Taxmann's Law & Practice Relating to UAE Transfer Pricing

Page 1


Parties and Connected Persons

Transfer Pricing Methods

Chapter 4

Transfer Pricing Documentation

Chapter 5

Transfer Pricing in Free Zones

Chapter 6

Tax Groups and Transfer Pricing

6.1

6.2.1

Chapter 7

Dispute Prevention & Resolution

7.1.4 Eligibility Criteria for Persons under the APA Framework

7.1.5 Illustrative Coverage of Transactions under an APA Framework 139

7.1.6 Illustrative Scope of Pre-filing Consultation in the APA Framework .............. 139

7.1.7 Probable Time Taken for Negotiate and Conclude an APA (unilateral and bilateral) .. 139

7.1.8 APA Guidelines in Saudi Arabia (KSA) .....

7.2 Advantages and Disadvantages for opting of APA....

7.4 Illustrative Scenarios of Bilateral APAs in the

7.5

7.5.2

Transfer Pricing Audits

Chapter 9

8.3.6 Demand Notices and Stay Mechanism ..... 177

8.3.7 Audit Timelines – Global Best Practice v. UAE Outlook .......................... 177

8.4 Corresponding Adjustments – Policy and Implementation 178

8.4.1 Freezone v. Mainland (UAE Tax Group) 178

8.5 Case Studies and Audit Scenarios 179

8.5.1 Scenario A – Manufacturing to Distribution – Resale Margin Evaluation 179

8.5.2 Scenario B: Intra-Group Services – Missing Agreements & No Economic Substance .... 180

8.5.3 Free Zone v. Mainland Pricing – Pricing Discrepancy ........................... 182

8.6 Key Takeaways for UAE Taxpayers ............... 183

Comparative Study of Transfer Pricing Regulations

9.1 Global Perspective on Transfer Pricing Regulations 185

9.1.1 Overview of Global Implementation 186

9.1.2 Comparative Table of Key Features in Transfer Pricing Regulations: UAE v. OECD Guidelines 186

9.2 Comparative Charts Across KSA, Kuwait, USA, and India TP Guidelines 187

9.2.1 Comparative Overview of Transfer Pricing Compliance Regimes in Africa 190

9.2.2 Comparative Analysis of Transfer Pricing Regulations: KSA v. UAE ................ 191

9.3 Analysis of the Implementation of BEPS Action Plan 196

9.3.1 UAE Perspective on Implementation of BEPS Action Plan 198

9.3.2 Illustrative Scenario: Transfer Pricing Compliance in the UAE 206

9.3.3 Illustrative Scenario: Transfer Pricing Compliance in Saudi Arabia (KSA) ........ 207

9.3.4 Illustrative Scenario: Transfer Pricing Compliance Under KSA and UAE Regulations 209

Chapter 10

Tax Compliance Requirements

10.1 Compliance Checklists and Timelines .............

Process/Steps of CT Return ..............

10.2.1 Cabinet Decision No. 75 of 2023: Administrative Penalties for Non-Compliance 262

10.2.2 Compliance Challenges Businesses May Face ................................. 265 10.2.3 Impact of Non-Compliance on Businesses .. 266

APPENDIX

Federal Decree-Law No. 47 of 2022 - Issued 3 October 2022 (Effective 15 days after publishing in the Official Gazette) ..................................... 273

Transfer Pricing Guide/Corporate Tax Guide CTGTP1Issued in October 2023 ...............................316

Ministerial Decision No. 97 of 2023 Requirements for Maintaining Transfer Pricing Documentation for the Purposes of Federal Decree-Law No. 47 of 2022 on the Taxation of Corporations and Businesses ................ 413

Ministerial Decision No. [301] of 2024 on Tax Group for the Purposes of Federal Decree-Law No. 47 of 2022 on the Taxation of Corporations and Businesses 415 Guidance Paper on Global Minimum Tax (Pillar Two)Issued in March 2024.

Cabinet Decision No. 142 of 2024 on the Imposition of Topup Tax on Multinational Enterprises - Issued in December 2024

United Arab Emirates Mutual Agreement Procedure Guidance - Issued in July 2025

Related Parties and Connected Persons

2.1 Introduction

The UAE Corporate Tax Law establishes specific rules for transactions involving Related Parties and Connected Persons to ensure transparency and proper tax compliance. These provisions, outlined in Articles 35 and 36, are designed to prevent misreporting of income and ensure that taxable entities accurately reflect their economic activities in their financial and tax reporting.

Related Parties include individuals and entities connected through ownership, control, or kinship within defined thresholds, while Connected Persons primarily involve individuals or entities with a significant relationship to a Taxable Person, such as owners, directors, or officers. These definitions are crucial for determining the scope of relationships subject to enhanced disclosure and compliance obligations under UAE tax law.

This chapter provides:

Clear Definitions: A comprehensive explanation of Related Parties and Connected Persons, as defined under UAE Corporate Tax Law, including key criteria for identification.

Ownership and Control Criteria: An overview of the thresholds for ownership and control, focusing on relationships that trigger additional compliance obligations.

Kinship and Affiliation: Detailed classifications of relationships through kinship, partnership, or association.

Illustrative Examples: Practical scenarios to demonstrate how these definitions apply to various business and personal relationships.

By outlining these regulations, the UAE ensures fairness and consistency in tax practices while safeguarding its tax base. This chapter equips businesses and stakeholders with the tools to identify applicable relationships, understand their compliance obligations, and align their operations with UAE Corporate Tax requirements.

2.2 Article 35: Related Parties and Control

The following is the definition provided in the law under Article 35:

1.“For the purposes of this Decree-Law, “Related Parties” means any of the following:

(

a) Two or more natural persons who are related within the fourth degree of kinship or affiliation, including by way of adoption or guardianship.

(

b) A natural person and a juridical person where:

i. The natural person or one or more of Related Parties of the natural person are shareholders in the juridical person, and the natural person, Parties, directly or a 50% (fifty per cent) or greater ownership interest in the juridical person; or

ii. the natural person, alone or together with its Related Parties, directly or indirectly controls the juridical person.

(

(

c) Two or more juridical persons where:

i. one juridical person, alone or together with its Related Parties, directly or indirectly owns a 50% (fifty per cent) or greater ownership interest in the other juridical person;

ii. one juridical person, alone or together with its Related Parties, directly or indirectly controls the other juridical person; or

iii. any Person, alone or together with its Related Parties, directly or indirectly owns 50% (fifty per cent) or greater ownership interest in or controls such two or more juridical persons.

d) A Person and its Permanent Establishment or Foreign Permanent Establishment.

(

e) Two or more Persons that are partners in the same Unincorporated Partnership.

(

f) A Person who is the trustee, founder, settlor or beneficiary of a trust or foundation, and its Related Parties.

2. For the purposes of this Decree-Law, “Control” means the ability of a Person, whether in their own right or by agreement or otherwise to influence another Person, including:

(

a) The ability to exercise 50% (fifty per cent) or more of the voting rights of another Person.

(b) The ability to determine the composition of 50% (fifty per cent) or more of the board of directors of another Person.

(c) The ability to receive 50% (fifty per cent) or more of the profits of another Person.

(d) The ability to determine, or exercise significant influence over, the conduct of the business and affairs of another Person.”

2.2.1 Overview

Article 35 of the UAE Corporate Tax Law provides the framework for identifying Related Parties, ensuring that transactions involving such relationships are subject to appropriate scrutiny. The article outlines specific criteria for determining when

individuals or entities are classified as Related Parties, with a focus on ownership, control, and kinship connections.

Key aspects of the definition include:

Natural Persons: Individuals related within the fourth degree of kinship or affiliation, including relationships by blood, marriage, adoption, or guardianship, are classified as Related Parties.

Natural and Juridical Persons: A natural person and a juridical person are considered Related Parties if the individual, alone or along with their Related Parties, directly or indirectly owns 50% or more of the juridical person or exercises control over it.

Juridical Persons: Two or more juridical persons are classified as Related Parties if one owns or controls 50% or more of the other, or if a third party owns or controls 50% or more of both entities.

Permanent Establishments: Relationships between a person and their permanent establishment or foreign permanent establishment are automatically considered Related Parties.

Unincorporated Partnerships: Partners in an unincorporated partnership and their Related Parties are also included under the definition.

These criteria ensure that transactions between Related Parties, whether domestic or cross-border, are appropriately monitored to prevent potential risks such as misallocation of income or tax avoidance. The law emphasizes transparency in dealings between Related Parties to protect the integrity of the UAE tax system.

The following sections provide a detailed breakdown of the specific relationships and examples that illustrate the application of these provisions in various contexts.

2.2.2 Related Parties (Two natural persons)

Two or more individuals are considered related parties if they are connected within the fourth degree of kinship or affiliation.

Kinship includes common blood ties as determined by the ancestors or common ancestors of the individual, where an ancestor or common ancestor may include guardians or adoptive parents, and affiliation covers relationship by marriage, or if one natural person’s spouse is related by kinship to the other Natural Person.

Degrees of kinship are classified as follows:

First-degree: Parents, children, and the parents and children of a spouse.

Second-degree: Grandparents, grandchildren, and siblings, including those of a spouse.

Third-degree: Great-grandparents, great-grandchildren, uncles, aunts, nieces, and nephews, including those of a spouse.

Fourth degree: Great-great-grandparents, great-great-grandchildren, grand uncles, grand aunts, grandnieces, grandnephews, and first cousins, including those of a spouse.

Examples:

Ali is Omar’s uncle. Under the UAE Corporate Tax Law, Ali and Omar are considered Related Parties because they are family members connected within the third degree of kinship, which includes relationships like uncles, aunts, and nephews.

Zayed and his first cousin Khalid are related as cousins. Under the UAE Corporate Tax Law, they are classified as Related Parties because first cousins are connected within the fourth degree of kinship, as defined in the law.

Abdullah and his sister Hiba are siblings. Under the UAE Corporate Tax Law, they are considered Related Parties because siblings are connected within the second degree of kinship.

2.2.3 Related Parties (Natural and Juridical Persons)

A natural person/juridical person and a juridical person shall be considered ‘related parties’ if they meet either the ownership or control criteria.

2.2.3.1 Ownership

A. Natural and Juridical Person

A natural person and a juridical person are considered Related Parties through ownership if the individual, either alone or along with their Related Parties, holds a 50% or greater ownership interest—whether directly or indirectly—in the juridical person. This also applies when the individual or their Related Parties are shareholders in the juridical person.

Examples: Ms. S and O LLC are related parties through combined ownership

1.If Mr. Person owns 85% of ABC LLC, Mr. Person and ABC LLC are related parties.

2.If Ms. T owns 80% of T LLC and 25% of U LLC, and T LLC owns 45% of U LLC, Ms. T and U LLC are related parties due to cumulative ownership exceeding 50%.

3.

4.

Ms. S and O LLC are related parties through combined ownership.

Form the above Mr. X is a related party to X Enterprises through his direct 60% ownership. Furthermore, due to the combined ownership interests of Mr. X (60%), Mr. Y (30%), and Mrs. X (10%) in Y LLC, which holds a 40% stake in Z Corp, Mr. X and Z Corp are also considered related parties, as the total ownership exceeds 50% when factoring in indirect ownership through Y LLC. Thus, Mr. X, Mr. Y, Mrs. X, Y LLC, and Z Corp are all related parties under these circumstances.

B. Two or more Juridical Persons

Two or more juridical persons are deemed Related Parties based on ownership if: One juridical person, either independently or in conjunction with its Related Parties, holds a direct or indirect ownership interest of 50% or more in the other juridical person; or

Any person, either individually or together with their Related Parties, directly or indirectly owns 50% or more of the ownership interests in two or more juridical persons.

Examples:

1.ABC Corp owns 90% of ABC LLC. Both are related parties.

2.V Inc. owns 55% of U LLC, and W LLC appoints 50% of U LLC’s board. Both V Inc. and W LLC are related parties to U LLC.

3.

From the above example Y Ltd. and Z Inc. related parties through common ownership. In this scenario, X Corp, with its direct ownership of 70% in Y Ltd. and 60% in Z Inc., establishes a relationship between X Corp, Y Ltd., and Z Inc. as related parties. The ownership interest held by X Corp in both juridical persons exceeds 50%, creating a direct or indirect ownership link between the entities, thereby classifying them as related parties under the ownership criteria.

2.2.3.2

Control criteria

Persons can also be regarded as Related Parties through direct or indirect ‘Control.’

Control refers to the ability of one person to direct or influence the actions and decisions of another person. This influence can be exerted through various means, including rights, agreements, or other methods.

If a natural person, either alone or with their related parties, directly or indirectly exercises control over a juridical person, both the natural person and the juridical person will be considered related parties.

The CT Law provides specific criteria to determine whether control exists, as mentioned below:

(

a)Voting rights

A person is considered to exercise control over another if they have the ability to exercise 50% or more of the voting rights of another Person.

For instance, Company P owns 40% of the shares in Company Q, while the remaining 60% is held by various individual shareholders. However, due to a special agreement, Company P has the right to cast 55% of the total votes in the company’s board decisions. Despite owning less than 50% of the shares, Company P has the power to influence the decisions of Company Q by exercising more than 50% of the voting rights. Therefore, Company P is considered to have control over Company Q based on its voting power, and the two companies are regarded as related parties.

(

b)Board Composition

A person is considered to have control over another if they have the ability to determine the composition of 50% or more of that person’s Board of Directors (BoD).

For example, Ms. B, through her ownership of preferred shares in Company W, has the right to appoint 5 out of 9 members of the company’s Board of Directors, granting her the power to control the board’s composition. Despite holding less than a majority of the shares, her ability to appoint the majority of the board members establishes her control over the company. As a result, Ms. B and Company W are considered related parties due to her control over the board.

(

c)Profit Entitlement

A person is considered to have control over another,If that person has the ability to receive 50% or more of the profits of the another person.

For example,

Company A, a company resident in the UAE, has licensed a software to Company B, resident in country Y, which allows it to operate and run its day-to-day business

activities in country Y. Company A and Company B signed a royalty agreement, which entitles Company A to 50% of profits generated by Company B from the use of the software in country Y as remuneration for the use of the software. As per the above, control can be established where a Person is entitled to 50% or more profits of another Person. Thus, Company A is deemed to have Control over Company B as Company A is entitled to 50% of Company B’s profits.

(d)Ability to exercise significant influence

A person is considered to have ‘control’ over the other person if it has the ability to determine or exercise significant influence over the business and affairs of another person. This includes two key aspects:

The power to determine the actions and operations of the other party; and

The ability to exercise substantial influence over the other party’s business and decisions.

If a person meets either of these conditions, they are considered to have ‘control’ over the other person.

For example,

High Dependency: Company X relies on Supplier Y for 90% of its raw materials.

Significant Influence: Supplier Y’s control over pricing, delivery terms, and product quality affects Company X.

Operational Impact: Any changes by Supplier Y can directly impact Company X’s production and profitability.

Control: Due to this influence, Supplier Y is considered to have ‘control’ over Company X’s operations.

2.2.3.3 Common ownership or control criteria

When a person, either individually or in conjunction with their related parties, directly or indirectly holds 50% or more of the ownership interest in or has control over two or more juridical persons, those entities will be classified as related parties. This means that sister companies within a corporate group are considered related parties. The connection between the two juridical persons can be formed through common ownership or control, with the controlling party being either a natural person or another juridical entity.

For example,

In this Scenario:

Related Parties: Mr. B and Mr. C are related parties.

Control Over Company A: Mr. B and Mr. C together control Company A.

Joint Ownership: They have joint ownership interests in Company X and Company Y.

Shareholding:

55% of Company X is held by Mr. B, Mr. C, and Company A.

40% of Company Y is held by the same group.

Related Party Classification:

Company X and Company Y are related parties to Mr. B, Mr. C, and Company A due to their ownership and control.

2.2.4 Related Parties (Additional Criteria)

2.2.4.1 Persons and its Permanent Establishment (PE) or Foreign PE:

A person and its permanent establishment shall be regarded as related parties.This means that if a non-resident person operates a permanent establishment in the UAE, the UAE permanent establishment and the non-resident’s other branches or offices outside the UAE are regarded as related parties.

For Example, Company P, a non-resident entity based in the US, has a permanent establishment in Dubai, UAE, to oversee its regional operations. Company P also operates branches in several countries outside the UAE, including the UK and Germany. The Dubai branch of Company P is involved in managing regional sales, while the UK branch handles marketing, and the German branch focuses on distribution. Because Company P and its UAE permanent establishment are linked as related parties, any transactions between the Dubai branch and the branches in the UK and Germany must adhere to transfer pricing regulations.

2.2.4.2 Related Parties (Partners in unincorporated partnership)

The partners in an unincorporated partnership are considered related parties to each other. An unincorporated partnership can have two or more partners, and each partner will be regarded as a related party to the others. It’s important to note that both natural persons and juridical persons can be partners in an unincorporated partnership.

For example,

Company A and Mr. X form an unincorporated partnership to jointly develop a new product line. Company A holds 60% of the partnership, and Mr. X holds 40%. As per the rules, both Company A and Mr. X are considered related parties to each other due to their partnership. Even though Company A is a juridical person and Mr. X is a natural person, their business relationship through the partnership classifies them as related parties.

The trustees, founders, settlor, or beneficiaries of a trust or foundation are considered related parties to the trust or foundation. Additionally, the related parties of these trustees, founders, settlor, or beneficiaries are also regarded as related parties of the trust or foundation.

For example,

Mr. Y is the settlor of a family trust and also serves as one of its trustees. His son, Mr. Z, is a beneficiary of the trust. Since Mr. Y, as the settlor and trustee, is a related party of the trust, Mr. Z, as a beneficiary, is also considered a related party of the trust. Furthermore, any related parties of Mr. Y or Mr. Z, such as their spouses or business partners, will also be regarded as related parties to the trust.

Comprehensive Example: Facts:

Mr. A and Ms. B are siblings (related within the second degree of kinship).

Mr. C is the son, Mr. A.

Mr. A owns 60% of shares in Alpha LLC.

Ms. B owns 40% of shares in Beta LLC. Mr. C (Mr. A’s son) owns another 30% of Beta LLC.

Alpha LLC owns 70% of shares in Gamma Ltd.

Gamma Ltd. owns 55% of shares in Delta Inc.

Mr. A also owns 25% of shares in Gamma Ltd.

Gamma Ltd operates a Permanent Establishment (PE) in Country X.

Delta Inc. and Beta LLC are partners in an Unincorporated Partnership called Joint Venture (JV) Partners.

Mr. A is the settlor of the A&B Trust.

Ms. B is a beneficiary of the A&B Trust.

Solution:

Relationship TypeParties

Related Parties (Kinship)

Related Parties (Kinship)

Related Parties (Ownership)

Related Parties (Ownership)

Related Parties (Juridical Persons)

Related Parties (Juridical Persons)

Related Parties (Indirect Control)

Related Parties (Permanent Establishment)

Related Parties (Unincorporated Partnership)

Related Parties (Trust)

Related Parties (Trust)

InvolvedReason

Mr. A and Ms. BThey are siblings, related within the second degree of kinship.

Mr. A and Mr. CThey are father and son, related within the first degree of kinship.

Mr. A and Alpha LLC

Mr. A owns 60% of Alpha LLC, exceeding the 50% ownership threshold.

Ms. B and Beta LLCMs. B owns 40%, and Mr. C (her nephew) owns 30%, giving Related Parties a total of 70% ownership.

Alpha LLC and Gamma Ltd

Gamma Ltd and Delta Inc.

Alpha LLC and Delta Inc.

Gamma Ltd. and its PE in Country X

Delta Inc. and Beta LLC

Mr. A and A&B Trust

Ms. B and A&B Trust

Alpha LLC owns 70% of Gamma Ltd., exceeding the 50% ownership threshold.

Gamma Ltd. owns 55% of Delta Inc.

Alpha LLC indirectly controls Delta Inc. through its 70% ownership in Gamma Ltd.

A Permanent Establishment is treated as part of the juridical person (Gamma Ltd.).

They are partners in the same Unincorporated Partnership (JV Partners).

Mr. A is the settlor of the trust.

Ms. B is a beneficiary of the trust.

2.3 Article 36: Payments to Connected persons

The following is provided under Article 36 of the law:

1. Without prejudice to the provisions of Article 28 of this Decree-Law, a payment or benefit provided by a Taxable Person to its Connected Person shall be deductible only if and to the extent the payment or benefit corresponds with the market value of the service, benefit or otherwise provided by the connected Person and is incurred wholly and exclusively for the purposes of the Taxable Person’s Business.

2. For the purposes of this Decree-Law, a Person shall be considered a Connected Person of a Taxable Person if that person is:

(a) An owner of the Taxable Person.

(b) A director or officer of the Taxable Person.

(c) A Related Party of any of the Persons referred to in paragraphs (a) and (b) of Clause 2 of this Article.

LAW & PRACTICE RELATING TO UAE TRANSFER PRICING

AUTHORS

PUBLISHER

DATE OF PUBLICATION

EDITION

ISBN NO

: NIRAV SHAH, MITHILESH REDDY

: Taxmann

: September 2025

: 2025 Edition

: 9789371264150

BINDING TYPE : Hardbound Rs. 2,495/-

DESCRIPTION

Law & Practice Relating to UAE Transfer Pricing is a concise, practice-ready treatise on the UAE’s TP regime, combining statutory text, FTA guidance, OECD-aligned methods, and implementation tools. It explains Articles 34–36 and 55 of the Corporate Tax Law with a UAE-specific lens—covering Related Party/Connected Person tests, ALP methods, documentation thresholds, and audit expectations. Distinctive UAE features—such as deductibility rules for Connected-Person payments, QFZP implications, and the implementa tion of BEPS Action 13 standards—are translated into clear processes, worked examples, and checklists. Comparative tables across KSA, Kuwait, the USA, India, and Africa facilitate cross-border benchmarking. Primary sources (Federal Decree-Law 47/2022, TP Guide CTGTP1, key Cabinet/Ministerial Decisions, MAP Guidance) are reproduced for one-volume reference. This book is intended for the following audience:

• CFOs, Heads of Tax & Corporate Controllers

• Advisors & Assurance Professionals

• Free Zone enterprises/QFZPs

• Multina tionals & Family Groups

• Litiga tion & Controversy Teams

The Present Publication is the Latest Edition, authored by Nirav Shah, with the following noteworthy features:

• [ Article-by-Article Foundations ] Arts. 34 ( ALP & methods ), 35 ( Related Parties/Control ), 36 ( Connected Persons ), 55 ( Documentation ) with implications and matrices

• [ Documentation Handbook ] TP Disclosure Form; category thresholds ( e.g., AED 40m RPT / AED 500k Connected Persons ); Local/Master File content, flow, common errors, audit readiness

• [ Free Zones & QFZPs ] Status conditions, PE attribution ( foreign/domestic ), Free Zone ↔ Mainland pricing, impact on qualifying-income tests

• [ Tax Groups ] Eligibility, consolidation, eliminations, attribution of taxable income ( incl. lending, interest caps, corresponding adjustments )

• [ Dispute Prevention & Resolution ] APA primer ( with KSA notes ) and UAE MAP—timelines, data packs, step-through processes

• [ FTA Audit Handbook ] Triggers, information requests, comparable selection, IQR ranges, timelines, appeal ladder, demand/stay, ‘fix-now’ checklists

• [ Comparative & BEPS View ] UAE vs OECD; cross-country charts ( KSA, Kuwait, USA, India, Africa ) ; CbCR essentials

• [ Appendix Library ] Core laws, decisions, and guidance compiled in one place

• [ UAE-centric Nuances ] ALP for domestic RP/CP transactions ( incl. Free Zone ↔ Mainland ) and dual deductibility tests ( market value + wholly/exclusively for business )

• [ Audit Practicality ] Typical information packs, benchmarking cadence, and FTA preferences ( local → regional → other regions; IQR usage )

Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.