Taxmann's Analysis | Revenue Recognition under Ind AS 115 – Common Pitfalls and Practical Remedies

Page 1


Insights into Common Pitfalls and Practical Remedies

Insights into Common Pitfalls and Practical Remedies

1. Introduction

Revenue is often hailed as the most critical figure in financial statements. It reflects a company’s ability to deliver value, sustain operations, and generate profits. It also significantly influences investor confidence, executive bonuses, and stock valuations. Due to its high visibility, revenue recognition has historically been a target for both fraudulent manipulation and unintentional misstatements.

The introduction of Ind AS 115, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, brought global alignment and conceptual clarity to revenue recognition. It introduced a structured five-step model and robust disclosure requirements designed to enhance transparency. However, recent reviews by the Financial Reporting Review Board (FRRB) have revealed that several companies continue to struggle with its proper implementation. From vague accounting policies and poor contract segmentation to premature revenue recognition and incomplete reconciliations, the gaps are not just technical but often fundamental in nature.

This article delves into five commonly observed non-compliances in revenue reporting, grounded in FRRB’s inspection findings and supported by verbatim extracts from Ind AS 115. Through practical illustrations, disclosure examples, and actionable recommendations, the goal is to equip preparers and auditors with the insights needed to ensure faithful and compliant revenue recognition that withstands both scrutiny and time.

2. Common Observations and Practical Solutions

2.1. Faliure to Disaggregate Revenue

2.1.1 Observation

A frequent issue is that companies present total revenue without breaking it into categories that reflect how the revenue behaves, by geography, product type, sales channel, or contract duration.

For example, AlphaTech Limited, operating in India and the EU, sells software licenses and provides support services. Its revenue disclosure in the financials reads: “Revenue from contracts with customers ₹800 crore.” No details on service vs. product revenue, or domestic vs. export sales are provided.

2.1.2

Relevant Provisions (Ind AS 115)

Extract of Para 110 – “The objective of the disclosure requirements is for an entity to disclose sufficient information to enable users of financial statements to understand the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers…”

Extract of Para 114 – “An entity shall disaggregate revenue recognised from contracts with customers into categories that depict how the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows are affected by economic factors…”

Extract of Para B89 – “…categories that might be appropriate include… type of good or service, geographical region, market or type of customer, type of contract, contract duration, timing of transfer, and sales channels.”

2.1.3 Recommendation

To comply with Ind AS 115, entities should present revenue broken down into relevant and material categories, such as product lines, geographies, or type of customers. These categories should align with how management internally views performance.

Suggested Table Format

2.2. Missing Disclosure on Revenue Recognition Methods

2.2.1 Observation

While many companies acknowledge that revenue is recognised over time, they fail to disclose whether the method used is input-based or output-based, or how it faithfully represents performance.

For example, InfraBuild Limited discloses – “Revenue is recognised over time based on the stage of completion.”

No reference is made to whether this stage is measured by costs incurred, milestones achieved, or technical progress.

2.2.2 Relevant Provisions (Ind AS 115)

Para 124 – “For performance obligations that an entity satisfies over time, an entity shall disclose both of the following:

(a) the methods used to recognise revenue (for example, a description of the output methods or input methods used and how those methods are applied); and

(b) an explanation of why the methods used provide a faithful depiction of the transfer of goods or services

2.2.3 Recommendation

Entities must explicitly describe the method used, cost-to-cost (input) or milestone-based (output), and explain why it best captures progress. Avoid vague terms like “percentage completion” without details.

Example Disclosure:

“The Company uses the cost-to-cost input method, where revenue is recognised based on actual costs incurred to date as a proportion of the total estimated costs.”

“This method is considered to provide a faithful depiction of performance as costs incurred directly reflect progress in service delivery.”

2.3. No Reconciliation of Revenue with Contracted Price

2.3.1 Observation

Companies record net revenue after adjusting for discounts, incentives, and returns, but do not show the reconciliation between the contracted price and recognised revenue.

For example, RetailMart Limited enters a ₹100 Cr supply contract offering volume discounts and performance rebates. The reported revenue is ₹90 Cr without any explanation of adjustments.

2.3.2 Relevant Provisions (Ind AS 115)

Para 126AA – “An entity shall reconcile the amount of revenue recognised in the statement of profit and loss with the contracted price showing separately each of the adjustments made to the contract price, for example, on account of discounts, rebates, refunds, credits, price concessions, incentives, performance bonuses, etc., specifying the nature and amount of each such adjustment separately.”

2.3.3 Recommendation

Companies must transparently show the build-up from contract price to revenue, outlining all material deductions. This is crucial for stakeholders to assess pricing dynamics and the quality of revenue.

Suggested Table:

2.4. Premature Recognition of Claims/Arbitrations

2.4.1 Observation

Unbilled revenue was recognised on unapproved variation claims or pending arbitration awards, contrary to the company’s own accounting policy which required enforceability or legal finality.

For example, BuilderCorp Limited includes ₹20 Cr from escalation claims still under negotiation, stating that “management is confident of recovery”.

2.4.2 Relevant Provisions

Ind AS 115, Para 9(e) – “An entity shall account for a contract with a customer that is within the scope of this Standard only when all of the following criteria are met:

“it is probable that the entity will collect the consideration to which it will be entitled in exchange for the goods or services that will be transferred to the customer. In evaluating whether the collectability of an amount of consideration is probable, an entity shall consider only the customer’s ability and intention to pay that amount of consideration when it is due. The amount of consideration to which the entity will be entitled may be less than the price stated in the contract if the consideration is variable because the entity may offer the customer a price concession (see paragraph 52).”

Ind AS 1, Para 18 – “An entity cannot rectify inappropriate accounting policies either by disclosure of the accounting policies used or by notes or explanatory material.”

2.4.3 Recommendation

Revenue should be recognised only when collection is probable and enforceable. Optimism or ongoing negotiations do not justify revenue recognition. Instead, disclose such items as contingent assets or include explanatory notes.

2.5. Contradictory Statements on Revenue Methods

2.5.1 Observation

Some companies declare the use of an “input method” but then mention milestones and technical progress, which actually indicate “output method”, leading to ambiguity.

For example, Tech Construct Limited says – “Revenue is recognised based on costs incurred and milestones achieved.”

These are two fundamentally different bases.

2.5.2 Relevant

Provisions (Ind AS 115)

Para 124 – “Determining the timing of satisfaction of performance obligations. For performance obligations that an entity satisfies over time, an entity shall disclose both of the following:

(a) the methods used to recognise revenue (for example, a description of the output methods or input methods used and how those methods are applied); and…”

Para B15 – “Output methods recognize revenue on the basis of direct measurements of the value to the customer of the goods or services transferred to date relative to the remaining goods or services promised under the contract. Output methods include methods such as surveys of performance completed to date, appraisals of results achieved, milestones reached, time elapsed and units produced or units delivered.”

2.5.3 Recommendation

Choose one method based on contract type. Where hybrid approaches are used, provide clarity on which method applies in which context. Don’t combine both methods unless justified.

Example Disclosure – “For construction contracts, the Company applies the input method based on cost incurred to date relative to total estimated costs, as this best reflects the progress of performance. However, for turnkey infrastructure projects where billing is tied to specific stages like foundation completion or system handover, the output method based on achievement of contractual milestones is used. The choice of method is determined by the nature of contractual obligations and availability of measurable progress indicators.”

3. Conclusion

Revenue recognition is more than just an accounting exercise; it is the narrative of value creation, the pulse of operational performance, and often the benchmark of credibility in the eyes of investors and regulators. When done well, it builds trust and signals sound governance. When done poorly, it not only misleads stakeholders but may invite penalties, reputational damage, and even forensic investigations.

The regulatory observations discussed in this article are not isolated technical oversights. They reflect a deeper issue, a gap between what the standard requires and how it is understood, interpreted, and implemented by companies. From incorrect methods to missing disclosures, these errors compromise the usefulness and reliability of financial statements.

To truly comply with Ind AS 115, companies must go beyond minimal disclosures or standard templates. They must internalise the spirit of the standard: clarity, consistency, and completeness. Auditors, on their part, must apply professional skepticism and insist on proper documentation, reconciliation, and evidence.

Also Read:

1. Non-compliances Related to Ind AS 16

2. Non-compliances Related to Ind AS 2

3. Non-compliances Related to Ind AS 38

About Us

Founded 1972

Evolution From a small family business to a leading technology-oriented Publishing/Product company

Expansion

Launch of Taxmann Advisory for personalized consulting solutions

Our Vision

Aim

Achieve perfection, skill, and accuracy in all endeavour

Growth

Evolution into a company with strong independent divisions: Research & Editorial, Production, Sales & Marketing, and Technology

Future

Continuously providing practical solutions through Taxmann Advisory

Our Strength

Core

Editorial and Research Division

Team

Over 200 motivated legal professionals (Lawyers, Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries)

Expertise

Monitoring and processing developments in judicial, administrative, and legislative fields with unparalleled skill and accuracy

Impact

Helping businesses navigate complex tax and regulatory requirements with ease

Taxmann Today

Legacy Innovation Commitment

Over 60 years of domain knowledge and trust

Technology-driven solutions for modern challenges

Ensuring perfection, skill, and accuracy in every solution provided

Our Core Domain Areas

Income Tax

Corporate Tax Advisory

Trusts & NGO Consultancy

TDS Advisory

Global Mobility Services

Personal Taxation

Training

Due Diligence

Foreign Exchange Management Laws

Due Dilligence

Advisory Services

Assistance in compounding of offences

Transactions Services

Investment outside India

Your Partners for Frictionless Advice

Goods

Transaction Advisory

Business Restructuring

Classification

Due Diligence

Training

Advisory

Trade Facilitation Measures

Corporate

Corporate Structuring

VAT Advisory

Residential Status

A Glimpse of the People Behind Taxmann

Naveen Wadhwa

Research and Advisory [Corporate and Personal Tax]

Chartered Accountant (All India 24th Rank)

14+ years of experience in Income tax and International Tax

Expertise across real estate, technology, publication, education, hospitality, and manufacturing sectors

Contributor to renowned media outlets on tax issues

Vinod K. Singhania Expert on Panel | Research and Advisory (Direct Tax)

Over 35 years of experience in tax laws

PhD in Corporate Economics and Legislation

Author and resource person in 800+ seminars

V.S. Datey Expert on Panel | Research and Advisory [Indirect Tax]

Holds 30+ years of experience

Engaged in consulting and training professionals on Indirect Taxation

A regular speaker at various industry forums, associations and industry workshops

Author of various books on Indirect Taxation used by professionals and Department officials

Manoj Fogla Expert on Panel | Research and Advisory [Charitable Trusts and NGOs]

Over three decades of practising experience on tax, legal and regulatory aspects of NPOs and Charitable Institutions

Law practitioner, a fellow member of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India and also holds a Master's degree in Philosophy

PhD from Utkal University, Doctoral Research on Social Accountability Standards for NPOs

Author of several best-selling books for professionals, including the recent one titled 'Trust and NGO's Ready Reckoner' by Taxmann

Drafted publications for The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India, New Delhi, such as FAQs on GST for NPOs & FAQs on FCRA for NPOs.

Has been a faculty and resource person at various national and international forums

the UAE

Chartered Accountant (All India 36th Rank)

Has previously worked with the KPMG

S.S. Gupta Expert on Panel | Research and Advisory [Indirect Tax]

Chartered Accountant and Cost & Works Accountant

34+ Years of Experience in Indirect Taxation

Bestowed with numerous prestigious scholarships and prizes

Author of the book GST – How to Meet Your Obligations', which is widely referred to by Trade and Industry

Sudha G. Bhushan Expert on Panel | Research and Advisory [FEMA]

20+ Years of experience

Advisor to many Banks and MNCs

Experience in FDI and FEMA Advisory

Authored more than seven best-selling books

Provides training on FEMA to professionals

Experience in many sectors, including banking, fertilisers, and chemical

Has previously worked with Deloitte

Contact Us

Taxmann Delhi

59/32, New Rohtak Road

New Delhi – 110005 | India

Phone | 011 45562222

Email | sales@taxmann.com

Taxmann Mumbai

35, Bodke Building, Ground Floor, M.G. Road, Mulund (West), Opp. Mulund Railway Station Mumbai – 400080 | Maharashtra | India

Phone | +91 93222 47686

Email | sales.mumbai@taxmann.com

Taxmann Pune

Office No. 14, First Floor, Prestige Point, 283 Shukrwar Peth, Bajirao Road, Opp. Chinchechi Talim, Pune – 411002 | Maharashtra | India

Phone | +91 98224 11811

Email | sales.pune@taxmann.com

Taxmann Ahmedabad

7, Abhinav Arcade, Ground Floor, Pritam Nagar Paldi

Ahmedabad – 380007 | Gujarat | India

Phone: +91 99099 84900

Email: sales.ahmedabad@taxmann.com

Taxmann Hyderabad

4-1-369 Indralok Commercial Complex Shop No. 15/1 – Ground Floor, Reddy Hostel Lane Abids Hyderabad – 500001 | Telangana | India

Phone | +91 93910 41461

Email | sales.hyderabad@taxmann.com

Taxmann Chennai No. 26, 2, Rajan St, Rama Kamath Puram, T. Nagar

Chennai – 600017 | Tamil Nadu | India

Phone | +91 89390 09948

Email | sales.chennai@taxmann.com

Taxmann Bengaluru

12/1, Nirmal Nivas, Ground Floor, 4th Cross, Gandhi Nagar

Bengaluru – 560009 | Karnataka | India

Phone | +91 99869 50066

Email | sales.bengaluru@taxmann.com

Taxmann Kolkata Nigam Centre, 155-Lenin Sarani, Wellington, 2nd Floor, Room No. 213

Kolkata – 700013 | West Bengal | India

Phone | +91 98300 71313

Email | sales.kolkata@taxmann.com

Taxmann Lucknow

House No. LIG – 4/40, Sector – H, Jankipuram Lucknow – 226021 | Uttar Pradesh | India

Phone | +91 97924 23987

Email | sales.lucknow@taxmann.com

Taxmann Bhubaneswar

Plot No. 591, Nayapalli, Near Damayanti Apartments

Bhubaneswar – 751012 | Odisha | India

Phone | +91 99370 71353

Email | sales.bhubaneswar@taxmann.com

Taxmann Guwahati

House No. 2, Samnaay Path, Sawauchi Dakshin Gaon Road

Guwahati – 781040 | Assam | India

Phone | +91 70866 24504

Email | sales.guwahati@taxmann.com

Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.
Taxmann's Analysis | Revenue Recognition under Ind AS 115 – Common Pitfalls and Practical Remedies by Taxmann - Issuu