24:36). The phrase Son of man, for its part, confirms Jesus will be the one returning since that phrase is His frequent selfdesignation (examples: 9:6; 16:13; 20:18; compare Daniel 7:13).
It is instructive to contrast the circumstances of Jesus’ first coming (advent) with those of His second coming. The first time, in Bethlehem, He came as a baby born under very modest conditions. His return will be anything but ordinary; He will come in his glory, and He will be seated upon a glorious throne. A “multitude of the heavenly host” was present to herald Jesus’ first coming, announcing His birth to shepherds near Bethlehem with the words “Glory to God in the highest” (Luke 2:13–14). When Jesus returns, He will be accompanied by not only all the holy angels but also by “his saints”—godly people who have died (1 Thessalonians 3:13; Jude 14).
Great Gathering (vv. 32–33)
And before him shall be gathered all nations, and he shall separate them one from another, as a shepherd divideth his sheep from the goats. At Jesus’ first coming, the angels spoke of good news to “all people” (Luke 2:10); at His return, it will be good news to some but bad news to others as everyone is gathered before Him. While other passages in the Bible emphasize that every person must give a personal, individual account before Jesus (examples: Romans 14:12; 2 Corinthians 5:10), the focus in the verse before us is on all nations appearing before Him. In the first century, many Jewish people believed that when the Messiah arrived, He would take control over powerful nations like the Roman Empire, as this verse describes. The purpose of Jesus’ first coming, however, was “to seek and to save that which was lost” (Luke 19:10). Jesus’ intent was and is for all nations to receive the message of this good news (Matthew 28:19–20). His second coming will bring
all nations (both ancient and modern) under the power of His mighty hand and the authority of His flawless judgment.
Judgment will result in separation, as one group is distinguished from another. Separation language is very important in the New Testament, and it always signals an evaluation of some kind for categorizing things, behavior, or people themselves. These distinctions are intended to be helpful (example: 2 Corinthians 6:17), but some are counterproductive (example: Galatians 2:12). Other ke verses in Matthew regarding eternal separation are 13:40–43, 49–50.
And he shall set the sheep on his right hand, but the goats on the left.
To be at a ruler’s right hand was to be in the place of approval and acceptance (compare Psalm 110:1 [quoted in Hebrews 1:13]; Acts 7:55–56). It is in this prominent position that the sheep are placed. Note that Jesus describes only two groups. When He carries out His judgment at this gathering, there will be no middle ground, no “provisional sheep.” Although we tend to view others in shades of gray, Jesus will be able to pronounce judgment clearly and decisively.
II. The Sheep (Matthew 25:34–40)
Invitation (v. 34)
Then shall the King say unto them on his right hand, Come, ye blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world. Speaking as the King, Jesus’ first pronouncement is to those on his right hand, the sheep of the analogy. Their invitation to inherit the kingdom prepared for them is an invitation to enter Heaven. The fact that this kingdom has been ready for them since the foundation of the world alludes to the truth of Genesis 1:1.
Even now, Christians belong to the kingdom of Jesus, having been delivered from the realm of spiritual darkness (Colossians 1:13). We wait for the ultimate consummation of that kingdom, even as Paul did (2 Timothy 4:18).
Explanation (vv. 35–36)
For I was an hungred, and ye gave me meat. I was thirsty, and ye gave me drink. I was a stranger, and ye took me in. Naked, and ye clothed me. I was sick, and ye visited me. I was in prison, and ye came unto me.
The favorable verdict resulted from six ways the favored helped the king and met His needs. Their conduct is reminiscent of that in the parable about the Samaritan who met the needs of someone after others had merely passed by (Luke 10:30–34).
Such a heavy emphasis on doing good to others may indicate that Judgment Day will be a time for counting up such deeds and calculating our “final score.” So how does Je-
sus’ commendation of good works here square with the biblical teaching on salvation by grace? In truth, salvation encompasses both divine initiative and human response. Salvation by God’s grace results in appropriate good works (Ephesians 2:8–10). We are not saved by works, but we are saved for works— a point James makes especially clear (James 2:14–26).
Consternation (vv. 37–39)
Then shall the righteous answer him, saying, Lord, when saw we thee an hungred, and fed thee? or thirsty, and gave thee drink? When saw we thee a stranger, and took thee in? or naked, and clothed thee?
Those designated as “sheep” are also the righteous. They will express their confusion at being told they were serving Jesus the King during their acts of mercy. They had seen themselves as meeting the needs of ordinary people, not Jesus. When had they ever encountered Jesus during such times?
Or when saw we thee sick, or in prison, and came unto thee?
The last act of mercy mentioned is the most fascinating of all. Prisons in the ancient world were not places of longterm incarceration as they are today. Prisons back then were places of short-term custody where perpetrators awaited either (1) corporal punishment such as flogging and then release or (2) execution. At what point would the righteous sheep ever have encountered King Jesus in such a place, especially after His ascension (Acts 1:9)? The answer comes next.
Commendation (v. 40)
And the King shall answer and say unto them, Verily I say unto you, inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me.
Here is the answer to the sheep’s bewilderment. Whatever the sheep have done to help even the least of these my brethren, they have done it to the greatest of all, King Jesus. The word brethren indicates Christians—those who have accepted the kingship of Jesus (compare John 1:12–13; Hebrews 2:11). This does not mean, however, that we have the freedom to ignore the needs of those who are not followers of Jesus (compare Proverbs 3:27; 25:21–22; Matthew 5:45; Galatians 6:10). Throughout Jesus’ life, the least and lowliest of the people in His surroundings received special attention.
At this point in our reading of the text, some may ask, “If Jesus is providing these details about the final judgment, will we even raise such questions as the sheep are pictured as asking since we already know what the answer is?”
Perhaps the element of surprise will occur as each of us individually comes before Jesus to be judged (2 Corinthians 5:10). There, we will see the true impact of our service
to others. We likely will be astonished to discover the occasions when we were serving Jesus and did not realize it.
III. The Goats (Matthew 25:41–46)
Rejection (v. 41)
Then shall he say also unto them on the left hand, Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels.
Next, Jesus will address the goats, those on His left. Note how the command to this group is exactly the opposite of that given to the group on Jesus’ right. The sheep will be invited to “come”; the goats will be ordered to depart. The sheep will be called “blessed”; the goats will be called cursed. One group will inherit a kingdom; the other will be sent into everlasting fire.
Unlike the sheep, the goats won’t be sent to a place that has been prepared just for them. Instead, the goats are to be sent to the place prepared for the devil and his angels (compare Revelation 20:10, 14–15; 21:8).
Explanation (vv. 42–43)
For I was an hungred, and ye gave me no meat. I was thirsty, and ye gave me no drink. I was a stranger, and ye took me not in; naked, and ye clothed me not; sick, and in prison, and ye visited me not.
King Jesus will confront the goats with the fact of having faced the same groups in need that the sheep faced. But whereas the sheep are pictured as having helped people in need, the goats chose to ignore those people. It is rather sobering to consider that the goats are not accused of doing anything evil—like murder, adultery, or theft. Rather, they are condemned for doing nothing. They had opportunities to meet needs, just as the sheep had. But the goats chose to look the other way. Sins of commission and sins of omission can both be sins (James 4:17)!
Consternation (v. 44)
Then shall they also answer him, saying, Lord, when saw we thee an hungred, or athirst, or a stranger, or naked, or sick, or in prison, and did not minister unto thee?
The goats will react with the same surprise that the sheep exhibited. The sheep will be astonished to be considered as having helped Jesus when they helped those in need; the goats no doubt will reason that had they realized the danger of their lack of action, they would have been more than eager to help. However, such logic is flawed, as it is circular. The goats will have no excuse (compare 1 John 3:17).
Condemnation (vv. 45–46)
Then shall he answer them, saying, Verily I say unto you, inasmuch as ye did it not to one of the least of these, ye did it not to me. The failure of the goats to address the needs of others is a failure to serve Jesus (com-
pare James 4:17). This is an image reversed from that of the sheep. And these shall go away into everlasting punishment, but the righteous into life eternal.
It is virtually impossible to imagine a greater contrast between the everlasting punishment that awaits the goats and the life eternal that awaits the sheep (compare Galatians 6:8–10). The words everlasting and eternal have the same meaning here, since they are translations of the same Greek word. The goats’ endless punishment will be where “the fire is not quenched” (Mark 9:48, quoting Isaiah 66:24). Hell is a place of unspeakable torment.
In contrast, eternal life awaits those numbered among the sheep (compare and contrast Danie 12:2; John 5:29). Nothing is said in today’s passage about this life other than it is eternal. But other portions of Scripture provide insights concerning it. The book of Revelation describes a heavenly city, eternally bright, inhabited by only the redeemed. It is a place where “the former things are passed away” (Revelation 21:4)—everything associated with a sin-cursed, broken world. God will be with His people, and they will be with Him—forever.
Conclusion: Three Functions
In today’s passage, Jesus holds three positions: the king on His glorious throne (Matthew 25:31, 34), a shepherd dividing sheep from goats, and the judge determining the eternal destinies of those gathered before Him. We must keep in mind the unique manner in which Jesus exercised each of these roles. He is no ordinary king, shepherd, or judge.
King. Pontius Pilate brought Jesus before the crowd and proclaimed sarcastically, “Behold your King!” (John 19:14). Pilate spoke better tha knew: Jesus was indeed a king, but not one of this world (6:15; 18:36; Revelation 17:14; 19:16). We want to stand confidently before King Jesus on Judgment Day in anticipation of inheriting the kingdom. Therefore, we must realize that meeting the needs of others means serving our king.
Shepherd. When Jesus declared, “I am the good shepherd” in John 10:11, He said, “the good shepherd giveth his life for the sheep.” Jesus’ death pro vided a propitiation (atonement) for the sins of the entire world (1 John 2:2). But what has been provided must be accepted in order to be counted among the sheep under His care.
Judge. The one who said “I judge no man” during His earthly ministry (John 8:15) becomes the ultimate judge at His return—one before whom all must appear (Matthew 16:27; John 5:22–23; Acts 10:42; 17:31; 2 Corinthians 5:10). Where’s Jesus?
Commentary Commentary
Trump’s Funding Freezes and Clawbacks: Illegal, Stupid, Dangerous
By Ben Jealous
(TriceEdneyWire.com) -
“Panic, confusion, and anger.”
That’s how BlueGreen Alliance president Jason Walsh described to CNN the state that Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) grant awardees were left in after having their funding frozen (then unfrozen, then frozen again) by the Trump administration.
“Contracts are going to get broken if this doesn’t stop, and workers are going to get laid off,” said Walsh. “I didn’t anticipate how fully brazen they’d be in ignoring the courts.”
It is brazen – for its lawlessness and cruelty, as well as its stupidity.
There’s a lot of lawbreaking going on, from usurping Congress’s constitutional “power of the purse” to defying court orders. But administration efforts to freeze funding appropriated by Congress and claw back money already obligated under contracts threatens our national credibility. And now, with EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin’s attempts to pull back $20 billion in money that has already been awarded under the Infla-
Ben Jealous
tion Reduction Act’s Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund (GGRF), we are seeing how the administration’s tactics could potentially cost taxpayers more in lawsuit damages than the money they are trying to freeze and claw back!
And, of course, in that scenario, Americans would lose out on the purpose of the appropriated funds: to lower energy costs, revitalize local economies, and address the climate crisis.
The targeted $20 billion in GGRF money is specifically meant to mobilize financing and private capital into clean energy projects to create jobs. And this comes on the heels of Zeldin’s EPA already having illegally frozen funds under contract
through the EPA’s Solar for All program.
Federal judges are saying the money needs to keep flowing. One in Rhode Island last week reaffirmed his temporary restraining order to block Trump’s funding freeze and noted the administration was in violation of the order.
As a former congressman and litigator, Administrator Zeldin should have at least a basic understanding of the law. And anyone with common sense should realize attempting to claw back already-disbursed funds to help us avoid the very worst of the climate crisis is as illogical as it is illegal. These investments are lowering costs for families, providing more reliable and resilient energy options in communities across the country, and helping create good jobs.
If you were to do a quick scan of this administration’s actions and statements over its first four weeks in office, you would see a clear list of national priorities it is willing to sacrifice for tax cuts for billionaires: public health, national parks, cancer research, food for starving people (both at home and abroad), the security
HUD Job Cuts Equal a Housing Implosion
By April Ryan
Large-scale protests in major cities across the nation and Washington D.C. continue to grow in number and discontent against the drastic Trump administration job cuts. The mass demonstrations have not moved President Trump and Elon Musk to change course to make the US government leaner. Recently, Black Press USA spoke with Black Republican and media mogul Armstrong Williams. “Trump is in charge, and no one is stopping him,” according to Williams. One of the many DOGE targets is the Department of Housing and Urban Development. Elon Musk and DOGE are expected to reduce HUD staff by 50%. According to a source close to the department, those cuts would “hol-
Neighborhood – New Homes In a Line – Sunset – North Carolina – Telephoto (Photo Credit by Carlo Franco)
low out the agency.” That same former official confirms HUD senior staff have already been eliminated. The DOGE anticipated next step in the elimination process targets job cuts of four to five thousand people [HUD employees] across the country.”
These cuts would create a work slowdown and a backlog for the “8 million” people
Talking Real Estate: Tips for First-Time
access to off-market listings and can provide insights into up-and-coming neighborhoods.
Research Neighborhoods and Market Trends
Dallas-Fort Worth is a diverse area with a wide range of neighborhoods. Research factors like school districts, commute times, and future development plans. If affordability is a concern, consider emerging areas where home values are expected to rise.
Be Prepared for Competition
With demand often exceeding supply, homes in DFW can sell quickly. Be ready to make a strong offer by getting pre-approved and having your paperwork in order. Consider writing a personal letter to the seller if the market is particularly competitive.
Don’t Skip the Home Inspection
A home may look perfect on the surface, but an inspection can reveal hidden issues such as foundation problems, roofing concerns, or plumbing defects. In Texas, foundation issues are common, so ensure your inspector thoroughly checks for any potential problems before finalizing the purchase.
Plan for Closing Costs and Additional Expenses
Closing costs in Texas typically range from 2% to 5% of the home’s purchase price. These include lender fees, title insurance, and appraisal fees. Additionally, budget for moving costs, utility deposits, and any immediate home improvements.
Take Advantage of FirstTime Homebuyer Programs
Several state and federal programs offer assistance to first-time buyers, such as down payment assistance, tax credits, and low-interest loans. The Texas State Affordable Housing Corporation (TSAHC) and My First Texas Home program are great resources for financial aid. Your mortgage lender will be able to guide you in the right direction to secure the best programs. Be aware of the current administration cuts in programs, first-time home buyer’s programs may and may not be affected. Be patient and stay flexible, finding the right home can take time, and you may need to make compromises. Don’t rush into a purchase out of frustration. If a deal doesn’t work out, trust that a better opportunity will come along.
of our nuclear arsenal, and good jobs for working families – just to name a few. What would also stand out are the lengths to which this administration is willing to go – and the straws at which they are willing to grasp – in their efforts to skirt the law and inflict harm on American communities.
One of the administration’s favorite talking points a few weeks ago was that the so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) had, according to President Trump, “identified and stopped $50 million being sent to Gaza to buy condoms for Hamas.” The claim was meant to justify DOGE’s government-wide slash-and-burn campaign that had just gotten started with USAID, as well as diversity, equity, and inclusion offices and Environmental Justice programs.
DOGE head and Trump’s co-president Elon Musk fed the claim into the Far Right’s manufactured outrage machine on his X platform, where it snowballed (reminiscent of the racist lie during the presidential campaign that members of the Haitian immigrant community in Springfield, Ohio were eating local pets). Trump himself repeated the claim multiple times and even inflated – baselessly – the cost of the supposed condom shipments to $100
million.
Of course, there was not a shred of truth to those claims. A former Biden administration official who worked on Gaza aid called the claim “imaginary” and said, “It’s a lie, they are making s*** up.” It turns out the Gaza mentioned in the records found by DOGE was probably in reference to HIV and Tuberculosis aid to Gaza Province in Mozambique, and there were no massive condom deliveries to there nor anywhere in the Middle East.
Now, in trying to defend his reckless and ideological war on clean energy funding, EPA Administrator Zeldin and others in the Trump administration are playing the same game. Zeldin and the administration have suggested the contracts with EPA grantees and the process by which funds are administered by Citibank through the GGRF were rushed, not properly vetted, and done in some novel and inappropriate way.
But Zealan Hoover, who directed IRA program implementation at the EPA under President Biden, attests the process and institutions involved were thoroughly vetted and pointed out the government has been using similar arrangements with private banks since the 1800s. And Zeldin’s ‘evidence?’ A supposed sting video by the group Project Veritas, infamous for dishonest smear attacks using highly edited recordings of its targets. Zeldin cited a recording by the group in a bizarre rant he posted to X last week.
Donald Trump and Lee Zeldin should quit skirting the law and defending their actions with outrageous lies. And we should all recognize their actions as the latest evidence they are willing to sink to any low to do the bidding of their fossil fuels cronies.
Ben Jealous is the Executive Director of the Sierra Club and a Professor of Practice at the University of Pennsylvania.
serviced monthly by HUD, said the former official who wishes to remain anonymous. Meanwhile, one of the first cuts in the Trump HUD agency was the program to halt discrimination in housing appraisals that targeted Black homeowners. On a related note, the Black homeownership rate in 2025 is lower than that of 1968, the year the
continued on page 7
Continued from page 2
Purchasing your first home in the Dallas-Fort Worth area in 2025 can be a rewarding experience with the right preparation. By following these tips and working with trusted professionals, you can make informed decisions and find a home that suits your needs and budget.
Banks Cash in as Republicans Move to Kill Consumer Protections
By Stacy M. Brown, NNPA Newswire Senior
Correspondent
The Biden administration’s effort to rein in excessive overdraft fees is now under direct attack from congressional Republicans, who have launched a campaign to repeal the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) rule that would cap overdraft charges at $5. The move comes as the banking industry—one of Washington’s most powerful lobbying forces—pushes to preserve the estimated $8 billion in annual revenue it collects from these fees. Republicans introduced a Congressional Review Act (CRA) resolution of disapproval on Wednesday, a legislative maneuver that cannot be filibustered and, if passed and signed into law, would wipe out the CFPB rule. The rule, finalized in December, was designed to prevent banks from exploiting consumers through excessive fees, a practice the agency found to be rife with deceptive tactics, including manipulating transaction orders to maximize overdraft charges.
“Republicans have introduced legislation to increase your bank fees,” former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg wrote on X. “Seriously, they are doing this.
And it sounds like the Trump administration supports it.” The American Prospect reported that Republicans in Congress have clarified who will gain from eliminating the rule. “The CRA has the support of key stakeholders, including the Consumer Bankers Association, Independent Community Bankers of America, American Bankers Association, and America’s Credit Unions,” Emma Janssen wrote for The American Prospect. These organizations are deeply entrenched in the banking industry, advocating for financial institutions rather than consumers—the Consumer Bankers Association lobbies on be-
HUD Job Cuts
half of banks with more than $10 billion in assets. The Independent Community Bankers of America represents 5,000 smaller banks nationwide. The American Bankers Association, one of the largest lobbying groups in the country, has made preserving overdraft fees a key legislative priority. America’s Credit Unions, which claims to represent credit unions, has also sided with the banks in opposing the CFPB rule.
“It is extremely telling that the main stakeholders who want to get rid of the CFPB rule are bankers rather than regular Americans who use banks,” Janssen noted. The lawmakers leading the
Continued from page 6 Fair Housing Act was implemented. Sources have said the HUD job cuts will create a negative jolt for some cities that depend on block grants, funding for public housing, housing vouchers, monies for housing the homeless, housing counseling, remediation of lead pipes, FHA loans, Fair Housing programs along with down payment assistance that helps first time home buyers. As we count the numbers, hundreds of thousands of people receive home loans from the Department of Housing and Urban Development.
Viewing the current state of the housing market, there is “a slowdown in the Hous-
Ministering Mightily
We live in a time and culture when the world seems to treat the Christian faith with contempt. Such an abrasive atmosphere is predicted in 2 Peter 3:3–4: “There shall come in the last days scoffers, walking after their own lusts, and saying, Where is the promise of his coming?” Even Christians might wonder Where’s Jesus? in times of despair.
Answering that question may be compared somewhat
to the Where’s Waldo? books that have fascinated children. The books contain illustrations depicting crowds engaged in various activities at specific locations. The reader is challenged to find “Waldo” somewhere in the crowd. The key to doing so lies in Waldo’s outward appearance: he can be found if one first knows how he can be recognized. Jesus makes it clear in today’s passage that whenever we serve anyone in need, we are
ing Market” as there is inventory for higher priced homes but those houses are “staying on the market longer” according to Marvetta Bozeman the President of the Empire Board of Realtists. When asked about affordable housing, Bozeman says, “The affordability is gone.”
Continued from page 4
serving Him. Christians often see themselves as being the hands, feet, and voice of Jesus to other people, and rightly so. But Jesus is also seen in the needs of others around us. Do you have eyes to “see Him” in such situations?
Thought to Remember: Jesus is closer than we realize.
Standard Publishing. KJV
Standard Lesson Commentary® 2024-2025 (p. 600). David C Cook. Kindle Edition.
Bank of New York Mellon, the 13th-largest bank in the country. Scott’s biggest contributor was Goldman Sachs. Hill, a former CEO of an Arkansas community bank, has a direct financial interest in preserving overdraft fees. At the same time, Scott has taken more than $5.3 million in campaign contributions from the financial services industry over his career, according to The Lever. “It’s up to Republicans to decide whether they will follow Hill and Scott and reveal themselves as objectively pro–junk fee by passing the resolution,” Janssen declared.
charge—House Financial Services Committee Chairman French Hill (R-AR) and Senate Banking Committee Chairman Tim Scott (R-SC)—both have deep financial ties to the banking industry. Hill’s top campaign donor last year was the
Republicans defending their move claim that removing the rule is about protecting “consumer choice.” Hill, in announcing the resolution of disapproval, said that the CFPB rule “[hurts] consumers who deserve financial protections and greater choice.”
But as Janssen asserted, “What they call ‘choice’ is
actually taking money away from consumers and giving it over to the banks, and it represents the dubious position that banks simply have to rip off their customers, or they cannot survive.” Lindsey Johnson, president and CEO of the Consumer Bankers Association, also tried to frame overdraft fees as a necessary tool for working-class Americans. “Millions of hardworking Americans, including the one in five without access to credit, rely on overdraft services as a valuable financial lifeline, yet the Biden-Chopra CFPB’s overdraft rule threatens to cut off their access to this essential bank product,” Johnson said. Janssen countered: “Hundreds of dollars in fees per family per year is far from a ‘valuable financial lifeline.’ If you’re going to sell out consumers to hand bankers billions of dollars, you might as well be honest about it.”
Dr. Karen C. Molinar Is the Lone Finalist for FWISD Superintendent
Final Board Action Expected March 11, 2025
Dr. Karen C. Molinar has been named the lone finalist for the position of Superintendent of Fort Worth ISD.
District trustees voted unanimously on the decision during a regular board meeting on Tuesday, February 18. In accordance with Texas law, a 21-day waiting period will now begin, with final board action expected at a special called meeting on March 11, 2025.
Dr. Molinar has been serving as Interim Superintendent since October 8. 2024. Previously, she served as Deputy Superintendent for Administrative Services, providing strategic oversight for multiple divisions, including Budget & Finance, Talent Management, Safety & Security, Assessment Data and Quality, Strategic Initiatives, Legal Services, and Professional Standards & Employee Services. Throughout her career, she has spearheaded initiatives to enhance operational efficiency, improve student outcomes, and support campus leadership development.
“We are excited to name Dr. Karen C. Molinar as the lone finalist for superintendent of Fort Worth ISD,” said Board President Roxanne Martinez.
Dr. Karen C. Molinar
“Her deep knowledge of the district, strong leadership, and unwavering commitment to student success make her the right choice to lead Fort Worth ISD into the future.”
Dr. Molinar has held numerous leadership roles in Fort Worth ISD, including Deputy Superintendent (2020-2024), Chief of Staff (2018-2020), Chief of Elementary Leadership (20162018), and multiple director, principal and assistant principal positions. She is known for her student-centered approach, collaborative leadership, and dedication to educational excellence.
“I am honored to be selected as the lone finalist for Fort Worth ISD superintendent,” said Dr. Molinar. “Fort Worth
ISD is my home and I look forward to working alongside our talented educators and staff to ensure every student receives a high-quality education that prepares them for future success.”
Dr. Molinar holds a Doctorate in Education Administration from Texas Wesleyan University (2023), a Master’s in Education Administration from Tarleton State University (2003), a Bachelor of Science from Salisbury State University (1997), and an Associate Degree in Early Childhood Education from Delaware Technical and Community College (1993). She holds multiple certifications, including Texas Superintendent, Texas Principal, and Maryland and Delaware certifications. She is an active member of professional organizations, including the Texas Urban Council, Council of Great City Schools, Texas Association of School Boards, Texas Association of School Administrators, and Association of Texas Professional Educators.
The Board will take final action on Dr. Molinar’s appointment following the state-mandated 21 day waiting period.
Here’s
What’s Happening Here’s What’s Happening
Ongoing Events
Are you a resident of the Rolling Hills area? Join the Glencrest Civic League Neighborhood Association and become part of our mission to create a safe, secure, clean, and well-maintained community. We actively seek residents’ support for our mission by spearheading neighborhood committee initiatives, coordinating, supporting, and planning various community events, actively engaging local leaders and nurturing a strong sense of community unity.
Join us for our Monthly Community Meetings:
• When: 10:00 AM on the 3rd Saturday of Each Month
• Where: C.R. Bradley Center, 2600 Timberline Drive, Fort Worth, TX 76119. For more information and to become a member, check out our Facebook Page (Glencrest Civic League Neighborhood Association) or visit our website at https:// www.glencrest.org. You may also email us at glencrest. na@gmail.com.
Fort Worth Wiley College Alumni Club Membership Meeting: Second Saturday of each month, 1 p.m., Carter Metropolitan CME Church, 4601 Wichita St. Fort Worth
76119. For additional information, contact one of the following members: Helen Crowder (817) 688-8937, Larry Pugh (817) 293-6543, Daisy Kahn (817) 292-1077.
I.M. Terrell Alumni Association Membership Meeting, 1st Tuesday of each month, 5 p.m., I. M. Terrell Stem/VPA Academy, 1411 I M Terrell Way, Fort Worth 76102.
M.L.Kirkpatrick Alumni Association Membership Meeting: First Saturday of each month at 2 p.m. at Shiloh Missionary Baptist Church, 2823 North Houston Street, Fort Worth 76106.
P.L. Dunbar Alumni Association Memberships Meeting: 3rd Saturday of each month at 3p.m. at The CenterFor STOP SIX HERITAGE, 5100 Willie St. next to Young Men’s Leadership Academy, Fort Worth. pldalumniassoc@gmail.com
Como Alumni. Every third Tureday, 7 p.m., Como Community Center, 4900 Horne Street, Fort Worth, TX 76107
Join the Texas Coalition of Black Democrats! We meet every fourth Saturday of the month from 5-6 p.m. at the Charles F. Griffin Sub-court-
house, 3500 Miller Ave. Fort Worth 76119. New Monthly Speakers.
United Methodist Church, 522 Missouri Ave. Fort Worth 76104. The Food pantry is open on the third Saturday of each month from 8 -10 a.m. For questions or concerns, please contact the Church Office at (817) 336-2117.
Forest Hill Ushers Union, “Welcomes All Church Ushers/Doorkeepers in Tarrant County”
Juniors & Young People (7-18)
Young Adults (19-35)
Seniors (36+)
Affiliations:
Texas Church Ushers
Southern Region Ushers
National United Church Ushers
Association of America, Inc. (NUCUAAA) For more information contact: Wanda King (817) 821-3017, Helen Moore (817) 584-7370, Thomas E. Troupe (817) 2292509
AARP Southeast Chapter #4508. Meets the 4th Wednesday of each month at 10:30 a.m., Southside Community Center, 959 E. Rosedale, Fort Worth, TX 76104. For additional information contact Debra Rivers by email:riv3ers@sbcglobal.net.
Public Transportation Help
Are you in need of transportation services? Here’s a list of resources that are available to you across Tarrant County.
Trinity Metro TEXRail operates daily between downtown Fort Worth and DFW International Airport’s Terminal B. Serving Fort Worth, North Richland Hills, Grapevine. RIDETRINITYMETRO.org/texrail or 817-2158600
Trinity Railway Express operates between downtown
Fort Worth and downtown Dallas. Serving Fort Worth, Hurst, Irving, Dallas. trinityrailwayexpress.org or 817215-8600
ZIPZONE on-demand service areas: Alliance, Crowley, Mercantile. Trinity Metro has expanded the Southside ZIPZONE to reach the TCU campus, the Fort Worth Zoo and the entertainment district along the West 7th corridor, including Crockett Row and Montgomery Plaza. Formerly known as the Near Southside ZIPZONE, the service area will continue to include access to the hospitals and facilities within the Medical District and the many popular destinations along Magnolia Avenue, plus grocery stores and other services throughout the Southside. Southside ZIPZONE riders may also con
La Vida News The Black Voice