Are we pushing the Baron into retirement?
By Tattler Staff
In early October, B-CC unveiled an attractive new array of gear in an online store set up especially for staff. The selection was fresh. So fresh in fact, that one teacher noted that not a single item offered featured the Baron name or logo. When asked about the selection/omission, Administration was quick to reply,
“...there has been no official change of our mascot. Both the Pine Tree and the Baron have historical significance to B-CC.” The statement is unambiguous. Still who could blame the Baron for feeling a little ghosted of late? Questions remain. Is the Baron being nudged into retirement? And, if so, does the
Baron, after all his years of service, deserve a proper debate and vote? After all, as senior Matan Mergi recently reminded us on B-CCTV, it was a Tattler-initiated vote back in 1940 that brought us the Baron in the first place. The discussion continues on page 5
After a hard Fall, B-CC pushes for social justice By Carmen Lopez- Fernandez, Karenna Barmada, and Bennet Galper
O
n October 18, 2021 during B-CC’s advisory period, students in Youth For Equity led discussions on the culture surrounding inclusion and race at B-CC. In one senior class the conversation became heated, and in response another senior posted a thread on instagram detailing their feelings about the conflict, and their experiences with racism at B-CC. The post soon led to others sharing their negative experiences. Clashes on social media brought into question the lack of inclusion for students of color in B-CCs community, administration’s failure to support minorities, and students racist behavior. On November 5th, 2 weeks after the original discussion and social media debacle, YFE, working with staff and the SGA, planned an assembly solely for the senior class. As the 2022 graduating class filled in, they were greeted by administration reviewing the community guidelines: “Lean in, and lean out”, and “impact over intent”.
The discussion originally set out by giving students scenarios highlighting microaggressions, and then allowing
them to discuss with a neighbor. Passing around a mic, some students volunteered to share their thoughts on each scenario. The guided slideshow ran smoothly, until one student decided to mention the hypocrisy they felt regarding the assembly as a whole. André Carpyé stood up and said, “I’m sure all of you remember the recent situation from all over Instagram about how people are being invalidated. The SGA was tagged multiple times but nothing has been said about it”. He followed up stating, “I just find it a bit hypocritical… a bit insulting honestly”. His address was immediately followed by an uproar of applause from the senior crowd. The positive response motivated other students to speak up about their concerns outside of the planned conversation. Administration was quick to respond to the claims. Ms. Adamson(who had worked with the Minority Scholars Program and YFE to plan the assembly
and make the conversation as helpful as possible) returned to the stage attempting to fix the situation, and was met with a few claps. Before the bell rang Ms. Adamson offered an apology, admitting that she regretted the impact of her earlier words and asking the senior class to take the conversation as an example of how to be accountable. Since the assembly there have been several meetings addressing the tensions between students, administration, and staff. The Tattler has received over a dozen viewpoints on the assembly and the issues leading up to assembly. While we can’t print all of them, in this newsletter are excerpts from some of the articles we have received. The full articles are available on TattlerExtra.com, and will be published in our upcoming feature magazine
Continued Page 2