the guide FRIDAY, OCTOBER 31, 2014
FORGING A SOCIAL LIFE As the university tries to bring socializing back to campus, fake IDs still reign
HANNAH KAUFMAN Hoya Staff Writer
G
eorgetown has spent the past several years trying to bring students’ social lives back to campus. While policy changes like the abolishment of the limit on the number of kegs an apartment can have and the elimination of the party registration system have proven effective, one thing is for certain: Georgetown’s bar culture isn’t going away anytime soon. However, with a social scene that for many students revolves around M Street’s pricy nightlife, comes the inevitable: fake IDs and inexpensive binge drinking. Georgetown’s rocky relationship with its neighbors doesn’t help matters. As students are forced back on campus by changing policies and enforcement of the District’s drinking and false identification laws grows stronger on M Street, Georgetown social life is at a transitional point. ————— Before the National Minimum Drinking Age Act encouraged states to raise the drinking age to 21 in 1984, Georgetown’s social scene was vastly different from what students recognize today. President of the Georgetown Alumni Association George Peacock (CAS ’84) recalls the Healy Pub, which was located in the basement of Healy Hall, as the hub of weekend partying. Policies were relatively lax and alcohol highly prevalent, but Peacock believes that there were benefits to be found in this kind of drinking culture. “I never even heard the phrase ‘binge drinking’ until 15 to 20 years after I graduated,” he said. “It wasn’t a contest. There was no reason to binge drink since you didn’t need to get it in all at once because of any other anxieties or concerns.” Fast forward three decades, and students are confronted by various changes that are deeply affecting their social lives. While the administration has made a successful push
for greater leniency concerning on-campus alcohol policies, these changes have not curbed the popularity of fake IDs. The Disorderly Conduct Amendment Act, which was enacted in 2010, made unreasonably loud noise from 10 p.m. to 7 a.m. punishable by fines and possible jail time. This noise restriction has led to a more frequent crackdown on townhouse parties around Georgetown by the Student Neighborhood Assistance Program and police. Connor Joseph (COL ’16) sees the effect that this new restriction has placed on off-campus activities. “SNAP is changing its tune and enforcing noise violations more frequently. Everything is going to [The Office of Student] Conduct. We’ve experienced that pattern, and the overall threat of that pattern has definitely seen a rise among the townhouses,” he said. Cory Peterson, director of the Office of Neighborhood Life, which coordinates SNAP, finds this negative relationship to be rooted in stereotype. “I believe the greatest source of tension between students and neighbors is generalizations of one another,” he said. While groups like the Georgetown Community Partnership have helped to improve student-neighbor tensions, these efforts go unnoticed by much of the student body. Whereas some organizations are making a conscious effort to strengthen their strained relationship with the neighborhood and believe that the university is facilitating communication between the two groups, others are not as convinced. “I think the 2010 Campus Plan is really starting to hit students,” Co-Director of the Student Advocacy Office Ben Manzione (SFS ’15) said. “When I first came to Georgetown, back then the GUSA Executive bused students to go to the zoning commission hearings and the university was thankful that we were there. I felt the spirit See FAKES, B2
THIS WEEK THEATER FEATURE
LIFESTYLE
Play Explodes With Talent Nomadic’s fall show ‘Boom’ succeeds with complex themes
EMILY WELCH
Special to The Hoya
From Georgetown to Libya
A new documentary by Matthew VanDyke (GRD ’04) shows his time in Libya, where he became a freedom fighter. B3
Cupcakes and Creativity
Baked and Wired’s weekly short story club offers the opportunity to discuss and debate intriguing texts. B4
FOOD & DRINK
Brasserie Beckons a Visit
Brasserie Beck delights with variety of mussel dishes and an expansive menu that delivers high-quality fare. B5
ARTS & ENTERTAINMENT
Swift Success
Taylor Swift returns with a new album that secures her claim to pop royalty. B7
THEHOYA.COM/ GUIDE @thehoyaguide
It’s the end of the world and two beautifully neurotic strangers — Jules, a gay scientist played by Taylor Mansmann (COL ’15) and Jo, a punky journalism student played by Emily Lett (COL ’17) — are stuck together in a biology lab as a comet hurtles toward Earth. In Peter Sinn Nachtrieb’s impishly intellectual play “Boom,” both Jo and Jules are looking for something better in their lives, something to claim for themselves, and are at each other’s throats trying to find it. Jo wants sex: no-strings-attached, wild sex. She finds herself answering to Jules’ Internet ad promising just that. However, Jules is more concerned with the sleep cycles of fish and his outlandish theory that the behavior of his aquatic friends reveals that the apocalypse is nigh. Jo doubts his prediction and seemingly just about everything else in life. She is looking to fill a void in her heart, but does not know what caused the void in the first place. Jules is possessed by the objectivity of science and Darwinism. His undershirt, quickly exposed by Jo in her attempts to seduce him, reads “Darwin is my Homeboy.’” The show is a sharp cocktail that mixes together a handful of big and small concepts. “A lot of the show is about control and how much autonomy we have. It can be taken in a religious perspective, in a scientific perspective, but it’s just the physical manifestation of the control we have over our lives,” producer Suzanne Coles (COL ’17) said. There is no “right” answer or way to think about what is being presented in “Boom. “ Feeling a little lost? Nomadic’s technical director Adam Bacigalupo (COL ’16) wants you to know that this is the point. “On the way into the play, it’s confusion, it’s weird, it’s off-putting, but it’s supposed to be like that. But on the way out, hopefully it makes sense,” he said. “Boom” initially appears to be a play centered on these two impassioned characters and their psychological crises only to throw you for a loop
DAN GANNONTHE HOYA
Sarah Frasco (COL ’15) impressively pulls off the complex and demanding role of Barbara in “Boom,” a play that challenges and confuses audience expectations throughout. when the character Barbara, played by Sarah Frasco (COL ’15), is introduced midway through the show. Barbara emerges as a narrator from the future and presents the audience with her museum exhibit: the metaphorically significant tale of an odd couple and the fish they live with. Frasco’s role is a demanding one; she operates on a different plane than the other actors — literally. This twist throws the play into another stratosphere of weird just when you think you were maybe putting your finger on the meaning behind the chaos on display. Are Jo and Jules autonomous or is Barbara in complete control of them? Who controls Barbara? What does this have to do with fate and
the end of the world? Director Johan Clarke (COL ’15), who made a courageous decision shepherding “Boom” onto Georgetown’s campus, addresses this confusion. “‘Boom’ demands us to think about our fates and identities without providing many answers. Being able to let go and realizing you won’t be able to control everything in your lives is at the play’s forefront,” Clarke said. Lett, Mansmann and Frasco all deliver flawless performances that leave the audience doubled over in laughter one minute and reflecting on the state of mankind the next. At its heart, “Boom” is a comedy, but it is also meant to evoke See BOOM, B3