DUTCH ELM DISEASE IN SUFFOLK.
219
REPORT OF THE SOCIETY UPON THE PROGRESS OF THE DUTCH ELM DISEASE IN SUFFOLK.
ON 23 July it was reported to the Society that this Disease had advanced northwards as far as Dedham in Essex, upon the south border of Suffolk, where several well-grown Elm Trees (Ulmus campestris, Sm.), Standing upon flat pastures, that had been attacked in the course of the previous year were now moribund. Xt was stated that neither the nature of the Disease nor its remedy were known. On 28 July the Society issued a circular letter seeking information as to (1) the nature of the Disease, and (2) preventive measures. On 7 August the Revd. C. Tennant, then staying at Darsham, detailed the deplorable condition of Elms at Worthing in Sussex. On 11 August our Member, Lord Ullswater, reported that the Dutch Disease was already in our midst and had destroyed numerous Elms upon his estate at Campsey Ash, adding :—It is highly infectious and, so far as I am informed by the Forestry Co mmission, there is at present no known remedy, the only course being to feil affected trees as soon as possible. I understand that in Holland the Elms have [mitigated later] almost disappeared : unless drastic steps are taken to stamp out the Disease, the same fate awaits our Elms in Suffolk. On 18 August the Honorary Secretary examined the Elms at Campsey Ash, with Lord Ullswater. He found both wood and bark to be totally free from all superficial evidences of disease, eitherfloralor faunal ; and considered the trees in this case to have perished from the natural cause of Wet Rot, i.e. having had their roots water-logged in ditches throughout long periods of time. Opinion respecting Elms in the twenty English counties known to be suffering from the Dutch Disease was reserved, but the Forestry Commission believed to be in error two years earlier with respect to the present locality.—Hence further information was provoked. On 24 August our Member, Mr. T. N. Waller of Waldringfield reported a typical instance of the Dutch Disease : On the east side of my grounds is a belt of nine Elms, all alongside the bank of a wet ditch on cold heavy land. In 1929 three of these Elms, at the lowest end of the ditch near boggy marshes, looked sickly ; but I attributed this appearance to lightning-flash. In 1930 these three appeared worse ; and the remaining six, on slightly higher and drier ground, showed similar initial signs of the trouble by a yellowish tinge of the foliage. This year 1931 the earlier three are dead, and the other nine so badly affected that the branches are nearly as bare of leaves as in winter: I expect to find the entire belt dead next spring. On 27 August the Revd. C. Tennant again wrote, stating that a particular Elm in Worthing Park was dead a month ago; and that now a neighbouring tree, which had shown only a patch of the disease or blight previously, is nearly as bad : which exhibits rapid dissemination of the evil. Also, those trees which had been trimmed down as a preventive last winter are now as bad as ever, showing pruning useless : indeed, all round the Park, which is exceptionally dry with no ditch or accumulation of water anywhere, trees are offering ominous signs of decay. On 25 August Mr. R. Eaton White of Boulge Hall near Woodbridge finally confirmed the Suffolk presence of the Dutch Disease, upon his estate. While agreeing that Elms die from old age and other causes, he averred the usual symptoms of the Disease are unmistakable : in July or August branches of a tree, until then apparently healthy, suddenly die and the leaves in a few days become brown and shrivelled, exactly as they would if the branch had been severed. When once affected, the Forestry Commission assured him, there is no eure. In areas where the infection is confined to few trees, everyone should remove thefirstaffected