A
the
MHCC custodian sells beats, produces music part-time
dvocate Mt. Hood Community College Gresham, Oregon
Music p. 10
www.advocate-online.net
May 28, 2010
Volume 45, Issue 30
Softball wins NWAACCs
Story on pages 6-7 Photo by Brett Stanley/The Advocate
Senate disciplinary bill vetoed by Best due to 'vagueness' concerns Jen Ashenberner The Advocate
Associated Student Government President Bradley Best on Wednesday vetoed a disciplinary bill passed by the Student Senate last week, saying he wasn’t comfortable signing it as presented. In the Senate meeting, Best took the opportunity to explain further and complimented the bill’s author, Sen. Charles Cookman, for the work he did on the bill and said that he appreciates all of the time put into it and that he wants to pass the bill but cannot as it is written. Best said his concerns regarded the vagueness in certain areas of the bill including the timeline for the investigative committee. “It doesn’t say anything about how soon information can be addressed and brought forth. Meaning --- is that a week, what is the shortest amount of time that you can launch
an investigation,” said Best. He also proposed that Senate clarify what offense would be “deemed worthy” of the removal of a president or vice president as he said that portion of the bill is not clear. The primary concern Best voiced was regarding Senate only requiring two-thirds votes in order to remove an elected official. “I like the process, I like what you guys are doing, your hard work has been impeccable, but I have to veto this,” he said. “If anybody picks this back up and puts in a unanimous vote, I will sign it faster than you can write it. I want to work with you, I want to be a part of this.” In reponse, Cookman said, “Seeing as how Senate has had disagreements about even the smallest details, when it comes to the heavier subjects we don’t come to agree all the time. Especially with something as heated as removing a president.” Best acknowledged Cookman’s point of
view and said that he would hope in a situation such as removal of an elected official, the complaint would be serious enough that all senators would have no problem deciding to remove them from office unanimously. Sen. Verity Bishop addressed the issue of a unanimous vote by discussing the federal impeachment requirement for a two-thirds vote. According to Janet Campbell, MHCC political science instructor, the two processes are different because of the structure of the balance of power because of how few senators are on ASMHCC Senate compared to the U.S. Senate. Campbell said, “There are two bodies involved in a federal impeachment process: one focuses on the accusation (House of Representatives) and one focuses on the conviction (U.S. Senate). There are a lot of people involved in the initial accusation, and a lot of people involved in the conviction. In the bylaws the accusation and
Queer Straight Alliance's Pride Week highlighted by guest speakers
conviction are (handled) within the same body.” “It’s different because there are only nine people involved and there’s not really that balance of power between the people who are accusing and the people who are convicting,” said Campbell. During the meeting, Vice President Bethany Peterman took a moment to clarify the veto process with the senators. “Once a bill passes through its second reading, it is just one complete thing,” she said. “We can’t tear it back open. It doesn’t go back to author. It’s passed. When the president vetoes, he is vetoing it in its entirety. Once he submits his veto, this will come back onto the agenda next week and you all have the choice to overturn the veto, which puts it back into the law books and it’s all
Senate continued on page 4 Index
News p. 12
Opinion
KMHD launch party announces public availability A&E p. 9
ASG responds to allegations of dismissing democratic process
Track athletes win shotput and 400-meter dash at NWAACCs
News
Opinion p. 3
Sports p. 5
Music
Sports A&E
p. 2-3 p. 4, 11, 12 p. 5-8 p. 9 p. 10