2020
REGIONAL EQUITY REPORT
THE 2020 REGIONAL EQUITY REPORT IS PRODUCED BY THE TAMPA BAY PARTNERSHIP FOUNDATION, IN COLLABORATION WITH THE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF TAMPA BAY AND UNITED WAY SUNCOAST, AND IS AFFILIATED WITH THE STATE OF THE REGION INITIATIVE. WWW.STATEOFTHEREGION.COM
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
ABOUT THE REPORT
2
INFRASTRUCTURE
54
Introduction
2
Digital Access & The Digital Divide
54
Executive Summary
3
Black-White Gap: Digital Access & The Digital Divide
55
Indicator Summary
4
Comparative Digital Access by Race/Ethnicity
56
User Guide
6
Regional Digital Access by Race/Ethnicity
57
Transportation To Work
58
Black-White Gap: Transportation to Work
59
Comparative Transportation to Work by Race/Ethnicity
60
Regional Transportation to Work by Race/Ethnicity
61
DEMOGRAPHICS
10
Diversity
10
Comparative Diversity
11
Regional Diversity
12
ECONOMIC VITALITY
14
Wages
14
Black-White Gap: Wages
15
Comparative Rate by Race/Ethnicity
16
Regional Wages by Race/Ethnicity
17
Wages & Educational Attainment
18
Wages & Educational Attainment
19
TALENT
22
Dropout Rate
22
Black-White Gap: Dropout Rate
23
Comparative Dropout Rate by Race/Ethnicity
24
Regional Dropout Rate by Race/Ethnicity
25
Youth Disconnection
26
Black-White Gap: Youth Disconnection
27
Comparative Youth Disconnection by Race/Ethnicity
28
Regional Youth Disconnection by Race/Ethnicity
29
Educational Attainment
30
Black-White Gap: Educational Attainment
31
Comparative Educational Attainment by Race/Ethnicity
32
Regional Educational Attainment by Race/Ethnicity
33
Labor Force Participation
34
Black-White Gap: Labor Force Participation
35
Comparative Labor Force Participation by Race/Ethnicity
36
Regional Labor Force Participation by Race/Ethnicity
37
Florida Talent Indicators
39
English Language Arts, Florida Standards Assessment
40
Math, Florida Standards Assessment
42
Science, Florida Standards Assessment
44
Algebra 1 End Of Course Exam
46
Biology 1 End of Course Exam
48
High School Graduation Rate
50
CIVIC QUALITY
CONTENTS
CONTENTS
62
Home Ownership
62
Black-White Gap: Home Ownership
63
Comparative Home Ownership by Race/Ethnicity
64
Regional Home Ownership by Race/Ethnicity
65
Health Insurance Coverage
66
Black-White Gap: Health Insurance Coverage
67
Comparative Health Insurance Coverage by Race/Ethnicity 68 Regional Health Insurance Coverage by Race/Ethnicity
OUTCOMES
69
70
Working Poor
70
Black-White Gap: Working Poor
71
Comparative Working Poor by Race/Ethnicity
72
Regional Working Poor by Race/Ethnicity
73
Poverty
74
Black-White Gap: Poverty
75
Comparative Poverty by Race/Ethnicity
76
Regional Poverty by Race/Ethnicity
77
Child Poverty
78
Black-White Gap: Child Poverty
79
Comparative Child Poverty by Race/Ethnicity
80
Regional Child Poverty by Race/Ethnicity
81
Unemployment
82
Black-White Gap: Unemployment
83
Comparative Unemployment by Race/Ethnicity
84
Regional Unemployment by Race/Ethnicity
85
High School Graduation Rate – Economically Disadvantaged 52
www.stateoftheregion.com
1
ABOUT THE REPORT
INTRODUCTION As we learned from the 2020 REGIONAL COMPETITIVENESS REPORT, Tampa Bay enjoyed a period of unprecedented economic prosperity prior to the COVID-19 crisis. However, the report also revealed that not everyone was able to share in this prosperity and access the opportunities that it created. In recent months, the global pandemic sent shock waves through our region, exposing the vulnerabilities of our population and inequities in our economy. How our residents have weathered this unprecedented crisis correlates strongly with the neighborhood they live in and the color of their skin. Now, more than ever, it is important for us to make a deliberate and coordinated effort to rebuild and reposition our region for future growth that is more inclusive—growth that creates more and better economic opportunities that can be accessed by everyone. Inequity restrains regions as a whole, inhibiting competitiveness with communities that better utilize their full human capacity. The first step is understanding where the gaps exist. The purpose of the 2020 REGIONAL EQUITY REPORT is to examine a set of indicators related to economic opportunity and assess performance and outcomes by race and ethnic groups. This provides us with context for identifying where our weaknesses lie. The report that follows carries over the 19-market peer group from the 2020 REGIONAL COMPETITIVENESS REPORT, as well as the key drivers identified within its framework for prosperity. This Regional Equity Report dives deeper into the indicators to examine the Black-White gap and outcomes relative to peers, regional counties, and race/ethnicity. This analysis will provide necessary insights to help public, private, and nonprofit leaders better understand racial disparities in Tampa Bay and set goals to diminish and, eventually, eliminate them. It’s our hope that, using this information, we can take tangible steps toward creating a more inclusive community—one where every person has equitable access to opportunity and prosperity, regardless of what they look like or where they live. Sincerely,
Rick Homans President and CEO Tampa Bay Partnership 2
2020 REGIONAL EQUITY REPORT
Marlene Spalten President and CEO Community Foundation of Tampa Bay
Jessica Muroff President and CEO United Way Suncoast
The 2020 REGIONAL EQUITY REPORT examines a set of 21 indicators related to economic vitality, talent, infrastructure, civic quality, and outcomes. It measures the gap between the Black population and the White, Non-Hispanic population to highlight the disparity between the two. It looks at the performance of Tampa Bay in six different racial and ethnic categories among a group of 19 other peers across the US, and it also documents differences in performance by race and ethnicity across the eight-county Tampa Bay region. The disparity and differences are stark, not just for the Black population but also for Hispanics and other people of color. People of color in the Tampa Bay region do not appear to be able to access the same opportunities as the White, Non-Hispanic population, and this situation is relatively worse in Tampa Bay than it is in the other peer metros. The economic outcomes for people of color show that they are more likely to be part of the working poor, living in poverty, or unemployed.
ABOUT THE REPORT
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Furthermore, the indicators related to youth preparedness—the dropout rate, the rate of youth disconnection, and in-school performance—foreshadow that the situation is not likely to improve without intervention. We must seize this opportunity to intentionally reignite our economy in ways that build bridges and scaffolding to lift up our most vulnerable residents.
KEY FINDINGS Median wages for Black workers ($16.42) in Tampa Bay are 21% less than White workers ($20.90), but this gap is the smallest of the 20 competitive markets. Important to note that median wages earned in Tampa Bay – across all races -rank in the bottom quintile among the comparison markets. Among Tampa Bay’s White residents, 30.3% have a bachelor’s degree or higher, compared to 20% of Black residents. The 10.3% gap is the second lowest gap amongst the 20 competitive markets. Educational attainment has been shown to have a strong positive influence on lifetime earnings potential. Tampa Bay’s Black workers earn roughly 20% less than their White counterparts – no matter what education level they attain: • Less than High School: -20.0% difference • High School Diploma: -19.0% difference • Some College: -18.2% difference • Bachelor’s Degree or Higher: -20.2% difference Black students in Tampa Bay are performing markedly below their White peers based on data from Florida schools: • 3rd Grade English Florida Standards Assessment: -32.5% difference • 3rd/8th Grade Math Florida Standards Assessment: -31.9% difference • 5th/8th Grade Science Florida Standards Assessment: -33.7% difference • Algebra I End of Course Exam: -31.0% difference • Biology I End of Course Exam: -34.4% difference • High School Graduation Rate: -9.6% difference Black and Hispanic residents of Tampa Bay are less likely to have a computer and broadband Internet, technology critical to success in education and work. Tampa Bay’s 13.8% gap between White (85.1%) and Black (71.3%) digital access ranks 18th among the 20 competitive markets. Across the region, Blacks, Hispanics, and individuals that fall into the “Other” category are much less likely to own their own home, compared to White residents. Tampa Bay’s 32.5% gap between White (73.3%) and Black (40.8%) home ownership rates ranks 15th among the 20 competitive markets. This gap not only affects housing stability for these families, it also affects the accumulation of wealth from one generation to the next. Black residents of Tampa Bay are more than two times as likely to be living in poverty compared to Whites. Tampa Bay’s 13.7% gap between White (10.6%) and Black (24.3%) poverty rates ranks 16th among the 20 competitive markets. Black children in Tampa Bay are almost three times as likely to be living in poverty, compared to Whites. Tampa Bay’s 22% gap between White (13%) and Black (35%) child poverty rates ranks 14th among the 20 competitive markets.
www.stateoftheregion.com
3
The table below summarizes how Tampa Bay ranks among its peers for the measure of disparity for each indicator: the Black-White gap. The Black-White Gap in Tampa Bay, relative to the peer group, is quite low for median hourly wages, educational attainment, labor force participation, and transportation to work. The gap is highest in Tampa Bay, relative to the peer group for digital access, poverty, child poverty, and home ownership. BEST
DROPOUT RATE
YOUTH DISCONNECTION
EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT
LABOR FORCE PARTICIPATION
DIGITAL ACCESS
TRANSPORTATION TO WORK
HOME OWNERSHIP
HEALTH INSURANCE COVERAGE
WORKING POOR
POVERTY
CHILD POVERY
UNEMPLOYMENT
Rank 1-4
WAGES
ABOUT THE REPORT
INDICATOR SUMMARY
Tampa Bay Bay ï‚„ Tampa
1
8
12
2
1
18
5
15
9
11
16
14
9
Atlanta
8
4
11
7
6
3
10
6
15
6
3
5
12
Austin
20
9
2
19
17
15
6
1
8
5
6
11
2
Baltimore
15
19
20
13
20
10
20
11
5
1
10
10
13
Charlotte
10
6
13
5
4
7
2
12
12
2
4
3
14
Dallas-Ft. Worth
9
5
10
10
10
17
3
14
17
13
11
7
4
Denver
7
10
4
20
18
11
16
13
7
17
12
12
3
Houston
18
2
3
11
11
13
4
9
18
9
9
9
11
Jacksonville
5
17
16
9
13
16
8
5
1
19
15
15
15
Mpls-St. Paul
16
18
14
15
16
9
18
20
14
20
20
20
18
Nashville
3
7
9
1
12
14
7
8
6
18
14
17
5
Orlando
14
12
8
8
5
6
12
2
13
10
7
4
7
Phoenix
4
13
17
3
3
4
11
19
4
16
8
2
10
Portland
6
14
5
6
14
5
19
17
3
3
18
16
16
Raleigh-Durham
13
15
7
16
15
12
1
4
16
12
2
6
8
San Antonio
2
1
1
4
8
8
9
3
10
7
1
1
1
San Diego
17
3
18
17
7
1
14
10
2
4
5
8
19
Seattle
11
11
6
14
9
2
15
16
11
8
17
18
6
South Florida
19
16
15
18
2
19
13
7
20
14
13
13
17
St. Louis
12
20
19
12
19
20
17
18
19
15
19
19
20
Rank 5-8 Rank 9-12 Rank 13-16
WORST
Rank 17-20
4
2020 REGIONAL EQUITY REPORT
ABOUT THE REPORT www.stateoftheregion.com
5
ABOUT THE REPORT
USER GUIDE THE 2020 REGIONAL EQUITY REPORT, and the data found within, are meant to be a community tool to help identify racial and ethnic disparities in economic opportunity and prosperity. By identifying these gaps and building a common understanding of the issues, we can work together to address some of these challenges. Knowing how to read and analyze the information presented within the pages of this report is key to making it a more useful and relevant tool for everyday use. Here’s what you’ll find inside:
INDICATOR CATEGORY
INDICATOR NAME
WHAT: A description of each indicator, including what it represents and how it is calculated. WHY: Why the indicator was selected, including a description of the indicator’s relationship with economic outcomes, opportunity, and prosperity.
OF NOTE: Key findings or relevant points related to the indicator.
6
2020 REGIONAL EQUITY REPORT
ABOUT THE REPORT
INDICATOR DESCRIPTION DISPARITY MEASURE: The difference between the indicator value for Blacks and White, Non-Hispanics.
TAMPA BAY: Appears in red for easier reference. UNITED STATES DATA: Where available, US data appears in gray to illustrate how Tampa Bay compares to national performance.
SOURCE: Provides attribution and a timestamp for the indicator data. NOTES: A description of the universe used for the indicator and any other relevant information needed for interpreting the indicator.
www.stateoftheregion.com
7
ABOUT THE REPORT
RACE/ETHNICITY: Indicates the category of race or ethnicity.
COLOR: A unique color is assigned to the four communities within each quintile, with the darkest color representing the best performance and the lightest color representing the worst.
ABOUT RACE/ETHNICITY IN THIS REPORT: For this report, the racial composition of the population is measured by the share of the population that falls into one of the following categories: ▬ White, Non-Hispanic ▬ Black Alone (includes those who identify as Hispanic) ▬ Asian Alone (includes those who identify as Hispanic) ▬ Other (includes those who identify as White Hispanic, American Indian and Alaska Native, Native Hawaiian and other Pacific Islander, some other race, or two or more races) The ethnic composition of a population for this report is measured by the share of the population that identifies as Hispanic or Latino. For the purposes of this report, “White” refers to “White, Non-Hispanic” and individuals that are classified in the Black, Other, or Hispanic categories are referred to as “people of color” throughout the report.
8
2020 REGIONAL EQUITY REPORT
ABOUT THE REPORT
REGIONAL INDICATOR: A breakdown of the indicator by race and ethnicity for the population in the Tampa Bay region.
COLOR: A unique color is assigned to each county in the Tampa Bay Region.
REGIONAL COMPARISON: A breakdown of the indicator by race and ethnicity for the each of the counties in the Tampa Bay region.
Disclaimer: The Tampa Bay Partnership has, to the best of its ability, compiled the information contained within and used to produce this publication. The data is believed to be the latest available at the time of production, accurate, and from reliable sources. The Tampa Bay Partnership welcomes constructive criticism and corrections of the errors that may appear in a project of this complexity. For more information on the methodology for this report, please contact Dave Sobush at dsobush@tampabay.org. www.stateoftheregion.com
9
DEMOGRAPHICS
DIVERSITY The demographic breakdown in this section serves as a baseline for understanding the racial and ethnic profile of the populations of the peer metro areas and the Tampa Bay region. The Non-White or Hispanic population in Tampa Bay accounts for 34 percent of the population, which makes Tampa Bay more racially diverse than only four of its peers. The Hispanic population in Tampa Bay accounts for 18 percent of the population, which makes it more ethnically diverse, than 10 of its peers. In addition to the race and ethnicity of the population, the nativity of each race and ethnic category is shown, which indicates the share of each population that is US-born or foreign-born. The nativity of the population in each of the categories can influence the indicators and outcomes presented in this report. In Tampa Bay, the Asian population has the largest share of foreign-born followed by the Hispanic and Other categories.
By Race
By Hispanic or Latino
White, Non-Hispanic Tampa Bay Bay Tampa
66.2%
Atlanta
47.6%
Austin
52.4%
Baltimore
57.0%
Charlotte
61.6%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
46.9%
Denver
64.3%
Houston
36.6%
Jacksonville
63.4%
Mpls-St. Paul
76.1%
Nashville
72.6%
Orlando
47.6%
Phoenix
55.8%
Portland
73.7%
Raleigh-Durham
59.5%
San Antonio
33.9%
San Diego
45.9%
Seattle
64.0%
South Florida
30.9%
St. Louis
73.9%
UnitedStates States United
61.1%
Black
Asian
Other
Non-Hispanic
19.7%
17.8%
82.2%
12.7%
10.6%
89.4%
34.6%
32.3%
67.7%
8.3%
5.6%
94.4%
12.4%
10.0%
90.0%
30.9%
28.6%
71.4%
25.9%
23.0%
77.0%
38.5%
37.0%
63.0%
11.3%
8.5%
91.5%
8.3%
9.2%
5.8%
94.2%
15.2%
9.6%
7.1%
92.9%
31.6%
29.9%
70.1%
34.9%
30.7%
69.3%
17.0%
11.8%
88.2%
13.3%
10.7%
89.3%
56.8%
55.2%
44.8%
37.3%
33.5%
66.5%
17.0%
9.9%
90.1%
45.3%
44.7%
55.3%
5.3%
3.0%
97.0%
20.8%
17.8%
82.2%
11.3% 33.9% 7.3% 29.1% 22.4% 15.5% 5.7% 17.3% 21.5%
16.5% 5.4% 2.8% 21.9% 6.8% 5.0% 12% 5.7% 21.3% 18.3% 12.7%
Hispanic
Source: US Census Bureau, 2018 American Community Survey 5-year estimates, B05003. Notes: Universe includes all people. Labels for values 5 percent and under in the “By Race” chart have been removed for readability.
10
2020 REGIONAL EQUITY REPORT
POPULATION BY RACE/ETHNICITY AND NATIVITY ■ US Born
All Tampa Bay 87.4% Tampa
■ Foreign Born
White, Non-Hispanic 12.6%
Black
Tampa Tampa Bay Bay
94.7%
5.3%
Atlanta
89.1%
10.9%
95.8%
4.2%
Atlanta
91.6%
8.4%
Austin
96.2%
3.8%
Austin
91.3%
8.7%
96.5%
3.5%
Baltimore
92.1%
7.9%
97.2%
2.8%
Charlotte
95.6%
4.4%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
96.6%
3.4%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
91.1%
8.9%
96.4%
3.6%
Denver
82.4%
17.6%
90.9%
9.1%
Atlanta
86.3%
13.7%
Austin
85.0%
15.0%
Baltimore
89.7%
10.3%
Charlotte
Baltimore
90.1%
9.9%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
Charlotte
81.7%
18.3%
TampaBay Bay Tampa
Denver
87.7%
12.3%
Denver
Houston
76.6%
23.4%
Houston
Jacksonville
94.4%
5.6%
Houston
90.9%
9.1%
Jacksonville
95.7%
4.3%
Jacksonville
95.1%
4.9%
Mpls-St. Paul
89.4%
10.6%
Mpls-St. Paul
97.9%
2.1%
Mpls-St. Paul
67.5%
32.5%
Nashville
92.0%
8.0%
Nashville
97.2%
2.8%
Nashville
94.5%
5.5%
77.7%
22.3%
Orlando
82.1%
17.9%
Orlando
93.4%
6.6%
Orlando
Phoenix
85.6%
14.4%
Phoenix
95.2%
4.8%
Phoenix
90.2%
9.8%
Portland
87.4%
12.6%
Portland
95.4%
4.6%
Portland
81.3%
18.7%
Raleigh-Durham
87.9%
12.1%
Raleigh-Durham
96.2%
3.8%
Raleigh-Durham
94.6%
5.4%
San Antonio
88.2%
11.8%
94.9%
5.1%
San Diego
76.6%
23.4%
Seattle
81.8%
18.2%
South Florida
59.6%
40.4%
St. Louis United United States States
95.3%
4.7%
86.5%
13.5%
Asian Tampa Tampa Bay Bay
29.1%
San Antonio
96.7%
3.3%
San Antonio
San Diego
91.1%
8.9%
San Diego
90.3%
9.7%
Seattle
93.5%
6.5%
Seattle
76.4%
23.6%
South Florida
86.4%
13.6%
South Florida
65.5%
34.5%
97.9%
2.1%
St. Louis
97.9%
2.1%
96.0%
4.0%
United States United States
90.3%
St. Louis United UnitedStates States
Hispanic, All Races 70.9%
Atlanta
29.4%
70.6%
Austin
33.2%
66.8%
Baltimore
31.9%
68.1%
Charlotte
30.0%
70.0%
9.7%
Other
Tampa Bay Bay Tampa
68.2%
31.8%
Atlanta
Tampa Tampa Bay Bay
56.6%
43.4%
70.3%
29.7%
Austin
Atlanta
74.0%
26.0%
62.2%
37.8%
Baltimore
Austin
61.6%
38.4%
75.3%
24.7%
Baltimore
Charlotte
72.1%
27.9%
54.5%
45.5%
Charlotte
Dallas-Ft. Worth
62.2%
37.8%
63.3%
36.7%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
Dallas-Ft. Worth
30.7%
69.3%
34.7%
34.9%
65.1%
Denver
65.3%
Denver
73.7%
26.3%
Denver
24.1%
Houston
30.0%
70.0%
Houston
75.9%
61.7%
38.3%
Houston
62.7%
37.3%
Jacksonville
30.3%
69.7%
Jacksonville
70.9%
29.1%
Jacksonville
76.6%
23.4%
62.7%
37.3%
Mpls-St. Paul
Mpls-St. Paul
39.3%
60.7%
Mpls-St. Paul
74.6%
25.4%
Nashville
28.4%
71.6%
Nashville
56.3%
43.7%
Nashville
65.7%
34.3%
Orlando
32.8%
67.2%
Orlando
73.4%
26.6%
Orlando
73.8%
26.2%
Phoenix
31.5%
68.5%
Phoenix
73.0%
27.0%
Phoenix
75.7%
24.3%
65.5%
34.5%
Portland
73.8%
26.2%
Raleigh-Durham
63.3%
36.7%
San Antonio
84.7%
15.3%
San Diego
68.9%
31.1%
Seattle
77.5%
22.5%
South Florida
40.4%
59.6%
St. Louis United UnitedStates States
81.1%
18.9%
Portland
35.1%
64.9%
Portland
Raleigh-Durham
29.1%
70.9%
Raleigh-Durham
San Antonio
55.7%
44.3%
32.6%
67.4%
San Antonio
San Diego
84.5%
15.5%
38.3%
61.7%
San Diego
Seattle
66.3%
33.7%
33.0%
67.0%
Seattle
South Florida
66.4%
33.6%
28.2%
71.8%
South Florida
St. Louis United UnitedStates States
39.3%
60.7%
28.9%
71.1%
70.1%
29.9%
33.7%
66.3%
St. Louis United UnitedStates States
66.1%
DEMOGRAPHICS
COMPARATIVE DIVERSITY
33.9%
70.1%
29.9%
Source: US Census Bureau, 2018 American Community Survey 5-year estimates, B05003. Notes: Universe includes all people. www.stateoftheregion.com
11
DEMOGRAPHICS
REGIONAL DIVERSITY POPULATION BY RACE/ETHNICITY AND NATIVITY Tampa Bay Region White, Non-Hispanic Citrus
88.3%
Hernando
78.4%
Hillsborough
49.5%
Manatee
71.5%
Pasco
75.6%
Pinellas
74.3%
Polk
60.0%
Sarasota
83.4%
Black
Asian
Other
Hispanic
2.9% 7.0%
5.5%
94.5%
15.3%
12.9%
87.1%
29.8%
28.0%
72.0%
17.8%
16.2%
83.8%
5.6%
16.3%
14.5%
85.5%
10.3%
12.1%
9.4%
90.6%
23.1%
21.5%
78.5%
9.0%
91.0%
5.1% 16.6% 8.7%
15.2%
4.5% 10.4% ■ US Born
All
Non-Hispanic
■ Foreign Born
White, Non-Hispanic
Black
Citrus
94.3%
5.7%
Citrus
97.1%
2.9%
Citrus
85.6%
14.4%
Hernando
93.1%
6.9%
Hernando
96.5%
3.5%
Hernando
87.5%
12.5%
Hillsborough
83.0%
17.0%
Hillsborough
95.1%
4.9%
Hillsborough
89.0%
11.0%
Manatee
87.4%
12.6%
Manatee
94.2%
5.8%
Manatee
91.0%
9.0%
Pasco
90.3%
9.7%
Pasco
95.5%
4.5%
Pasco
82.4%
17.6%
Pinellas
88.1%
11.9%
Pinellas
92.8%
7.2%
Pinellas
92.0%
8.0%
Polk
90.0%
10.0%
Polk
97.0%
3.0%
Polk
88.4%
11.6%
Sarasota
87.7%
12.3%
Sarasota
92.5%
7.5%
Sarasota
86.5%
13.5%
Asian
Hispanic, All Races
Other
Citrus
21.5%
78.5%
Citrus
75.8%
24.2%
Citrus
81.8%
18.2%
Hernando
31.2%
68.8%
Hernando
79.7%
20.3%
Hernando
82.2%
17.8%
Hillsborough
28.5%
71.5%
Hillsborough
65.4%
34.6%
Hillsborough
66.8%
33.2%
Manatee
26.2%
73.8%
Manatee
62.0%
38.0%
Manatee
65.2%
34.8%
Pasco
33.8%
66.2%
Pasco
75.9%
24.1%
Pasco
77.8%
22.2%
Pinellas
30.3%
69.7%
Pinellas
67.2%
32.8%
Pinellas
71.4%
28.6%
Polk
29.8%
70.2%
Polk
76.4%
23.6%
Polk
77.2%
22.8%
Sarasota
23.6%
76.4%
Sarasota
54.7%
45.3%
Sarasota
59.7%
40.3%
Source: US Census Bureau, 2018 American Community Survey 5-year estimates, B05003. Notes: Universe includes all people. In the Tampa Bay Region chart, labels for values below 4 percent have been omitted for readability.
12
2020 REGIONAL EQUITY REPORT
DEMOGRAPHICS www.stateoftheregion.com
13
ECONOMIC VITALITY
WAGES WHAT
The median hourly wage for full-time civilian workers ages 25 through 64. The values are in 2018 dollars.
WHY
The median hourly wage reflects an economy’s occupational composition and the distribution of economic opportunity between low-wage and high-wage jobs. An economy with many low-wage jobs would have a lower median hourly wage than an economy with more high-wage jobs. Within an economy, the racial and ethnic variation in median hourly wages can indicate differences in access to economic opportunity.
In Tampa Bay, the median hourly wage for Black workers is 21% lower than it is for White, Non-Hispanic workers.
OF NOTE
– The Tampa Bay region has a relatively low median hourly wage as a result of the size of its tourism and hospitality sector. It ranks in the bottom quintile with other tourism economies in the peer group: South Florida, San Antonio, and Orlando. – The difference in median hourly wage between Black ($16.42) and White, Non-Hispanic workers ($20.90) is the lowest among the peer group. – Asian workers in Tampa Bay earn the highest median hourly wage while workers in the “Some Other Race” earn the lowest. Black, Hispanic, and other non-white workers earn the highest median hourly wage in Pasco County. For the most part, non-white workers earn the lowest median hourly wage in Sarasota County. Source: 2018 5-year American Community Survey microdata file from IPUMS USA. Notes: Universe includes civilian full-time wage and salary workers ages 25 through 64. Values are in 2018 dollars.
14
2020 REGIONAL EQUITY REPORT
MEDIAN HOURLY WAGE Disparity Measure Region
Tampa Bay in Context
White
Black
Difference
Tampa Bay
$20.90
$16.42
-21.4%
San Antonio
$23.88
$18.41
-22.9%
Nashville
$21.67
$16.45
-24.1%
Phoenix
$24.66
$18.45
-25.2%
Jacksonville
$22.10
$16.45
-25.6%
Portland
$25.70
$18.92
-26.4%
Denver
$27.42
$19.90
-27.4%
Atlanta
$26.37
$19.02
-27.9%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
$26.45
$19.01
-28.1%
Charlotte
$24.61
$17.48
-29.0%
Seattle
$30.52
$21.40
-29.9%
St. Louis
$24.33
$17.00
-30.1%
Raleigh-Durham
$26.73
$18.51
-30.8%
Orlando
$22.39
$15.42
-31.1%
Baltimore
$31.87
$21.85
-31.4%
Mpls-St. Paul
$27.20
$18.50
-32.0%
San Diego
$30.83
$20.92
-32.1%
Houston
$29.50
$19.90
-32.5%
South Florida
$24.88
$16.03
-35.6%
Austin
$28.27
$17.91
-36.6%
TampaBay Bay ï‚„ Tampa
-21.4%
San Antonio
-22.9%
Nashville
-24.1%
Phoenix
-25.2%
Jacksonville
-25.6%
Portland
-26.4%
Denver
-27.4%
Atlanta
-27.9%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
-28.1%
Charlotte
-29.0%
Seattle
-29.9%
St. Louis
-30.1%
Raleigh-Durham
-30.8%
Orlando
-31.1%
Baltimore
-31.4%
Mpls-St. Paul
-32.0%
San Diego
-32.1%
Houston
-32.5%
South Florida Austin
ECONOMIC VITALITY
BLACK-WHITE GAP: WAGES
-35.6% -36.6%
Source: 2018 5-year American Community Survey microdata file from IPUMS USA. Notes: Universe includes civilian full-time wage and salary workers ages 25 through 64. Values are in 2018 dollars. www.stateoftheregion.com
15
ECONOMIC VITALITY
COMPARATIVE RATE BY RACE/ETHNICITY MEDIAN HOURLY WAGE All
White, Non-Hispanic
Seattle
$28.77
Baltimore
$27.42
Baltimore
$31.87
Baltimore
$21.85
San Diego
$30.83
Seattle
$21.40
$30.52
San Diego
$20.92
$29.50
Denver
$19.90
Houston
$19.90
$25.69
Seattle
San Diego
$24.88
Houston
Denver
$24.64
Austin
Mpls-St. Paul
Black
$28.27
Portland
$24.42
Denver
$27.42
Atlanta
$19.02
Raleigh-Durham
$23.73
Mpls-St. Paul
$27.20
Dallas-Ft. Worth
$19.01
Austin
$18.92
$23.31
Raleigh-Durham
$26.73
Portland
St. Louis
$22.85
Dallas-Ft. Worth
$26.45
Raleigh-Durham
$18.51
Houston
$22.39
Atlanta
$26.37
Mpls-St. Paul
$18.50
Atlanta
$22.19
Portland
$25.70
Phoenix
$18.45
Charlotte
$21.58
South Florida
$24.88
San Antonio
$18.41
Dallas-Ft. Worth
$21.36
Phoenix
$24.66
Austin
$17.91
Phoenix
$21.16
Charlotte
$24.61
Charlotte
$17.48
Jacksonville
$20.35
St. Louis
$24.33
St. Louis
$17.00
Nashville
$23.88
Jacksonville
$16.45
$20.35
San Antonio
Tampa Bay Bay Tampa
$19.43
Orlando
San Antonio
$19.18
Jacksonville
$22.39
Nashville
$16.45
$22.10
Tampa Bay Bay Tampa
$16.42
South Florida
$19.07
Nashville
$21.67
South Florida
$16.03
Orlando
$18.93
Tampa Bay Bay Tampa
$20.90
Orlando
$15.42
Asian
Hispanic, All Races
Austin
$36.99
Raleigh-Durham
$36.62
Charlotte
Seattle Baltimore
$19.43 $19.18
Other Baltimore Seattle
$20.56
San Diego
$17.81
$32.34
Denver
$31.57
St. Louis
$29.86
South Florida
St. Louis
$29.86
Jacksonville
$16.96
Portland
$17.91
Phoenix
$29.14
Portland
$16.78
Jacksonville
$17.48 $17.13
Baltimore Seattle Houston
$33.99
St. Louis
$18.50
$17.80
Denver
$18.21
$17.69
San Diego
$18.15
$17.00
Mpls-St. Paul
$17.97
$27.87
San Antonio
$16.78
Austin
San Diego
$27.67
Austin
$16.65
South Florida
$17.00
Atlanta
$27.13
Phoenix
$16.44
San Antonio
$16.95
Portland
$26.73
Mpls-St. Paul
$16.28
Phoenix
$16.78
Houston
$16.10
Houston
$16.44
Dallas-Ft. Worth
Denver
$25.12
San Antonio
$24.28
Orlando
$15.52
Orlando
$15.77
Jacksonville
$23.65
Dallas-Ft. Worth
$15.42
Dallas-Ft. Worth
$15.68
Mpls-St. Paul
$23.13
Tampa Bay Bay Tampa
$15.42
Atlanta
$15.54
TampaBay Bay Tampa
$23.09
Atlanta
$14.93
Tampa Bay Bay Tampa
$15.43
South Florida
$22.82
Charlotte
$14.93
Charlotte
$15.42
Nashville
$22.20
Raleigh-Durham
$13.93
Nashville
$14.80
$22.12
Nashville
$13.87
Raleigh-Durham
$14.78
Orlando
Source: 2018 5-year American Community Survey microdata file from IPUMS USA. Notes: Universe includes civilian full-time wage and salary workers ages 25 through 64. Values are in 2018 dollars.
16
$20.85
2020 REGIONAL EQUITY REPORT
ECONOMIC VITALITY
REGIONAL WAGES BY RACE/ETHNICITY MEDIAN HOURLY WAGE Tampa Bay Region Asian
$23.09
White, Non-Hispanic
$20.90
All
$19.43
Two or More Races
$17.48
Black
$16.42
Hispanic, All Races
$15.42
Some Other Race
$14.39
All
White, Non-Hispanic
Black
Hillsborough
$20.35
Hillsborough
Pasco
$19.90
Pinellas
$21.15
Hillsborough
Pinellas
$19.90
Manatee
$20.56
Pinellas
$15.98
Sarasota
$19.43
Pasco
$20.55
Polk
$15.26
Sarasota
$20.55
Manatee
$14.60
Sarasota
$14.57
Manatee
$18.71
Hernando
$17.82
Polk
Polk
$17.80
Hernando
Citrus
$24.12
$19.73 $18.45
Citrus
$16.65
Asian
$16.86
Pasco
$29.14
Pasco
$26.73
Pasco
$17.00
$17.00
Citrus
n/d
Hernando
n/d
Hispanic, All Races
Hillsborough
$18.51
Other Pasco
$17.00
Hernando
$16.11
Hillsborough
$16.28
Polk
$21.37
Hillsborough
$15.93
Hernando
$16.11
Manatee
$20.90
Pinellas
$15.43
Pinellas
$15.64
Pinellas
$18.41
Manatee
$14.57
Manatee
$14.57
Citrus
n/d
Polk
$14.57
Polk
$14.57
Hernando
n/d
Sarasota
$14.57
Sarasota
$14.57
Sarasota
n/d
Citrus
n/d
Citrus
n/d
Source: 2018 5-year American Community Survey microdata file from IPUMS USA. Notes: Universe includes civilian full-time wage and salary workers ages 25 through 64. Values are in 2018 dollars. The label “n/d” indicates “non-disclosed” and that the sample size was not big enough to make the calculation. www.stateoftheregion.com
17
ECONOMIC VITALITY
WAGES & EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT WHAT
The median hourly wage, in 2018 dollars, for full-time civilian workers ages 25 to 64 by educational attainment level.
In Tampa Bay, the highest pay differential between Black and White, NonHispanic workers is for those with a bachelor’s degree or higher.
WHY
Educational attainment tends to influence lifetime earnings. As such, median hourly wages increase with higher levels of educational attainment. Looking at the variations by race reveals that differences in median hourly wages cannot be explained by differences in educational attainment. It also reveals that disparities in pay persist even at high levels of educational attainment. Quintile:
Top
Bottom
Quintile:
LESS THAN HIGH SCHOOL
Bottom
Top
HIGH SCHOOL DIPLOMA
White, NonHispanic
Black
Difference (#)
Difference (%)
White, NonHispanic
Black
Difference (#)
Difference (%)
Tampa Bay
$14.93
$11.94
-$2.99
-20.0%
$16.95
$13.73
-$3.22
-19.0%
Atlanta
$16.03
$12.21
-$3.82
-23.8%
$18.84
$14.93
-$3.91
-20.8%
Austin
$17.13
n/d
n/d
n/d
$17.98
$14.57
-$3.41
-19.0%
Baltimore
$18.31
$15.54
-$2.77
-15.1%
$22.39
$17.26
-$5.13
-22.9%
Charlotte
$14.93
$10.68
-$4.24
-28.4%
$18.15
$14.24
-$3.91
-21.6%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
$16.61
$11.94
-$4.67
-28.1%
$19.90
$14.93
-$4.98
-25.0%
Denver
$18.20
n/d
n/d
n/d
$20.55
$16.81
-$3.74
-18.2%
Houston
$18.04
$12.86
-$5.18
-28.7%
$21.04
$15.22
-$5.83
-27.7%
Jacksonville
$15.00
$13.22
-$1.78
-11.9%
$17.12
$14.39
-$2.73
-16.0%
Mpls-St. Paul
$17.98
$12.33
-$5.65
-31.4%
$20.55
$15.93
-$4.62
-22.5%
Nashville
$14.39
$12.33
-$2.06
-14.3%
$17.42
$13.87
-$3.54
-20.3%
Orlando
$14.99
$10.70
-$4.29
-28.6%
$17.38
$13.22
-$4.16
-23.9%
Phoenix
$15.92
$13.99
-$1.94
-12.2%
$18.91
$15.41
-$3.50
-18.5%
Portland
$17.94
n/d
n/d
n/d
$19.43
n/d
n/d
n/d
Raleigh-Durham
$14.48
$12.72
-$1.76
-12.2%
$18.82
$14.90
-$3.93
-20.9%
San Antonio
$15.13
n/d
n/d
n/d
$17.35
$13.43
-$3.92
-22.6%
San Diego
$19.43
n/d
n/d
n/d
$21.06
$16.66
-$4.40
-20.9%
Seattle
$20.45
$15.06
-$5.39
-26.4%
$22.89
$17.06
-$5.83
-25.5%
South Florida
$15.82
$11.82
-$4.00
-25.3%
$19.01
$13.70
-$5.31
-27.9%
St. Louis
$15.54
$12.79
-$2.75
-17.7%
$18.91
$14.64
-$4.27
-22.6%
City
Source: 2018 5-year American Community Survey microdata file from IPUMS USA. Notes: Universe includes civilian full-time wage and salary workers ages 25 through 64. Values are in 2018 dollars. The label “n/d” indicates “non-disclosed” and that the sample size was not big enough to make the calculation.
18
2020 REGIONAL EQUITY REPORT
MEDIAN HOURLY WAGE BY RACE/ETHNICITY AND EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT
OF NOTE
– In Tampa Bay, the median hourly wage for Black workers with at least a 4-year degree is $5.88, an hour lower than their White, Non-Hispanic counterparts, or nearly 21 percent lower. The lowest pay differential is among those Black and White, Non-Hispanic workers with more than a high school diploma but less than a bachelor’s degree; the median hourly wage for Black workers in this category is $3.66 lower, or 18 percent lower.
ECONOMIC VITALITY
WAGES & EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT
– In comparison to its peers, the dollar value of the Black/White pay disparity in Tampa Bay is among the lowest for all educational attainment levels, except for those with less than a high school diploma. – White, Non-Hispanic workers at all educational attainment levels in Tampa Bay earn more than their counterparts in other racial and ethnic categories, with the exception of Asians with a bachelor’s degree or higher.
Quintile:
Bottom
Top
SOME COLLEGE
Quintile:
Bottom
Top
BACHELOR'S DEGREE OR HIGHER
White, NonHispanic
Black
Difference (#)
Difference (%)
White, NonHispanic
Black
Difference (#)
Difference (%)
$20.05
$16.39
-$3.66
-18.2%
$28.27
$22.39
-$5.88
-20.8%
Tampa Bay
$22.39
$17.48
-$4.91
-21.9%
$34.25
$25.70
-$8.55
-25.0%
Atlanta
$22.10
$17.00
-$5.11
-23.1%
$33.84
$23.22
-$10.62
-31.4%
Austin
$27.54
$20.35
-$7.19
-26.1%
$39.37
$31.98
-$7.38
-18.7%
Baltimore
$20.56
$16.45
-$4.11
-20.0%
$33.40
$23.31
-$10.09
-30.2%
Charlotte
$23.63
$17.99
-$5.64
-23.9%
$34.08
$25.43
-$8.65
-25.4%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
$23.22
$18.31
-$4.91
-21.1%
$33.51
$24.88
-$8.63
-25.8%
Denver
$25.43
$18.15
-$7.29
-28.7%
$38.36
$26.87
-$11.49
-30.0%
Houston
$20.56
$16.51
-$4.05
-19.7%
$29.79
$22.39
-$7.39
-24.8%
Jacksonville
$24.11
$17.48
-$6.63
-27.5%
$34.33
$27.23
-$7.10
-20.7%
Mpls-St. Paul
$20.35
$15.92
-$4.42
-21.7%
$28.04
$22.10
-$5.93
-21.2%
Nashville
$20.35
$15.42
-$4.92
-24.2%
$28.86
$22.61
-$6.25
-21.7%
Orlando
$21.92
$17.50
-$4.42
-20.2%
$31.82
$25.69
-$6.13
-19.3%
Phoenix
$22.89
$17.44
-$5.45
-23.8%
$33.40
$27.75
-$5.65
-16.9%
Portland
$21.85
$17.42
-$4.44
-20.3%
$33.00
$23.88
-$9.12
-27.6%
Raleigh-Durham
$20.85
$17.69
-$3.16
-15.2%
$30.52
$25.25
-$5.27
-17.3%
San Antonio
$24.77
$20.20
-$4.57
-18.4%
$38.53
$30.33
-$8.21
-21.3%
San Diego
$25.87
$19.53
-$6.34
-24.5%
$38.84
$31.66
-$7.18
-18.5%
Seattle
$22.28
$16.19
-$6.09
-27.3%
$31.97
$23.12
-$8.85
-27.7%
South Florida
$21.37
$16.19
-$5.19
-24.3%
$30.85
$25.08
-$5.77
-18.7%
St. Louis
City
Source: 2018 5-year American Community Survey microdata file from IPUMS USA. Notes: Universe includes civilian full-time wage and salary workers ages 25 through 64. Values are in 2018 dollars. The label “n/d” indicates “non-disclosed” and that the sample size was not big enough to make the calculation. www.stateoftheregion.com
19
MEDIAN HOURLY WAGE BY RACE/ETHNICITY AND EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT Tampa Bay Region White, Non-Hispanic
Black
Asian
Hispanic
Other $33.84
$30.00
$0.00
Less than HS
HS Diploma
$22.39 $16.42
$16.94
$16.44
$16.39
$13.36
$13.36
$12.84
$13.73
$16.95
$11.90
$11.90
$11.85
$5.00
$11.94
$10.00
$14.93
$15.00
$20.05
$20.00
Some College
LESS THAN HIGHSCHOOL
$23.31
$25.00
$23.00
$35.00
$28.27
ECONOMIC VITALITY
WAGES & EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT
Bachelors or Higher
HIGH SCHOOL DIPLOMA
White, NonHispanic
Black
Difference (#)
Difference (%)
White, NonHispanic
Black
Difference (#)
Difference (%)
Citrus
n/d
n/d
n/d
n/d
$14.22
n/d
n/d
n/d
Hernando
n/d
n/d
n/d
n/d
$16.66
n/d
n/d
n/d
Hillsborough
$16.45
$12.57
-$3.88
-23.6%
$18.34
$13.87
-$4.47
-24.4%
Manatee
$15.41
n/d
n/d
n/d
$16.28
$11.82
-$4.46
-27.4%
Pasco
$13.88
n/d
n/d
n/d
$16.28
n/d
n/d
n/d
Pinellas
$14.39
n/d
n/d
n/d
$16.70
$14.03
-$2.67
-16.0%
Polk
$15.26
n/d
n/d
n/d
$17.26
$13.70
-$3.56
-20.6%
Sarasota
$15.41
n/d
n/d
n/d
$17.00
n/d
n/d
n/d
County
SOME COLLEGE
BACHELOR'S DEGREE OR HIGHER
White, NonHispanic
Black
Difference (#)
Difference (%)
White, NonHispanic
Black
Difference (#)
Difference (%)
Citrus
$18.36
n/d
n/d
n/d
$24.15
n/d
n/d
n/d
Hernando
$18.31
n/d
n/d
n/d
$23.13
n/d
n/d
n/d
Hillsborough
$21.40
$16.44
-$4.96
-23.2%
$30.52
$22.89
-$7.63
-25.0%
Manatee
$20.55
n/d
n/d
n/d
$27.86
n/d
n/d
n/d
Pasco
$20.55
$18.41
-$2.14
-10.4%
$27.24
$24.88
-$2.36
-8.7%
Pinellas
$19.90
$15.77
-$4.14
-20.8%
$28.99
$22.89
-$6.10
-21.1%
Polk
$19.28
$15.92
-$3.35
-17.4%
$24.77
$19.78
-$4.99
-20.2%
Sarasota
$19.13
n/d
n/d
n/d
$27.97
n/d
n/d
n/d
County
Source: 2018 5-year American Community Survey microdata file from IPUMS USA. Notes: Universe includes civilian full-time wage and salary workers ages 25 through 64. Values are in 2018 dollars. The label “n/d” indicates “non-disclosed” and that the sample size was not big enough to make the calculation.
20
2020 REGIONAL EQUITY REPORT
ECONOMIC VITALITY www.stateoftheregion.com
21
TALENT
DROPOUT RATE WHAT
The share of youth (age 16 to 24) who do not have a high school diploma or equivalent and are not enrolled in school.
WHY
Having a high school diploma is essential to a more secure future. Individuals with no high school diploma earn less, experience higher rates of unemployment, and are more likely to engage in criminal behavior or require social services.1
In Tampa Bay, 1 in 12 Black youth and 1 in 8 Hispanic youth have dropped out of high school.
OF NOTE – In Tampa Bay, the share of Black youth without a high school diploma, not enrolled in school is 1.8 percentage points higher than the share for their White, Non-Hispanic counterparts. – In the peer group, the share of Hispanic youth and youth in the “Other” category without a high school diploma, on average, is almost double that of the youth population overall. – In Tampa Bay, Hispanic youth and youth in the “Some Other Race” category are significantly less likely to have a high school diploma or be enrolled in school than White, Non-Hispanic youth. 1 Economic Impacts of Dropouts.” National Dropout Prevention Center. Accessed 8/7/2020: dropoutprevention.org/resources/statistics/ quick-facts/economic-impacts-of-dropouts/
Source: 2018 5-year American Community Survey microdata file from IPUMS USA. Notes: Universe includes all people ages 16 through 24.
22
2020 REGIONAL EQUITY REPORT
SHARE OF 16-TO 24-YEAR-OLDS NOT ENROLLED IN SCHOOL AND WITHOUT A HIGH SCHOOL DIPLOMA Disparity Measure Region
Tampa Bay in Context
White
Black
San Antonio
2.7%
2.5%
-0.2%
Houston
4.5%
4.6%
+0.1%
San Diego
2.4%
2.9%
+0.4%
Atlanta
4.9%
5.6%
+0.7%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
3.9%
4.7%
+0.8%
Charlotte
4.7%
5.5%
+0.8%
Nashville
3.5%
4.6%
+1.1%
Tampa Bay
6.4%
8.1%
+1.8%
Austin
1.9%
3.8%
Difference
San Antonio -0.2% Houston San Diego
3.8%
5.8%
4.5%
6.7%
+0.4% +0.7%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
+0.8%
Charlotte
+0.8%
Nashville
+1.1%
Tampa Bay Bay ï‚„ Tampa
+1.8%
Austin
+1.9%
+1.9% +2.0%
+2.0% Seattle
Seattle
+0.1%
Atlanta
Denver Denver
TALENT
BLACK-WHITE GAP: DROPOUT RATE
+2.2%
+2.2%
Orlando
3.6%
6.0%
+2.4%
Phoenix
5.2%
7.6%
+2.5%
Portland
4.9%
7.4%
+2.5%
Raleigh-Durham
2.7%
5.2%
+2.5%
South Florida
3.7%
6.3%
+2.6%
Jacksonville
5.6%
8.3%
+2.7%
Mpls-St. Paul
2.6%
5.8%
+3.2%
Baltimore
3.7%
7.5%
+3.8%
St. Louis
3.9%
8.0%
+4.1%
Orlando
+2.4%
Phoenix
+2.5%
Portland
+2.5%
Raleigh-Durham
+2.5%
South Florida
+2.6%
Jacksonville Mpls-St. Paul Baltimore St. Louis
+2.7% +3.2% +3.8% +4.1%
Source: 2018 5-year American Community Survey microdata file from IPUMS USA. Notes: Universe includes all people ages 16 through 24. www.stateoftheregion.com
23
TALENT
COMPARATIVE DROPOUT RATE BY RACE/ETHNICITY SHARE OF 16-TO 24-YEAR-OLDS NOT ENROLLED IN SCHOOL AND WITHOUT A HIGH SCHOOL DIPLOMA All
White, Non-Hispanic
Mpls-St. Paul
3.8%
Austin
San Diego
3.9%
San Diego
2.4%
San Diego
Raleigh-Durham
4.4%
Mpls-St. Paul
2.6%
Austin
Austin
4.6%
San Antonio
2.7%
Houston
4.6%
Nashville
4.7%
Raleigh-Durham
2.7%
Nashville
4.6%
San Antonio
1.9%
St. Louis
5.1%
Baltimore
5.2%
Orlando
Seattle
5.3%
Baltimore
Orlando
5.4%
South Florida 3.7%
Portland
5.8%
Denver
3.8%
South Florida
Nashville 3.5%
2.5% 2.9% 3.8%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
4.7%
3.6%
Raleigh-Durham
5.2%
3.7%
Charlotte
5.5%
Atlanta
5.6%
Mpls-St. Paul
5.8%
3.9%
Denver
5.8%
3.9%
Orlando
6.0%
South Florida
6.3% 6.7%
5.9%
St. Louis
Charlotte
5.9%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
Atlanta
6.0%
Houston
4.5%
San Antonio
6.3%
Seattle
4.5%
Seattle
Denver
6.5%
Charlotte
4.7%
Portland
7.4%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
6.7%
Atlanta
4.9%
Baltimore
7.5%
Jacksonville
6.9%
Portland
4.9%
Phoenix
7.6%
Houston
7.1%
Phoenix
5.2%
St. Louis
8.0%
Jacksonville
5.6%
TampaBay Bay Tampa Jacksonville
8.1%
Tampa Bay Bay Tampa
7.6%
Phoenix
8.1%
Asian Austin
0.8%
Tampa Bay Bay Tampa
6.4%
Hispanic, All Races San Diego
6.0%
8.3%
Other San Diego
5.4% 5.8%
1.3%
South Florida
7.1%
Baltimore
Portland
1.4%
Orlando
7.3%
St. Louis
6.9%
Raleigh-Durham
1.6%
Baltimore
7.4%
South Florida
6.9%
8.2%
Orlando
8.5%
Austin
8.0%
Baltimore
Seattle
1.7%
San Antonio
Phoenix
2.0%
Austin
South Florida
7.4%
2.0%
St. Louis
9.8%
San Antonio
8.1%
Houston
2.0%
Seattle
10.1%
Mpls-St. Paul
8.5%
Tampa Bay Bay Tampa
2.1%
Mpls-St. Paul
10.2%
Seattle
8.7% 8.9%
San Diego
2.3%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
10.7%
Portland
Dallas-Ft. Worth
2.6%
Raleigh-Durham
10.8%
Jacksonville
9.3%
Jacksonville
9.5%
2.6%
Jacksonville
10.8%
Raleigh-Durham
Orlando
2.8%
Houston
11.0%
Tampa Bay Bay Tampa
10.3%
Atlanta
3.1%
Tampa Bay Bay Tampa
11.4%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
10.3%
3.2%
Denver
11.5%
Houston
10.6%
Portland
11.8%
Charlotte
10.6%
St. Louis Mpls-St. Paul
4.1%
Denver
4.8%
Phoenix
11.9%
Denver
10.9%
5.3%
Charlotte
12.4%
Nashville
11.2%
13.0%
Phoenix
11.4%
13.1%
Atlanta
11.4%
San Antonio Charlotte Nashville
5.8%
Nashville
5.9%
Atlanta
Source: 2018 5-year American Community Survey microdata file from IPUMS USA. Notes: Universe includes all people ages 16 through 24.
24
Black
2020 REGIONAL EQUITY REPORT
SHARE OF 16-TO 24-YEAR-OLDS NOT ENROLLED IN SCHOOL AND WITHOUT A HIGH SCHOOL DIPLOMA
TALENT
REGIONAL DROPOUT RATE BY RACE/ETHNICITY Tampa Bay Region Asian
2.1%
White, Non-Hispanic
6.4%
Two or More Races
6.9%
All
7.6%
Black
8.1%
Hispanic, All Races
11.4%
Some Other Race
15.0%
All Hernando
White, Non-Hispanic Hillsborough
5.6%
Sarasota
Pinellas
6.3%
Black Pasco 3.2%
4.0% 5.5%
Pinellas
8.4%
Hillsborough
8.5% 8.6%
Pinellas
6.9%
Sarasota
Hillsborough
7.1%
Hernando
6.7%
Polk
6.7%
Manatee
Polk
8.5%
Polk
Pasco
8.6%
Manatee
Manatee
10.0%
Citrus
11.0%
Asian Hillsborough Pinellas
0.2% 4.9%
6.2%
8.4%
Pasco
9.9%
Citrus
11.8%
Citrus
n/d
Hernando
n/d
Sarasota
n/d
Hispanic, All Races Hernando
Other Hernando 3.3%
4.1%
Pasco
Sarasota
7.4%
Citrus
n/d
Sarasota
Hernando
n/d
Hillsborough
Manatee
n/d
Polk
Pasco
n/d
Manatee
13.3%
Manatee
Polk
n/d
Pinellas
13.3%
Polk
Sarasota
n/d
Citrus
Pasco
8.1% 11.6% 12.6%
n/d
10.3%
Citrus Pinellas
Hillsborough
6.6% 7.0% 7.4% 8.6% 9.4% 10.0% 10.5%
Source: 2018 5-year American Community Survey microdata file from IPUMS USA. Notes: Universe includes all people ages 16 through 24. The label “n/d” indicates “non-disclosed” and that the sample size was not big enough to make the calculation. www.stateoftheregion.com
25
TALENT
YOUTH DISCONNECTION WHAT
The share of youth (age 16 to 24) who are neither enrolled in school nor working. This segment of the youth population is often called “disconnected youth.”
WHY
While reasons and circumstances may vary, these disconnected youth are missing key educational, vocational, and employment experiences and are associated with an increased risk—according to researchers —for a host of negative outcomes, each with significant costs to society: long spells of unemployment, poverty, criminal behavior, substance abuse, and incarceration. Youth of color are far more likely to be disconnected.
In Tampa Bay, the share of “disconnected” Black youth is nearly 6 percentage points higher than the share of White, Non-Hispanic youth.
OF NOTE
– This disparity between the share of Black youth that are disconnected and the share of White, Non-Hispanic youth ranks Tampa Bay 12th out of its 20 peer regions. – Among the peers, the rate of disconnection for White, Non-Hispanic and Asian youth is lowest, and it is highest for Black and Hispanic youth in addition to youth that fall into the “Other” category. – Minneapolis, Austin, Raleigh, and Denver have the lowest rates of youth disconnection overall, while San Antonio, Houston, Phoenix, and Tampa Bay have the highest rates. – Among the eight counties in the region, Sarasota has the lowest rate of disconnection overall, and Pasco County has the highest rate. In Manatee County, 19 percent of Black youth are neither enrolled in school nor working, which is the highest rate of disconnection for any of the youth categories. The lowest rate of disconnection is among Asian youth in Hillsborough County. Source: 2018 5-year American Community Survey microdata file from IPUMS USA. Note: Universe includes all people ages 16 through 24.
26
2020 REGIONAL EQUITY REPORT
TALENT
BLACK-WHITE GAP: YOUTH DISCONNECTION SHARE OF 16-TO 24-YEAR-OLDS NOT IN SCHOOL OR WORK Disparity Measure Region
Tampa Bay in Context
White
Black
Difference
10.7%
11.4%
+0.7%
5.5%
8.3%
+2.8%
Houston
11.3%
14.9%
+3.6%
Denver
7.2%
10.9%
+3.7%
Portland
10.4%
14.3%
+3.9%
Seattle
10.0%
14.6%
+4.6%
Raleigh-Durham
6.3%
11.3%
+4.9%
Orlando
8.4%
13.5%
+5.1%
San Antonio Austin
San Antonio Austin
Dallas-Ft. Worth Atlanta Tampa Bay
9.3% 9.4% 9.9%
14.7% 15.2% 15.7%
+2.8%
Houston
+3.6%
Denver
+3.7%
Portland
+3.9%
Seattle
+4.6%
Raleigh-Durham
+4.9%
Orlando
+5.1%
Nashville Nashville
+0.7%
+5.4%
+5.4% Dallas-Ft. Worth
+5.8%
Atlanta
+5.8%
Tampa Bay Bay ï‚„ Tampa
+5.9%
Charlotte
+6.0%
Mpls-St. Paul
+6.2%
+5.8% +5.8%
11.4%
17.3%
+5.9%
Charlotte
9.6%
15.6%
+6.0%
Mpls-St. Paul
5.5%
11.7%
+6.2%
South Florida
9.4%
16.0%
+6.6%
Jacksonville
11.0%
17.9%
+6.9%
Phoenix
10.5%
18.2%
+7.6%
San Diego
8.3%
16.8%
+8.5%
St. Louis
7.5%
17.2%
+9.7%
Baltimore
8.4%
20.3%
+11.8%
South Florida Jacksonville Phoenix San Diego St. Louis Baltimore
+6.6% +6.9% +7.6% +8.5% +9.7% +11.8%
Source: 2018 5-year American Community Survey microdata file from IPUMS USA. Note: Universe includes all people ages 16 through 24. www.stateoftheregion.com
27
TALENT
COMPARATIVE YOUTH DISCONNECTION BY RACE/ETHNICITY SHARE OF 16-TO 24-YEAR-OLDS NOT IN SCHOOL OR WORK All Mpls-St. Paul
White, Non-Hispanic
7.3%
Austin
Austin
7.5%
Mpls-St. Paul
Raleigh-Durham
7.7%
5.5%
Austin
5.5%
Denver
10.9%
Raleigh-Durham
11.3%
Raleigh-Durham 6.3%
8.3%
Denver
9.5%
Denver
7.2%
San Antonio
11.4%
San Diego
9.7%
St. Louis
7.5%
Mpls-St. Paul
11.7%
St. Louis
10.1%
San Diego
8.3%
Orlando
Seattle
10.4%
Orlando
8.4%
Portland
14.3%
Nashville
10.5%
Baltimore
8.4%
Seattle
14.6%
Portland
11.0%
Nashville
9.3%
Nashville
14.7%
Orlando
11.0%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
9.4%
Houston
14.9%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
13.5%
11.8%
South Florida
9.4%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
15.2%
South Florida
12.0%
Charlotte
9.6%
Charlotte
15.6%
Charlotte
12.1%
Atlanta
9.9%
Atlanta
15.7% 16.0%
Atlanta
12.3%
Seattle
10.0%
South Florida
Baltimore
12.8%
Portland
10.4%
San Diego
16.8%
Jacksonville
12.8%
Phoenix
10.5%
St. Louis
Tampa Tampa Bay Bay
17.2%
12.9%
San Antonio
10.7%
Tampa Tampa Bay Bay
17.3%
Phoenix
13.0%
Jacksonville
11.0%
Jacksonville
17.9%
Houston
13.2%
Houston
11.3%
Phoenix
18.2%
San Antonio
13.9%
Tampa Bay Bay Tampa
11.4%
Baltimore
Asian
Hispanic, All Races
20.3%
Other
Austin
3.9%
Raleigh-Durham
7.5%
Raleigh-Durham
St. Louis
8.8%
Baltimore
7.8%
4.4%
Baltimore
Jacksonville
4.5%
St. Louis
9.7%
Austin
9.7%
Raleigh-Durham
4.6%
Austin
10.2%
San Diego
10.4%
9.2%
Seattle
5.5%
San Diego
10.8%
Nashville
11.1%
Baltimore
5.9%
South Florida
11.3%
St. Louis
11.1%
Nashville
11.4%
South Florida
11.1%
11.9%
Atlanta
11.8%
12.4%
Jacksonville
12.3% 12.6%
Portland 6.2% Orlando
6.5%
Atlanta
Nashville
6.6%
Seattle
6.6%
Orlando
12.6%
Mpls-St. Paul
San Diego 6.7%
Denver
12.9%
Denver
12.7%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
6.9%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
13.2%
Seattle
12.9%
Atlanta
6.9%
Mpls-St. Paul
13.8%
Orlando
12.9%
Houston
7.0%
Jacksonville
14.2%
Portland
13.0%
Tampa Bay Bay Tampa
8.1%
Tampa Bay Bay Tampa
14.5%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
13.1%
Denver
8.4%
Houston
14.7%
Tampa Bay Bay Tampa
13.7%
Mpls-St. Paul
Phoenix
8.6%
Charlotte
14.7%
Charlotte
14.1%
South Florida
8.9%
Phoenix
14.9%
Houston
14.5%
Charlotte
9.0%
San Antonio
15.6%
Phoenix
14.9%
Portland
15.6%
San Antonio
15.4%
San Antonio
11.9%
Source: 2018 5-year American Community Survey microdata file from IPUMS USA. Note: Universe includes all people ages 16 through 24.
28
Black
2020 REGIONAL EQUITY REPORT
TALENT
REGIONAL YOUTH DISCONNECTION BY RACE/ETHNICITY SHARE OF 16-TO 24-YEAR-OLDS NOT IN SCHOOL OR WORK Tampa Bay Region Asian
8.1%
White, Non-Hispanic
11.4%
Two or More Races
12.2%
All
12.9%
Some Other Race
14.0%
Hispanic, All Races
14.5%
Black
17.3%
All
White, Non-Hispanic
Sarasota
10.8%
Hillsborough
Hillsborough
11.2%
Pinellas
Black Pasco
16.3%
10.3%
Hillsborough
16.3%
8.4%
Pinellas
12.4%
Sarasota
10.4%
Pinellas
Manatee
12.5%
Manatee
10.8%
Polk
18.9%
Manatee
19.0%
Hernando
14.1%
Polk
Citrus
15.1%
Citrus
Polk
15.6%
Hernando
Pasco
15.9%
Pasco
Asian Hillsborough
14.5% 15.3% 16.3%
Citrus
n/d
Hernando
n/d
Sarasota
n/d
Hispanic, All Races Sarasota
5.4%
Pinellas
13.4%
13.1%
Hernando
Other Sarasota
10.3%
Manatee
12.5%
17.9%
7.1% 9.1%
Citrus
n/d
Hillsborough
13.2%
Hernando
Hernando
n/d
Manatee
13.3%
Hillsborough
12.1%
Manatee
n/d
Pinellas
Pinellas
12.3%
Pasco
n/d
Pasco
Polk
n/d
Polk
Sarasota
n/d
Citrus
14.4% 17.2% 17.7% n/d
Citrus Pasco Polk
10.1%
12.8% 14.6% 16.0%
Source: 2018 5-year American Community Survey microdata file from IPUMS USA. Note: Universe includes all people ages 16 through 24. The label “n/d” indicates “non-disclosed” and that the sample size was not big enough to make the calculation. www.stateoftheregion.com
29
TALENT
EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT WHAT
The percent of the population that is 25 years old or older who has completed at least a bachelor’s degree.
WHY
It is well documented that individuals who have earned at least a bachelor’s degree experience better economic outcomes—higher earnings and lower unemployment— than those individuals with a high school diploma or less. Examining the share of the population with a bachelor’s degree or higher by race and ethnicity can reveal achievement gaps.
In Tampa Bay, the share of Blacks with at least a bachelor’s degree is 10 percentage points lower than that of White, Non-Hispanics.
OF NOTE
– The disparity in 4-year degree attainment between Blacks and White, Non-Hispanics in Tampa Bay is one of the lowest among the group of peers. – Among the peer group and across the region, the rate of degree attainment is highest for Asians and lowest for Hispanics. – In comparison to the peer group, the share of the White, Non-Hispanic population with a bachelor’s degree or higher is lowest in Tampa Bay, which ranks last. In fact, Tampa Bay ranks in the bottom quintile for the following categories: All; White, Non-Hispanic; Black; and Asian. – Across the eight-county Tampa Bay region, the share of the population with a bachelor’s degree or higher varies greatly. In Hillsborough County, 58 percent of the Asian population has at least a bachelor’s degree, while in Sarasota County, less than 12 percent of the Black population has attained that level of education. Source: US Census Bureau, 2018 American Community Survey 5-year estimates, S1501.
30
2020 REGIONAL EQUITY REPORT
TALENT
BLACK-WHITE GAP: EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT SHARE OF POPULATION WITH A BACHELOR’S DEGREE OR HIGHER Disparity Measure
Tampa Bay in Context
Region
White
Black
Difference
Nashville
37.0%
26.9%
-10.1%
Tampa Bay
30.3%
20.0%
-10.3%
Phoenix
37.0%
24.7%
-12.3%
San Antonio
40.3%
27.9%
-12.3%
Charlotte
38.3%
25.7%
-12.7%
Portland
40.9%
27.0%
-13.9%
United States
35.2%
21.1%
-14.1%
Atlanta
43.7%
29.3%
-14.4%
Orlando
36.6%
21.9%
-14.7%
Jacksonville
33.2%
18.5%
-14.7%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
42.6%
26.2%
-16.4%
Houston
43.4%
27.0%
-16.5%
St. Louis
36.1%
18.8%
-17.2%
Baltimore
44.4%
25.4%
-19.0%
Seattle
43.9%
24.9%
-19.0%
Mpls-St. Paul
44.0%
21.4%
-22.6%
Raleigh-Durham
52.7%
30.0%
-22.7%
San Diego
47.9%
25.2%
-22.7%
South Florida
42.7%
19.3%
-23.4%
Austin
53.2%
29.4%
-23.8%
Denver
50.9%
26.3%
-24.6%
Nashville
-10.1%
TampaBay Bay Tampa
-10.3%
Phoenix
-12.3%
San Antonio
-12.3%
Charlotte
-12.7%
Portland
-13.9%
United United States
-14.1%
Atlanta
-14.4%
Orlando
-14.7%
Jacksonville
-14.7%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
-16.4%
Houston
-16.5%
St. Louis
-17.2%
Baltimore
-19.0%
Seattle
-19.0%
Mpls-St. Paul
-22.6%
Raleigh-Durham
-22.7%
San Diego
-22.7%
South Florida
-23.4%
Austin
-23.8%
Denver
-24.6%
Source: US Census Bureau, 2018 American Community Survey 5-year estimates, S1501.
www.stateoftheregion.com
31
TALENT
COMPARATIVE EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT BY RACE/ETHNICITY SHARE OF POPULATION WITH A BACHELOR’S DEGREE OR HIGHER All
White, Non-Hispanic
Raleigh-Durham
46.1%
Austin
53.2%
Austin
43.9%
Raleigh-Durham
52.7%
Denver
42.9%
Denver
Seattle
42.0%
San Diego
Mpls-St. Paul
41.2%
Baltimore
Baltimore
39.5%
Mpls-St. Paul
44.0%
Portland
38.9%
Seattle
43.9%
50.9% 47.9% 44.4%
San Diego
38.1%
Atlanta
43.7%
Atlanta
37.8%
Houston
43.4%
Nashville
34.8%
South Florida
42.7%
Charlotte
34.7%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
42.6%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
34.4%
Portland
40.9%
St. Louis
33.7%
San Antonio
40.3%
Houston
32.4%
Charlotte
38.3%
United States United South Florida
31.5%
Nashville
37.0%
31.5%
Phoenix
37.0%
Orlando
31.3%
Orlando
36.6%
Phoenix
30.8%
St. Louis
36.1%
Jacksonville Tampa Tampa Bay Bay
30.5%
United States United
35.2%
28.3%
Jacksonville
33.2%
San Antonio
27.7%
Tampa Bay Bay Tampa
Asian Raleigh-Durham Austin St. Louis Baltimore Dallas-Ft. Worth Charlotte Phoenix Atlanta Houston Seattle United States San Antonio Denver Orlando San Diego Portland South Florida Nashville Tampa Bay Jacksonville Mpls-St. Paul
30.3%
Hispanic, All Races 72.7% 70.6% 65.4% 63.4% 60.5% 57.5% 57.2% 56.9% 56.8% 54.4% 53.5% 52.1% 51.9% 51.6% 50.6% 50.4% 50.2% 50.1% 49.8% 48.2% 44.6%
St. Louis 28.9% Baltimore 28.0% Jacksonville 26.9% South Florida 26.7% Orlando 22.4% Austin 22.2% Seattle 21.3% Atlanta 20.0% Tampa Bay 19.7% Portland 19.0% Mpls-St. Paul 18.7% Raleigh-Durham 18.4% San Diego 17.1% Charlotte 17.0% San Antonio 16.6% Nashville 16.1% United States United 15.8% Denver 15.7% Houston 14.3% Dallas-Ft. Worth 13.1% Phoenix 12.5%
Source: US Census Bureau, 2018 American Community Survey 5-year estimates, S1501.
32
2020 REGIONAL EQUITY REPORT
Black Raleigh-Durham 30.0% Austin 29.4% Atlanta 29.3% San Antonio 27.9% Portland 27.0% Houston 27.0% Nashville 26.9% Denver 26.3% Dallas-Ft. Worth 26.2% Charlotte 25.7% Baltimore 25.4% San Diego 25.2% Seattle 24.9% Phoenix 24.7% Orlando 21.9% Mpls-St. Paul 21.4% United States 21.1% 20.0% Tampa Bay South Florida 19.3% St. Louis 18.8% Jacksonville 18.5%
Other Baltimore 32.4% St. Louis 30.1% Jacksonville 27.8% South Florida 27.1% Seattle 25.0% Austin 23.7% Raleigh-Durham 23.6% Atlanta 23.5% Orlando 23.3% Mpls-St. Paul 23.2% Portland 22.5% Nashville 20.9% Tampa Bay Bay Tampa 20.6% Charlotte 20.2% San Diego 19.1% Denver 18.3% United States United 17.4% San Antonio 17.1% Houston 15.3% Dallas-Ft. Worth 15.0% Phoenix 13.8%
SHARE OF POPULATION WITH A BACHELOR’S DEGREE OR HIGHER
TALENT
REGIONAL EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT BY RACE/ETHNICITY Tampa Bay Region Asian
49.8%
Two or More Races
30.5%
White, Non-Hispanic
30.3%
All
28.3%
Black
20.0%
Hispanic, All Races
19.7%
Some Other Race
19.6%
All Sarasota
Manatee Pasco
Hillsborough
34.7%
Hillsborough Pinellas
White, Non-Hispanic 38.6%
Sarasota
32.7% 31.0% 29.3% 23.4%
36.7%
Pasco Hillsborough Pinellas
18.5%
Manatee
32.0%
Citrus
17.9%
Pasco
22.4%
Hernando
17.0%
21.9%
Manatee
15.3%
Polk
Citrus
17.6%
Hernando
Hernando
17.5%
Polk 15.0%
17.5%
Sarasota
Citrus 16.9%
Hispanic, All Races 58.0%
Citrus
52.7%
23.0%
32.6%
20.0%
Hillsborough
30.0%
Pinellas
Polk
Asian
Black
Pinellas
24.5%
11.7%
Other Pinellas
25.3%
Citrus
21.6%
Pasco
22.1%
Pasco
50.9%
Pasco
21.3%
Hillsborough
21.9%
Manatee
49.8%
Hillsborough
20.9%
Sarasota
21.8%
Sarasota
20.6%
Citrus
20.2%
Manatee
17.5%
Manatee
18.0%
Polk
44.1%
Pinellas
40.8%
Sarasota
40.7%
Hernando
33.4%
Hernando 15.7%
Hernando 14.9% Polk
13.6%
Polk
14.4%
Source: US Census Bureau, 2018 American Community Survey 5-year estimates, S1501.
www.stateoftheregion.com
33
TALENT
LABOR FORCE PARTICIPATION WHAT
The percent of the population that is 16 years old or older that is either working or actively looking for work.
WHY
An individual’s decision to participate in the workforce is economic, influenced by financial security, earnings prospects, and labor market dynamics. For example, retirees and certain single-income families contribute to a lower participation rate, because they have achieved a degree of financial security allowing them not to work. Conversely, a discouraged worker lowers the participation rate because the earnings prospects or the labor market are not favorable enough to keep looking for work. Thus, a low labor force participation rate for the population age 16 or older, as opposed to strictly that of traditional working age, could be good or bad, depending on the causes. Yet, racial variations can reflect disparities in economic outcomes when coupled with wage, unemployment, and poverty data.
In Tampa Bay, the labor force participation rate for Blacks is 8 percentage points higher than for White, Non-Hispanics.
OF NOTE
– The difference in Tampa Bay’s labor force participation rate for Blacks and White, Non-Hispanics is the highest among the peer metros. In the context of Tampa Bay’s relatively low wages, this difference may reflect disparities in financial security between these demographic groups. – Overall, Tampa Bay’s labor force participation rate is the lowest among its peers. And it ranks in the bottom quintile for every racial and ethnic category. – White, Non-Hispanics in Tampa Bay have a significantly lower labor force participation rate than every other racial and ethnic category. This may reflect the demographics of the region’s sizable retiree population that is included in this segment of the population. Source: US Census Bureau, 2018 American Community Survey 5-year estimates, S2301.
34
2020 REGIONAL EQUITY REPORT
TALENT
BLACK-WHITE GAP: LABOR FORCE PARTICIPATION SHARE OF POPULATION 16 AND OLDER THAT IS WORKING OR LOOKING FOR WORK Disparity Measure
Tampa Bay in Context
Region
White
Black
Difference
Tampa Bay
53.4%
63.1%
+9.7%
South Florida
57.2%
65.7%
+8.5%
Phoenix
59.8%
67.0%
+7.2%
Charlotte
65.1%
70.0%
+4.9%
Orlando
61.8%
65.8%
+4.0%
Atlanta
65.2%
68.6%
+3.4%
San Diego
63.8%
67.1%
+3.3%
San Antonio
61.8%
65.0%
+3.2%
Seattle
67.5%
70.4%
+2.9%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
67.1%
69.9%
+2.8%
Houston
64.7%
67.4%
+2.7%
Nashville
67.1%
69.8%
+2.7%
Jacksonville
62.3%
64.9%
+2.6%
Portland
65.7%
66.9%
+1.2%
Raleigh-Durham
67.1%
68.3%
+1.2%
United States
62.3%
62.5%
+0.2%
Mpls-St. Paul
71.8%
71.6%
-0.2%
Austin
69.4%
69.2%
-0.2%
Denver
71.3%
69.5%
-1.8%
St. Louis
65.6%
63.1%
-2.5%
Baltimore
67.2%
64.5%
-2.7%
Tampa Bay Bay ï‚„ Tampa
+9.7%
South Florida
+8.5%
Phoenix
+7.2%
Charlotte
+4.9%
Orlando
+4.0%
Atlanta
+3.4%
San Diego
+3.3%
San Antonio
+3.2%
Seattle
+2.9%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
+2.8%
Houston
+2.7%
Nashville
+2.7%
Jacksonville
+2.6%
Portland
+1.2%
Raleigh-Durham
+1.2%
United United States
+0.2%
Mpls-St. Paul
-0.2%
Austin
-0.2%
Denver
-1.8%
St. Louis -2.5% Baltimore -2.7%
Source: US Census Bureau, 2018 American Community Survey 5-year estimates, S2301.
www.stateoftheregion.com
35
TALENT
COMPARATIVE LABOR FORCE PARTICIPATION BY RACE/ETHNICITY SHARE OF POPULATION 16 AND OLDER THAT IS WORKING OR LOOKING FOR WORK All
White, Non-Hispanic Mpls-St. Paul
71.8%
Mpls-St. Paul
71.6%
Denver
71.3%
Seattle
70.4%
Austin
69.4%
Charlotte
70.0%
Seattle
67.5%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
69.9%
68.2%
Baltimore
67.2%
Nashville
69.8%
Nashville
68.1%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
67.1%
Denver
69.5%
Raleigh-Durham
68.0%
Nashville
67.1%
Austin
69.2%
Charlotte
67.1%
Raleigh-Durham
67.1%
Atlanta
68.6%
Atlanta
67.0%
Portland
65.7%
Raleigh-Durham
68.3%
Baltimore
66.9%
St. Louis
65.6%
Houston
67.4%
Portland
66.8%
Atlanta
65.2%
San Diego
67.1%
Houston
66.7%
Charlotte
65.1%
Phoenix
67.0%
San Diego
65.7%
Houston
64.7%
Portland
66.9%
St. Louis
65.3%
San Diego
63.8%
Orlando
65.8%
Mpls-St. Paul
72.1%
Denver
71.2%
Austin
70.3%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
68.6%
Seattle
Orlando
63.8%
Jacksonville
62.3%
South Florida
65.7%
San Antonio
63.8%
United UnitedStates States
62.3%
San Antonio
65.0%
Jacksonville
63.7%
Orlando
Jacksonville
United States States United South Florida
61.8%
64.9%
63.3%
San Antonio
61.8%
64.5%
62.9%
Phoenix
Baltimore Tampa Tampa Bay Bay
Phoenix
63.1%
62.5%
South Florida
St. Louis
63.1%
United States States United
62.5%
Tampa Bay Bay Tampa
56.8%
Asian Mpls-St. Paul
Tampa Tampa Bay Bay
59.8% 57.2% 53.4%
Hispanic, All Races
Other
71.6%
Mpls-St. Paul
77.6%
Mpls-St. Paul
Charlotte
69.8%
Baltimore
75.3%
Nashville
74.0%
Nashville
69.5%
Nashville
74.5%
Portland
73.2%
Denver
69.3%
Raleigh-Durham
74.4%
Raleigh-Durham
72.9%
75.9%
Baltimore
69.2%
Portland
74.3%
Charlotte
72.6%
Austin
68.8%
Charlotte
74.0%
Austin
72.5%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
68.1%
Seattle
74.0%
Baltimore
72.4%
Seattle
67.4%
Austin
72.6%
Denver
71.7%
Raleigh-Durham
67.1%
Atlanta
72.1%
Seattle
71.7%
Jacksonville
66.9%
Denver
71.4%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
70.9%
Atlanta
66.8%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
71.2%
Atlanta
70.4%
St. Louis
71.0%
Jacksonville
69.1%
Houston
69.1%
Houston
69.0%
St. Louis
66.4%
Portland
66.2%
Houston
65.5%
Phoenix
64.9%
South Florida
64.9%
United States States United San Antonio
64.9% 64.5%
San Diego
64.5%
Orlando
62.6%
Tampa Tampa Bay Bay
61.6%
San Diego
68.8%
San Diego
68.6%
Jacksonville
68.7%
St. Louis
68.1%
UnitedStates States United Phoenix
67.4% 67.0%
United States United Phoenix
66.6%
Orlando
66.2%
Orlando
66.5%
2020 REGIONAL EQUITY REPORT
66.8%
Tampa TampaBay Bay
65.9%
Tampa Tampa Bay Bay
65.7%
South Florida
65.4%
South Florida
65.6%
San Antonio
65.0%
San Antonio
64.9%
Source: US Census Bureau, 2018 American Community Survey 5-year estimates, S2301.
36
Black
TALENT
REGIONAL LABOR FORCE PARTICIPATION BY RACE/ETHNICITY SHARE OF POPULATION 16 AND OLDER THAT IS WORKING OR LOOKING FOR WORK Tampa Bay Region Hispanic, All Races
65.9%
Some Other Race
65.7%
Two or More Races
65.2%
Black
63.1%
Asian
61.6%
All
56.8%
White, Non-Hispanic
53.4%
All
White, Non-Hispanic
Hillsborough
64.9%
Pinellas
58.0%
Hillsborough
64.0%
Pinellas
56.8%
Black Hillsborough
66.9%
Pinellas
62.9% 62.6%
Polk
55.0%
Polk
53.7%
Pasco
Manatee
53.6%
Manatee
52.3%
Manatee
60.8%
Pasco
53.4%
Pasco
52.2%
Sarasota
59.4% 58.5%
Sarasota
48.6%
Sarasota
47.7%
Polk
Hernando
46.9%
Hernando
46.1%
Hernando
Citrus
Citrus
40.2%
Asian
Citrus
39.6%
Hispanic, All Races
Pinellas
64.9%
52.6% 41.9%
Other
Sarasota
68.4%
Hillsborough
67.6%
Hillsborough
62.1%
Hillsborough
67.8%
Sarasota
67.3%
Pasco
62.0%
Manatee
67.6%
Pinellas
67.3%
Hernando
61.8%
Pinellas
67.6%
Manatee
67.1%
Polk
61.7%
Pasco
Manatee Sarasota Citrus
59.0% 50.3% 43.0%
Polk Hernando Citrus
64.7% 61.3% 54.7% 49.4%
Pasco Polk Hernando Citrus
64.3% 61.9% 54.1% 49.6%
Source: US Census Bureau, 2018 American Community Survey 5-year estimates, S2301.
www.stateoftheregion.com
37
TALENT 38
2020 REGIONAL EQUITY REPORT
TALENT
FLORIDA TALENT INDICATORS WHAT
The following indicators measure a collection of capstone and other assessments generally viewed as markers of academic progress and content mastery.
WHY
Content mastery and passage of the relevant exams allows for progression through the education pipeline. Conversely, failure to meet these standards may preclude student advancement, from one grade to the next, from secondary school to an institution of higher education, and from school into a job with family-sustaining wages. Examining these indicators through a lens of race and ethnicity can uncover achievement gaps.
The Black-White achievement gap in Tampa Bay is significantly larger than the State of Florida’s overall gap, for every indicator but the Science Assessment.
OF NOTE
– The passage rates in Tampa Bay are the lowest among the Florida peers for every measure and for every race/ethnic category except Asian. – In the region overall, White and Asian students’ pass rate is above the regional average in each of the measured subjects, while Hispanic, Black, and Economically Disadvantaged students’ pass rate is below. – The pass rates and performance for Black students is best in Pasco County. The pass rates and graduation rate for Hispanic students is generally best in Citrus County. Source: Florida Department of Education; EDStats Portal, 2018-2019 Academic Year.
www.stateoftheregion.com
39
TALENT
ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS, FLORIDA STANDARDS ASSESSMENT SCORE OF 3 OR BETTER (3RD GRADE)
Tampa Bay in Context
Disparity Measure White, Non-Hispanic
Region Region
Black Black
Difference Difference
Florida
70.6%
40.0%
-30.6%
South Florida
75.5%
43.3%
-32.2%
Tampa Bay
67.9%
35.4%
-32.5%
Orlando
74.5%
40.9%
-33.6%
Jacksonville
72.5%
38.7%
-33.8%
All
Florida Florida
-30.6%
South Florida
-32.2%
Bay Tampa Bay
-32.5%
Orlando
-33.6%
Jacksonville
-33.8%
White, Non-Hispanic
Black
Jacksonville
59.8%
South Florida
75.5%
South Florida
43.3%
South Florida
58.6%
Orlando
74.5%
Orlando
40.9%
Florida Florida
57.6%
Jacksonville
72.5%
Florida Florida
40.0%
Orlando
56.9%
Florida Florida
70.6%
Jacksonville
38.7%
Bay Tampa Bay
55.2%
Tampa Bay Bay Tampa
Asian South Florida
67.9%
Hispanic, All Races 82.1%
South Florida
60.8%
Bay Tampa Bay
35.4%
Economically Disadvantaged South Florida
50.6%
Orlando
79.4%
Florida Florida
53.8%
Florida Florida
48.0%
Florida Florida
78.8%
Jacksonville
52.7%
Orlando
46.8%
Tampa Bay
77.4%
Orlando
50.2%
Jacksonville
45.9%
Jacksonville
77.1%
Tampa Bay Bay Tampa
45.9%
Tampa Bay
43.7%
Source: Florida Department of Education; EDStats Portal, 2018-2019 Academic Year. Note: Economically disadvantaged students are students determined to be eligible for free and reduced price meals under the National School Lunch Program.
40
2020 REGIONAL EQUITY REPORT
SCORE OF 3 OR BETTER (3RD GRADE)
TALENT
ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS, FLORIDA STANDARDS ASSESSMENT Tampa Bay Region Asian
77.4%
White, Non-Hispanic
67.9%
All
55.2%
Hispanic, All Races
45.9%
Economically Disadvantaged
43.7%
Black
35.4%
All
White, Non-Hispanic
Sarasota
70.5%
Sarasota
78.6%
Black Citrus
50.0% 47.8%
Citrus
60.8%
Manatee
70.8%
Pasco
Pasco
59.9%
Hillsborough
69.9%
Sarasota
Hernando
57.4%
Pinellas
67.1%
Hernando
39.9%
Pinellas
55.9%
Polk
66.1%
Polk
39.2%
44.4%
Hillsborough
52.5%
Pasco
63.8%
Hillsborough
33.4%
Polk
52.1%
Citrus
62.7%
Pinellas
31.3%
Manatee
51.1%
Hernando
60.9%
Manatee
30.7%
Asian
Hispanic, All Races
Sarasota
86.3%
Economically Disadvantaged
Sarasota
57.8%
Sarasota
Hillsborough
81.8%
Hernando
55.4%
Citrus
Manatee
80.0%
Pasco
53.0%
Hernando
Citrus
51.6%
Pasco
Pasco
75.7%
Polk
72.5%
Pinellas
Hernando
72.0%
Polk Hillsborough
Pinellas Citrus
66.4% 58.8%
Manatee
59.7% 56.8% 51.7% 48.2%
Polk
43.3%
44.9%
Pinellas
43.1%
44.9%
Hillsborough
39.7%
Manatee
38.3%
48.8%
34.4%
Source: Florida Department of Education; EDStats Portal, 2018-2019 Academic Year. Note: Economically disadvantaged students are students determined to be eligible for free and reduced price meals under the National School Lunch Program. www.stateoftheregion.com
41
TALENT
MATH, FLORIDA STANDARDS ASSESSMENT SCORE OF 3 OR BETTER (3RD & 8TH GRADE)
Disparity Measure
Tampa Bay in Context
White, Non-Hispanic
Region
Black
Difference
Florida
68.2%
40.2%
-28.0%
Orlando
69.4%
40.2%
-29.2%
Jacksonville
72.8%
41.4%
-31.4%
Tampa Bay
64.8%
33.0%
-31.9%
South Florida
77.9%
45.3%
-32.6%
All
Orlando
60.5%
South Florida
South Florida
59.6%
Jacksonville
56.2%
72.8%
-29.2% -31.4%
TampaBay Bay Tampa
-31.9%
South Florida
-32.6%
Black South Florida
45.3%
Jacksonville
41.4%
Orlando
69.4%
Orlando
40.2%
68.2%
Florida Florida
40.2%
Orlando
53.4%
Florida Florida
Tampa Bay Bay Tampa
52.8%
Tampa Bay Bay Tampa
Asian
77.9%
-28.0%
Jacksonville
White, Non-Hispanic
Jacksonville
Florida Florida
Florida Florida
64.8%
Hispanic, All Races
Tampa Bay
33.0%
Economically Disadvantaged
South Florida
85.5%
South Florida
Florida Florida
83.1%
Jacksonville
53.8%
Jacksonville
48.9%
Tampa Bay Bay Tampa
82.6%
Florida Florida
53.7%
Florida Florida
48.0%
Orlando
82.0%
Orlando
Jacksonville
81.7%
Tampa Bay Bay Tampa
61.3%
48.2% 45.5%
South Florida
52.5%
Orlando
45.2%
Bay Tampa Bay
43.0%
Source: Florida Department of Education; EDStats Portal, 2018-2019 Academic Year. Note: Economically disadvantaged students are students determined to be eligible for free and reduced price meals under the National School Lunch Program.
42
2020 REGIONAL EQUITY REPORT
TALENT
MATH, FLORIDA STANDARDS ASSESSMENT SCORE OF 3 OR BETTER (3RD & 8TH GRADE) Tampa Bay Region Asian
82.6%
White, Non-Hispanic
64.8%
All
52.8%
Hispanic, All Races
45.5%
Economically Disadvantaged
43.0%
Black
33.0%
All
White, Non-Hispanic
Sarasota
70.4%
Pasco
63.5%
Hernando
57.1%
Sarasota
76.4%
Black Pasco
47.4% 46.5%
Manatee
69.0%
Sarasota
Pasco
67.5%
Citrus
40.4%
Citrus
54.2%
Pinellas
63.1%
Hernando
38.3%
Manatee
53.4%
Hillsborough
62.2%
Manatee
36.4%
Pinellas
52.0%
Hernando
61.9%
Polk
35.9%
61.4%
Hillsborough
29.1%
Polk
48.2%
Polk
Hillsborough
46.7%
Citrus
Asian Sarasota
56.1%
Hispanic, All Races 92.5%
Sarasota
Hillsborough
86.2%
Pasco
Pasco
85.4%
Hernando
Manatee
84.5%
Citrus
61.6%
Pinellas
28.8%
Economically Disadvantaged Sarasota
61.2%
Pasco
52.0%
Hernando
50.4%
49.0%
Citrus
50.1%
47.1%
Manatee
44.1%
57.6% 51.6%
Polk
72.4%
Pinellas
Pinellas
71.0%
Polk
42.5%
Pinellas
42.4% 41.6%
Citrus
n/d
Manatee
42.2%
Polk
Hernando
n/d
Hillsborough
42.1%
Hillsborough
36.3%
Source: Florida Department of Education; EDStats Portal, 2018-2019 Academic Year. Notes: Economically disadvantaged students are students determined to be eligible for free and reduced price meals under the National School Lunch Program. The label “n/d” indicates “non-disclosed” and that the sample size was not big enough to make the calculation. www.stateoftheregion.com
43
TALENT
SCIENCE, FLORIDA STANDARDS ASSESSMENT SCORE OF 3 OR BETTER (5TH & 8TH GRADE)
Disparity Measure
Tampa Bay in Context
White, Non-Hispanic
Region
Black
Difference
Orlando
68.7%
36.5%
-32.1%
Tampa Bay
62.0%
28.3%
-33.7%
Florida
65.0%
31.1%
-33.9%
South Florida
68.3%
32.8%
-35.5%
Jacksonville
68.8%
31.0%
-37.8%
Orlando Tampa Bay Bay Tampa
-33.7%
Florida Florida
-33.9%
South Florida
All Jacksonville
Jacksonville
White, Non-Hispanic
55.2%
-32.1%
-35.5% -37.8%
Black
Jacksonville
68.8%
Orlando
36.5%
Orlando
51.5%
Orlando
68.7%
South Florida
32.8%
Florida Florida
50.7%
South Florida
68.3%
Florida Florida
31.1%
Tampa Bay Bay Tampa
50.1%
Florida Florida
Jacksonville
31.0%
South Florida
48.5%
Tampa Bay Bay Tampa
Asian
65.0% 62.0%
Hispanic, All Races
Tampa Bay 28.3%
Economically Disadvantaged
Orlando
77.7%
Jacksonville
49.3%
Orlando
40.7%
Florida Florida
76.3%
South Florida
49.3%
Jacksonville
40.2%
Jacksonville
75.9%
Florida Florida
45.2%
South Florida
40.1%
South Florida
75.8%
Orlando
43.2%
Florida Florida
40.0%
Tampa Bay Bay Tampa
41.4%
Tampa Bay
38.8%
Tampa Bay Bay Tampa
71.8%
Source: Florida Department of Education; EDStats Portal, 2018-2019 Academic Year. Note: Economically disadvantaged students are students determined to be eligible for free and reduced price meals under the National School Lunch Program.
44
2020 REGIONAL EQUITY REPORT
TALENT
SCIENCE, FLORIDA STANDARDS ASSESSMENT SCORE OF 3 OR BETTER (5TH & 8TH GRADE) Tampa Bay Region Asian
71.8%
White, Non-Hispanic
62.0%
All
50.1%
Hispanic, All Races
41.4%
Economically Disadvantaged
38.8%
Black
28.3%
All Sarasota
White, Non-Hispanic 63.3%
Sarasota
70.1%
Black Hernando
33.9%
Citrus
55.4%
Hillsborough
66.2%
Sarasota
33.5%
Hernando
54.4%
Pinellas
64.4%
Pasco
33.4%
Pasco
53.4%
Manatee
62.9%
Citrus
32.6%
Pinellas
52.3%
Hernando
58.8%
Hillsborough
29.2%
Pasco
58.6%
Polk
26.8%
Citrus
57.7%
Manatee
23.6%
Polk
57.4%
Pinellas
23.2%
Hillsborough Manatee Polk
49.1% 46.4% 42.8%
Asian Sarasota
Hispanic, All Races 84.0%
Sarasota
51.6%
Economically Disadvantaged Sarasota
50.7% 50.5%
Hillsborough
79.7%
Citrus
47.8%
Citrus
Pasco
78.2%
Hernando
47.0%
Hernando
Polk
73.1%
47.2%
Pasco
44.2%
Pasco
41.2% 39.0%
Manatee
69.6%
Pinellas
43.0%
Pinellas
Citrus
68.3%
Hillsborough
40.8%
Hillsborough
36.0%
Pinellas
68.2%
Polk
34.9%
Manatee
34.0%
Manatee
32.9%
Polk
33.4%
Hernando
65.5%
Source: Florida Department of Education; EDStats Portal, 2018-2019 Academic Year. Note: Economically disadvantaged students are students determined to be eligible for free and reduced price meals under the National School Lunch Program. www.stateoftheregion.com
45
TALENT
ALGEBRA 1 END OF COURSE EXAM SCORE OF 3 OR BETTER
Disparity Measure
Tampa Bay in Context
White, Non-Hispanic
Region
Black
Difference
Florida
70.9%
42.7%
-28.2%
Jacksonville
74.5%
46.3%
-28.2%
Orlando
71.2%
42.0%
-29.2%
Tampa Bay
69.1%
38.1%
-31.0%
South Florida
78.5%
46.0%
-32.6%
All
Florida Florida
-28.2%
Jacksonville
-28.2%
Orlando
-29.2%
Bay Tampa Bay South Florida
White, Non-Hispanic
Jacksonville
64.9%
South Florida
78.5%
-31.0% -32.6%
Black Jacksonville
46.3%
South Florida
46.0%
South Florida
61.2%
Jacksonville
Florida Florida
60.0%
Orlando
71.2%
Florida Florida
42.7%
Tampa Bay Bay Tampa
59.1%
Florida Florida
70.9%
Orlando
42.0%
Orlando
56.8%
Tampa Bay Bay Tampa
69.1%
Bay Tampa Bay
Asian
74.5%
Hispanic, All Races
38.1%
Economically Disadvantaged
South Florida
87.1%
South Florida
Florida Florida
85.5%
Jacksonville
Tampa Bay
84.7%
Florida Florida
Orlando
84.2%
TampaBay Bay Tampa
50.8%
Tampa Bay
47.6%
Jacksonville
83.9%
Orlando
48.9%
Orlando
46.9%
62.4% 59.6% 56.2%
South Florida
54.1%
Jacksonville
51.6%
Florida Florida
50.6%
Source: Florida Department of Education; EDStats Portal, 2018-2019 Academic Year. Note: Economically disadvantaged students are students determined to be eligible for free and reduced price meals under the National School Lunch Program.
46
2020 REGIONAL EQUITY REPORT
TALENT
ALGEBRA 1 END OF COURSE EXAM SCORE OF 3 OR BETTER Tampa Bay Region Asian
84.7%
White, Non-Hispanic
69.1%
All
59.1%
Hispanic, All Races
50.8%
Economically Disadvantaged
47.6%
Black
38.1%
All
White, Non-Hispanic
Sarasota
72.9%
Black
Sarasota
78.9%
Pasco
47.7% 47.0%
Citrus
66.6%
Manatee
77.0%
Sarasota
Manatee
64.1%
Hillsborough
75.6%
Hillsborough
42.8%
Manatee
41.6% 41.5%
Hillsborough
61.5%
Citrus
Pasco
59.3%
Pinellas
64.0%
Hernando
Hernando
58.2%
Pasco
63.0%
Polk
32.3%
Hernando
62.9%
Pinellas
28.2%
Polk
62.8%
Citrus
Pinellas Polk
54.9% 48.6%
Asian
69.2%
Hispanic, All Races
n/d
Economically Disadvantaged
Sarasota
90.1%
Sarasota
61.1%
Citrus
62.4%
Manatee
90.0%
Citrus
60.5%
Sarasota
61.0%
Hillsborough
89.0%
Hillsborough
54.7%
Manatee
Citrus
88.2%
Manatee
53.2%
Hernando
50.3%
Hernando
86.0%
Pasco
50.8%
Hillsborough
48.9%
Pasco
85.1%
Pinellas
46.7%
Pasco
Polk
84.2%
Hernando
46.6%
Pinellas
41.3%
Polk
40.2%
Pinellas
74.0%
Polk
41.2%
55.4%
46.1%
Source: Florida Department of Education; EDStats Portal, 2018-2019 Academic Year. Notes: Economically disadvantaged students are students determined to be eligible for free and reduced price meals under the National School Lunch Program. The label “n/d” indicates “non-disclosed” and that the sample size was not big enough to make the calculation. www.stateoftheregion.com
47
TALENT
BIOLOGY 1 END OF COURSE EXAM SCORE OF 3 OR BETTER
Disparity Measure
Tampa Bay in Context
White, Non-Hispanic
Region
Black
Difference
Orlando
78.7%
53.3%
-25.4%
Jacksonville
82.0%
54.0%
-27.9%
Florida
77.7%
49.4%
-28.3%
South Florida
83.1%
53.9%
-29.2%
Tampa Bay
75.1%
40.8%
-34.4%
All Jacksonville
Orlando Jacksonville
-27.9%
Florida Florida
-28.3%
South Florida
-29.2%
Tampa Bay Bay Tampa
White, Non-Hispanic 73.0%
-34.4%
Black
South Florida
83.1%
Jacksonville
54.0%
82.0%
South Florida
53.9% 53.3%
South Florida
67.7%
Jacksonville
Florida Florida
66.9%
Orlando
78.7%
Orlando
Orlando
66.7%
Florida Florida
77.7%
Florida Florida
Tampa Bay Tampa
64.6%
Tampa Bay Tampa
75.1%
Bay Tampa Bay
Asian
-25.4%
Hispanic, All Races
49.4% 40.8%
Economically Disadvantaged
South Florida
89.2%
Jacksonville
69.5%
South Florida
60.8%
Jacksonville
87.6%
South Florida
68.5%
Jacksonville
59.8%
Orlando
86.9%
Florida Florida
63.3%
Orlando
57.6%
Florida Florida
86.7%
Orlando
60.9%
Florida Florida
57.2%
Tampa Bay
85.8%
Tampa Bay
56.3%
Bay Tampa Bay
52.1%
Source: Florida Department of Education; EDStats Portal, 2018-2019 Academic Year. Note: Economically disadvantaged students are students determined to be eligible for free and reduced price meals under the National School Lunch Program.
48
2020 REGIONAL EQUITY REPORT
TALENT
BIOLOGY 1 END OF COURSE EXAM SCORE OF 3 OR BETTER Tampa Bay Region Asian
85.8%
White, Non-Hispanic
75.1%
All
64.6%
Hispanic, All Races
56.3%
Economically Disadvantaged
52.1%
Black
40.8%
All
White, Non-Hispanic
Sarasota
76.1%
Citrus
72.0%
Black
Sarasota
82.3%
Sarasota
49.6%
Manatee
81.1%
Pasco
47.2%
80.6%
Hillsborough
45.6%
Manatee
68.0%
Hillsborough
Hillsborough
66.4%
Citrus
73.8%
Manatee
44.3%
Pasco
66.1%
Pinellas
73.5%
Citrus
43.2%
Hernando
65.9%
Hernando
71.3%
Hernando
38.7%
Pasco
70.4%
Polk
38.0%
Pinellas Polk
62.2%
Polk
54.2%
Asian Manatee
67.1%
Hispanic, All Races 95.6%
Citrus
71.4%
Pinellas
29.5%
Economically Disadvantaged Sarasota
64.8%
Citrus
64.4%
Hillsborough
90.3%
Sarasota
Sarasota
87.7%
Hillsborough
59.9%
Manatee
56.7%
Hernando
86.1%
Pasco
58.9%
Hernando
55.5%
Pasco
83.8%
Hernando
58.1%
Pasco
53.7%
56.3%
Hillsborough
52.7%
Citrus
81.0%
Manatee
Polk
79.9%
Pinellas
Pinellas
79.3%
Polk
65.4%
51.8% 47.4%
Pinellas Polk
47.8% 44.1%
Source: Florida Department of Education; EDStats Portal, 2018-2019 Academic Year. Note: Economically disadvantaged students are students determined to be eligible for free and reduced price meals under the National School Lunch Program. www.stateoftheregion.com
49
TALENT
HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATION RATE SHARE OF STUDENTS WHO GRADUATED WITHIN 4 YEARS OF THEIR INITIAL ENROLLMENT IN 9TH GRADE
Disparity Measure
Tampa Bay in Context
White, Non-Hispanic
Region
Black
Difference
Jacksonville
90.6%
85.2%
-5.3%
Florida
90.2%
81.5%
-8.7%
Tampa Bay
89.3%
79.7%
-9.6%
Orlando
92.8%
82.2%
-10.6%
South Florida
92.3%
81.4%
-10.8%
All
-5.3%
Florida Florida
-8.7%
TampaBay Bay Tampa
-9.6%
Orlando
-10.6%
South Florida
-10.8%
White, Non-Hispanic
Black
Orlando
89.3%
Orlando
92.8%
Jacksonville
Jacksonville
89.2%
South Florida
92.3%
Orlando
82.2%
Florida Florida
86.9%
Jacksonville
90.6%
Florida Florida
81.5%
South Florida
86.2%
Florida Florida
90.2%
South Florida
81.4%
Tampa Bay Bay Tampa
86.1%
Tampa Bay
89.3%
Tampa Bay Bay Tampa
79.7%
Asian
Hispanic, All Races
Orlando
96.7%
Jacksonville
90.5%
Florida Florida
95.6%
Orlando
89.2%
Tampa Bay
95.6%
South Florida
86.4%
South Florida
94.9%
Florida Florida
85.9%
Jacksonville
94.3%
Tampa Bay
83.0%
Source: Florida Department of Education; EDStats Portal, 2018-2019 Academic Year.
50
Jacksonville
2020 REGIONAL EQUITY REPORT
85.2%
SHARE OF STUDENTS WHO GRADUATED WITHIN 4 YEARS OF THEIR INITIAL ENROLLMENT IN 9TH GRADE
TALENT
HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATION RATE Tampa Bay Region Asian
95.6%
White, Non-Hispanic
89.3%
All
86.1%
Hispanic, All Races
83.0%
Black
79.7%
All
White, Non-Hispanic
Black
Sarasota
89.4%
Sarasota
92.1%
Pasco
Pinellas
88.4%
Hillsborough
91.6%
Pinellas
81.3%
Hernando
88.4%
Pinellas
90.5%
Hernando
80.3%
Pasco
88.3%
Hernando
89.4%
Hillsborough
79.8%
Hillsborough
86.2%
Manatee
88.7%
Polk
78.7%
Citrus
86.0%
Pasco
88.4%
Manatee
74.9%
86.4%
Sarasota
74.0%
Manatee
83.2%
Citrus
Polk
81.2%
Polk
Asian
83.6%
Citrus
88.0%
70.0%
Hispanic, All Races
Sarasota
97.7%
Citrus
86.8%
Hernando
96.4%
Pinellas
86.7%
Manatee
96.4%
Pasco
86.7%
Pasco
96.3%
Sarasota
86.2%
Hillsborough
96.2%
Hernando
86.0%
Citrus
95.5%
Hillsborough
83.9%
Pinellas
94.5%
Polk
78.7%
Polk
94.2%
Manatee
77.0%
Source: Florida Department of Education; EDStats Portal, 2018-2019 Academic Year.
www.stateoftheregion.com
51
TALENT
HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATION RATE – ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED SHARE OF STUDENTS WHO GRADUATED WITHIN 4 YEARS OF THEIR INITIAL ENROLLMENT IN 9TH GRADE
Disparity Measure
Tampa Bay in Context
White, Non-Hispanic
Region
Black
Difference
Jacksonville
81.3%
82.4%
1.1%
Florida
82.7%
80.4%
-2.2%
Tampa Bay
81.2%
77.5%
-3.8%
Orlando
86.8%
82.3%
-4.5%
South Florida
85.8%
81.1%
-4.7%
All Orlando
Jacksonville Florida Florida -2.2%
TampaBay Bay Tampa
-3.8%
Orlando
-4.5%
South Florida
-4.7%
White, Non-Hispanic 86.9%
1.1%
Black
Orlando
86.8%
Jacksonville
82.4%
85.8%
Orlando
82.3%
South Florida
83.7%
South Florida
Jacksonville
83.2%
Florida Florida
82.7%
South Florida
81.1%
Florida Florida
82.9%
Jacksonville
81.3%
Florida Florida
80.4%
Tampa Bay Tampa
80.5%
Tampa Bay
81.2%
Tampa Bay Bay Tampa
Asian Orlando
Hispanic, All Races 97.1%
Jacksonville
89.8% 88.8%
Florida Florida
93.7%
Orlando
Tampa Bay Bay Tampa
92.9%
South Florida
85.1%
South Florida
92.4%
Florida Florida
84.5%
Jacksonville
77.5%
87.4%
Tampa Bay
81.0%
Source: Florida Department of Education; EDStats Portal, 2018-2019 Academic Year. Note: Economically disadvantaged students are students determined to be eligible for free and reduced price meals under the National School Lunch Program.
52
2020 REGIONAL EQUITY REPORT
SHARE OF STUDENTS WHO GRADUATED WITHIN 4 YEARS OF THEIR INITIAL ENROLLMENT IN 9TH GRADE
TALENT
HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATION RATE – ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED Tampa Bay Region Asian
92.9%
White, Non-Hispanic
81.2%
Hispanic, All Races
81.0%
All
80.5%
Black
77.5%
All
White, Non-Hispanic
Black
Hernando
86.3%
Sarasota
87.1%
Pasco
Sarasota
84.6%
Hernando
85.9%
Hernando
Citrus
83.7%
Citrus
83.7%
Hillsborough
77.5%
Pasco
83.0%
Hillsborough
83.0%
Pinellas
77.4%
Pinellas
81.5%
Pasco
81.8%
Polk
77.1%
Hillsborough
80.6%
Pinellas
81.1%
Manatee
74.6%
Citrus
73.2%
Sarasota
72.3%
Manatee
77.0%
Manatee
Polk
75.6%
Polk
Asian
77.8% 71.9%
95.5%
Citrus
86.8%
Hillsborough
94.2%
Sarasota
86.6%
Sarasota
93.3%
Hernando
86.5%
Pasco
93.1%
Pinellas
85.1%
Polk
92.7%
Pasco
82.8%
Hernando
92.3%
Hillsborough
81.2%
Pinellas
90.9%
Manatee
77.1%
Polk
76.9%
n/d
82.2%
Hispanic, All Races
Manatee
Citrus
85.8%
Source: Florida Department of Education; EDStats Portal, 2018-2019 Academic Year. Note: The label “n/d” indicates “non-disclosed” and that the sample size was not big enough to make the calculation. www.stateoftheregion.com
53
INFRASTRUCTURE
DIGITAL ACCESS & THE DIGITAL DIVIDE WHAT
The share of households with a computer and a dedicated physical broadband internet subscription using a service such as cable, fiber optic, or DSL.
WHY
Increasingly, modern life requires digital access and basic digital skills. Those households with adequate technology and broadband access are better equipped to participate in activities ranging from school to telemedicine to working from home, and the people in those households will have higher levels of digital literacy. The disparity in access between socio-economic groups and racial and ethnic groups is referred to as the “Digital Divide.”
The disparity in digital access between Blacks and White, NonHispanics in Tampa Bay is one of the highest of its peers.
OF NOTE – Digital access in Tampa Bay is the lowest among its peer group. Tampa Bay ranks in the bottom quintile in all racial and ethnic categories. – While 92 percent of all households in Seattle have broadband internet, less than 83 percent of households in Tampa Bay have it. Among Black households, only 71 percent have broadband access. – Among the eight counties in the Tampa Bay region, Polk County has the lowest share of households with digital access—only about half of the households of color have broadband access. Source: US Census Bureau, 2018 American Community Survey 5-year estimates, B28009.
54
2020 REGIONAL EQUITY REPORT
SHARE OF HOUSEHOLDS WITH A COMPUTER AND A BROADBAND INTERNET SUBSCRIPTION Disparity Measure Region
Tampa Bay in Context
White
Black
San Diego
93.6%
87.3%
-6.3%
Seattle
92.7%
86.0%
-6.7%
Atlanta
90.4%
82.7%
-7.7%
Phoenix
90.4%
82.1%
-8.3%
Portland
91.1%
82.8%
-8.3%
Orlando
90.4%
81.6%
-8.8%
Charlotte
89.4%
80.5%
-8.9%
San Antonio
89.3%
80.4%
Difference
San Diego
-6.3%
Seattle
INFRASTRUCTURE
BLACK-WHITE GAP: DIGITAL ACCESS & THE DIGITAL DIVIDE
-6.7%
Atlanta
-7.7%
Phoenix
-8.3%
Portland
-8.3%
Orlando
-8.8%
Charlotte
-8.9%
San Antonio
-8.9%
-8.9%
Mpls-St. Paul
91.3%
80.9%
-10.4%
Baltimore
90.8%
80.2%
-10.5%
Denver
92.7%
82.1%
-10.6%
Raleigh-Durham
91.6%
80.9%
-10.7%
Houston
91.3%
80.6%
-10.8%
Nashville
87.4%
76.5%
-11.0%
United States
86.6%
75.4%
-11.1%
Austin
92.8%
81.0%
-11.8%
Jacksonville
88.5%
76.0%
-12.6%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
91.3%
77.6%
-13.7%
Tampa Bay
85.1%
71.3%
-13.8%
South Florida
88.5%
74.6%
-13.9%
St. Louis
88.2%
72.3%
-15.8%
Mpls-St. Paul
-10.4%
Baltimore
-10.5%
Denver
-10.6%
Raleigh-Durham
-10.7%
Houston
-10.8%
Nashville
-11.0%
United States United States
-11.1%
Austin
-11.8%
Jacksonville
-12.6%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
-13.7%
Tampa Bay Bay ï‚„ Tampa
-13.8%
South Florida
-13.9%
St. Louis
-15.8%
Source: US Census Bureau, 2018 American Community Survey 5-year estimates, B28009.
www.stateoftheregion.com
55
INFRASTRUCTURE
COMPARATIVE DIGITAL ACCESS BY RACE/ETHNICITY SHARE OF HOUSEHOLDS WITH A COMPUTER AND A BROADBAND INTERNET SUBSCRIPTION All
White, Non-Hispanic
Seattle
91.9%
San Diego
93.6%
San Diego
87.3%
San Diego
91.0%
Austin
92.8%
Seattle
86.0%
Portland
90.4%
Denver
92.7%
Portland
82.8%
Mpls-St. Paul
90.0%
Seattle
92.7%
Atlanta
82.7%
Denver
89.5%
Raleigh-Durham
91.6%
Phoenix
82.1%
Raleigh-Durham
88.4%
Houston
91.3%
Denver
82.1%
Austin
87.7%
Mpls-St. Paul
91.3%
Orlando
81.6%
Baltimore
87.6%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
91.3%
Austin
81.0%
Orlando
87.1%
Portland
91.1%
Raleigh-Durham
80.9%
Charlotte
86.8%
Baltimore
90.8%
Mpls-St. Paul
80.9%
Atlanta
86.7%
Orlando
90.4%
Houston
80.6%
Phoenix
85.9%
Phoenix
90.4%
Charlotte
80.5%
Jacksonville
85.8%
Atlanta
90.4%
San Antonio
80.4%
Nashville
85.4%
Charlotte
89.4%
Baltimore
80.2%
St. Louis
85.2%
San Antonio
89.3%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
77.6%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
85.1%
Jacksonville
88.5%
Nashville
76.5%
Houston
84.6%
South Florida
88.5%
United States United
84.2%
St. Louis
88.2%
Jacksonville United United States
75.4%
South Florida
83.1%
South Florida
74.6%
82.9%
Nashville United United States
87.4%
San Antonio
86.6%
72.3%
Tampa Bay
82.5%
Tampa Tampa Bay
85.1%
St. Louis Tampa Tampa Bay Bay
Asian Baltimore
Hispanic, All Races 95.6%
Seattle
88.2%
76.0%
71.3%
Other Seattle
89.7%
Austin
95.4%
San Diego
86.4%
Portland
87.3%
San Diego
94.6%
Portland
86.2%
San Diego
87.1%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
94.5%
Jacksonville
85.1%
Jacksonville
86.8%
Raleigh-Durham
94.3%
Baltimore
83.6%
Baltimore
86.5%
Houston
94.2%
Orlando
83.3%
Mpls-St. Paul
85.9%
Orlando
94.2%
Mpls-St. Paul
83.3%
St. Louis
84.5%
Nashville
94.1%
South Florida
82.5%
Orlando
84.1%
Phoenix
94.0%
St. Louis
82.4%
Raleigh-Durham
83.6%
Seattle
93.9%
Raleigh-Durham
82.4%
Charlotte
83.0%
Portland
93.7%
Denver
81.6%
South Florida
82.9%
Charlotte
93.6%
Charlotte
81.4%
Denver
82.7%
Atlanta
93.3%
Nashville
80.6%
Nashville
81.5%
Denver
92.9%
United States United
79.6%
Atlanta
80.6%
San Antonio United United States States
92.6%
Austin
79.1%
United States United
80.3%
92.5%
San Antonio
78.6%
Austin
80.1%
South Florida
92.5%
78.4%
79.0%
77.7%
San Antonio Tampa Tampa Bay
79.0%
77.7%
Phoenix
78.2%
Jacksonville
92.3%
Atlanta Tampa Tampa Bay
Mpls-St. Paul
91.7%
Phoenix
St. Louis Tampa Bay
91.4%
Houston
77.6%
Houston
78.1%
91.3%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
76.5%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
77.6%
Source: US Census Bureau, 2018 American Community Survey 5-year estimates, B28009.
56
Black
2020 REGIONAL EQUITY REPORT
SHARE OF HOUSEHOLDS WITH A COMPUTER AND A BROADBAND INTERNET SUBSCRIPTION Tampa Bay Region Asian
91.3%
Two or More Races
89.4%
White, Non-Hispanic
85.1%
All
82.5%
Hispanic, All Races
77.7%
Some Other Race
77.3%
Black
71.3%
All
White, Non-Hispanic
Black
Sarasota
87.1%
Hillsborough
Hillsborough
87.1%
Sarasota
87.7%
Hillsborough
79.4%
Hernando
85.3%
Pinellas
86.0%
Citrus
79.4%
Citrus
84.5%
Manatee
85.0%
Pasco
79.2%
Pasco
84.0%
Hernando
84.7%
Sarasota
78.9%
Pinellas
83.7%
Citrus
84.7%
Manatee
Manatee
82.1%
Pasco
83.7%
Pinellas
Polk
INFRASTRUCTURE
REGIONAL DIGITAL ACCESS BY RACE/ETHNICITY
Polk
66.5%
Asian
90.8%
73.2%
Hernando
Polk
Hispanic, All Races
82.3%
73.0% 67.2% 51.3%
Other
Hillsborough
94.3%
Hernando
89.3%
Hernando
Pasco
93.9%
Citrus
87.1%
Citrus
85.7%
Sarasota
93.0%
Sarasota
84.2%
Sarasota
85.3%
89.7%
Pinellas
90.0%
Pasco
83.6%
Pasco
85.0%
Manatee
88.8%
Hillsborough
83.4%
Hillsborough
84.3%
Polk
83.0%
Pinellas
Hernando
81.1%
Manatee
Citrus
79.3%
Polk
79.8% 73.2% 55.6%
Pinellas Manatee Polk
81.2% 74.0% 57.9%
Source: US Census Bureau, 2018 American Community Survey 5-year estimates, B28009.
www.stateoftheregion.com
57
INFRASTRUCTURE
TRANSPORTATION TO WORK WHAT
The share of workers 16 years old and older that relies on public transit or walking to commute to work.
WHY
A reliable means of transportation is vital to accessing education, social services, and job opportunities. In communities without robust public transit networks, relying on public transportation and walking can be a burden that falls disproportionately on economically vulnerable populations. While in communities with better transit networks, not having personal transportation is a more viable and less burdensome alternative.
Black workers in Tampa Bay are almost three times as likely to rely on public transit or walking to commute to work as White, Non-Hispanic workers.
OF NOTE
– There is wide variation among the peer group in the percent of workers who commute by public transit or walking. However, in the communities with higher ridership, such as Baltimore, Portland, and Minneapolis-St. Paul, the disparities are also some of the highest. In Tampa Bay, where both the supply of transit and ridership are the lowest among the comparison set, the difference between Black and White, Non-Hispanic workers’ reliance on public transit or walking ranks it 5th out of 20. – In the Tampa Bay region, the rates of reliance on public transit and walking vary from a low of 0.2 percent for Hispanic workers in Hernando County to a high of 6.6 percent for Black and Hispanic workers in Pinellas County. Source: US Census Bureau, 2018 American Community Survey 5-year estimates, B08105.
58
2020 REGIONAL EQUITY REPORT
INFRASTRUCTURE
BLACK-WHITE GAP: TRANSPORTATION TO WORK SHARE OF POPULATION COMMUTING VIA WALKING/TRANSIT Disparity Measure Region
Tampa Bay in Context
White
Black
Difference
Raleigh-Durham
2.8%
4.8%
+2.0%
Charlotte
2.0%
4.8%
+2.8%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
2.0%
4.9%
+2.9%
Houston
2.4%
5.4%
+2.9%
Tampa Bay
1.8%
4.8%
+3.0%
Austin
3.4%
6.5%
+3.1%
Nashville
1.8%
5.0%
+3.3%
Jacksonville
1.8%
5.9%
+4.1%
San Antonio
2.3%
6.9%
+4.6%
Atlanta
2.3%
7.1%
+4.8%
Phoenix
2.5%
7.5%
+5.0%
Orlando
1.6%
6.7%
+5.1%
South Florida
2.9%
8.9%
+5.9%
San Diego
4.8%
11.1%
+6.4%
12.1%
19.3%
+7.2%
United States
5.6%
13.1%
+7.5%
Denver
5.6%
13.4%
+7.8%
St. Louis
2.3%
12.3%
+10.0%
Mpls-St. Paul
5.6%
16.3%
+10.6%
Portland
8.5%
19.4%
+10.9%
Baltimore
5.1%
17.6%
+12.6%
Seattle
Raleigh-Durham
+2.0%
Charlotte
+2.8%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
+2.9%
Houston
+2.9%
Tampa Bay Bay ï‚„ Tampa
+3.0%
Austin
+3.1%
Nashville
+3.3%
Jacksonville
+4.1%
San Antonio
+4.6%
Atlanta
+4.8%
Phoenix
+5.0%
Orlando
+5.1%
South Florida San Diego Seattle United United States Denver St. Louis Mpls-St. Paul Portland Baltimore
+5.9% +6.4% +7.2% +7.5% +7.8% +10.0% +10.6% +10.9% +12.6%
Source: US Census Bureau, 2018 American Community Survey 5-year estimates, B08105.
www.stateoftheregion.com
59
INFRASTRUCTURE
COMPARATIVE TRANSPORTATION TO WORK BY RACE/ETHNICITY SHARE OF POPULATION COMMUTING VIA WALKING/TRANSIT All
White, Non-Hispanic Orlando Tampa Tampa Bay Bay
1.6%
2.7%
Nashville
1.8%
2.8%
Jacksonville
1.8%
Orlando
2.8%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
2.0%
Charlotte
3.0%
Charlotte
2.0%
Houston
5.4%
Houston
3.3%
Atlanta
2.3%
Jacksonville
5.9%
Nashville Tampa Tampa Bay Bay
2.4%
Dallas-Ft. Worth Jacksonville
2.4%
Raleigh-Durham 4.8% Tampa Bay Bay 4.8% Tampa
1.8%
Charlotte 4.8% Dallas-Ft. Worth 4.9% Nashville 5.0%
Phoenix
3.5%
St. Louis
2.3%
Austin
6.5%
Raleigh-Durham
3.5%
San Antonio
2.3%
Orlando
6.7%
San Antonio
3.6%
Houston
2.4%
San Antonio
6.9%
Austin
3.9%
Phoenix
2.5%
Atlanta
7.1%
St. Louis
4.2%
Raleigh-Durham
2.8%
Phoenix
7.5%
Atlanta
4.4%
South Florida
2.9%
South Florida
3.4%
San Diego
Austin
South Florida 5.1% San Diego 5.8% Denver Mpls-St. Paul United UnitedStates States Baltimore Portland
San Diego
4.8%
Denver
13.4%
5.6%
Mpls-St. Paul
5.6%
Baltimore
Denver United United States Mpls-St. Paul Portland
9.8% 13.7%
Asian
8.5%
Seattle
12.1%
2.1%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
2.6%
Orlando Tampa Tampa Bay Bay
2.5%
Nashville
2.6%
Orlando Tampa Tampa Bay Bay Houston
Nashville
2.9% 3.6%
16.3% 17.6%
Seattle
19.3%
Portland
19.4%
Hispanic, All Races
Jacksonville
Dallas-Ft. Worth
12.3%
5.6%
6.9% 9.0%
11.1%
St. Louis
13.1%
6.3%
5.1%
7.7%
8.9%
United United States States
Baltimore
Seattle
Other Dallas-Ft. Worth
2.6%
2.9%
Orlando
2.8%
2.9%
Nashville
3.1%
3.2%
3.2%
3.2%
Jacksonville Tampa Tampa Bay Bay
Jacksonville
3.5%
Houston
3.2%
3.2%
Houston
4.2%
Phoenix
4.7%
Charlotte
3.6%
Austin
3.8%
San Diego
4.9%
Raleigh-Durham
3.7%
Raleigh-Durham
3.9%
Atlanta
Austin
3.8%
Charlotte
3.9%
San Antonio
3.9%
San Antonio
4.0%
5.7%
Phoenix
4.1%
Phoenix
4.4%
6.2%
South Florida
South Florida
4.9%
San Antonio
6.4%
Atlanta
Austin
6.6%
Denver
St. Louis
6.8%
4.9%
South Florida
5.4%
Charlotte Raleigh-Durham
Denver
4.9% 5.5%
Atlanta
5.4%
6.5%
San Diego
6.8%
San Diego
7.0%
Denver
6.8%
7.2%
St. Louis United United States States
6.9%
Baltimore
8.8%
St. Louis United United States
Mpls-St. Paul
9.1%
Mpls-St. Paul
9.9%
Baltimore
10.6%
Seattle
10.2%
Mpls-St. Paul
10.7%
Baltimore
10.6%
Portland
Portland United UnitedStates States Seattle
7.8%
12.0% 14.6% 18.6%
Portland
9.8%
14.0%
Source: US Census Bureau, 2018 American Community Survey 5-year estimates, B08105.
60
Black
2020 REGIONAL EQUITY REPORT
Seattle
9.6%
13.6% 14.7%
INFRASTRUCTURE
REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION TO WORK BY RACE/ETHNICITY SHARE OF POPULATION COMMUTING VIA WALKING/TRANSIT Tampa Bay Region White, Non-Hispanic
1.8%
All
2.4%
Asian
2.6%
Some Other Race
3.1%
Hispanic, All Races
3.2%
Two or More Races
4.5%
Black
4.8%
All
White, Non-Hispanic
Black
Citrus
1.2%
Citrus
1.0%
Pasco
Hernando
1.3%
Pasco
1.2%
Polk
Pasco
1.3%
Hernando
1.3%
Citrus
Polk 1.6%
Polk
1.3%
Hernando
Sarasota 1.6%
Sarasota
1.3%
Manatee
3.0%
Manatee
Manatee
Sarasota
3.1%
1.9%
Hillsborough
Hillsborough
3.0%
Pinellas
Pinellas
3.4%
Asian Pasco
Hernando Citrus
1.4%
1.8% 2.4% 2.8%
Hillsborough
1.9%
6.1%
Pinellas
2.6%
Hispanic, All Races
0.7%
Polk
1.6%
1.0%
6.6%
Other Hernando
0.2%
0.9%
Citrus
1.3%
1.5%
Manatee
1.8%
Polk
2.1%
Polk
2.1%
Pinellas
2.1%
Pasco
2.3%
Sarasota
2.2%
Sarasota
2.3%
Pasco
2.2%
Hillsborough
3.5%
Sarasota
5.1%
Citrus Hernando
5.5% n/d
Manatee Hillsborough Pinellas
Manatee
2.8%
Hillsborough
3.1% 6.6%
2.9% 3.2%
Pinellas
6.5%
Source: US Census Bureau, 2018 American Community Survey 5-year estimates, B08105. Note: The label “n/d” indicates “non-disclosed” and that the sample size was not big enough to make the calculation. www.stateoftheregion.com
61
CIVIC QUALITY
HOME OWNERSHIP WHAT
The percent of housing units occupied by owners. This includes only occupied housing units.
WHY
In addition to providing a stable place to live, home ownership is an important way that families build wealth. In particular, it is an important way for families to build and transfer wealth across generations. Many factors contribute to whether or not a family can afford to own a home. However, discriminatory policies, such as redlining, have limited access to homeownership for people of color in the past, and the legacy of these practices still persists today.
In Tampa Bay, Black and Hispanic households have the lowest home ownership rates.
OF NOTE
– The difference in homeownership rates between Black households and White, Non-Hispanic households is stark, ranging from a low 22 percentage point difference in Austin to a high 51 percentage point difference in Minneapolis-Saint Paul. – The Tampa Bay region ranks in the 4th quintile for the disparity measure, or 15th out of 20. – In Tampa Bay, White, Non-Hispanic and Asian households have the highest home ownership rates. – Among the eight counties in the region, Black households in Hillsborough County have the lowest rate of home ownership while Asians in Citrus County have the highest. Source: US Census Bureau, 2018 American Community Survey 5-year estimates, S2502.
62
2020 REGIONAL EQUITY REPORT
CIVIC QUALITY
BLACK-WHITE GAP: HOME OWNERSHIP SHARE OF HOUSING UNITS THAT ARE OWNER-OCCUPIED Disparity Measure Region
Tampa Bay in Context
White
Black
Difference
Austin
64.6%
42.6%
-22.0%
Orlando
70.3%
44.0%
-26.3%
San Antonio
71.0%
44.2%
-26.9%
Raleigh-Durham
72.6%
45.2%
-27.4%
Jacksonville
71.5%
44.1%
-27.4%
Atlanta
75.3%
47.4%
-28.0%
South Florida
73.5%
44.5%
-29.0%
Nashville
72.1%
42.9%
Austin
-22.0%
Orlando
-26.3%
San Antonio
-26.9%
Raleigh-Durham
-27.4%
Jacksonville
-27.4%
Atlanta
-28.0%
South Florida
-29.0%
Nashville
-29.2%
Houston
-29.4%
United States United States
-30.0%
San Diego
-30.7%
Baltimore
-31.4%
Charlotte
-31.5%
Denver
-31.7%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
-32.0%
Tampa Bay Bay ï‚„ Tampa
-32.5%
-29.2%
Houston
71.7%
42.3%
-29.4%
United States
71.8%
41.8%
-30.0%
San Diego
60.9%
30.2%
-30.7%
Baltimore
77.3%
45.9%
-31.4%
Charlotte
75.5%
44.0%
-31.5%
Denver
69.8%
38.1%
-31.7%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
69.4%
37.4%
-32.0%
Tampa Bay
73.3%
40.8%
-32.5%
Seattle
65.3%
31.7%
-33.5%
Portland
65.8%
31.9%
-33.9%
St. Louis
76.6%
40.2%
-36.5%
Phoenix
70.1%
33.2%
-36.9%
Mpls-St. Paul
76.3%
25.2%
-51.0%
Seattle
-33.5%
Portland
-33.9%
St. Louis
-36.5%
Phoenix
-36.9%
Mpls-St. Paul
-51.0%
Source: US Census Bureau, 2018 American Community Survey 5-year estimates, S2502.
www.stateoftheregion.com
63
CIVIC QUALITY
COMPARATIVE HOME OWNERSHIP BY RACE/ETHNICITY SHARE OF HOUSING UNITS THAT ARE OWNER-OCCUPIED All
White, Non-Hispanic
Mpls-St. Paul
70.0%
Baltimore
77.3%
Atlanta
47.4%
St. Louis Tampa Tampa Bay Bay
68.9%
St. Louis
76.6%
Baltimore
45.9%
66.9%
Mpls-St. Paul
76.3%
Raleigh-Durham
45.2%
Baltimore
66.4%
Charlotte
75.5%
South Florida
44.5%
Charlotte
65.6%
Atlanta
75.3%
San Antonio
44.2%
Nashville
65.6%
73.5%
Jacksonville
44.1%
Jacksonville
63.9%
South Florida Tampa Tampa Bay Bay
73.3%
Orlando
44.0%
United States States United
63.8%
Raleigh-Durham
72.6%
Charlotte
44.0%
Raleigh-Durham
63.8%
Nashville
72.1%
Nashville
42.9%
Denver
63.6%
United United States States
71.8%
Austin
42.6%
Atlanta
63.1%
Houston
71.7%
Houston
42.3%
San Antonio
62.7%
Jacksonville
71.5%
Phoenix
62.4%
San Antonio
71.0%
United States United Tampa Tampa Bay Bay
40.8%
Portland
61.9%
Orlando
70.3%
St. Louis
40.2%
Orlando
60.5%
Phoenix
70.1%
Denver
38.1%
Houston
60.4%
Denver
69.8%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
37.4%
Seattle
60.0%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
Dallas-Ft. Worth
59.6%
Portland
South Florida
59.4%
Seattle
65.3%
Seattle
31.7%
Austin
58.1%
Austin
64.6%
San Diego
30.2%
Mpls-St. Paul
25.2%
San Diego
53.1%
Asian Orlando
69.4% 65.8%
San Diego
60.9%
70.8%
San Antonio
58.7%
41.8%
Phoenix
33.2%
Portland
31.9%
Hispanic, All Races
Other San Antonio
58.8%
Houston
68.4%
Houston
52.8%
Houston
53.1%
Jacksonville
68.3%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
52.0%
South Florida
52.0%
South Florida Tampa Tampa Bay Bay
68.0%
St. Louis
52.0%
66.6%
South Florida
51.6%
Dallas-Ft. Worth Tampa Tampa Bay Bay
51.7%
Atlanta
66.2%
Tampa Bay Bay Tampa
51.0%
St. Louis
51.7%
Baltimore
64.9%
Phoenix
49.3%
Baltimore
Portland
64.3%
Baltimore
49.0%
Jacksonville
52.0%
51.6% 49.2%
Raleigh-Durham
62.3%
Austin
47.9%
Atlanta
48.5%
Phoenix
62.0%
Denver
47.3%
Phoenix
48.2%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
61.2%
Austin
48.1%
60.6%
Orlando United United States
46.9%
Seattle
46.7%
Denver
47.8%
Charlotte
60.3%
Jacksonville
46.4%
Orlando
47.7%
Denver United United States States
60.0%
Atlanta
46.4%
United States States United
47.7%
59.0%
Charlotte
45.0%
Charlotte
46.3%
Mpls-St. Paul
58.5%
Raleigh-Durham
44.2%
Raleigh-Durham
45.9%
San Diego
57.6%
Mpls-St. Paul
42.3%
Mpls-St. Paul
43.8%
41.5%
Nashville
Nashville
57.5%
Nashville
St. Louis
57.0%
San Diego
Austin
55.6%
Portland
39.0%
Seattle
40.3%
San Antonio
53.4%
Seattle
37.9%
San Diego
39.7%
39.1%
Source: US Census Bureau, 2018 American Community Survey 5-year estimates, S2502.
64
Black
2020 REGIONAL EQUITY REPORT
Portland
43.8% 41.2%
CIVIC QUALITY
REGIONAL HOME OWNERSHIP BY RACE/ETHNICITY SHARE OF HOUSING UNITS THAT ARE OWNER-OCCUPIED Tampa Bay Region White, Non-Hispanic
73.3%
All
66.9%
Asian
66.6%
Two or More Races
52.9%
Some Other Race
51.6%
Hispanic, All Races
51.0%
Black
40.8%
All
White, Non-Hispanic
Citrus
81.4%
Hernando
77.8%
Black
Citrus
82.2%
Citrus
Hernando
80.4%
Hernando
65.4% 55.9%
Sarasota
73.8%
Manatee
77.4%
Pasco
Pasco
72.0%
Sarasota
76.2%
Polk
48.6%
Manatee
71.6%
Polk
75.0%
Sarasota
47.5%
Pasco
74.6%
Manatee
Polk
68.5%
Pinellas
65.7%
Hillsborough
Pinellas Hillsborough
58.1%
Asian 84.3%
Citrus
Pasco
82.8%
Hernando
Sarasota
77.2%
Pasco
Polk
75.8%
Polk
Hernando
75.6%
Sarasota
Pinellas Hillsborough
68.3%
69.8% 64.5% 59.9%
74.8% 66.4% 59.7% 56.3% 50.9%
40.6%
Pinellas
37.5%
Hillsborough
36.6%
Hispanic, All Races
Citrus
Manatee
70.5%
51.6%
Other Citrus
75.0%
Hernando Pasco Polk Sarasota
67.5% 60.6% 56.5% 52.4%
Manatee
47.8%
Manatee
48.4%
Hillsborough
47.7%
Pinellas
48.4%
Pinellas
47.3%
Hillsborough
48.3%
Source: US Census Bureau, 2018 American Community Survey 5-year estimates, S2502.
www.stateoftheregion.com
65
CIVIC QUALITY
HEALTH INSURANCE COVERAGE WHAT
The percent of the population that is covered by health insurance—either through private health insurance or public medical assistance programs.
WHY
Individuals with health insurance have better and more affordable access to health care than those who are uninsured. As such, they are more likely to seek preventative care and necessary medical treatment, which leads to better health outcomes.
In Tampa Bay, the disparity between the highest and lowest rates of coverage is nearly 15 percentage points.
OF NOTE
– In Tampa Bay, the share of insured Blacks is almost 5 percentage points lower than the share for White, Non-Hispanics, which ranks Tampa Bay 9th out of 20. – In comparison to its peers, Tampa Bay has a low health insurance coverage rate. When broken down by race, Tampa Bay’s coverage rate places it in the fourth or fifth quintile in each category. – Hispanics and individuals classified as “Some Other Race” have the lowest rates of health insurance coverage in the region and White, Non-Hispanics and Asians have the highest. Source: US Census Bureau, 2018 American Community Survey 5-year estimates, C27001.
66
2020 REGIONAL EQUITY REPORT
CIVIC QUALITY
BLACK-WHITE GAP: HEALTH INSURANCE COVERAGE SHARE OF THE POPULATION WITH HEALTH INSURANCE Disparity Measure Region
Tampa Bay in Context
White
Black
Jacksonville
86.0%
83.6%
-2.4%
San Diego
93.1%
90.3%
-2.9%
Portland
93.1%
90.1%
-3.0%
Phoenix
91.2%
88.1%
-3.1%
Baltimore
95.5%
91.6%
-3.8%
Nashville
89.9%
85.9%
-4.0%
Denver
93.6%
89.6%
-4.0%
Austin
90.0%
85.8%
Difference
-4.3%
Tampa Bay
84.7%
80.0%
-4.6%
San Antonio
87.5%
82.5%
-5.0%
Seattle
94.2%
89.1%
-5.1%
Charlotte
89.7%
84.0%
-5.8%
United States
91.0%
84.7%
-6.3%
Orlando
86.5%
79.9%
-6.6%
Mpls-St. Paul
96.2%
89.6%
-6.6%
Atlanta
88.2%
81.4%
-6.8%
Raleigh-Durham
92.3%
84.4%
-7.8%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
87.7%
80.0%
-7.8%
Houston
88.8%
79.7%
-9.0%
St. Louis
92.6%
82.6%
-10.0%
South Florida
86.1%
74.1%
-12.0%
Jacksonville
-2.4%
San Diego
-2.9%
Portland
-3.0%
Phoenix
-3.1%
Baltimore
-3.8%
Nashville
-4.0%
Denver
-4.0%
Austin
-4.3%
Tampa Bay Bay ï‚„ Tampa
-4.6%
San Antonio
-5.0%
Seattle
-5.1%
Charlotte
-5.8%
United United States
-6.3%
Orlando
-6.6%
Mpls-St. Paul
-6.6%
Atlanta
-6.8%
Raleigh-Durham
-7.8%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
-7.8%
Houston St. Louis South Florida
-9.0% -10.0% -12.0%
Source: US Census Bureau, 2018 American Community Survey 5-year estimates, C27001.
www.stateoftheregion.com
67
CIVIC QUALITY
COMPARATIVE HEALTH INSURANCE COVERAGE BY RACE/ETHNICITY SHARE OF THE POPULATION WITH HEALTH INSURANCE All
White, Non-Hispanic
Mpls-St. Paul
94.1%
Mpls-St. Paul
96.2%
Baltimore
91.6%
Baltimore
92.8%
Baltimore
95.5%
San Diego
90.3%
Seattle
91.7%
Seattle
94.2%
Portland
90.1%
Portland
90.8%
Denver
93.6%
Mpls-St. Paul
89.6%
St. Louis
90.1%
San Diego
93.1%
Denver
89.6%
Denver
89.2%
Portland
93.1%
Seattle
89.1%
San Diego
88.1%
St. Louis
92.6%
Phoenix
88.1%
United United States
86.8%
Raleigh-Durham
92.3%
Nashville
85.9%
Nashville
86.5%
Phoenix
91.2%
Austin
85.8%
Raleigh-Durham
86.5%
United States United
91.0%
United United States States
84.7%
Phoenix
85.4%
Austin
90.0%
Raleigh-Durham
84.4%
Charlotte
84.9%
Nashville
89.9%
Charlotte
84.0%
Jacksonville
84.6%
Charlotte
89.7%
Jacksonville
83.6%
Austin
83.6%
Houston
88.8%
St. Louis
82.6%
Atlanta
82.1%
Atlanta
88.2%
San Antonio
82.5%
Orlando Tampa Tampa Bay Bay
81.6%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
87.7%
81.4%
81.4%
San Antonio
87.5%
Atlanta Tampa Tampa Bay
80.0%
San Antonio
79.6%
Orlando
86.5%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
80.0%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
78.3%
South Florida
86.1%
Orlando
79.9%
South Florida
77.4%
86.0%
Houston
79.7%
Houston
76.1%
Jacksonville Tampa Tampa Bay Bay
84.7%
South Florida
Asian Mpls-St. Paul
Hispanic, All Races 94.1%
San Diego
78.8%
74.1%
Other San Diego
79.9%
Seattle
93.7%
Jacksonville
75.1%
Seattle
79.7%
Raleigh-Durham
93.0%
Denver
74.8%
Portland
78.6%
Baltimore
93.0%
Orlando
74.7%
St. Louis
77.7%
Portland
92.9%
Portland
74.3%
Jacksonville
77.7%
San Diego
92.1%
Phoenix
73.9%
Mpls-St. Paul
77.4%
Phoenix
92.0%
San Antonio
73.8%
Baltimore
76.9%
Denver United United States States
91.3%
St. Louis
73.1%
Denver
76.5%
90.7%
Seattle
73.1%
Orlando
74.9%
Austin
90.0%
73.0%
Phoenix
74.5%
St. Louis
89.9%
South Florida United United States
72.9%
United States States United
74.3%
Charlotte
87.4%
Mpls-St. Paul
71.4%
San Antonio
74.2%
San Antonio
86.6%
Baltimore
70.5%
South Florida
73.2%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
86.3%
70.3%
85.6%
Austin Tampa Tampa Bay Bay
71.4%
Atlanta
Austin Tampa Tampa Bay Bay
70.3%
71.1%
Nashville
85.4%
Houston
58.8%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
59.9%
Jacksonville
85.4%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
58.4%
Houston
59.7%
Houston
85.4%
Charlotte
54.2%
Charlotte
59.2%
South Florida Tampa Tampa Bay Bay
84.7%
Atlanta
51.7%
Nashville
58.6%
84.4%
Nashville
51.2%
Raleigh-Durham
57.0%
Orlando
83.6%
Raleigh-Durham
50.2%
Atlanta
56.4%
Source: US Census Bureau, 2018 American Community Survey 5-year estimates, C27001.
68
Black
2020 REGIONAL EQUITY REPORT
SHARE OF THE POPULATION WITH HEALTH INSURANCE Tampa Bay Region White, Non-Hispanic
84.7%
Asian
84.4%
All
81.4%
Two or More Races
81.0%
Black
80.0%
Hispanic, All Races
70.3%
Some Other Race
69.9%
All
White, Non-Hispanic
Black
Pinellas
82.8%
Hillsborough
Hillsborough
81.8%
Manatee
84.8%
Pasco
83.0%
Pasco
81.5%
Pinellas
84.8%
Hillsborough
81.6%
Citrus
80.8%
Polk
84.6%
Pinellas
81.3%
Sarasota
80.3%
Sarasota
83.3%
Citrus
80.1%
Polk
80.2%
Pasco
82.7%
Polk
Manatee
79.6%
Citrus
80.9%
Manatee
Hernando
79.5%
Hernando
79.0%
Sarasota
Asian
87.7%
Hernando
Hispanic, All Races
Citrus
95.7%
Hernando
80.5%
89.0%
77.2% 74.4% 68.7%
Other Hernando
79.6%
Hillsborough
87.5%
Citrus
76.1%
Citrus
77.1%
Manatee
86.0%
Pasco
74.9%
Pasco
75.5%
Polk
86.0%
Pinellas
71.5%
Pinellas
72.9%
Pasco
84.7%
Hillsborough
70.4%
Hillsborough
71.1%
Polk
69.7%
Polk
70.8%
Pinellas Sarasota Hernando
CIVIC QUALITY
REGIONAL HEALTH INSURANCE COVERAGE BY RACE/ETHNICITY
80.2% 75.6% 70.1%
Sarasota Manatee
65.2% 61.0%
Sarasota Manatee
66.3% 62.2%
Source: US Census Bureau, 2018 American Community Survey 5-year estimates, C27001.
www.stateoftheregion.com
69
OUTCOMES
WORKING POOR WHAT
The share of workers who have worked full time in the last 12 months and have household incomes below the poverty line. This includes all individuals ages 25 to 64 who worked at all during the last 12 months. The poverty line refers to the federal poverty level and varies by household size and composition. Full-time work is defined as working at least 35 hours per week for at least 50 weeks in the year prior to the survey.
WHY
Having a full-time job does not always provide families with a pathway out of poverty. The rise of low-wage service sector jobs has led to an increase in the number of workers who work full time and still cannot make ends meet. The variations by race and ethnicity in the share of fulltime workers who earn below the poverty line reveal the demographic groups who are most burdened by the failure of full-time work to pay family-supporting wages.
Black workers in Tampa Bay are two times as likely to be part of the working poor as White workers. And Hispanic workers are almost four times as likely.
OF NOTE
– Across the region and in the peer communities, workers of color are much more likely to be working full-time and still below the poverty line. Among the peer metros, the average share of working poor for White workers is less than 1 percent while the average share for Black workers is almost 3 percent and for Hispanic workers it is more than 4 percent. – In the eight-county region, the highest share of working poor is among Asian workers in Sarasota County and the lowest is among Asian workers in Pasco County. Source: 2018 5-year American Community Survey microdata file from IPUMS USA.
70
2020 REGIONAL EQUITY REPORT
SHARE OF WORKERS WORKING FULL-TIME IN LAST 12 MOS. WITH FAMILY INCOME BELOW THE POVERTY LINE Disparity Measure Region
Tampa Bay in Context
White
Black
Difference
Baltimore
0.5%
1.4%
+1.0%
Charlotte
1.1%
2.1%
+1.0%
Portland
0.9%
2.0%
+1.0%
San Diego
0.8%
2.0%
+1.3%
Austin
0.9%
2.3%
+1.3%
Atlanta
0.9%
2.4%
+1.5%
San Antonio
1.0%
2.6%
+1.5%
Seattle
0.6%
2.2%
+1.6%
Houston
0.8%
2.5%
+1.6%
Orlando
1.2%
3.0%
+1.8%
Tampa Bay
1.2%
3.0%
+1.8%
Raleigh-Durham
0.7%
2.5%
+1.8%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
0.8%
2.7%
+1.9%
South Florida
1.0%
3.0%
+2.0%
St. Louis
0.9%
3.0%
+2.2%
Phoenix
1.0%
3.3%
+2.3%
Denver
0.7%
3.0%
+2.3%
Nashville
1.2%
3.5%
+2.3%
Jacksonville
1.3%
3.7%
Mpls-St. Paul
0.5%
4.4%
Baltimore
+1.0%
Charlotte
+1.0%
Portland
+1.0%
San Diego Austin
+1.3% +1.3%
Atlanta
+1.5%
San Antonio
+1.5%
Seattle
+1.6%
Houston
+1.6%
Orlando
+1.8%
Tampa Bay Bay ï‚„ Tampa
+1.8%
Raleigh-Durham
+1.8%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
+1.9%
South Florida
+2.0%
St. Louis
OUTCOMES
BLACK-WHITE GAP: WORKING POOR
+2.2%
Phoenix
+2.3%
Denver
+2.3%
Nashville
+2.3%
+2.4%
Jacksonville
+2.4%
+3.9%
Mpls-St. Paul
+3.9%
Source: 2018 5-year American Community Survey microdata file from IPUMS USA. Notes: Universe includes the civilian population ages 25 through 64 not living in group quarters who worked at all during the year prior to the survey. The poverty line refers to the federal poverty level and varies by household size and composition. Full-time work is defined as usually working at least 35 hours per week for at least 50 weeks during the year prior to the survey. www.stateoftheregion.com
71
OUTCOMES
COMPARATIVE WORKING POOR BY RACE/ETHNICITY SHARE OF WORKERS WORKING FULL-TIME IN LAST 12 MOS. WITH FAMILY INCOME BELOW THE POVERTY LINE All
White, Non-Hispanic
Black
Seattle
0.9%
Baltimore
0.5%
Baltimore
0.9%
Mpls-St. Paul
0.5%
Baltimore Portland 2.0%
Mpls-St. Paul
1.0%
1.4%
Seattle
0.6%
San Diego 2.0%
1.3%
Raleigh-Durham
0.7%
Charlotte 2.1%
Denver
1.4%
Denver
0.7%
St. Louis
1.4%
Portland
Seattle
2.2%
San Diego
0.8%
Austin
2.3%
San Diego
1.6%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
0.8%
Atlanta
2.4%
Raleigh-Durham
1.7%
Houston
0.8%
Houston
2.5%
1.8%
St. Louis
0.9%
Raleigh-Durham
2.5%
Nashville 2.0%
Atlanta
0.9%
San Antonio
2.6%
Tampa Tampa Bay Bay 2.0%
Portland
0.9%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
2.7%
Jacksonville 2.0%
Austin
0.9%
Orlando
3.0%
Atlanta 2.0%
Phoenix
1.0%
Tampa Bay Bay Tampa
3.0%
Charlotte
San Antonio
1.0%
Denver
3.0%
Orlando
2.2%
South Florida
1.0%
South Florida
3.0%
San Antonio
Austin 2.1% 2.4%
Charlotte
1.1%
St. Louis
3.0%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
2.4%
Nashville
1.2%
Phoenix
3.3%
Phoenix
2.5%
Orlando
1.2%
Nashville
3.5%
South Florida
2.6%
Tampa Bay Bay Tampa
1.2%
Jacksonville
3.7%
Houston
2.8%
Jacksonville
1.3%
Mpls-St. Paul
Asian
Hispanic, All Races
Seattle
0.9%
San Diego
Baltimore
2.2% 2.3%
1.1%
Seattle
Baltimore
1.2%
Jacksonville
St. Louis
1.2%
Denver
4.4%
Other Seattle
1.9%
Baltimore 2.0%
3.0%
Jacksonville
2.6%
3.2%
Mpls-St. Paul
2.7%
Austin
1.3%
Mpls-St. Paul
3.2%
Denver
3.0%
Portland
1.4%
San Diego
3.2%
San Diego
3.0%
Atlanta
1.4%
San Antonio
3.3%
Portland
3.3%
Houston
1.4%
Orlando
3.4%
San Antonio
3.3%
Phoenix
1.5%
South Florida
3.5%
St. Louis
3.3%
Tampa Tampa Bay Bay
Orlando
3.4% 3.4%
1.6%
Portland
Denver
1.7%
St. Louis
4.1%
South Florida
Mpls-St. Paul
1.7%
Austin
4.3%
Tampa Tampa Bay Bay
4.1%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
1.8%
Tampa Tampa Bay Bay
4.4%
Austin
4.2%
South Florida
1.9%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
5.3%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
Houston
5.5%
Houston
5.3%
Raleigh-Durham 2.0% Orlando 2.0%
Phoenix
San Antonio
2.1%
Charlotte
Nashville
2.2%
Raleigh-Durham
Charlotte
2.6%
Atlanta
Jacksonville
2.6%
Nashville
3.8%
5.7% 6.0% 6.4% 6.6% 7.6%
5.1%
Phoenix
5.4%
Charlotte
5.4%
Raleigh-Durham
5.7%
Atlanta Nashville
6.0% 6.6%
Source: 2018 5-year American Community Survey microdata file from IPUMS USA. Notes: Universe includes the civilian population ages 25 through 64 not living in group quarters who worked at all during the year prior to the survey. The poverty line refers to the federal poverty level and varies by household size and composition. Full-time work is defined as usually working at least 35 hours per week for at least 50 weeks during the year prior to the survey.
72
2020 REGIONAL EQUITY REPORT
SHARE OF WORKERS WORKING FULL-TIME IN LAST 12 MOS. WITH FAMILY INCOME BELOW THE POVERTY LINE Tampa Bay Region White, Non-Hispanic
1.2%
Asian
1.6%
Two or More Races
1.9%
All
2.0%
Black
3.0%
Hispanic, All Races
4.4%
Some Other Race
5.1%
All
White, Non-Hispanic
Black
Hernando
1.5%
Hillsborough
1.0%
Pasco
Sarasota
1.5%
Manatee
1.0%
Manatee
1.8%
Pinellas
1.5%
Sarasota
1.1%
Hernando
1.9%
Citrus
1.7%
Pinellas
1.2%
Pinellas
Pasco
1.8%
Pasco
1.3%
Sarasota
2.9%
Polk
1.4%
Polk
3.0%
Manatee 1.9% Hillsborough
2.3%
Hernando
1.5%
Hillsborough
Polk
2.4%
Citrus
1.5%
Citrus
Asian Pasco Hillsborough
Hernando Sarasota
0.8%
Pinellas
1.3%
Pinellas Manatee
Hispanic, All Races
0.5%
Polk
3.6% 4.1%
Hillsborough
2.8% 8.5%
4.4%
Polk
Citrus
n/d
Manatee
Hernando
n/d
Citrus
Sarasota
3.0%
5.3% 5.7% n/d
1.5%
2.4%
3.6% n/d
Other Hernando
1.1%
Pasco
1.8%
Sarasota
OUTCOMES
REGIONAL WORKING POOR BY RACE/ETHNICITY
0.5% 2.5%
Pinellas
3.2%
Citrus
3.2%
Pasco Hillsborough Polk Manatee
3.9% 4.3% 5.0% 5.4%
Source: 2018 5-year American Community Survey microdata file from IPUMS USA. Notes: Universe includes the civilian population ages 25 through 64 not living in group quarters who worked at all during the year prior to the survey. The poverty line refers to the federal poverty level and varies by household size and composition. Full-time work is defined as usually working at least 35 hours per week for at least 50 weeks during the year prior to the survey. The label “n/d” indicates “non-disclosed” and that the sample size was not big enough to make the calculation. www.stateoftheregion.com
73
OUTCOMES
POVERTY WHAT
The percentage of the population that is living below the federal poverty line. The poverty line refers to the federal poverty level and varies by household size and composition.
WHY
The poverty rate shows the percentage of the population impacted by financial insecurity and reflects a lack of access to family-sustaining economic opportunity. People who live in poverty struggle to secure basic human needs, and they can require higher levels of social support. Increasing levels of poverty may translate into greater community needs regarding homelessness, crime, illiteracy, and health.
The poverty rate in Tampa Bay is highest for Black residents (24.3%) and lowest for Non-Hispanic, White residents (10.6%).
OF NOTE
– Overall, about one in seven residents in Tampa Bay live in poverty. – Tampa Bay’s disparity in poverty rates between Black and White residents is slightly better than the disparity for the United States as a whole, yet Tampa Bay ranks 16th out of its 20 peers. – Asian residents also experience a lower-than-average poverty rate, while residents of other minority groups or mixed races experience a higher-than-average poverty rate. – The rates vary widely across the eight-county region. Residents of Sarasota County (9.7%) are the least likely to live in poverty, while residents of Citrus County (16.7%) are the most likely to live in poverty. Source: US Census Bureau, 2018 American Community Survey 5-year estimates, B17020. Notes: Population for whom poverty status is determined.
74
2020 REGIONAL EQUITY REPORT
OUTCOMES
BLACK-WHITE GAP: POVERTY SHARE OF POPULATION WITH INCOME BELOW THE POVERTY LEVEL IN THE LAST 12 MONTHS Disparity Measure Region
Tampa Bay in Context
White
Black
Difference
San Antonio
8.6%
17.8%
+9.2%
Raleigh-Durham
7.3%
17.5%
+10.3%
Atlanta
7.7%
18.1%
+10.4%
Charlotte
8.5%
19.0%
+10.5%
San Diego
8.9%
19.5%
+10.7%
Austin
7.4%
18.2%
+10.8%
Orlando
9.7%
20.6%
+11.0%
Phoenix
9.3%
21.0%
San Antonio
+9.2%
Raleigh-Durham
+10.3%
Atlanta
+10.4%
Charlotte
+10.5%
San Diego
+10.7%
Austin
+10.8%
Orlando
+11.0%
Phoenix
+11.7%
Houston
+11.7%
Baltimore
+11.9%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
+11.9%
+11.7%
Houston
6.8%
18.5%
+11.7%
Baltimore
6.2%
18.1%
+11.9%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
6.9%
18.8%
+11.9%
Denver
6.1%
18.5%
+12.4%
South Florida
8.9%
22.3%
+13.3%
Nashville
9.0%
22.4%
+13.3%
Jacksonville
9.9%
23.3%
+13.4%
Tampa Bay
10.6%
24.3%
+13.7%
United States
10.0%
24.2%
+14.2%
Seattle
7.2%
21.5%
+14.3%
Portland
9.1%
26.8%
+17.7%
St. Louis
7.9%
26.4%
+18.5%
Mpls-St. Paul
5.5%
28.3%
+22.8%
Denver
+12.4%
South Florida
+13.3%
Nashville
+13.3%
Jacksonville
+13.4%
Tampa Bay Bay ï‚„ Tampa
+13.7%
United United States
+14.2%
Seattle
+14.3%
Portland St. Louis Mpls-St. Paul
+17.7% +18.5% +22.8%
Source: US Census Bureau, 2018 American Community Survey 5-year estimates, B17020. Notes: Population for whom poverty status is determined. www.stateoftheregion.com
75
OUTCOMES
COMPARATIVE POVERTY BY RACE/ETHNICITY SHARE OF POPULATION WITH INCOME BELOW THE POVERTY LEVEL IN THE LAST 12 MONTHS All Mpls-St. Paul
9.0%
Mpls-St. Paul
5.5%
Denver
9.4%
Denver
6.1%
Seattle
9.6%
Baltimore
6.2%
Baltimore
10.4%
Houston
6.8%
Portland
11.4%
Austin
11.6%
Dallas-Ft. Worth 6.9% Seattle 7.2%
Raleigh-Durham
11.8%
St. Louis
11.9%
Nashville
12.4%
Raleigh-Durham 7.3% Austin 7.4% Atlanta 7.7%
San Diego
12.5%
St. Louis
7.9%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
12.6%
Charlotte
8.5%
Charlotte
12.7%
San Antonio
8.6%
Atlanta
13.1%
San Diego
8.9%
Jacksonville
13.3%
South Florida
8.9%
United United States Tampa Bay
14.1%
Nashville
9.0%
14.1%
Portland
9.1%
Houston
14.2%
Phoenix
9.3%
Phoenix
14.7%
Orlando
9.7%
Orlando
14.7%
Jacksonville
9.9%
San Antonio
14.9%
10.0%
South Florida
15.4%
United States States Bay Tampa Bay
Asian Baltimore
7.9%
Houston
9.3%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
9.6%
Seattle
9.7%
St. Louis Jacksonville Atlanta
Raleigh-Durham
17.5%
San Antonio
17.8%
Atlanta
18.1%
Baltimore
18.1%
Austin
18.2%
Denver
18.5%
Houston
18.5%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
18.8%
Charlotte
19.0%
San Diego
19.5%
Orlando
20.6%
Phoenix
21.0%
Seattle
21.5%
South Florida
22.3%
Nashville
22.4%
Jacksonville United United States States Tampa Tampa Bay Bay
23.3% 24.2% 24.3%
St. Louis
26.4%
Portland
26.8%
Mpls-St. Paul
10.6%
Hispanic, All Races
28.3%
Other
15.2%
Baltimore
14.1%
Seattle
16.0%
Seattle
14.8%
Denver
16.1%
Jacksonville
15.3%
Jacksonville
15.5%
9.7%
16.5%
Denver
South Florida
16.9%
South Florida
16.7%
9.9%
Austin
17.3%
San Diego
16.8%
9.9%
Baltimore
San Diego
17.4%
Austin
16.8%
Mpls-St. Paul
18.2%
Mpls-St. Paul
17.4%
10.5%
San Antonio
18.7%
San Antonio
18.4%
10.7%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
19.4%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
18.8%
10.8%
Orlando
19.9%
Portland
18.9%
11.0%
St. Louis
20.2%
St. Louis
19.2%
11.0%
Houston
20.7%
Orlando
20.8%
11.8%
Portland United United States
Tampa Bay Bay Tampa
19.6%
11.5%
Tampa Bay Bay Tampa Orlando
Tampa Bay Bay Tampa
21.0%
11.9%
21.0%
Houston United United States
12.0%
Atlanta
22.5%
Atlanta
Portland
12.4%
Phoenix
23.1%
Phoenix
South Florida
22.8%
12.7%
Charlotte
24.0%
Charlotte
San Antonio
22.8%
13.4%
Nashville
25.6%
Nashville
Mpls-St. Paul
23.1%
14.0%
Raleigh-Durham
25.9%
Raleigh-Durham
23.2%
San Diego
10.2%
Nashville Raleigh-Durham Charlotte Austin Denver United United States States
Phoenix
Source: US Census Bureau, 2018 American Community Survey 5-year estimates, B17020. Notes: Population for whom poverty status is determined.
76
Black
White, Non-Hispanic
2020 REGIONAL EQUITY REPORT
20.2% 20.3% 20.6% 21.4%
OUTCOMES
REGIONAL POVERTY BY RACE/ETHNICITY SHARE OF POPULATION WITH INCOME BELOW THE POVERTY LEVEL IN THE LAST 12 MONTHS Tampa Bay Region White, Non-Hispanic
10.6%
Asian
11.9%
All
14.1%
Two or More Races
17.3%
Some Other Race
20.7%
Hispanic, All Races
21.0%
Black
24.3%
All Sarasota
White, Non-Hispanic
9.7%
Sarasota
7.6%
Citrus
8.2%
Pasco
Manatee
12.5%
Manatee
Pinellas
13.0%
Hillsborough
Pasco
13.5%
Pinellas
Hernando Hillsborough
14.3% 15.3%
9.7%
Hernando
22.8%
10.6%
Manatee
23.5% 24.2%
Hillsborough
Pasco
12.4%
Polk
25.8%
12.9%
Sarasota
26.0%
Pinellas
26.4%
Hernando
Citrus
16.7%
Citrus
16.4%
Hispanic, All Races
8.8%
15.1%
12.1%
16.6%
Pasco
10.6%
Polk
Polk
Asian
Black
Other
Pinellas
17.4%
Sarasota
16.9% 17.0%
Polk
10.2%
Sarasota
17.8%
Pinellas
Citrus
10.2%
Hernando
18.3%
Pasco
18.3%
Hillsborough
10.6%
Pasco
18.8%
Hernando
18.7%
Pinellas Hernando Manatee Sarasota
Hillsborough
12.6%
Citrus
14.2% 17.2% 22.6%
Polk Manatee
21.3% 22.2% 23.3% 24.7%
Hillsborough Polk
20.3% 22.8%
Manatee
23.7%
Citrus
24.2%
Source: US Census Bureau, 2018 American Community Survey 5-year estimates, B17020. Notes: Population for whom poverty status is determined. www.stateoftheregion.com
77
OUTCOMES
CHILD POVERTY WHAT
The percentage of the population under the age of 18 that is living below the federal poverty line. The poverty line refers to the federal poverty level and varies by household size and composition.
WHY
As previously mentioned, the poverty rate shows the percentage of the population impacted by financial insecurity, which can affect family stability. Children who live in poverty often have less access to quality education, healthcare, and community environments—elements that are crucial to their healthy development.
In Tampa Bay, Black children are almost three times as likely to live in poverty as White, Non-Hispanic children.
OF NOTE
– Overall, 1 in 5 children in Tampa Bay live in poverty. – In comparison to its peers, Tampa Bay has a high child poverty rate for every demographic category and ranks in the 4th or 5th quintile in each category. Notably, Tampa Bay ranks 20th for child poverty among White, Non-Hispanic children and 19th for child poverty among Black children. – Across the peer metros and in Tampa Bay, children of color are significantly more likely to live in poverty. – The county where child poverty is highest is Pinellas County, where more than 40 percent of Black children live in poverty. In Citrus County, where the child poverty rate is the highest in the region for White, Non-Hispanic children and children in the “Other” category, it is lowest for Black and Hispanic children. Source: US Census Bureau, 2018 American Community Survey 5-year estimates, B17020. Note: Population for whom the poverty status is known.
78
2020 REGIONAL EQUITY REPORT
SHARE OF CHILDREN <18 LIVING IN HOUSEHOLDS BELOW THE POVERTY LEVEL IN THE LAST 12 MONTHS Disparity Measure Region
Tampa Bay in Context
White
Black
Difference
9.5%
24.4%
+14.9%
Phoenix
10.2%
27.9%
+17.7%
Charlotte
9.6%
27.4%
+17.8%
Orlando
11.2%
29.3%
+18.1%
Atlanta
8.1%
26.5%
+18.4%
Raleigh-Durham
6.7%
25.1%
+18.4%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
7.5%
26.1%
+18.6%
San Antonio
San Diego
8.4%
27.2%
San Antonio
OUTCOMES
BLACK-WHITE GAP: CHILD POVERTY
+14.9%
Phoenix
+17.7%
Charlotte
+17.8%
Orlando
+18.1%
Atlanta
+18.4%
Raleigh-Durham
+18.4%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
+18.6%
San Diego
+18.7%
Houston
+18.8%
+18.7%
Houston
7.4%
26.2%
+18.8%
Baltimore
5.9%
25.6%
+19.7%
Austin
5.0%
25.4%
+20.4%
Denver
5.3%
25.8%
+20.5%
South Florida
9.9%
32.2%
+22.4%
Tampa Bay
13.2%
35.7%
+22.4%
United States
11.7%
34.8%
+23.1%
Jacksonville
11.8%
35.2%
+23.4%
Portland
9.4%
33.1%
+23.7%
Nashville
10.4%
34.6%
+24.3%
Seattle
6.6%
33.2%
+26.5%
St. Louis
9.4%
38.8%
+29.4%
Mpls-St. Paul
4.5%
35.2%
+30.6%
Baltimore
+19.7%
Austin
+20.4%
Denver
+20.5%
South Florida
+22.4%
Tampa Bay Bay ï&#x201A;&#x201E; Tampa
+22.4%
United United States
+23.1%
Jacksonville
+23.4%
Portland
+23.7%
Nashville
+24.3%
Seattle St. Louis Mpls-St. Paul
+26.5% +29.4% +30.6%
Source: US Census Bureau, 2018 American Community Survey 5-year estimates, B17020. Note: Population for whom the poverty status is known. www.stateoftheregion.com
79
OUTCOMES
COMPARATIVE CHILD POVERTY BY RACE/ETHNICITY SHARE OF CHILDREN <18 LIVING IN HOUSEHOLDS BELOW THE POVERTY LEVEL IN THE LAST 12 MONTHS All
White, Non-Hispanic
Mpls-St. Paul
11.7%
Mpls-St. Paul
4.5%
San Antonio
24.4%
Seattle
11.8%
Austin
5.0%
Raleigh-Durham
25.1%
Denver 12.4%
Denver
5.3%
Austin
25.4%
Baltimore
5.9%
Baltimore
25.6%
14.2%
Seattle
6.6%
Denver
25.8%
14.5%
Raleigh-Durham
6.7%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
26.1%
Raleigh-Durham
16.1%
Houston
7.4%
Houston
26.2%
San Diego
16.1%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
7.5%
Atlanta
26.5%
St. Louis
17.0%
Atlanta
8.1%
San Diego
27.2%
Baltimore
13.6%
Portland Austin
Nashville
17.5%
San Diego
8.4%
Charlotte
27.4%
Charlotte
18.1%
Portland
9.4%
Phoenix
27.9%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
18.2%
St. Louis
9.4%
Orlando
Atlanta
18.8%
San Antonio
9.5%
South Florida
32.2%
Jacksonville
19.2%
Charlotte
9.6%
Portland
33.1%
United States United
19.5%
South Florida
9.9%
Seattle
33.2%
Tampa Bay Bay Tampa
20.7%
Phoenix
10.2%
Houston
20.7%
Nashville
Orlando
21.0%
Phoenix
21.0%
San Antonio
21.1%
South Florida
21.3%
Asian St. Louis
5.4%
29.3%
34.6%
10.4%
Nashville United United States States
Orlando United United States States
11.2%
Mpls-St. Paul
35.2%
11.7%
Jacksonville
35.2%
Jacksonville Tampa Bay Bay Tampa
11.8%
Tampa Bay Bay Tampa St. Louis
35.7%
13.2%
Hispanic, All Races Baltimore
17.5%
34.8%
38.8%
Other Baltimore
14.1%
Austin
6.8%
Seattle
20.5%
Seattle
14.8%
Baltimore
7.5%
Denver
21.4%
Jacksonville
15.3%
Raleigh-Durham
8.1%
South Florida
21.7%
Denver
15.5%
Phoenix
8.7%
Jacksonville
22.6%
South Florida
16.7%
San Diego
8.8%
San Diego
22.8%
San Diego
16.8%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
8.9%
Mpls-St. Paul
23.0%
Austin
16.8%
Seattle
9.1%
Austin
23.2%
Mpls-St. Paul
17.4%
Houston
9.3%
San Antonio
26.1%
San Antonio
18.4%
Atlanta
10.1%
St. Louis
26.8%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
18.8%
Jacksonville
11.1%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
27.0%
Portland
18.9%
United United States
11.3%
Portland
27.5%
St. Louis
19.2%
Nashville
11.8%
Orlando United United States Tampa Bay Bay Tampa
27.9%
Orlando
19.6%
Houston
28.9%
Orlando 12.2% Tampa Bay Bay 12.2% Tampa Denver 12.3% South Florida
12.7%
Charlotte Portland San Antonio Mpls-St. Paul
28.4%
Tampa Bay Bay Tampa
28.4%
Houston United United States
20.3%
Atlanta
21.4%
20.2% 20.6%
Phoenix
31.0%
12.8%
Atlanta
31.6%
Phoenix
22.8%
13.0%
Charlotte
32.7%
Charlotte
22.8%
14.8%
Nashville
33.8%
Nashville
23.1%
18.7%
Raleigh-Durham
35.4%
Source: US Census Bureau, 2018 American Community Survey 5-year estimates, B17020. Note: Population for whom the poverty status is known.
80
Black
2020 REGIONAL EQUITY REPORT
Raleigh-Durham
29.9%
SHARE OF CHILDREN <18 LIVING IN HOUSEHOLDS BELOW THE POVERTY LEVEL IN THE LAST 12 MONTHS Tampa Bay Region Asian
12.2%
White, Non-Hispanic
13.2%
Two or More Races
19.8%
All
20.7%
Some Other Race
28.0%
Hispanic, All Races
28.4%
Black
35.7%
All Sarasota
White, Non-Hispanic
15.1%
Black
Sarasota
9.2%
Citrus
4.0% 19.3%
Pasco
18.1%
Manatee
9.7%
Pasco
Pinellas
18.8%
Hillsborough
9.9%
Hillsborough
34.0%
Hernando
19.2%
Pinellas
Manatee
35.2%
11.6%
Manatee
20.6%
Pasco
16.2%
Sarasota
36.9%
Hillsborough
20.7%
Hernando
16.5%
Hernando
37.0%
Polk
17.4%
Polk
Polk
26.0%
Citrus
29.0%
Asian
Citrus
30.8%
38.8%
Pinellas
Hispanic, All Races
42.1%
Other
Pasco
5.3%
Pinellas
22.4%
Sarasota
16.9%
Citrus
5.9%
Citrus
23.2%
Pinellas
17.0%
Hillsborough
6.9%
Hernando
23.6%
Pasco
18.3%
Hernando
18.7%
Polk Pinellas
19.5% 24.6%
Sarasota Hernando
Pasco
16.0%
Manatee
27.9% n/d
OUTCOMES
REGIONAL CHILD POVERTY BY RACE/ETHNICITY
26.0%
Sarasota
27.4%
Hillsborough
Hillsborough
28.4%
Polk
22.8%
Manatee
23.7%
Citrus
24.2%
Polk Manatee
31.5% 33.1%
20.3%
Source: US Census Bureau, 2018 American Community Survey 5-year estimates, B17020. Note: Population for whom the poverty status is known. www.stateoftheregion.com
81
OUTCOMES
UNEMPLOYMENT WHAT
The percentage of the labor force who is not working but is actively looking for work.
WHY
The unemployment rate, when viewed by race and ethnicity, provides a measure of these demographic groups’ success in finding work and, conversely, their barriers to employment. The differences reflect education and experience as well as barriers such as criminal background, transportation access, immigration status, and others.
In Tampa Bay, Black workers are almost two times as likely as White workers to be unemployed.
OF NOTE
– The unemployment rate for Black workers was 4.4 percentage points higher than the rate for White workers, which ranks it 9th of 20 metros. – The unemployment rate for workers of color was generally higher than the rate for White workers in Tampa Bay and in the peer metros. – Among the eight counties in the region, there was a great deal of variation in unemployment rates, from a low of 1 percent for Asian workers in Citrus County to a high of 15 percent for Asian workers in Hernando County. – The COVID-19 pandemic and resulting economic crisis have led to a dramatic spike in unemployment, which has hit communities of color particularly hard. As the regional economy begins to improve, many of the disparities highlighted in this report are likely to lead to an uneven recovery. Source: US Census Bureau, 2018 American Community Survey 5-year estimates, S2301.
82
2020 REGIONAL EQUITY REPORT
OUTCOMES
BLACK-WHITE GAP: UNEMPLOYMENT SHARE OF THE LABOR FORCE THAT IS UNEMPLOYED Disparity Measure Region
Tampa Bay in Context
White
Black
Difference
San Antonio
4.6%
7.1%
+2.5%
Austin
3.7%
6.8%
+3.1%
Denver
3.5%
7.0%
+3.5%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
4.0%
7.6%
+3.6%
Nashville
3.7%
7.6%
+3.9%
Seattle
4.3%
8.4%
+4.1%
Orlando
4.7%
9.0%
+4.3%
Raleigh-Durham
3.7%
8.0%
+4.4%
Tampa Bay
5.4%
9.8%
+4.4%
Phoenix
4.9%
9.4%
+4.5%
Houston
4.6%
9.3%
+4.7%
Atlanta
4.2%
9.0%
+4.8%
Baltimore
4.0%
9.2%
+5.2%
Charlotte
4.6%
9.8%
+5.2%
Jacksonville
5.1%
10.6%
+5.5%
Portland
4.9%
10.5%
+5.6%
South Florida
5.0%
10.7%
+5.7%
United States
4.7%
10.6%
+5.9%
Mpls-St. Paul
3.1%
9.2%
+6.1%
San Diego
5.2%
12.4%
+7.2%
St. Louis
4.1%
11.9%
+7.8%
San Antonio Austin
+2.5% +3.1%
Denver
+3.5%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
+3.6%
Nashville Seattle
+3.9% +4.1%
Orlando
+4.3%
Raleigh-Durham
+4.4%
ï&#x201A;&#x201E; Tampa Tampa Bay Bay
+4.4%
Phoenix
+4.5%
Houston
+4.7%
Atlanta
+4.8%
Baltimore
+5.2%
Charlotte
+5.2%
Jacksonville
+5.5%
Portland
+5.6%
South Florida
+5.7%
United States States United Mpls-St. Paul San Diego St. Louis
+5.9% +6.1% +7.2% +7.8%
Source: US Census Bureau, 2018 American Community Survey 5-year estimates, S2301.
www.stateoftheregion.com
83
OUTCOMES
COMPARATIVE UNEMPLOYMENT BY RACE/ETHNICITY SHARE OF THE LABOR FORCE THAT IS UNEMPLOYED All Mpls-St. Paul 3.9% Denver 3.9% Austin
4.4%
Nashville
4.5%
Raleigh-Durham
4.7%
Seattle
4.8%
White, Non-Hispanic Mpls-St. Paul 3.1% Denver 3.5%
Austin
6.8%
Denver
7.0%
Raleigh-Durham 3.7% Austin 3.7%
San Antonio
7.1%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
7.6%
Nashville
7.6%
Raleigh-Durham
8.0%
Seattle
8.4%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
4.8%
Nashville 3.7% Dallas-Ft. Worth 4.0% Baltimore 4.0%
Portland
5.3%
St. Louis
4.1%
Atlanta
9.0%
Baltimore
5.6%
Atlanta
4.2%
Orlando
9.0%
San Antonio
5.6%
Seattle
4.3%
Baltimore
9.2%
St. Louis
5.6%
Charlotte
4.6%
Mpls-St. Paul
9.2%
Phoenix
5.6%
Houston
4.6%
Houston
9.3%
Houston
5.8%
San Antonio
4.6%
9.4%
United United States
5.8%
4.7%
Atlanta
5.9%
Orlando United United States
Phoenix Tampa Bay Tampa Bay
4.7%
Charlotte
9.8%
Orlando
6.0%
Phoenix
4.9%
Portland
10.5%
Charlotte Tampa Tampa Bay Bay
6.0%
Portland
4.9%
10.6%
6.1%
South Florida
5.0%
Jacksonville United United States
Jacksonville
6.3%
Jacksonville
5.1%
South Florida
10.7%
San Diego
6.4%
5.2%
St. Louis
South Florida
6.4%
San Diego Tampa Bay Bay Tampa
5.4%
San Diego
Asian
Hispanic, All Races
9.8%
10.6% 11.9% 12.4%
Other
Denver 3.3% St. Louis 3.3%
Raleigh-Durham
4.2%
Raleigh-Durham
4.4%
Denver
4.5%
Denver
4.6%
Austin 3.6% Baltimore 3.6%
Nashville
4.5%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
4.9%
Atlanta
4.7%
Austin
5.1%
Raleigh-Durham 3.7% Atlanta 3.7%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
4.8%
Atlanta
5.1%
Austin
4.9%
South Florida
5.5%
Jacksonville
3.9%
St. Louis
5.2%
Houston
5.7%
Nashville
4.2%
Baltimore
5.4%
Seattle
5.9%
Seattle
4.2%
South Florida
5.5%
Nashville
6.0%
Dallas-Ft. Worth
4.3%
Seattle
5.5%
San Antonio
6.1%
Phoenix
4.3%
Houston
5.6%
Baltimore
6.2%
Portland
4.3%
Portland
5.9%
Phoenix
6.5%
San Antonio
4.3%
San Antonio
6.0%
Jacksonville
6.5%
South Florida
4.5%
Jacksonville
6.1%
Portland
6.5%
Houston
4.6%
Phoenix
6.2%
Orlando
6.6%
Mpls-St. Paul
6.2%
Charlotte
6.7%
6.5%
6.7% 6.9%
Mpls-St. Paul
4.6%
United United States
4.6%
Charlotte
5.0%
Orlando
6.6%
Mpls-St. Paul Tampa Bay Bay Tampa
Orlando
5.1%
Charlotte
6.7%
United United States States
5.1%
United States United San Diego
6.8%
San Diego
San Diego
Tampa Tampa Bay Bay
5.3%
Tampa Bay Tampa
7.6%
Source: US Census Bureau, 2018 American Community Survey 5-year estimates, S2301.
84
Black
2020 REGIONAL EQUITY REPORT
St. Louis
6.7% 7.6% 8.1%
OUTCOMES
REGIONAL UNEMPLOYMENT BY RACE/ETHNICITY SHARE OF THE LABOR FORCE THAT IS UNEMPLOYED Tampa Bay Region Asian
5.3%
White, Non-Hispanic
5.4%
All
6.1%
Some Other Race
6.4%
Hispanic, All Races
6.5%
Two or More Races
8.8%
Black
9.8%
All Sarasota
White, Non-Hispanic
4.7%
Black
Sarasota
4.5%
Pasco
6.7%
Pinellas
5.7%
Hillsborough
4.7%
Citrus
8.4%
Manatee
5.9%
Manatee
5.0%
Sarasota
8.7%
Hillsborough
6.1%
Pinellas
5.0%
Hernando
8.9%
Pasco
6.5%
Polk
6.2%
Pinellas
9.1%
Polk
6.9%
Pasco
6.3%
Hillsborough
Hernando
Hernando
7.3%
Citrus
Citrus
8.6%
Asian Citrus Sarasota
8.5%
Polk
Sarasota
1.8% 3.8%
12.6%
Other Sarasota
4.5%
10.6%
Manatee
Hispanic, All Races
1.0%
Polk
7.3%
9.9%
4.8%
Manatee
5.7%
Hernando
6.2%
Hernando
6.1%
Manatee
6.2%
Hillsborough
5.1%
Polk
6.3%
Polk
6.6%
Pasco
5.1%
Pinellas
6.6%
Hillsborough
6.6%
6.7%
Pinellas
7.0%
Pinellas
6.3%
Hillsborough
Manatee
6.5%
Pasco
Hernando
15.1%
Citrus
7.3% 10.3%
Pasco Citrus
7.6% 11.6%
Source: US Census Bureau, 2018 American Community Survey 5-year estimates, S2301.
www.stateoftheregion.com
85
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The 2020 REGIONAL EQUITY REPORT is produced by the Tampa Bay Partnership Foundation, in collaboration with the Community Foundation of Tampa Bay and United Way Suncoast and is affiliated with the State of the Region initiative. This report expands and advances previous benchmarking efforts, drawing primarily from the work that our organizations have done together in producing the annual Regional Competitiveness Report. Very sincerely, we thank and acknowledge the work of hundreds of volunteer leaders and stakeholders for building the foundation for this research. We would also like to recognize the executive leadership of our collaborating partners: from the Community Foundation of Tampa Bay, Marlene Spalten; and from United Way Suncoast, Jessica Muroff. Thank you and your staff for your significant contributions of time, talent, and financial resources. The Tampa Bay Partnership, with the support of all listed above, led the development of this report through its research and education foundation. Rick Homans, President and CEO, provided leadership and strategic vision. Dave Sobush, Director of Policy and Research, served as project manager for this initiative. Additional support was provided by Jennifer Mikosky, Vice President of Communications, and Courtney McDonnell, Program Director. This research was performed by Alexander Research & Consulting.
ABOUT OUR PARTNERS The Tampa Bay Partnership is a coalition of regional business leaders, joined by a shared commitment to improving the personal and economic well-being of Tampa Bay residents. Through its foundation, the Partnership conducts objective, datadriven research to identify the regionâ&#x20AC;&#x2122;s greatest challenges and measure our progress toward shared community goals. The Community Foundation of Tampa Bay is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit that connects people and resources to inspire charitable giving and create a meaningful, lasting impact on our region. Serving Hillsborough, Pinellas, Pasco, Hernando, and Citrus counties, the Community Foundation of Tampa Bay works to build a better community through creative philanthropy, vision, and leadership. United Way Suncoast staff, volunteers, and trusted community partners fight for the education and financial stability of every person in the communities we serve. Across DeSoto, Hillsborough, Manatee, Pinellas, and Sarasota counties, United Way Suncoast develops, enhances, and implements services and initiatives to help create a stronger, more vibrant community.
