Skip to main content

SPA-20260305

Page 1

SPRINGFIELD

MARCH 5, 2026 | FREE

WWW.THEREMINDER.COM

FOR DELIVERY CONCERNS OR TO STOP DELIVERY, CALL 413-788-1100 OR EMAIL CIRCULATION@REPUB.COM

IN THIS

EDITION In Senate, Moulton would focus on affordability, abolishing ICE SPRINGFIELD — U.S. Rep. Seth Moulton wants the Pioneer Valley to know that he has a plan.

Page 4

Run to End Homelessness to raise money for Springfield Rescue Mission

Winter is the perfect time for the Run to End Homelessness, said Kevin Ramsdell, executive director and CEO of the Springfield Rescue Mission. “People get to experience what homeless people face every day. They get to feel the cold, feel the damp,” he said.

Page 4

Baystate updates Play Deck, where young patients can just be kids The first thing people notice when entering the Baystate Play Deck are the colors. Jewel toned film panels on the floor-to-ceiling windows splash colors across the floor as the sun moves throughout the day.

Page 5

Officials, advocates clash over rent control By Trent Levakis

tlevakis@thereminder.com

HOLYOKE — Lighthouse Holyoke’s Divine Theater was the site for a Feb. 25 press conference hosted by leaders from Holyoke and Springfield to share their opinions about the rent control initiative that looms across the state this year. The conference was led by Housing for Massachusetts, a broad coalition of state residents, small property owners, family-owned real estate companies, affordable housing developers, housing advocates, and business leaders concerned about the housing affordability and availability across the state. Holyoke Mayor Joshua Garcia, Springfield City Councilor Mike Fenton, small property owners and Pioneer Valley Developers joined the event to speak out against the proposed rent control ballot question and highlight unintended consequences from the statewide proposal. The current state ballot initiative proposes a cap on annual residential rent increases at 5%, or by the Consumer Price Index, whichever is lower. If passed, the policy would repeal a law passed by Massachusetts voters in 1994 to ban rent control and would apply to virtually all privately owned rental housing across the Pioneer Valley that is not owner-occupied, a point expressed repeatedly by speakers during the press conference. Members of Springfield No One Leaves and other local protesters attended in response to the campaign, arguing the ballot question is one of the few protections available for tenants facing drastic increases to rent. According to a recent Bay State Poll conducted by the University of New

Hampshire Survey Center, 56% of respondents either somewhat or strongly support the proposed ballot question. In December, Gov. Maura Healey told Boston Public Radio she was against the initiative and said that rent control was not going to solve the state’s housing affordability crisis, arguing that the current proposal would “effectively halt production.” Healey also noted then that she has noticed that investors in housing are already pulling out of the state due to concerns with the looming ballot question. During the conference, Chair of Housing for Massachusetts Conor Yunits explained that while the initiative was well intentioned, it was not a solution to the state’s housing crisis. Instead, he argued that in order to really start combating the issue, the state simply needs to develop more housing. “Everyone here is concerned about housing. We know there is an affordability crisis, and that’s why many of us have been working with the governor, with the Legislature, with mayors, city councilors and policy leaders for years, to build more housing. Because when you look around the country and you see where housing prices are falling, like in Austin, Texas, where rents are down 6%, or in Phoenix, where rents are down 4%, it’s because they are building housing,” said Yunits. “They have more supply than demand, here we have significantly more demand than we have supply. Cities and states that build new quality housing see prices fall.” Yunits also pointed out that the cap of rental rate increases does not include any exceptions for building renovations and no appeal process for property own-

Chair of Housing for Massachusetts Conor Yunits explained that while the initiative was well intentioned, it was not a solution to the state’s housing crisis. Reminder Publishing photos by Trent Levakis

ers to recover costs for upgrades or improvements. He noted that if increases could only match the rate of inflation, as measured by the consumer price index, most rent increases would fall well below the 5% cap, based on the average 2.6% seen over the last 20 years in inflation. “We all know that we need to pick up the pace of housing creation, and that’s why we all support solutions that remove barriers to affordable and market rate housing, and [we] would welcome new ideas that spark construction. But we also know that any policy that constricts supply will take us backwards, and that’s what this ballot question will do,” added Yunits. Yunits said similar efforts for rent control across the country have yielded negative consequences. Proponents of the mea-

sure have said “this is not your father’s rent control,” to which Yunits said, that is correct, it is a worse policy. “This question, with some minor exemptions, will apply to every single residential dwelling unit that is rented out in Massachusetts. Not just every apartment building, not just housing in every city, every single residential dwelling unit in every community in Massachusetts,” Yunits said. He shared that the measure would leave landlords unable to cover rising costs of upkeep and would give no incentive for a property owner to manage or invest, and that these issues could also lead to an eroded local tax base from reduced property values. “And what happens when See RENT on page 2


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
SPA-20260305 by the-reminder - Issuu