| Issue 11 | Volume 148 | Tuesday, December 5, 2017 | theavion.com |
Photo Courtesy: Sodexo and Starbucks
Holy Frap! The New UC’s Starbucks is Bigger Than Ever! An inside look into the food options in the new Student Union
The final list of the food options that will be featured in the new Student Union has been released. Excluding Starbucks, all the dining services will be on the first floor towards the western portion of the Student Union. The most notable upgrade coming to the Student Union is a full-service Chickfil-A. Torrie Smith, the Sodexo operations manager on campus, explained that this Chick-fil-A would be like the ones in Daytona and Port Orange regarding the menu. This means that milkshakes, ice cream, and other menu items not offered in the UC's Chick-fil-A Express will now be available for consumption. A close second in popularity to Chickfil-A will be the debut of Qdoba. Qdoba is a Mexican chain restaurant that can best be described as being similar to Moe's or Chipotle. This comes as a significant upgrade from the Landing Strip's "fake Chipotle." The offerings will be similar with Qdoba serving tacos, burritos, quesadillas, and rice bowls.
“
The most notable upgrade coming to the Student Union is a full-service Chick-fil-A.
“
Other upgrades include Propellers moving out of the trailer on Legacy Walkway and into the Student Union. Their space will be bigger than what they had at the restaurant behind the College of Aviation that was demolished about two years ago. From what Smith told the Avion, the menu items have not seemed to change. The other upgrade comes to Starbucks which will be on the second floor. This Starbucks will be bigger than the current or previous iterations and
boasts more seating. It will have a more open feel and will also be getting furniture to give it a modern vibe. An annexed part of Starbucks will showcase students' photography and artwork. With the library occupying half of the third floor and all of the fourth floor, students will have to walk a bit from the library to get their caffeine fix. Other dining options in the upcoming Student Union include a "food servery area." This concept will be similar to a food court. This will include pizza, which is still being debated as to whether or not be a brick oven, a deli, a salad bar, a grill and comfort station. The last four options are the same as what the UC has currently. The back of the dining area is a network of halls and rooms where Sodexo employees can wheel carts and transport food back and forth to each of the dining locations. This will significantly decrease the traffic in the halls and students will not have to worry about being hit with carts. With these upgrades comes some questions. For instance, what will happen to Freshens? Freshens will not be in the Student Union and, therefore, its future is solely dependent on the future of the Student Center which has not yet been decided. It may be torn down or converted to something else. After the Student Union is completed, construction will begin on the newest dorm in the lot between Apollo and New Dorm. The first floor, of which, will have an all-you-can-eat buffet. This means that the space where the buffet is now in the Student Village is open to a plethora of options in the coming years. With the Student Union being a mere semester away from completion, The Avion Newspaper will provide as many updates as possible as they become available. Please check back next semester to learn more about the new Student Union.
Orbital ATK Takes on Dept. of Defense Michael Weinhoffer Staff Reporter On July 12, 2017, an opinion ruling was issued by Judge Leonie Brinkema of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia in the matter of Orbital ATK v. Walker. The plaintiff of the case was Orbital ATK, which frequently launches cargo missions to the International Space Station, and the defendant was the Department of Defense's Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), and its acting director, Dr. Steven Walker. The case concerned Orbital ATK and DARPA fighting over competing satellite programs, with the defense emerging victorious. This case is a great example of a private spaceflight company directly competing with the U.S. government, and thus warrants further discussion. In short, Orbital ATK argued that a DARPA satellite program called "Robotic Servicing of Geosynchronous Satellites" (RSGS) violates President Obama's 2010 National Space Policy (NSP), and therefore should be canceled. RSGS will consist of a spacecraft inspection, repairs, and correction of the orbit of geostationary satellites, which are very expensive and difficult to maintain once in orbit. This program has been in development for several years. On the private side, Orbital ATK has been developing Mission Extension Vehicles (MEVs) since 2008, which also aims to service geostationary satellites. In 2016, Orbital ATK's CEO wrote to DARPA and said that its well-developed RSGS program was in direct competition with Orbital ATK's program, and would harm investments into the MEV program. DARPA contended
“
This case is a great example of a private spaceflight company directly competing with the U.S. government, and thus warrants further discussion.
“
Collin Anderson News Editor
that the two competing programs had different goals, but Orbital ATK did not find the response satisfactory. DARPA still wanted Orbital ATK to manufacture the spacecraft, but Orbital ATK repeatedly proposed different paths that DARPA should take to avoid competition with the MEV program. After failing to come to a compromise on the goals of the RSGS mission, DARPA stopped working with Orbital ATK and instead selected one of Orbital ATK's competitors, Space Systems Loral, to manufacture the spacecraft. Shortly thereafter, Orbital ATK filed a lawsuit against DARPA, claiming that the agency violated multiple provisions of the 2010 NSP, which today remains the official space policy of the U.S. Orbital ATK claimed that DARPA, by law, needed to implement commercial space capabilities when developing the RSGS program, such as MEV components, and discouraged U.S. commercial space activity by not doing so. Instead of merging the MEV and RSGS program, DARPA decided to develop a very similar program with another partner. The case was brought before the district court to determine if DARPA had indeed violated the NSP and that the RSGS was to be canceled. Continued on B3 >>