Oct. 07, 2020

Page 1

THE TIMES-DELPHIC The weekly student newspaper of Drake University Vol. 140 | No. 7 | Oct. 7, 2020

FEATURES

SPORTS

COMMENTARY

Members of La Fuerza Latina discuss celebrating Latinx history month and how their programming this year is shining a light on the diversity of the Latinx experience.

The Tampa Bay Lightning took home the Stanley Cup after defeating the Dallas Stars in an epic battle of wits, skill, strategy and passion

One columnist discusses the highs and lows of the recent presidential debate, including who they believe won over voters in the most effective way.

Read more on page 3

Read more on page 6

Read more on page 7

Faculty Senate approves changes to spring break timesdelphic.com

Sophia Lacy Staff Writer sophia.lacy@drake.edu

On Sept. 28, Sue Mattison, Provost of Drake University, announced through email to students and faculty the movement of spring break to the end of J-term. The decision was made by the Faculty Senate after voting to move spring break from March to Jan. 2529. The email stated the change was “designed to help minimize the campus community from leaving the Des Moines area to travel to potentially high-risk COVID regions.” Shelley Fairbairn, Faculty Senate President, said student preference and student health and safety were two important factors in deciding. Fairbairn said the discussion was “vigorous” and there were lots of perspectives shared, including the Student Senate President, Adam Koch. “This was a challenging decision for faculty, as we really care about our students, even though the final decision was not aligned with the student desire for a break during the spring semester,” Fairbairn said. With the many factors in deciding the fate of the break, senate members said they thought long and hard on students’ and faculty health as well as staying connected to the Drake community. Jill VanWyke, a professor at Drake and a part of the Faculty Senate, said she thought a lot about the students and worried often about their college experience and mental health. “There was no good option that was safe from a public

health standpoint,” VanWyke said. Sandy Henry, a professor at Drake and a part of the Faculty Senate, said there were many factors that were considered when making the decision and they were discussed at length. Henry said she wanted to let students know that she made her decision with students in mind and their college experience in mind. “It was hard because I would love to have a spring break with my son,” Henry said. “But this is what we have to do to keep our community together.” Students were surprised with the final decision even though the Senate had their health and safety as top priority. Kyle Tekautz, a junior at Drake and member of the Student Senate Faculty Senate Committee, said he was disappointed in the final decision and believed that having it after the Drake Relays would help students more. “In my opinion, I believe that after Drake Relays, including going virtual for the two weeks after spring break was one of the better options,” Tekautz said. Tekautz said this option would have allowed students to have a “mental break” and help them prepare for upcoming finals. Many students were upset with the change in schedule because their plans for March were changed and the email said students will be on campus for spring break. Esther Gendler, a junior at Drake, said she felt the Senate made the best decision to ensure the community’s safety and health, but feels students need a break from campus life. “I think it will be hard not

SPRING BREAK will now take place Jan. 25-29 due to COVID concerns. Faculty Senate made the decision at their meeting on Sept. 28. GRAPHIC BY ALLYN BENKOWICH | STAFF PHOTOGRAPHER

to have a break and it has the potential for students to become drained and have ‘Zoom fatigue,’” Gendler said. With students being in dorms for the majority of the time and having limited interactions, living on campus has been draining for some. Caleb Lillquist, a sophomore at Drake, said he thinks students will need a break and be worn out if remaining on campus that long. “I feel like I’m going to be worn out when the semester is done for sure,” Lillquist said. “I

already am exhausted from online classes and this semester in particular.” With the decision, many students have expressed what they would have voted for in regard to spring break. Gracie Geist, a sophomore at Drake, said she thinks spring break should be after Relays because of the amount of interactions students will have with others. Geist said she doubts there will be “any social distancing” during relays and having a week after to prepare for the

aftermath would be good and safe. “It makes a lot more sense to have spring break after Relays based on the amount of social interactions that come with Relays,” Geist said. Tekautz said the Student Senate is working on having a week in the spring where there are no events or programming during a time frame to help students have some kind of break in the spring semester.

every time he steps back, he gets further from the progressive wing of the party, and he makes it less likely that he’s energizing young, progressive voters.” In contrast, Kody Craddick, the president of Drake Democrats, says that Trump appeals only to his base. “He’s playing to appease the 30 to 35 percent of the country who will do anything for him,” Craddick said. Biden’s array of insults for the President stood out from the other personal attacks. Over the course of the debate, Biden called Trump “racist,” a “clown,” and “the worst president America has ever had.”

moderator of the debate, called out Trump in particular for repeatedly interrupting Biden. These problems and the focus on personal attacks led Caufield to form a strong negative impression of the debate. “[The debate] was confrontational, it was chaotic, it was disorganized, it was frustrating… it was a difficult debate to watch,” Caufield said. “I have a hard time even calling it a debate, ‘cause I’m not sure that’s what it was.” Altendorf and Craddick disagree about what changes should be made to improve the quality of future debates. Altendorf is open to making improvements to the debate format, but he is “not a fan” of giving the debate moderator the power to mute candidates. “I don’t like the idea of silencing free speech by cutting off the President or the former vice president while they’re speaking,” Altendorf said. “I’ll leave it up to the Debate Commission to figure out… the best way forward to make the debates more productive.” Craddick, on the other hand, is in favor of muting microphones and ending debates early in some cases. “I think that it seems childish to [mute candidates]. We shouldn’t… have to cut people’s mics if they’re interrupting 70 times in a debate, but we’re not dealing with a fully grown-up incumbent,” Craddick said. Altendorf and Craddick also have different ideas about who

won the debate. “I think Biden won, hands down, because Trump showed himself to be an individual who… [is] not capable of making the tough decisions,” Craddick said. “Biden… has the experience… and he has the tools and intelligence to make sure that these issues get taken care of.” On the other hand, Altendorf thought that Trump did a better job articulating his accomplishments than Biden, especially his economic achievements. Madeleine Leigh, a member of Drake Democrats, took a different view. “I’m not sure that anyone won [the debate], but I think that the American people kind of lost,” Leigh said. Leigh and other Drake students attended a Debate watch party hosted by Drake Democrats on Tuesday night. According to Craddick, about fifty to sixty people attended, and the watch party was covered by KCCI. “I think we showed that we’re not afraid to show who we are as Democrats,” Craddick said. Caufield and her dog Lucy also attended the watch party. “It was a beautiful night,” Caufield said. “It’s great to give people an opportunity to come together in a social environment, even amid the limitations of the pandemic, and to have some sort of communal political experience… It’s like going to a drive-in movie theater, but updated!”

first presidential debate brings chaos, contention

Andrew Kennard Staff Writer andrew.kennard@drake.edu

On Sept. 29, President Donald Trump and former Vice President Joe Biden clashed in an exceptionally chaotic first presidential debate. The debate covered a variety of important issues, including the COVID-19 pandemic, the state of the economy and the recent Black Lives Matter protests. However, personal attacks made by the candidates defined the debate for many viewers. Drake University professor Rachel Caufield of the Department of Political Science wants to reassure young voters that this was not a normal presidential debate. “For first time voters… on behalf of America, I apologize,” Caufield said. “This is not how it’s meant to be and this is not how it will always be.” Accusations flew thick and fast as each nominee presented their own version of the truth. Often, Biden and Trump could not come to an agreement about the basic facts of the issues they were discussing, such as the approximate amount of time it will take for a COVID-19 vaccine to become widely available. Both nominees frequently attacked their opponent’s record on COVID-19, race relations and other topics, changing the focus of the conversation from the issues at hand to the candidates themselves. “The lack of any sort of

coherent explanation of how you would like to lead the country to change policy to address problems is… just frustrating to people,” Caufield said. “Which future do we want? That [choice] requires… some idea of what the future looks like under each candidate.” John Altendorf, president of the Drake College Republicans, said that he thinks the debate was a waste of time. “I don’t think that either candidate really did a service to the voters by the debate on Tuesday night,” Altendorf said. “They spend far too much time attacking each other [and] not enough time on issues of substance to voters.” Each candidate tried to paint a certain picture of their opponent during the debate. Biden cast Trump as a divisive figure who lacks plans for healthcare and COVID-19, while Trump portrayed Biden as a tool of the “Radical Left” during discussion of the Green New Deal and the Black Lives Matter protests. According to Caufield, Trump’s strategy has hit on the “fundamental question” of Joe Biden’s campaign. “One of the problems [Joe Biden] faces is that there is a legitimate left, progressive wing of the party with some fairly dramatic policy proposals that have gained mainstream support within the Democractic Party,” Caufield said. “Joe Biden has always been able to step back and say, that’s not me, that’s not who I am. But

“I’m not sure that anyone won [the debate], but I think that the American people kind of lost.” Craddick says that Biden’s name-calling was necessary in light of Trump’s behavior. “I think that… if someone’s going to act like a child, you’re going to have to try to be the father up on that stage, and I think Joe Biden did that by… telling him to shut up, man, or calling him a clown,” Craddick said. In addition, both candidates evaded questions and made many attempts to cut in while their opponent was still speaking. Chris Wallace, the

twitter: @timesdelphic | instagram: draketimesdelphic | facebook: the times delphic


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.
Oct. 07, 2020 by Times-Delphic - Issuu