Skip to main content

Jan. 9, 2025

Page 1

FOLLOW US ON SOCIAL MEDIA

@THECALIFORNIAAGGIE

SERVING THE UC DAVIS CAMPUS AND COMMUNITY SINCE 1915

@THECALIFORNIAGAGGIE

THEAGGIE.ORG

@THECALIFORNIAAGGIE

VOLUME 148, ISSUE 11 |THURSDAY, JANUARY 9, 2025

ASUCD Senate increases student pay at Nov. 26 meeting Senate Bill #22, which unanimously passed, leading to a $1 per hour pay raise to most ASUCD employees BY VINCE BASADA campus@theaggie.org ASUCD Internal Vice President Aaminah Mohammad called the Nov. 26 senate meeting, held over Zoom, to order at 6:10 p.m. She then read the UC Davis Land Acknowledgement. With several senators absent due to prior commitments and other difficulties joining the Zoom, the table moved to pass the consent calendar of legislation while a quorum was present. Senate Bill (SB) #20, allocating $90 to the Office of Senator Sabah Nabiha for a transfer student event, and SB#21, implementing accessibility requirements for ASUCD websites and social media pages, both passed unanimously. The table also approved a resolution to urge the US Forest Service to enact the National Old-Growth Amendment, protecting old-growth trees from logging and commercial exchange without issue. Continuing legislative discussion, the senate unanimously passed SB#22,

The ASUCD Senate during their Thursday meeting. (Jenna Lee / Aggie) increasing the hourly wages of most ASUCD workers by 50 cents. It allocates $151,844.12 for the wage increases for the upcoming winter and spring quarters, to take effect in January 2025. Alongside a previous budget allocation, the passing of SB#22 means that the majority of ASUCD workers will experience a $1/hour raise starting in 2025. Senator Max Gouvalaris stated a concern after the bill’s passing that

the focus of the senate had been on worker retention and not on worker appreciation. “I think the vast majority of the discussion [over SB#22] was extremely misplaced,” Gouvalaris said. “We are here to support our workers. I’m incredibly alarmed by the tone-deaf nature of [the] dialogue on this bill.” ASUCD President Gaius Ilupjeu reassured him that the bill’s focus on retention was done to take advantage of university policies that allow ASUCD to

increase wages in order to keep workers and express appreciation of the work of all student employees. “This [raise] is not something we had to do, but we felt that we had to,” Ilupeju said. “Our underlying intention is always to do right for our workers.” Ilupeju also said he had tried to push through a $2 to $3 wage raise, but was limited by University of California policy. The senate also passed SB#15 to update personnel bylaws to match

current internal practices. Quarterly reports from the Aggie Reuse Store, the Aggie Arts Committee and the Campus Center for the Environment were reviewed by the table before completing ex-officio and elected officer reports. The meeting was adjourned at 7:32 p.m.

Gunrock or a cow?: The Davis Measure Q takes mascot debate effect as Davis rings UC Davis students discuss what image of UC Davis best in 2025 represents the school and its history JASON XIE / AGGIE

BY AMBER WARNKE features@theaggie.org

The measure on last November’s ballot raised Davis’ sales tax from 8.25% to 9.25% KAYLA TRAN / AGGIE

The debate over whether or not the cow should replace Gunrock as the UC Davis mascot has been going on for years. In 2022, 73% of students voted to change the mascot to a cow in the spring elections for the ASUCD. However, concerns over how difficult re-branding would be, as well as what alumni would think, led to the choice to institute the cow as the ASUCD mascot, rather than as the UC Davis mascot. Nevertheless, the debate about which mascot would better represent the UC Davis community has lasted since this decision over two years ago. Diego Tolliver, a third-year materials science and engineering major, weighed in. “I think the cow is just a better representative of the spirit of the school in general,” Tolliver said. “Everything is cow-themed already. And the mustang is kind of a thing of the past.” Tolliver proposed “Bucket” as a name for the potential cow mascot, and suggested that another reason the cow is the right mascot choice lies in how people often perceive UC Davis. “I’ve heard of people kind of using ‘Davis as a cow school’ as a little bit of a derogatory thing,” Tolliver said. “But if we were to change our mascot to a cow, it would be kind of reclaiming that.” Tolliver also pointed out that

READ MORE The Davis Raging Grannies bring a unique approach to activism

The local organization tackles important issues through song SEE PAGE 10

the cow mascot would suit Davis’ agriculture-heavy culture. “I think it would be better to have a cow,” Tolliver said. “[Horses] are not as much of an agricultural thing as cows are, so that fits that a lot better.” Jack Manly, a fourth-year history major, takes a very different approach to the issue. “There is no such thing more agricultural than a horse,” Manly said. “It was horses that were used historically to till the fields, pull the plows, take farmers from one place to another. Horses have been an integral part of agriculture since we tamed them. I see no reason why we should switch to a cow.” Manly went on to clarify the reasons behind his opinion. “I think [Gunrock] then and still now represents the ideas of Davis as a campus and as a community,” Manly said. “I think it’s important also that we honor our history, which I feel strongly about as a history major.” The real-life Gunrock was actually named Gun Rock and was a Thoroughbred, not a Mustang as the current mascot is. Gun Rock was born in 1914 to Rock Sand, the British Triple Crown Winner in 1903. He lived at UC Davis from 1921 to 1931, and while he did compete in races, Gun Rock did not land any significant wins. Instead, he was mainly considered valuable as a breeding horse. During his time at UC Davis, Gun Rock was bred with a whopping 476 mares, siring many notable racing horses. Manly considered Gunrock a

valuable symbol that represents UC Davis students. “I think Gunrock represents the hardworking and motivated drive that all Aggies possess when it comes to academics,” Manly said. “Speaking from my personal opinion, I view horses as animals that have that drive, that motivation. Cows don’t evoke the same image. They evoke a wandering laziness, which is not what I believe that Davis currently represents, has represented in the past or will represent in the future.” Manly also reflected on his experience as the Gunrock mascot at the 2024 Big West Conference basketball game. “It’s hard to not feel connected when you are the embodiment of something, even if for a short period of time,” Manly said. “Being inside the Gunrock costume has only amplified that connection and passion I feel for it as a mascot.” Grace Zuroff, a first-year graduate student at the School of Education, said she considers Gunrock to be unique from other university mascots. “What other school has an anthropomorphic blue horse as their mascot who’s ripped AF?” Zuroff said. She believes that Gunrock, standing apart from any other mascot, captures the spirit of UC Davis in a special way. “It plays into the beauty of Davis in that we may not be like the biggest UC, but it’s still something that makes us fun and quirky,” Zuroff said. THEMASCOTDEBATE on 9

BY RORY CONLON city@theaggie.org Measure Q, which passed in November 2024 with a 64.2% majority, raised the sales tax in Davis by one percent, from 8.25% to 9.25%. It is set to generate about $11 million worth of tax revenue annually. Residents will pay more for taxable goods purchased in Davis, with notable exceptions being on purchases of groceries and prescription medicine. In an FAQ section on Measure Q, the city of Davis listed purposes the money can be used for. “Measure Q is a general tax, which means it can be used for any city governmental purpose,” the city of Davis website reads. “This includes maintaining public safety and emergency response; addressing aging infrastructure needs; maintaining and improving our roads, bike paths and parks; providing affordable housing support and addressing impacts of homelessness; providing programs to community members of all ages; and taking actions that reduce greenhouse gas emissions and address climate change.” The city estimated that it would have $6.3 million, or 7.5% of the General Fund for the 2024-25 year. Since the city aims to maintain a baseline of 15% in the General Fund Reserve, supporters for the measure argued that more money was needed.

Supporters for Measure Q included all members of the 2024 city council and five former Davis mayors. In a statement in favor of the measure, the five former mayors reiterated the importance of increasing city revenue to provide adequate services for residents. “The City of Davis has worked diligently to manage existing resources efficiently, trimming expenses while protecting residents’ services and staff positions,” the argument in favor reads. “Now we need to catch up to inflation, increasing costs and our growing population.” Those against Measure Q included Elaine Roberts Musser, a former chair on the utilities and Senior Citizen Commission; Mark Mezger, the president of the Yolo County Taxpayers Association; and three others. Their statement outlined questions on how taxpayer money would be allocated by the city and alleged that the city is paying “exorbitant salaries” to senior management and firefighters. “The real problem is our Davis City Council has irresponsibly granted excessive salary increases to senior management and firefighters while the city is in dire financial straits,” the argument against reads. “The latest salary increases granted by the current Davis City Council will cost taxpayers millions of dollars over the coming years.” NEWMEASURES on 9


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook