Leadership Focus March/April 2015

Page 1

LEADERSHIP F O C U S NAHT seizes the agenda P.34 The magazine for NAHT members March/April 2015 • £5

Issue #68

Changes in special needs P.38 Peer coaching and mentoring P.42

Election special The main parties tell NAHT about their plans for education, should they be elected…

01 LF Cover.indd 1

26/02/2015 13:40


Last year, 99% of our teachers completing their first year achieved 'outstanding' or 'good' in their Qualified Teacher Status grade

99% 9%

We can support your school. Find out how at teachfirst.org.uk/partnership

LFO.03.15.002.indd 2

20/02/2015 09:09


EDITORIAL WE N A T I O N A L P R E S I D E N T

I

n this pre-election edition of LF we asked the main political parties to answer a series of GAIL LARKIN questions about education (p28) and you may be interested – even surprised – when you read their responses. More importantly, we have taken the opportunity to highlight and publicise NAHT’s own manifesto. It’s a tribute to our knowledgeable, experienced and highly skilled staff, led by Russell Hobby and Kathryn James, that the education spokespeople for each party have had their attention drawn to the highly principled and sound proposals contained in Owning what is ours whenever possible. The article on page 34 gives the background to the manifesto, which followed Russell’s annual conference speech last year. He emphasised: “Being critical is not enough. We can construct an alternative; we can get out there and do it. We should be the ones talking loudly about what we want to change.” But we must be strong in our resolve. We need to work together and to support each other. Throughout this edition, there are many examples of how the association is working hard to provide professional support for you through the development of new initiatives such as NAHT Aspire, Instead, NAHT Assure,

WELCOME

MANIFESTO FOR CHANGE NAHT Edge, the Leadership Compact and alternative league tables. Each will help us to achieve our aim of encouraging members not to just take ownership of standards but to provide mutual care and support for each other. Elsewhere, we would like your views on Leadership Focus (p13) and I would like to draw your attention to a fascinating interview with head teacher Dame Helen Hyde (p26) on holocaust education. NAHT has been a long time supporter of the Unicef UK Rights Respecting Schools Award, which links well with holocaust education and, of course, British values. Finally, as I near the end of my presidential year, I would like to thank you so much for your support over the past 12 months. I look forward to meeting you on my travels.

Member of the Audit Bureau of Circulation: 27,642 (July 2013-June 2014)

ASSOCIATION AND EDITORIAL ENQUIRIES NAHT 1 Heath Square, Boltro Road, Haywards Heath, West Sussex RH16 1BL www.naht.org.uk Tel: 0300 30 30 333 Editorial board: Clare Cochrane, Tony Draper, Heather Forse, Lesley Gannon, Nicky Gillhespy, Magnus Gorham, Chris Harrison, Russell Hobby, Bernadette Hunter, Gail Larkin, Caroline Morley, Stephen Watkins and Paul Whiteman. @nahtnews @LFmagNAHT

EDITORIAL TEAM Managing editor: Steve Smethurst Assistant editor: Carly Chynoweth Designer: Adrian Taylor Senior picture editor: Claire Echavarry Production manager: Jane Easterman Cover photograph: Getty Printed by: Woodford Litho

ADVERTISING ENQUIRIES Advertisement sales: Joe Elliott-Walker Sales director: Jason Grant Leadership Focus is published on behalf of NAHT by Redactive Publishing Limited, 17 Britton Street, London EC1M 5TP www.redactive.co.uk Tel: 020 7880 6200 Email: naht@redactive.co.uk

ISSN: 1472–6181 © Copyright 2015 NAHT All rights reserved; no part of this publication may be copied or reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical, photocopy, recording or otherwise without the prior written permission of the publishers. While every care has been taken in the compilation of this publication, neither the publisher nor NAHT can accept responsibility for any inaccuracies or changes since compilation, or for consequential loss arising from such changes or inaccuracies, or for any other loss, direct or consequential, arising in connection with information in this publication. Acceptance of advertisements does not imply recommendation by the publishers. The views herein are not necessarily those of the publisher, the editor or NAHT.

MARCH/APRIL 2015 l LEADERSHIP FOCUS

03 editorial.indd 3

3

26/02/2015 14:06


DfE ACCREDITED BASELINE RECEPTION ASSESSMENT

BASE

DfE

ACCREDITED

RECEPTION BASELINE ASSESSMENT

• Assess early Literacy, Maths and PSED • Takes just 20 minutes with each child • Computer-based and adaptive • Interactive baseline and progress feedback • Not-for-profit providers of a reception baseline for over 20 years

www.cem.org/BASE

@CEMatDurham #receptionbaseline

e re

F fom in w.

w

nt d! sme oa es nl ass w .uk/ do tor.co

en

”10 steps to implementing your assessment framework”

w

Download our new practical guide The second in the series of whitepapers, an invaluable guide to successfully implementing your assessment framework with contributions from Russell Hobby, General Secretary, NAHT and Dame Alison Peacock DBE. Planning, Assessing, Tracking and Reporting – InfoMentor now has assessment frameworks including the NAHT, Michael Tidd and Rising Stars, available for schools to use, free of charge. Life after levels made easy!

0845 680 3681

enquiries@infomentor.co.uk

All pupils should reach their full potential | www.infomentor.co.uk

LFO.03.15.004.indd 4

20/02/2015 09:28


CONTENTS

EN

EWS

E

FEATURES

6

Channel 5 series visits Barking NAHT member Bob Garton invited TV cameras to record life at the UK’s biggest primary school, Barking’s Gascoigne Primary

20 NAHT principles for SBM pay NAHT is refreshing the balance for school business managers, reports Valentine Mulholland

7

Disqualification by association Guidance for schools on child protection has become a burning issue for school leaders

22 Budget-setting tips Timely advice from NAHT’s school business managers’ committee on what to bear in mind when setting budgets for the year ahead

8

Careers funding ‘error’ The loss of ring-fenced funding for careers education, information, advice and guidance has proved to be a “serious error”

9

New Year honours Two damehoods and a knighthood are highlights as school leaders are recognised for their hard work and achievements

10 ERA finalists announced The shortlisted school leaders and educational establishments are revealed for this year’s Education Resources Awards 11 NAHT backs Freedom Charity NAHT has joined forces with Freedom Charity, which aims to stop forced marriages and dishonour-based violence

24 The future of governance NAHT members can use National Governors Association resources to set their school strategy, advises its chief executive Emma Knights 26 Lest we forget Holocaust education has been the subject of a government education committee recently, chaired by head teacher Dame Helen Hyde 28 Election special As the country prepares to go to the polls on 7 May, we ask what the main political parties have in store for schools 34 There is a better way… How NAHT is leading change in education to help leaders and learners. Susan Young reports

11 Baseline reception testing Six providers for the reception baseline assessment have been approved by the Standards and Testing Agency

38 Making sense of complexity Susan Young looks at the changes to special needs through the eyes of speakers at NAHT’s SEND conference

12 Family Action leaflet The latest leaflet from NAHT’s charity partner focuses on the benefits of praise and reward

42 School counsels Peer mentoring and coaching are increasingly being used to improve confidence and reduce behavioural issues, reports Carly Chynoweth

13 Annual conference 2015 Liverpool is set to host NAHT’s annual conference from 1 to 3 May, with speakers from the major political parties in attendance

46 At the European chalkface ESHA president Clive Byrne tells LF about the challenges facing school leaders across Europe

EV

IEWS

14 NAHT partners GL Assessment’s ‘Baseline’ tool, specially developed for reception testing; and customised, reliable travel insurance from Rock 15 Legal update NAHT senior solicitor Simon Thomas looks at the contentious issue of partisan politics in schools 16 Best of the blogs It’s a turbulent issue for NAHT’s bloggers, as they turn their attention to sex, cheating and fighting their corner 17 Rona Tutt’s column The NAHT past president urges whoever is secretary of state after the election to involve the profession much more closely than before 19 Russell Hobby’s column The general election is an opportunity to find out how politicians will support NAHT’s ideals 50 Susan Young’s column Susan meets Marcelo Staricoff (pictured above), whose school has won an award for being among the most improved for the progress of children entitled to the pupil premium

LEADERSHIP F O C U S

MARCH/APRIL 2015 l LEADERSHIP FOCUS

05 contents.indd 5

5

27/02/2015 08:14


NEWS FOCUS

NEWS • DISQUALIFICATION BY ASSOCIATION • CAREERS FUNDING • EDUCATION HONOURS • FREEDOM CHARITY • ANNUAL CONFERENCE

WE N E W S F R O M T H E W O R L D O F E D U C A T I O N

BRITAIN’S BIGGEST

In at the deep end? NAHT MEMBER BOB GARTON INVITED CHANNEL 5 CAMERAS INSIDE HIS SCHOOL, THE BIGGEST PRIMARY IN THE COUNTRY, FOR A FOUR-PART DOCUMENTARY

6

LEADERSHIP FOCUS l MARCH/APRIL 2015

06-07 News.indd 6

A Channel 5 series that aims to show the realities of caring for pupils at a large and vibrant London primary school features an NAHT head teacher. Gascoigne Primary School in Barking is Britain’s biggest primary with more than 1,100 pupils, 38 classes, 39 teachers and 160 staff. NAHT member Bob Garton is the school’s head teacher. He gave a film crew access over two terms to view the devotion that goes into steering and nurturing a modern primary school.

The series follows him and his staff pushing for the best for their pupils despite a range of challenges. Many come from vulnerable backgrounds and need tireless care and support – which Mr Garton and his dedicated team readily give them. Britain’s Biggest Primary School, In at the Deep End, was screened over four weekly episodes from 12 February. It is available to watch on Demand 5. www.channel5.com/ demand5

PHOTOGRAPH: CHANNEL 5

26/02/2015 14:06


Schools risk stigmatising children

How poverty affects education A National Children’s Society inquiry finds labels like ‘FSM’ or ‘pupil premium’ can stigmatise children from poorer families and sometimes lead to bullying

1

/

Parents spend an average of £800 per child per year on school costs, including £159 on uniform and sports kit and £167 on school trips

2

/

Disqualification by association ‘number one issue for members’ Stay up to date with Guidance for schools on child protection laws has led to dozens of the latest association news on Twitter primary school staff being wrongly suspended from work. According to official guidance, staff could face disqualification from their jobs if they share a home with a person who has committed a serious violent or sexual crime or been banned from working with children. The rules were brought in for childminders and nurseries in 2009, but in October the DfE clarified that they also apply to schools. As a result, schools and local authorities have been asking staff to declare any previous convictions or cautions by people living in their household. A DfE spokesperson said: “These are not new requirements and the law has not changed. Schools and governing bodies should use their judgement when deciding where it is necessary take action.” NAHT general secretary Russell Hobby (pictured) said that at least one primary head had decided to leave their job to prevent family secrets being exposed. “We’re receiving many calls about this. It’s the number one issue for our members at the moment. If a school leader is suspended, it is very visible in the school community and trying to explain it to parents can be very unpleasant. “For staff with long, unblemished service to a school, it is an insult; this legislation isn’t designed for schools and is causing chaos. Every local authority seems to be using a different interpretation of the rules. “We all want children to be safe in school but these regulations are not yet in a workable state. We are working with the government to help them make the guidance more effective. At present they are designed for childcare in the home not school settings. “They will prevent good and trustworthy staff from doing their jobs and wrap schools up in unnecessary red tape, distracting them from real safeguarding issues and the hard work of raising standards.”

@NAHTnews

Workload Challenge proposals ‘modest’ The government published its response to the Workload Challenge survey in February. More than 40,000 teachers offered their views and, while the proposals will help, NAHT feels they do not tackle the causes of excess workload in schools. NAHT general secretary Russell Hobby said: “The proposals for better planning and greater notice of changes are a step in the right direction. They could improve the quality of education but only if they really do limit the constant churn of new initiatives and allow teachers to prepare for and implement fresh changes. We also welcome commitments to further the development of school leaders.” However, Mr Hobby said some questions remained unanswered. “At the heart of excess workload are fear and over-compliance. There are some useful suggestions for limiting Ofsted’s overreach but the adversarial culture will always remain. We should stop tinkering with Ofsted and commit to an overhaul. Likewise, the commitment to review the consistency of Ofsted reports is welcome but what would be even more welcome would be a commitment to look at the skills and experience of the inspection teams themselves.”

PHOTOGRAPH: TEMPEST

06-07 News.indd 7

95 per cent of parents who were “not well off” said they struggled at least “to a small extent” with costs generated by school requirements

Welsh minister’s ‘own goal’ The Welsh government’s new school categorisation data has angered many school leaders. After promising to consult closely and seeming to have agreed an acceptable way forward, the Welsh government has changed the rules for judging standards in secondary schools. NAHT Cymru acting director Dr Chris Howard said: “Our members see this as a breach of trust. This is an own goal by minister Huw Lewis which will do nothing to encourage schools and teachers working with the most challenging communities.” Dr Howard said the new system: • is little better than the discredited system of secondary school banding; • ensures that half the schools in Wales must be classified as sub-standard before a lesson has been taught; • encourages schools to exclude pupils with poor behaviour and low levels of academic achievement; • provides no real measurement of the value added by each school to each child’s outcomes; • works against the minister’s intention of doing better by the most disadvantaged; • discourages head teachers from taking jobs in schools in socially deprived areas; and • penalises rural schools where entitlement to free school meals and other economic indicators show there is “heavy lifting” to do.

MARCH/APRIL 2015 l LEADERSHIP FOCUS

7

26/02/2015 14:06


NEWS FOCUS

E

TELL US ABOUT YOUR INSPECTION EXPERIENCE If you have been inspected recently, NAHT would like to know more about how it went. Fill in the survey at www.surveymonkey.com/s/MTCYMQM

Cutting back on ring-fenced funding for careers is ‘ultimate false economy’

NI funding ‘less bleak’

The loss of ring-fenced funding for CEIAG (careers education, information, advice and guidance) has proved to be a ‘serious error’ and NAHT is seeking its restoration. The government line was stressed by business minister Nick Boles. He said: “Budget decisions lie with principals and head teachers. Good schools invest in careers information, advice and guidance and have a designated careers coordinator to work with young people.” The government’s current strategy is for Ofsted to mark down schools that fail to provide independent careers guidance and, once the Careers and Enterprise Company is set up, by allocating enterprise advisers to schools. However, Louis Coiffait, CEO of NAHT Edge, the section of NAHT for middle leaders, told LF: “It’s essential for careers education funding to be ring-fenced. Cutting back here would be the ultimate false economy, with the price paid by the next generation of workers. “We would like to see a commitment to careers funding by all political parties. The Gatsby Commission’s report proposed that schools would need around £50,000 each per year to achieve the benchmarks it identified as being indicators of effective provision.” Kathryn James, NAHT’s deputy general secretary, added: “Careers education, information and guidance all work best as a partnership between schools, employers and trusted intermediaries such as the National Careers Service. They each hold a different part of the puzzle. This would guarantee a national standard for careers guidance taking as its template the work being done under the auspices of the QiCS and CEIAG quality awards.” • CASCAiD, which produces computer based careers information, is launching its survey of young people’s opinions about careers, education options and employers.

Schools in Northern Ireland are still uncertain about the extent of the budget cuts they will face in 2015-16. Figures outlined in the Northern Ireland Assembly’s initial consultation included proposals for a 19.7 per cent reduction in capital budget and a 29 per cent reduction in the entitlement framework to help address a £160 million ‘funding gap’ in education. By January, the Northern Ireland Executive had found £60m extra for schools, but as LF went to press NAHT was still waiting to hear how it would be spent. “Schools have still not been provided with written details about their budgets,” said Helena Macormac, NAHT Northern Ireland policy director. “The situation is not as bleak as it was before Christmas but we still can’t be sure what the final impact of the cuts will be.”

www.cascaid.co.uk/survey2015

NEWS IN BRIEF SUCCESSFUL BETT SHOW FOR NAHT January’s Bett Show in London saw NAHT’s head of press and media Steven George and policy adviser Siôn Humphreys hold productive talks with organisations such as Computing at Schools, Naace and the Education Technology Action Group. NAHT also announced an agreement with Frog Education, which will disseminate materials the

8

association has produced on assessment without levels in schools. Siôn told LF: “We were also given the opportunity to curate two afternoons on a DfE stand run by Heppell.net. It gave us the opportunity to talk about ICT’s role in easing the assessment burden and also the effective use of ICT in a special school environment. “We even spoke to Bett’s radio station, which was broadcast live at the event and on the internet.”

LEADERSHIP FOCUS l MARCH/APRIL 2015

08-09 News.indd 8

GENERAL SECRETARY ON RADIO 4’S TODAY

NASBM MEMBERSHIP OFFER FOR SBMs

NAHT general secretary Russell Hobby was interviewed on Radio 4’s Today programme on 29 January to raise concerns over secondary school league tables. Mr Hobby said parents had a right to information about school performance but that such data should cover a wider range of topics to provide a more rounded picture of school achievement.

NAHT and the National Association of School Business Management (NASBM) have launched a membership offer to give SBMs access to both organisations at a special rate. Individuals who become members of both will receive a 25 per cent discount on their membership of each organisation. bit.ly/SBM_offer

PHOTOGRAPH: GETTY

26/02/2015 14:07


NEW YEAR HONOURS The following school leaders are among those awarded honours for services to education.

School leaders rewarded in New Year’s Honours list It’s nice to be reminded that being a school leader isn’t always a thankless task when it comes to government interference. According to the Cabinet Office, 10 per cent of honours are for work in education and its education committee recommended 30 head teachers for this year’s New Year’s list. Two of the most prominent among the 30 are Dame Kate Dethridge and Dame Oremi Evans (pictured). Reading’s Churchend School’s head teacher Dame Kate, an associate director of the National Education Trust and chair of a DfE group writing new standards for teaching assistants, said it was a “huge surprise and an amazing honour”. “I still can’t quite believe it,” she said. “Education is the only thing I have ever known, it is my absolute passion. Any success I have had has always been about the teams and the children I have been lucky enough to work with.” She has led Churchend school for the past 17 years, seeing it become a National

Support School and twice being rated as ‘outstanding’ by Ofsted. Her school held a special assembly to mark the occasion and presented her with a Waterford Crystal vase, engraved with her new title and the date. Dame Oremi has been head teacher of the Brookfield School in Hereford for 13 years, during which it has been judged ‘outstanding’ by Ofsted three times. A Cabinet Office spokesperson said she had received her award in part because she was “head teacher of the only special school to receive three consecutive ‘outstanding’ Ofsted judgements”. Dame Oremi said: “I was very surprised but at the same time incredibly honoured. But any success that I’ve had is because of the team of people I work with – you don’t work alone and this isn’t about me as an individual, it’s about what we as a team have achieved.” Another significant award was bestowed on Sir John Townsley. He oversees the Morley and Farnley academies in Leeds, both of which are rated ‘outstanding’ by Ofsted, and also a free school, the Ruth Gorse Academy, which opened last September. Sir John became principal of the Gorse Academies Trust in 2010. Under his leadership, two of the four academies that make up the trust have gone from ‘requires improvement’ to ‘outstanding’.

Knighthood John Townsley, executive principal, The Gorse Academies Trust, Leeds Damehoods Kate Dethridge, principal, Churchend Primary School, Reading and National Leader of Education Oremi Evans, head teacher, The Brookfield School, Herefordshire CBE Catherine Garside head teacher, St Ambrose Barlow RC High School, Swinton, Salford Judith Salter, head teacher, Glenwood Special School, Essex OBE Gulfaraz Ahmed, head teacher, Parkinson Lane Primary, Halifax Lorraine Allen, principal, Whitley Academy, Coventry Adam Chedburn, head teacher, Whitley Bay High School, Tyne and Wear Dr Lesley Curtis, head teacher, Everton Nursery School and Family Centre, Liverpool John Dahlstrom head teacher, Hope Special School, Wigan David Hudson, executive head, Wickersley School and Sports College; Rawmarsh Community School and Clifton Community School, Rotherham Nicholas Simon Hurn, executive head, Cardinal Hume Catholic School, Gateshead; St Robert of Newminster School, Sunderland Richard Millington, executive principal, Chepping View Primary School, Buckinghamshire John Morris, head teacher, Ardleigh Green Junior School, Havering Dr Anne Murray, principal, Oakgrove Integrated Primary and Nursery School, Londonderry Maura Regan, principal, Carmel College and chief executive, Carmel Education Trust MBE Geoffrey Dunn, principal, Ballysally Primary School, Coleraine Stephen Hill, deputy head teacher, St Joseph’s RC Primary School, Shaw, Oldham Florence Mairs, principal, Straid Primary School, Ballyclare Brendan McCusker, principal, St Mary’s Primary School, Maguiresbridge, Northern Ireland Judith Miln, deputy head, Clapton Girls’ Academy, Hackney Mohammad Aslam Rashud, head teacher, John Summers High School, Flintshire Eunice Walters, head teacher, Brynhyfryd Primary School, Neath, Wales Deborah Withers, lately head teacher, Wren Spinney Special School, Kettering Medallists of the Order of the British Empire Tracy Cullen, SBM, Queensbridge Primary School, London Janet Inglis, deputy head teacher, Immanuel College, Bradford If we have missed anyone, please let us know: naht@redactive.co.uk

MARCH/APRIL 2015 l LEADERSHIP FOCUS

08-09 News.indd 9

9

26/02/2015 15:56


AWARDS NIGHT WE ERA leadership

finalists announced PRIMARY FUTURES

Fast growth for ‘Futures’ 2014’s Leadership in education award winner: Sofina Islam, head teacher of Stanton Bridge Primary School, Coventry, with event host Paul Ross and NAHT president Gail Larkin

The Education Resources Awards (ERA) finalists have been selected for two key educational categories: ‘Leadership in education’ and ‘Educational establishment of the year’. Leadership in education finalists • Lorraine Allen, Whitley Academy, Coventry • Ann Clark, King Edward VI High School for Girls, Birmingham • Dr Lesley Curtis, Everton Nursery School and Family Centre, Liverpool • David Hudson, Wickersley School and Sports College, Rotherham Educational establishment of the year finalists • Brynhyfryd Primary School, Neath, Wales • Clapton Girls’ Academy, Hackney • Matthew Arnold School, Oxford • Saltley School, Birmingham • St Ambrose Barlow RC High School, Swindon Organised by the British Educational Suppliers Association (BESA) and Brilliant Marketing Solutions, the ERAs highlight the quality and diversity of educational products and resources, excellent educational establishments and the most inspiring members of the teaching profession, all working together to encourage the very best in education. The winners will be announced at the National Motorcycle Museum, Birmingham, on 20 March. The ERAs are sponsored by procurement specialists YPO and supported by NAHT and the SSAT. Media partners are Education Today. See below for more information, or to book a seat at one the UK’s leading education events. chris@educationresourcesawards.co.uk

More than 1,600 primary schools and 1,800 teachers have registered for the free Primary Futures programme, giving them access to volunteers, information and other resources to help children make connections between what they learn and their futures. London has the highest number of schools registered, with 276 – 15 per cent of all its primaries – but the North West and the East of England are not far behind. Recent sessions at NAHT conferences in York and Barnsley also drew large numbers of school leaders, said Steve Iredale, NAHT past president and Primary Futures project manager. “We have had a really positive response from delegates as we have been

able to share the potential of Primary Futures with examples of how our project can have an impact on individual children and on schools and localities,” he said. Over the first two years of Inspiring the Future – Primary Futures’ parent scheme, aimed at secondary schools and colleges – nearly half a million young people heard from 18,500 volunteers. The initiative, developed by NAHT in partnership with the Education and Employers charity, is also garnering political attention: as LF went to press, secretary of state Nicky Morgan was preparing to join children at Priestmead Primary School in Harrow, London, for a morning of Primary Futures activities. www.primaryfutures.org

‘Expert centre’ opportunity If you have an interest in global learning and could manage a network there is an opportunity for your school to join the Global Learning Programme (GLP) as an expert centre. This would bring access to up to £5,000 of government funding, subject-specific guidance and learning resources, plus support from a GLP advisor. Following initial training, you’d establish and manage your network of local GLP schools, leading a programme of eight twilight sessions over four terms. Alternatively, you could join as a partner school and get access to funded CPD, curriculum guidance, free resources and support from a local GLP network.

01622 474011 www.educationresourcesawards.co.uk

10

LEADERSHIP FOCUS l MARCH/APRIL 2015

10_11 News.indd 10

www.glp-e.org.uk

PHOTOGRAPHY: ERA

26/02/2015 15:56


E

NAHT SUPPORT FOR MENTAL HEALTH INITIATIVE Children’s Mental Health Week took place in February. NAHT general secretary Russell Hobby said: “We believe this initiative will draw attention to the scale of the problem.” For more details, see www.place2be.org.uk

Reception baseline assessments

NAHT joins forces with Freedom Charity to curb forced marriages Freedom Charity was set up in 2011 to protect the lives of children and young people by raising awareness of forced marriage and the associated problem of dishonour-based violence in the UK. Freedom works with the government’s Forced Marriage Unit and the Metropolitan Police as well as organisations such as NAHT, ChildLine and the Samaritans. The charity offers visits to schools to highlight some of the key signs associated with forced marriage and female genital mutilation and suggests courses of action that could help potential victims. Freedom has visited more than 60 schools and handed out 20,000 copies of But it’s not fair, a novel by the charity’s founder Aneeta Prem, which aims to raise awareness of forced marriage. It also runs training programmes for key front line staff including teachers. Chief executive Vineeta Thornhill said: Education is the “We all need to look for the warning signs key to prevention that someone might be about to become in forced marriages a victim.” The charity’s education work also aims to change the hearts and minds of potential perpetrators. “It’s not just the parents who insist on forced marriages, it’s often young brothers and cousins too,” she said. The practice goes beyond south Asian communities as an increasing number of Turkish and some traveller families are involved. Ms Prem said: “Education is the key to prevention. School staff can save lives by knowing what to look out for. Also trying to change the hearts and minds of young men who are often now the perpetrators of the future is vital,” she said. www.freedomcharity.org.uk

bit.ly/safeguarding_course

INSPIRING LEADERSHIP . BIG-NAME CONFERENCE SPEAKERS ANNOUNCED The first speakers have been announced for the Inspiring Leadership conference – philosopher and author Alain de Botton, senior adviser to Fortune 500 companies Erica Ariel Fox and Singapore’s leading educationalist Pak Tee Ng, associate dean for leadership and learning at the country’s National Institute of Education. The conference will also offer practical masterclasses, carefully chosen exhibitors and the opportunity to re-energise and reflect on what it means to be a leader. Over two full days (Wednesday lunchtime to Friday lunchtime) on 10 to 12 June,

PHOTOGRAPH: STEPHANIE SINCLAIR/VII

10_11 News.indd 11

the conference will provide real depth and breadth, with themes including innovation, leadership, partnership, development and technology and much more. Delegates have an unrivalled opportunity to meet their peer group, share experiences, exchange views and crystallise what they will take back in to the workplace. The conference for school leaders is hosted by NAHT, CfBT Education Trust and ASCL and takes place at the ICC in Birmingham. You can follow the conference on Twitter for updates: @InspLdrshipConf #ILConf2015 www.inspiringleadership.org

Six providers for the reception baseline assessment have been approved by the Standards and Testing Agency. They are: • Centre for Evaluation and Monitoring, Durham University (CEM) • Early Excellence • GL Assessment • Hodder Education • National Foundation for Educational Research • Speech Link. The reception baseline will be the only measure used to assess progress for children who start reception from September 2016. Schools that choose not to use an approved baseline assessment from 2016 will be judged on an attainment floor standard alone. Schools can sign up by the end of April 2015 to start using their chosen reception baseline from 1 September 2015. Schools will still be able to sign up after this date, but their preferred provider may not be available. NAHT is in the process of scrutinising each of the assessments and will produce a guide in March to help members with their deliberations. If a provider does not recruit sufficient schools they won’t be able to offer the reception baseline. If schools choose a provider that is later suspended because of a lack of interest, they will be alerted by 3 June 2015 and will be able to choose an alternative approved provider.

MARCH/APRIL 2015 l LEADERSHIP FOCUS

11

26/02/2015 14:12


NAHT NEWS AND INFORMATION

FA M I LY A C T I O N

Praise and reward The penultimate leaflet in the ‘Ready to Learn series’ co-produced by NAHT and Family Action will focus on praise and reward. Praise and reward play an important part in a healthy upbringing by boosting self-esteem and confidence, encouraging good behaviour and allowing young people to feel good about themselves. It is important, both at home and at school, to praise children when they have achieved a challenging task or demonstrated good behaviour as it typically leads to positive outcomes. Rewarding children with something they request as a result of a desired behaviour being achieved can also lead to continued achievement. In 1989, Hans van der Mars of Arizona State University

long assembly pack, at the websites listed on the right. Make Family Action your Charity of the year 2015

found that verbal praise could reduce the number of off-task behaviours. The ‘praise and reward’ leaflet, currently in production, will offer ways in which parents and teachers can use methods that are effective and give children the natural desire to achieve and behave. As always if your school would like to get involved in the Ready to Learn campaign you can access free resources, including the series of leaflets and a week-

Fundraising ideas for schools include dress down days, recycling, bring and bakes, mini sports days and drawing competitions. The money will be well spent: • £10 could fund an hour of one-to-one support for a young carer • £15 could buy ingredients for a healthy cooking session at a children’s centre • £25 could fund a support session for a mum with postnatal depression 020 7241 7454 elisa.cappello@ family-action.org.uk www.family-action.org. uk/naht

NAHT confirms affiliation with TUC NAHT has affiliated to the TUC for the first time. Affiliation was confirmed by the TUC’s General Council in October last year. Affiliation will bring many benefits, including access to training for representatives and NAHT staff, influence and alliances with other education and public sector unions on education policy. It will also bring access to expertise and publications on union issues. NAHT general secretary Russell Hobby said: “Over the long term the best interests of students, teachers and school leaders are inextricably linked. There is a great deal we can do together to create great places to learn and great places to work.” Further information on the TUC will be shared in future issues.

Officials gather in Bristol for annual branch conference More than 80 NAHT branch and regional officials gathered in Bristol at the end of November last year for the annual officials’ conference. As is customary, a programme of training and briefing was provided. It was also an opportunity to thank officials for the hard work that they undertake on behalf of NAHT members throughout the year. This year, officials heard from Paul Nowak, assistant

general secretary of the TUC, who formally welcomed NAHT into the TUC family of unions and outlined some of the work the TUC is prioritising in the lead up to the general election. Simon Ferrar, a TUC tutor also led a lively session on handling of grievance procedures. There was much discussion about the issues arising from extremism in Birmingham. A representative from the

DfE led a session on the government response to the reports on Trojan Horse and the Prevent agenda. Finally, officials were treated to an impassioned speech by Sarah HewittClarkson, head teacher of a Birmingham school caught up in the issues surrounding Trojan Horse, as she explained the work that she and her school were undertaking to combat extremism.

12 LEADERSHIP FOCUS l MARCH/APRIL 2015

12_13 NAHT News.indd 12

26/02/2015 15:59


General secretary re-elected

Annual conference to tap into election fever in Liverpool Heavy hitters from the UK’s three main political parties will be among the speakers at this year’s NAHT conference, which will be held at ACC in Liverpool (pictured) on May 1 to 3. General secretary Russell Hobby and other inspirational keynote speakers will also appear on stage. Association president Gail Larkin will step down to make way for new president Tony Draper, head teacher at Water Hall Primary in Milton Keynes. He will be assisted in his role by new vice president Kim Johnson, the principal of Bradfield Academy, a special school in Chatham, Kent. The conference theme, ‘Own the story’, builds on the work NAHT is undertaking to ensure it is the profession, not politicians, that leads the way on education, and to recognise that it is members working in schools who make the real difference in children’s lives. Members will have the opportunity to debate a variety of motions proposed by branches and regions at Saturday morning’s AGM while, given conference’s proximity to the forthcoming general election (see p28), the hustings event scheduled for that afternoon is likely to generate significant interest. Conference is also an opportunity for delegates to participate in a number of panel sessions and debates that will help shape the association’s work over the year ahead; it is also a chance to share best practice with other school leaders. Documents including the full conference programme will be sent to attendees in mid-April. Members attending will also be sent the AGM book.

Russell Hobby has been re-elected as NAHT general secretary. The association’s president, Gail Larkin, told LF: “During the past four years, Russell has worked tirelessly to raise the profile of our association and to ensure that our professional voice is heard in the highest of circles. “He is highly respected for his professionalism and knowledge and I know just how much members appreciate and value the skills and experience that he brings to the post. “It is a credit to his hard work and excellent leadership that he has been elected unopposed.” Mr Hobby has been general secretary of NAHT since September 2010.

bit.ly/Conference_2015

LEADERSHIP F O C U S

FOCUS ON FOCUS WHAT DO YOU THINK? Part of NAHT’s support for its members is to ensure we give you the information you need in the format you want to read it. As well as ensuring our advice and guidance is available 24/7 online and in the form of downloadable newsletters that can be read on smart phones, we know many of you still like to read a hard copy magazine. We’d love to know what you think of Leadership Focus and how we can improve it. This is your magazine and we want to get it right for you.

PHOTOGRAPH: ACC

12_13 NAHT News.indd 13

Let us know: Are we getting the content right? For example, would you like to see: • more or fewer advice articles? • more or fewer features? • more chances to share your views with colleagues? Would you like to receive the magazine: • via email? • in an accessible format for your tablet or mobile phone?

SHIP S LEADER F O C U

School business managers p38

work at Rewarding p30 ol BESD scho life Assessment: p34 after levels ation NAHT educ p40 conference

bers NAHT mem azine for The mag 2015 • £5 February January/

7 Issue #6

Fi din Fin di g th the per p erfe fec ctt pitch Is music getting the atte attent entiion on it deserves in secondary y schoo schools?

tle help s With a lit iend eir fr from th tive trust co-opera 01 LF_Cover_NovDec

Whatever ideas you think would help us improve Leadership Focus, we’d really appreciate your views.

Talented Leaders programme p26 Behind NAHT Aspire p30

The magazine for NAHT membe members ers er 2014 • £5

November/Decemb

Issue #66

final.indd 1

s s A Midland its first 18 month celebrates

19/12/2014

09:48

publications@naht.org.uk

MARCH/APRIL 2015 l LEADERSHIP FOCUS 13

26/02/2015 16:00


MEMBER BENEFITS

PARTNERS WE M E S S A G E F R O M A S C H O O L P A R T N E R Assessment tool specially developed for reception testing As part of government reforms to early years, all schools will be required to carry out baseline testing on children on entry to reception from September 2016. GL Assessment, the UK’s leading provider of formative assessments, has developed Baseline as an innovative, fully digital assessment to meet this demand. Approved by the DfE for use from September this year and shortlisted in the early years category at the Education Resources Awards, Baseline is an immersive experience delivered on tablets in full colour. Mixing touch-based and oral questions, it is both engaging and simple to deliver. Baseline allows teachers to measure literacy, language and communication and mathematics both on entry and, optionally, at the end of reception. Taking less than 25 minutes over one or two sessions, our rigorous development standards ensure that, like all of our resources, it is an assessment tool schools can rely on. DfE funding is guaranteed for orders made before April. GL Assessment will be holding a series of seminars of Baseline, details of which can be found on the website below. So, if you have any questions, or wish to order Baseline, contact our dedicated support team on 020 8996 3384, email baseline@gl-assessment.co.uk or visit www.gl-assessment.co.uk/baseline.

WE M E S S A G E F R O M A M E M B E R P A R T N E R Travel insurance that comes with extra peace of mind NAHT makes travel insurance as quick and simple as possible to cover you and your family. Whether you’re buying online or require help with your policy from one of our advisers, we can talk you through all the options available to help make your holiday cover choices easier. We provide a range of policies, options and cover levels for our customers. Whether it’s a one off trip to Europe or an annual worldwide multi-trip policy for frequent flyers, there’s something for everyone. If you like to go on cruise holidays then you’ll be glad to know these will be included in the policy as standard. We also offer a range of upgrades whether you’re skiing, playing golf or riding a motor bike on your travels to name just a few. You can also add gadget cover to your policy for your family’s valuables including smartphones, laptops, tablets and headphones. Should you be getting married on your travels you can add wedding cover to your policy. This provides cover for wedding rings, wedding attire, photographs, wedding cakes and wedding cars, giving you additional security on your special day. For your added peace of mind the travel insurance will also cover pre-existing medical conditions at no extra cost, providing you can meet the set criteria at the commencement of the period of insurance. Visit www.nahttravelinsurance.co.uk or call 0844 482 3390.

14

WE NAHT

partner contacts NAHT is committed to negotiating a wide range of high quality, value added benefits and services for its members. If you have any comments on the services provided by our affinity partners, contact marketing@naht.org.uk.

SERVICES FOR SCHOOLS NAHT ASSURE HR, payroll, property, health and safety 0845 519 7001 Email: helpdesk@nahtassure.co.uk www.nahtassure.co.uk Online DBS checking 0845 519 7001 www.nahtassure.co.uk/online-dbs ETEACH Online staff recruitment 0845 226 1906 Email: info@eteach.com www.eteach.com GL ASSESSMENT Pupil assessment 0845 602 1937 www.gl-assessment.co.uk GL PERFORMANCE Kirkland Rowell Surveys 0191 270 8270 www.kirkland-rowell.com THE EDUCATION BROKER Staff absence insurance 0845 600 5762 www.theeducationbroker.co.uk

SERVICES FOR MEMBERS ROCK Travel insurance 0844 482 3390 www.nahttravelinsurance.co.uk AVIVA Home, contents and motor insurance 0800 046 6389 www.fromyourassociation.co.uk/NAHT CS HEALTHCARE Private medical insurance 0800 917 4325 (use code 147) www.cshealthcare.co.uk GRAYBROOK INSURANCE BROKERS Professional indemnity and public liability cover 01245 321 185 Email: enquiry@graybrook.co.uk www.graybrook.co.uk/naht-members MBNA Credit card services 0800 028 2440 www.mbna.co.uk SKIPTON FINANCIAL SERVICES Financial planning 0800 012 1248 Email: sfsnaht@skipton.co.uk www.skiptonfs-naht.co.uk

LEADERSHIP FOCUS l MARCH/APRIL 2015

14 Partners.indd 14

26/02/2015 14:13


NEWS FOCUS

LEGAL UPDATE

Politics in schools: how to achieve balance With an election campaign under way, it is timely to remind ourselves of the law concerning politics in schools, writes NAHT senior solicitor Simon Thomas. The 1996 Education Act deals with political indoctrination and the duty to secure balanced treatment of political issues in England and Wales. Section 406 requires local authorities, governing bodies and head teachers to forbid junior pupils (under 12) from pursuing partisan political activities at the school and also the promotion of partisan political views in the teaching of any subject. The same provisions apply to any offpremises activities arranged by the school. Similarly, section 407 requires steps to be taken to ensure where political issues are brought to the attention of pupils (not just those under 12) they offer a balanced presentation of opposing views. Sections 406 and 407 do not apply to academies but the DfE’s Mainstream academy and free school: single funding agreement (December 2014) says an academy trust must: • prevent political indoctrination and secure the balanced treatment of political issues, in line with the requirements for maintained schools set out in the Education Act 1996 and have regard to any guidance; • ensure the academy actively promotes the fundamental British values of democracy, the rule of law, individual liberty, and mutual respect and tolerance of those with different faiths and beliefs; and • ensure the academy promotes principles that support equality of opportunity for all. An inconvenient film? The interpretation of sections 406 and 407 came before the High Court in 2007 in the case of Dimmock v Secretary of State for Education and Skills. The case concerned the distribution by the secretary of state to every secondary school in the UK of US politician Al Gore’s film on climate change, An inconvenient truth. It was not disputed that the film was ‘political’ (which is not restricted to party political) and that it did contain views about public policy and responses to climate change.

PHOTOGRAPH: PLAINPICTURE

15 Law.indd 15

In a DfES news release, then secretary of state Alan Johnson wrote: “I am delighted that every secondary school has a copy to stimulate children into discussing climate change and global warming in school classes” and “Influencing the opinions of children is crucial to developing a long term view on the environment among the public.” Literature sent with film included reference to guidance for schools on the DfES website that mentioned the climate change sceptic view. Stuart Dimmock, a parent and school governor, brought a judicial review application to declare the actions of the secretary of state unlawful and contrary to sections 406 and/or 407. The dispute focused on the meaning of “promotion of partisan political views” and “offer a balanced presentation of opposing views”. The judge found that: • Showing a film that is ‘partisan’ or one-sided is not necessarily ‘promoting its view’ (any more than showing a Nazi or Leninist/Stalinist propaganda film would be promoting a partisan political view); • The guidance notes were relevant to whether section 407 had been complied with. Merely referring to the guidance on the website was not sufficient. The question was whether, when viewed with the guidance, the purpose was to stimulate children into discussing climate change (ok), or influencing the opinions of children (not ok); • ‘Balanced’ means ‘fair and dispassionate’ and does not require ‘equal presentation’ or giving equal air time to opposing views; and • With amended guidance that was less enthusiastically supportive of the film than the news releases, and that drew more attention to ‘errors’ in the film and that pointed out that the film promoted certain views that were not universally accepted, there was no breach of section 407. If you need professional advice, call 0300 30 30 333

MARCH/APRIL 2015 l LEADERSHIP FOCUS

15

26/02/2015 14:13


BEST OF THE

BLOGS Government’s sex position gets ‘hammering’ Susan Young It’s difficult to understand why the Select Committee on Education is having to battle so hard in its latest report to urge that PSHE, including sex and relationships education (SRE), is put on a statutory footing, writes education journalist Susan Young. Most of the witnesses appearing before the committee argued for this, with the exception of the DfE and groupings such as the Society for the Protection of the Unborn Child. The government’s position comes in for a hammering. The introduction says, crisply: “PSHE requires improvement in 40 per cent of schools. The situation appears to have worsened over time, and young people consistently complain that the SRE they receive is

Let’s have full disclosure over exam cheats Warwick Mansell Journalist Warwick Mansell asks: Is the regulation of England’s education system strong enough to cope with the seemingly ever-rising pressures on schools to raise pupils’ results? One field of school policy where the answer is ‘no’ is the area of institutional exams malpractice: cheating by schools. The number of cases of schools and colleges being found guilty of institutional exams malpractice has risen sharply in recent years, yet… • the names of schools and colleges investigated by the boards for exams malpractice are rarely published; • the names of such institutions found guilty of cheating are rarely published, no matter how serious the case; • particularly staggeringly, even school or college insiders who go to the authorities to raise concerns, thus

16

inadequate. This situation would not be tolerated in other subjects, and yet the government’s strategy for improving PSHE is weak.” Equally depressing evidence came from the Ofsted lead on PSHE, Janet Palmer, who told of a primary school not providing SRE “because their chair of governors was an elderly priest and they could not possibly discuss it with him,” putting the sensibilities of powerful adults ahead of the welfare and wellbeing of children. She also disagreed with some witnesses concerned about what they considered to be inappropriate teaching materials, saying: “What we did find in many schools were materials that were too little too late… we did not come across anything that we would say was too explicit for children who were too young.” www.naht.org.uk/welcome/newsand-media/blogs/susan-young

triggering investigations with often potentially worrying implications for their own careers, are not told the outcomes of their whistleblowing; • Ofqual, which was set up to oversee the exams system as a whole, does not routinely look into individual cases of alleged malpractice, leaving it to the boards to investigate, in a system where boards compete for custom from schools and colleges; • some of the penalties handed out by the boards seem very lenient given the seriousness of the evidence and the stakes of rising or falling results for schools; and • teachers found guilty by an exam board investigation – and penalised by the board – can move school without the information being kept on their records unless the school, which may itself have been guilty of malpractice, chooses to pass it on to the authorities. It’s time for full disclosure. www.naht.org.uk/welcome/newsand-media/blogs/warwick-mansell

VIEWS IN EDUCATION • SELECT COMMITTEE’S BATTLE OVER PHSE • SEIZING THE INITIATIVE FOR SBM MEMBERS • WHY ARE EXAM CHEATS BEING COVERED UP?

Fighting the corner for school business managers Nicky Gillhespy This looks set to be a busy year, writes school business manager Nicky Gillhespy. “With an election looming, my local authority has already informed head teachers that it is unlikely to be able to carry on offering any nonstatutory services, so we have taken control and arranged a presentation on converting to academy status to find out more. I have also signed up to attend an HR and payroll workshop and a premises management training session being organised by a local school because, although we currently use outside companies for these services, I need to keep my knowledge up to date. I have a three-yearly health and safety audit to prepare for and have also been elected as an NAHT branch secretary, which is pretty exciting. Back in November, at the NASBM annual conference, a joint membership offer for members of NAHT and NASBM was announced. I am looking forward to working with NASBM in its work on developing a professional framework and set of qualifications for SBMs, along with the other NAHT SBM committee members. I am also very happy that NAHT has now produced its pay principles for SBMs (see page 20) and hope the lobbying of political parties and government will eventually pay off. It’s about time SBMs were remunerated appropriately for their role in school and I will continue to push on this issue whenever and wherever I can. Finally I would like thank all SBM members for their continued support and let you know that I have been reelected as your representative on the NAHT National Executive until 2018. I promise to keep fighting SBMs’ corner! www.naht.org.uk/welcome/ news-and-media/blogs/nickygillhespy-blog

LEADERSHIP FOCUS l MARCH/APRIL 2015

16 blogs.indd 16

26/02/2015 14:14


OPINION

VIEWS IN EDUCATION • RONA TUTT • RUSSELL HOBBY • BEST OF THE BLOGS

WE V I E W F R O M A P A S T P R E S I D E N T

A

s we approach the May general election, one thing is clear. Whichever RONA TUTT politicians are elected, all will say they want to improve education and raise standards. They will believe that their party is the only one able to deliver this. But whoever is in government, they will be wrong, because every party starts from the same false premise. THE ELECTION OFFERS A CHANCE Their desire to improve the educational experience of every learner TO TACKLE EDUCATION IN A RADICAL is not in question and, indeed, school WAY – WITH THE PROFESSION leaders would agree that they share this vision. However effective a school, them to four, politicians have created a system where endless there is always room for improvement. What is wrong is the paperwork is seen as being of greater value than having time to belief that a political party has the solution. So, for what it is teach children. If the profession had been involved, the original worth, here is my three point plan for the secretary of state for national curriculum, which fitted into an assortment of coloureducation in post after the election. coded ringbinders but did not fit into the hours of the school day, would never have been invented. Mr Gove said levels had to go 1: Replace unfairness with fairness because parents found them too hard to understand, yet in their It is not fair to judge schools on a combination of dubious data place are performance descriptors and a scaled score that only and the wisdom of Wilshaw. A tape measure may be able to give parents who are statisticians may be able to understand. an accurate account of a person’s vital statistics but performance tables cannot accurately reflect the unique combination of 3: Replace arrogance with humility circumstances of schools in terms of their pupils, the families I apologise for using the word arrogance but I cannot think of from which they come and the community in which they are another word that adequately reflects the way the profession situated. Data is there to raise queries, not to answer them, and, has been treated by successive secretaries of state. The scandal in any case, columns of statistics can only give a partial picture of of an overwhelming and unnecessary workload caused by standards in a particular school. Study the league tables and you constant ill-considered change and the waste of money this has will discover a pattern. When results appear to be improving, it involved has been the direct result of the failure to involve is attributed to grade inflation. When standards appear to be teachers and to respect their professionalism. going down headlines in the press scream that schools are in You have a chance to be different, to recognise that school decline. There is a very simple answer to this; abandon the idea leaders and those they lead know most about how to improve that dubious data is a fair way to judge schools and give groups schools. By working with the profession, you could make a real of schools the responsibility for improving each other, as is being difference to standards in schools and to the educational successfully achieved in some areas now. experiences of young learners. So why not give it a try? 2: Replace complexity with common sense Successive governments have come up with ideas about what pupils should be taught, how the curriculum should be assessed Rona Tutt is a retired head and schools held to account. From the multitude of items that teacher and a had to be recorded on the original early years foundation stage past president of NAHT profile to the 27 judgements that Ofsted used before reducing

VIEWPOINT •

LET’S CHANGE THE RECORD

MARCH/APRIL 2015 l LEADERSHIP FOCUS

17 Rona col.indd 17

17

26/02/2015 14:15


NFER Reception Baseline Assessment DfE Approved Supplier Order by 30th April for use in September 2015 The practical, child-friendly baseline activity assessment What does the assessment cover? Mathematics - achievements such as counting, number recognition, addition and shape recognition are assessed through child-friendly one-to-one activities using physical resources. Literacy - one-to-one tasks assess early literacy skills, such as letter recognition, story sequencing, and writing their own name. Communication and Language - practitioner records overall judgements based on observations of individual pupil’s achievements for example, listening with attention, recounting events that have happened to them or following instructions. Foundations of learning (optional) - observational checklist that provides a fully rounded picture of each child, including key aspects of physical development, personal, social and emotional development and characteristics of effective learning.

ed cont act “We ll-org anise d and simp le to use. Children enjoy proc ess.” with teacher – not at all worr ied by asse ssme nt

What schools think

We gained feedback from over 500 schools during our trialling process

• 85% of teachers said that the assessment approach ensured most children completed tasks that were appropriate to their level of development.

LFO.03.15.018.indd 18

• 80% of teachers said most children were able to demonstrate the skills and knowledge they bring to school. • 92% of teachers rated the child-friendly physical resources as very important.

• 79% of teachers rated the optional Foundations of Learning module as very important.

Key benefits • Practical, child-friendly and with physical resources. • The assessment is in the hands of the teacher who knows the child best. • Mixture of tasks and observation checklists to assess communication, language, literacy and numeracy. • Optional module gives a holistic picture of the child. • Ability to record key judgements about each child’s development and attainment. • Online administration instructions (paper documents are also available). • Mapped to Early Years Outcomes. • Standardised with a nationally representative sample of approximately 3000 children in over 500 schools.

“Ac curate, evidenc e-ba sed judgeme nts are give n. Time spe nt talk ing to and wor king wit h indi vidu al children give s a mas s of info rmation and stre ngt hen s relation ship s.”

Visit www.nfer.ac.uk/ba2 to find out more

20/02/2015 09:49


OPINION

EE “We have our own manifesto and our vision of what an effective education system should look like”

P

olitics and education mix badly. Indeed, the resulting solution is often highly RUSSELL HOBBY toxic. Unfortunately, the coming general election has only brought the two closer. For example, we were treated to ‘education week’ in the campaign recently, which involved a variety of threats and punishments, matched by a studious refusal to examine any actual evidence about what works. THE ELECTION IS AN OPPORTUNITY Yet it is important to remember that TO FIND OUT HOW POLITICIANS these campaigns produce more heat WILL SUPPORT NAHT’S IDEALS than light and so, to get behind the headlines, we’ve asked the various with neglect of the resources, support and infrastructure political parties to answer some detailed questions on their that schools need to thrive. We can prevent interference policies. You can read their responses on page 28. They include and counteract neglect by taking ownership of standards a warm endorsement of NAHT’s effectiveness from the current and responsibility for each other. When parents see school secretary of state – although I’m not sure whether that would leaders expressing their vision and ambition for education it hurt or harm us if we put it on our recruitment materials. will crowd out the room for politics and, by looking out for We also asked the politicians which of NAHT’s ideas each other, we can build our own infrastructure of school to and policies they would support. This marks an interesting school support. position for us. We have our own manifesto, Owning what is ours, and we have our own vision of what an effective Taking back ownership education system should look like. It has been pleasing to see how many of our ideas are already We are therefore not solely interested in what politicians working their way into the debate, from investment in early want to do to us, but how they will help us work towards years to fairer admissions to better inspection. We have also our own ideals. We are a union of leaders and we have begun work on many projects of our own (see page 34). more freedom than we realise. We do not need to wait for Our NAHT Aspire project has reached an important permission, but can get on with building the education system milestone, with more than half the schools inspected since we want to see. it began receiving a ‘good’ inspection rating. Our alternative It may be that no single party achieves overall power in May to Ofsted, Instead, is being piloted in the Midlands and is and we might not be subject to the same driving ideological demonstrating that peer review can be a viable alternative approach we have experienced over the past few years. The to the current adversarial inspection regime. We also had temptation could be to heave a sigh of relief and get back on hundreds of middle leaders sign up to the new NAHT Edge with the job. But that would be a mistake. Even if we have a section of the association when it was launched, helping to period of calm, politics will intrude again eventually. Our goal fulfil our duty to the next generation of leaders in education. should be to build a bulwark of professional leadership that We really can use the opportunities ahead of us to take back can stand against political interference should it ever return. ownership of what is ours. There are two parts to our strategy to achieve this. We need to take back ownership of standards and we need to take responsibility for each other. The past years have been Russell Hobby a paradoxical combination of interference and neglect – is NAHT general secretary interference in the detail of classroom practice combined

VIEWPOINT •

VISION AND AMBITION

MARCH/APRIL 2015 l LEADERSHIP FOCUS

19 Russell column.indd 19

19

27/02/2015 08:14


BUSINESS MANAGERS

How NAHT is redressing the balance for school business managers, by Valentine Mulholland

NAHT principles for SBM pay NAHT HAS A GROWING SCHOOL BUSINESS MANAGER (SBM) membership, whose biggest concern relates to inconsistency in how much they are paid. There is significant variation in how pay levels are set across the country, even for posts of equal responsibility, because SBM pay falls outside the school teachers’ pay and conditions document (STPCD) and is set at a local level by the employer, such as the local authority. NAHT has therefore seized the initiative (see also feature, page 34) and created its own framework, which can work with the STPCD leadership pay structure and appropriately reflect the range of SBM leadership roles and responsibilities. This was published on 15 January. While many schools will still not have the freedom to determine SBM pay, the framework sets out NAHT’s position and the association will use these principles to

20

lobby government to allow this to happen. General secretary Russell Hobby has already written to the secretary of state for education, Nicky Morgan, asking her to give maintained schools the option to pay SBMs on the leadership pay spine. NAHT is also approaching the Labour and Liberal Democrat education spokespeople.

SBM pay principles NAHT represents those SBMs who operate as school leaders, working alongside the head teacher and the rest of the leadership team to deliver high levels of achievement for their school or academy. Their specific responsibility on the leadership team is to ensure that their school or academy’s services are effective, efficient and in line with probity and all requirements of good governance. Their role on the leadership team is critical and

LEADERSHIP FOCUS l MARCH/APRIL 2015

20-22 SBMs.indd 20

26/02/2015 16:44


72 per cent did not feel that their salary was an accurate reflection of their responsibilities. Where SBMs are performing leadership roles, then it should be possible to pay them on an equivalent pay scale to assistant and deputy head roles as they, in effect, deputise for the school management parts of the head teacher’s role. The determination of whether an SBM is operating as a school leader is that they are: • formally included in the school’s senior leadership team; • perform at a level of competence of ‘SBM’ or above in the National College competency framework for SBMs; and • have a minimum of a level five qualification such as a relevant diploma in school business management or other level five qualification in a relevant discipline.

Competency levels

allows others on the leadership team to focus on teaching and learning. This allows schools to raise standards as well as contributing to the retention of excellent head teachers, deputy and assistant heads. However, there is clearly an anomaly in how this leadership role is rewarded, because SBMs cannot be paid under the STPCD. In maintained schools, attempts to evaluate SBM pay under single status local authority frameworks have failed to recognise the real nature of the role and have instead created parity with local authority administrative roles with lower levels of accountability and responsibility. While some academies have been able to use their freedom to attract and retain the best professionals for the role, others have felt it necessary to adopt the local authority approaches. The SBM role is evolving quickly, both in response to the pace of change in schools and as head teachers recognise the extent to which an SBM can take on many of the responsibilities that they have carried historically. It is also a dynamic process: as SBMs have grown in their roles, so head teachers have trusted and relied on them to take on more of the leadership of school business management issues. However, this evolution will be stifled unless there is a change in setting the pay of SBMs to reflect their full range of responsibilities. In a recent survey of NAHT’s SBM members,

ILLUSTRATION: TINA ZELLMER

20-22 SBMs.indd 21

The determination of whether their salary should be at the level of an assistant or deputy head would be down to the governing body and employer to consider based on the level of accountability and responsibility in the role but generally, an SBM performing at the National College competency level for a ‘school business leader’ should be remunerated at the same level as a deputy head in a school. The core accountabilities of the role are normally in: • Financial management and control • Strategic budget setting and forecasting • Administrative management for the school • Procurement and contract management • Premises and estate management • Health and safety • HR management The employer would also need to consider any additional accountability and contextual factors that add to the complexity of a particular role. This includes the following areas, although this list is not exhaustive: • The complexity of managing more than one school, for example, having different premises, different health and safety plans or several catering services; • Managing geographically split sites; • A role in leading a teaching school alliance; • Running one or more children’s centres in addition to the school, with their own financial implications and programme of work; • Specialist units within the school, for example, a speech and language unit or a unit for children with autism; and • A role in system leadership supporting, mentoring and/ or training SBMs in other schools to develop and perform effectively, or in developing work across a number of schools. Valentine Mulholland is a policy adviser at NAHT bit.ly/Prof_dev_courses

MARCH/APRIL 2015 l LEADERSHIP FOCUS

21

27/02/2015 08:15


BUSINESS MANAGERS

Budget setting tips Many heads already rely on their SBMs to lead the budget-setting process in their schools. So here, just in time for your planning process, are some tips from NAHT’s own expert school business management committee members to help their senior leadership team colleagues prepare WE Ensure your budget

WE Factor in your high needs and pupil premium funding based on your previous year’s census data.

pay progression in your staffing budgets alongside cost of living increases, and estimate what the support staff increases might be. Many schools were caught out last year by the 2.2 per cent increase agreed by local government.

WE Don’t forget you now

WE Remember that support

need to report on your website how you are spending your PE and sports premium funding.

staff only go up their pay scale once they have been in post for at least six months.

reflects the priorities identified in your school development plan.

WE View your staffing as a resource and evaluate the needs of the school on an annual basis.

WE Remember to plan for any predicted change in staffing. There is a choice of education specialist software packages that can make salary and pension budgeting easier by linking your management information system data, the government’s STPCD, local government pay scales and pension contributions, then automatically reflecting your staffing details. This is useful for support staff whose salary arrangements are usually far more complex and varied.

WE Ensure that you build in a budget for supply staff or absence cover insurance. Each year school forums decide whether to delegate funds for planned absences – including maternity and union facilities time – to schools, or back to the local

authority. Ensure your school will be reimbursed for such absences and staff taking part in trade union activities.

WE Remember to set a budget for staff training.

WE Remember that from September 2015, the employer’s contribution rate to the teacher’s pension scheme is increasing from 14.1 per cent to 16.48 per cent. The employers’ national insurance contribution will increase by 3.4 per cent when the public sector rebate is removed in April 2016.

reduction in the educational support grant from £140

20-22 SBMs.indd 22

WE In voluntary aided schools remember to factor in the cost of any VAT for any capital projects.

WE Ensure you are clear about what licences are delegated to schools and those that local authorities or academy chains will cover, for example for copyright or music licences.

WE Finally, when your budget is prepared, compare this year’s against previous year actuals as a sense check and ensure you can validate any large movements.

for performance related

LEADERSHIP FOCUS l MARCH/APRIL 2015

WE Review your service level agreements (SLAs) regularly and don’t shy away from renegotiations or asking for free or additional facilities within your existing SLA. Build in an allowance for new contracts that will need to be negotiated in the period and may increase, such as utilities.

WE Schools will see a

WE Remember to allow

22

to £87 per pupil, with an element of tapered protection, but not for long. Even if the changes do not affect the current year you are budgeting for, you need to understand their implications to have enough time to plan for them. Note that the grant is received directly by academies but goes to the local authority for maintained schools. Within the £140 was also an academy top up because they do not enjoy the same economies of scale as local authorities.

ILLUSTRATION: ALAMY

27/02/2015 08:15


A time-saving solution to keep all your school policies up to date Why spend hours of your valuable time struggling to keep your school policies up to date when there is a better way? Policies for Schools can help make your task of school policy writing more manageable. A year’s subscription costs just £225 and will provide you with:

t 300+ model school policies covering 20 different categories and if we do not have the policy you are looking for, just ask and we will write it for you and include it in your subscription.

t policies that are thoroughly researched, clear, concise and consistent and are

regularly updated which means you keep up to date with any national legislative changes.

t policies that are very easy to customise for your own school setting. t 24/7 access, all you need is an internet connection to log into your account to download the policies.

To subscribe to Policies for Schools go to www.policiesforschools.co.uk Teachers Resource Centre Ltd Telephone: 01600 891506 Website: www.policiesforschools.co.uk Email: sales@policiesforschools.co.uk

iTRACK Primary Tracking pupil progress

Track Pupil Progress and Attainment through Early Years to KS1 and KS2

Tracks Progress Without Levels

• Powerful, robust online tracking tool provides critical data required by Ofsted.

• Track vulnerable groups such as SEN, FSM, Pupil Premium and monitor interventions for closing the gap analysis.

• Tracks advanced and deep learning to show 'Mastery' status.

• Flexibility to track against National Curriculum or customise to your school programme of study.

• Fast, simple set-up, easy and intuitive to use.

www.itrackprimary.co.uk

Book a demo to learn more about using iTRACK Primary 01926 468687 support@itrackprimary.co.uk iTRACK Primary is a Data Management Service from

LFO.03.15.023.indd 23

LCP

20/02/2015 09:55


NATIONAL GOVERNORS’ ASSOCIATION WE Eight elements of

effective governance 1. The right people around the table 2. Understanding the role and responsibilities 3. Good chairing 4. Professional clerking 5. Good relationship based on trust

The future of governance

6. Knowledge of the school – data, staff, parents, children, community and the quality of teaching 7. Committed to asking tough questions 8. Confidence to have courageous conversations in the interests of the children and young people

legally they have different lines of accountability, but the principles are the same. They have three core functions: • Setting vision, ethos and strategic direction; • To challenge, strengthening school leaders, holding them to account for teaching, achievement, behaviour and safety; • Ensuring finances are managed well leading to probity, solvency and effective use of resources. It is the first of these that governing boards are generally less confident about, so, with the Wellcome Trust, the NGA has developed Framework for governance, a short, sharp, flexible guide to strategic planning. Schools will have development or improvement plans but most are managerial plans with actions for staff, rather than a school strategy with a small number of priorities. Any discussion about school strategy needs to start with the vision – the sentences that describe where you want the school to be in three or five years. The school’s relationship with other schools must be considered. Collaboration between schools is here to stay but formal federation should also be given an airing. Maintained schools have been slow to federate despite the benefits for pupils documented by the NGA in our research paper The road to federation, and also by Ofsted and the National College. Federating means one governing body has responsibility for up to five or six schools. Far more important than the improved governance that follows, the offer for pupils improves, with staff sharing expertise across the schools. If you haven’t yet developed your school’s strategy, I would advise you to draw on the NGA’s resources and set aside time to do that with senior leaders and governors and prepare for whatever is around the corner. Organisations with strong governance don’t fail.

Use NGA resources to set your school strategy, advises Emma Knights WHICHEVER GOVERNMENT IS IN POWER AFTER THE election, I am sure it will encourage schools to lead their own improvement. This requires schools to work together, sharing expertise and resources. When we talk about resources in schools, by and large we mean people. It is individuals who make the difference to the lives of our pupils, whether by working in the classroom or in another role in the school. It is the role of governing boards to ensure that school staff work within a culture and a structure that not just supports but also enhances their ability to do their job. Governing boards need to ensure continuing professional development (CPD) is at the heart of staff management, not an add-on when someone is struggling. Is there at least one objective within the appraisal process for each member of staff that relates to their development? Is there an adequate budget for CPD, involving time as well as money? Are there ways besides courses to share experience and good practice? And do we know which CPD makes a difference? Governing boards are the guardians of the public purse as well as the education of children in their community, yet the accountability regime within schools has often come to be feared and resented as adding bureaucracy to an already overstretched profession. We need to make it work in the way it was intended – as a safeguard. We need to try to capture what we value, not just what the current performance tables can measure, as part of our school strategy discussions. I’m using ‘governing board’ to cover both the governing bodies of maintained schools and academy boards of trustees;

24

LEADERSHIP FOCUS l MARCH/APRIL 2015

24 Governance.indd 24

Emma Knights is chief executive of the NGA

PHOTOGRAPH: ISTOCK

26/02/2015 16:50


ADVERTISEMENT FEATURE

Show My Homework Product Review Name: Tom Payne @BGSPayne Blog: mrtmpayne.wordpress.com Occupation: Maths Teacher at Borden Grammar School in Kent & Educational Technology Consultant About: Technology Lover, MEng from Oxford & soon to be wed! When my school announced Show My Homework (SMHW), I was quite excited. When we received training, I was even more so. After using it for a year, I couldn’t live without it. Then I started at a new school, and I am coming to terms with using a physical homework planner again, but I took the chance to review some beta features for SMHW. Overnight, my Twitter followers doubled and I had global blog views, implying as I had already guessed, that SMHW has its finger on the pulse right now. So let’s get started: 1. Announcements: I don’t know of many other products that are as easy to use or affordable as SMHW wherein you can send push notifications to pupils’ phones about a test tomorrow or new homework. My pupils spend an inordinate amount of time on their phones; and as little as possible in their homework planners. If I can send a SMHW notification to their phone alongside Fruit Ninja, are we not engaging pupils more on their own terms? I think so, and I think it’s a good thing.

range of numbers to consider, number of questions and how long a pupil gets for each question. The pupil can practise first to improve, before the results are logged in the SMHW Gradebook already marked for me. As a Maths teacher, this is priceless and I can’t wait to set this up with lower years. 3. Spelling Tests (new) For English or MFL teachers, stand by. SMHW has a similar feature for spellings using text-to-speech technology and automatic grading. Combine these together and you start to see how SMHW is more than just homework software. And they haven’t stopped there; the ‘Set Quiz’ function is equally easy: You can reuse these year on year, or find quizzes shared by teachers from other schools in the Resources Store section. 4. The best and the basic These great new functions (I haven’t touched on Gradebook and Reports) are building on their existing platform, which I would like to end this review on. Because despite all the new features, the bit I like the most, is just how good the basics of SMHW are.

2. Numeracy Quiz (beta): You set a homework, add resources of all types, can easily (yes, This really tells you what a smart company SMHW is; they are easily!) differentiate it, reuse it, use homework set by colleagues not sitting idly, but building on an already very strong product in your department, it appears on both according to customers and current trends in pupils’ and parents’ phones (finally putting education. When my school announced SMHW, the ball back in the court of parents) and At the time of writing, the government stated that all primary school pupils must leave knowing their times tables. This is exactly where the Numeracy Quiz could help. As a teacher, I pick the functions (addition, subtraction, multiplication & division), the

I was quite excited. When we received training, I was even more so. After using it for a year, I couldn’t live without it.

notifies them if homework is overdue or late, as well as class events.

It is without a doubt the market leader in homework because it is simple, yet essential and now with a tonne of fabulous features. So don’t just sit there, start nagging your SLT and make them make the call. Pricing is very competitive and on a per pupil basis, for more info contact: help@showmyhomework.co.uk www.showmyhomework.co.uk +44 (0)207 197 9550 MARCH/APRIL 2015 l LEADERSHIP FOCUS

Teacher Centric Adv.indd 25

25

20/02/2015 09:58


HOLOCAUST EDUCATION

Lest we forget Holocaust education has been the subject of a government education committee recently, chaired by head teacher Dame Helen Hyde

A visitor at the Yad Vashem museum, Israel’s official memorial to the victims of the Holocaust

GIVEN THE UNCERTAIN TIMES IN WHICH WE LIVE, Holocaust Memorial Day took on a greater significance this year. The national day of commemoration, held on 27 January, is dedicated to the remembrance of those who suffered in the holocaust under Nazi persecution – and in subsequent genocides in Cambodia, Rwanda, Bosnia and Darfur. It was first held in 2001, the date marking the anniversary of the 1945 liberation of Auschwitz concentration camp. This year’s remembrance was particularly significant for NAHT member Dame Helen Hyde, head The centre at Laxton is a fantastic resource for schools, writes Sally Bates, teacher at Watford Grammar School head teacher at Nottingham’s Wadsworth Fields Primary School for Girls, because she has been chairing a government education Holocaust education is essential to ensure we continue to learn the committee seeking the public’s lessons of how easily a society can be manipulated so it cannot happen again. views on the future of holocaust The message from holocaust survivors at Laxton is that genocides continue education and commemoration. and we need to develop global understanding and tolerance to combat it. Dame Helen tells Leadership Focus Children in key stage two have the capacity to understand these issues. why it matters so much. They can also empathise with the survivors who are alive to re-tell their

WE The National Holocaust Centre

experiences. A school visit is an opportunity to reflect on what sort of citizen they want to be, what sort of society they would like to create and how to be critical of governments that persecute individuals and groups. Some parents were anxious about the visit but all were supportive. Some of the staff were moved to tears by the experience and the children appreciated why this should be. So many young people see death and suffering through TV programmes, computer games and internet images. This was real – and people affected were physically present. There is a calendar of speakers at Laxton but the opportunity to listen to survivors will not be available for much longer. My abiding memory is listening to someone who described arriving at Auschwitz to be met by Josef Mengele. www.holocaustcentre.net

26

01623 836 627

Why is holocaust education important, to you personally and for young people today? Members of my family died in the gas chambers at Sobibor and I have been involved in holocaust education for many years. Future generations need the historical knowledge – it is an event that happened on their doorstep, within their grandparents’ lifetime and they need to learn how racism, prejudice and stereotypes occur

LEADERSHIP FOCUS l MARCH/APRIL 2015

26-27 Holocaust.indd 26

26/02/2015 14:17


W• NAHT support for

rights respecting schools An initiative that links well with holocaust education is the Unicef UK Rights Respecting Schools Award (RRSA). It seeks to put the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child at the heart of a school’s ethos and culture. It is based on principles of equality, dignity, respect, non-discrimination and participation. Unicef says: “We work with primary schools, secondary schools, schools for children with SEND and pupil referral units to promote a child-rights based approach and to share good practice in improving outcomes for children and young people.” NAHT gives RRSA its full backing because there is clear evidence it makes a positive difference. A 2014 survey from more than 300 rights respecting schools head teachers shows the following: • 99 per cent believe it has a positive impact on relationships and behaviour • 99 per cent believe it contributes to children and young people being more engaged in their learning and what happens if people don’t counteract that from day one. In other words, it’s to stop students from being bystanders and turning them into thinking, caring citizens.

• 98 per cent believe it has an impact on children’s and young people’s positive attitudes to diversity and overcoming prejudices • 96 per cent believe that working on RRSA improves children’s and young people’s respect for themselves and others • 75 per cent believe it has a positive impact on reducing exclusions and bullying

Is enough time devoted to the holocaust in schools? www.unicef.org.uk/rrsa It really varies. Research shows that teachers are keen to teach it but there is very little time in the What advice would you give other school leaders? curriculum and, while it is compulsory, some For me the value is embedded in the school ethos and a focus schools will give it an hour while others do it in much more on tolerance, understanding and mutual respect. My hope depth. The time pressures from the curriculum are huge but it would be that every head sees the absolute importance of this, must remain compulsory. no matter what the ethnic makeup of their school is. All the research indicates that students really want to learn about this, How much time does your school devote to it? but they need time to learn about it. I should also point out that We do it in units so, for example, we start with basic prejudice there are some wonderful websites around, such as those – stereotyping, your own prejudices and the development of created by the Imperial War Museum and the Holocaust prejudice – in year nine. We spend a substantial amount of Educational Trust (see links, below) – look out for the latter’s time looking at that and it moves slowly into the holocaust. 70 Voices app – and the centre in Laxton (see panel, left). They look very carefully at life before the holocaust and then they spend time looking at Holland and Anne Frank. We look Finally, what’s the latest on the government at bystanders, collaborators, perpetrators, rescuers and committee on holocaust education? resistance. In the holidays, we take a group to Amsterdam, The consultation has now ended, but we had more than 2,000 where the girls hear from a Dutch survivor. submissions. I was privileged enough to run the education In year 10, the history department teaches the historical context and timeline, while the moral issues are studied further group, which included two expert historians in this area, Simon in religious studies. Later, we take groups to Auschwitz and look Sebag Montefiore and David Cesarani. We looked at all sorts of possibilities regarding curriculum and training. We delivered at the other victims, such as Poles, homosexuals and people with our findings to the Prime Minister on 27 January and I’m disabilities. We also have a programme called ‘Linking the dots’ pleased to report he has accepted all the recommendations where we look at other genocides, such as in Rwanda. made by the commission. When the girls reach sixth form, I run a holocaust conference with university academics and workshops. We also invite more www.iwm.org.uk/history/the-holocaust than 20 survivors who talk to the students in small groups. www.het.org.uk

PHOTOGRAPH: GETTY

26-27 Holocaust.indd 27

MARCH/APRIL 2015 l LEADERSHIP FOCUS 27

26/02/2015 14:17


Election special As the country prepares to go to the polls on 7 May, we ask what the main political parties have in store for the education sector 28

LEADERSHIP FOCUS l MARCH/APRIL 2015

28-33 manifestos.indd 28

27/02/2015 08:16


GENERAL ELECTION WE The big questions We feature the Conservatives, Labour, Liberal Democrats, UKIP and Green Party (in order of seats at parliament) and their answers to the questions below. Their education spokespeople were all keen to respond, a sure sign that school leaders’ votes are keenly sought by all parties. 1. What outcomes for children and young people do your IF SCHOOLS COULD VOTE AS SINGLE education policies aim to deliver? entities, what would they vote for? Smarter buildings? Better facilities? Bigger salaries 2. What priorities for education would you have for the first and greater recognition for staff ? Evidence six months in office? based teaching practices? Fairer assessment and inspection systems? The tick would probably go into the box that says: ‘All of 3. What nature of relationship with head teachers and NAHT the above’. would you foresee? How would you engage and win over head Yet everyone knows that money is tight and teachers? times are tough and no one wants to draw blood from equally worthy causes in the scrap 4. Which proposals in NAHT’s manifesto do you think could have over limited funds. We all have to prioritise most traction? and sometimes those priorities are hard to rank. How can children learn and be welltaught in a run down or unsafe environment? But, equally, how can children learn if they are not taught by the best and how can you attract the best if you don’t address pay and conditions for staff ? What resources should we invest Nicky Morgan, secretary of state for education in researching what we actually teach our children and in how we measure each school’s ability to teach it? That’s before we even start addressing how we tackle inequities of background and social deprivation. What we do know for sure is that school leaders are among the most trusted professionals in the UK, ranking way above politicians on the public’s ‘integrityometer’. After all, the public knows the economy can’t thrive without an accomplished workforce; that life would be poorer without the contribution of artists and sports people so often nurtured by great teachers; and that parents couldn’t sleep at night if they thought their children’s futures were not in safe hands. Given the massive responsibility that is placed on the shoulders of the profession by the public, the political classes ignore the opinions of school leaders at their peril. The welfare of teachers can’t be disentangled from the interests of their pupils – teachers know it and the public knows it – which is why politicians need to think seriously before dismissing the views of a profession widely perceived as the champion of children. So, let’s take a look at what the main parties are offering and, importantly, what NAHT is doing to proactively seize the agenda for the profession (see also page 34). Because when we stand up for ourselves, we give a voice to the whole school community as a single entity. That’s what the public trusts us to do and that’s what NAHT – for leaders and for learners – will do, regardless of who runs the next or any future government.

IMAGE: GETTY

28-33 manifestos.indd 29

1. What outcomes for children and young people do your education policies aim to deliver? Our approach is driven by a determination to ensure that every young person leaves school prepared for life in modern Britain, whether they choose to go on to work, training or further study. This starts in primary school. That’s why we’ve put so much focus on things like the phonics check, which has helped more than 100,000 six year olds become confident readers in this parliament. We have now set an ambitious target to be one of the top five performing countries worldwide for English and maths by the end of the next parliament. We make no apology for focusing on the basics but we also want every young person to gain the skills and values they need to be able to succeed in life. One of my priorities has been to talk about the importance of teaching the character, resilience and grit necessary to help young people face up to the challenges of life. Much as I want a child to be able to solve a quadratic equation, I also want them to be able to apply for a job, perform in an interview and bounce back when things don’t go so well. 2. What priorities for education would you have for the first six months in office? We have set out five priorities: • a good primary school place for every child with zero tolerance for failure E • turning every failing and coasting secondary school into

MARCH/APRIL 2015 l LEADERSHIP FOCUS

29

26/02/2015 16:53


GENERAL ELECTION

W an academy and delivering free schools for parents and communities that want them • supporting teachers to make Britain the best country in the world for developing maths, science and computing skills • creating three million new apprenticeships and ensuring there is no cap on university places, so we have aspiration for all • guaranteeing a place on National Citizen Service for every teenager who wants it We are also committed to introducing a National Teachers Service, ensuring that some of the most deprived areas of the country benefit from excellent teaching. We know that there has been a lot of change in the last parliament and, while it was necessary, we also know that it has presented real challenges for members of the teaching profession. So it’s important to say that, while we will continue to push forward with our plan for education, we also know that we need to allow some time for the reforms of recent years to bed in. As our recent response to the Workload Challenge made clear, we want to work with the profession in a constructive way to keep raising standards in our schools. 3. What nature of relationship with head teachers and NAHT would you foresee? How would you engage and win over head teachers? Our announcements in recent weeks have acknowledged the critical importance of strong leadership in our schools. It is key to an effective school, so we have promised to support head teachers as much as possible and ensure they access the help they need to maintain high standards or turn around failing or coasting schools. As part of this, we have committed to doubling the number of National Leaders of Education so that every primary school that needs help from an outstanding head teacher can access the support they need. We have promised to introduce a scheme to support middle leaders too. Our philosophy is to give head teachers more responsibility and autonomy. We will continue to push power down to school leaders as we have seen the success of this approach over the past few years. NAHT will continue to play a vital role in this and I look forward to continuing to work closely with it. 4. Which proposals in NAHT’s manifesto do you think could have most traction? I welcome the core themes of the manifesto: returning the focus and the pride to teaching; refining accountability; rebuilding relationships between the profession, government and the public; and strengthening the bonds between schools. This is a constructive approach that is hugely welcome. As someone who strongly supports collaboration between schools, I am very interested to think about how collaboration can be rewarded in a constructive way. I have said before that I am also interested in exploring ideas around accountability

30

– particularly how schools can benchmark themselves against their peers. The one thing that really stands out though is the demand for a new College of Teaching. This is an idea whose time has come and I hope it will become a reality as soon as possible. www.conservatives.com

Tristram Hunt, shadow education secretary 1. What outcomes for children and young people do your education policies aim to deliver? At a very basic level a great education must equip young people with the skills they need to thrive in the economy of tomorrow. But the challenge is that due to the awesome power of technology it is becoming ever more difficult to peer into the future and know what they might be. We need to “prepare students for jobs that have not yet been created, technologies that have not yet been invented and problems that we don’t yet know will arise,” as Andreas Schleicher at the OECD puts it. Equally, we can see the same forces creating new challenges in terms of child protection, mental health issues and, through social media, a sort of turbo-charged peer pressure. Creativity, character, resilience, confidence in relationships and respect for diversity: a great education should also have a moral purpose in that it should grow rounded young citizens as well as transfer knowledge, skills and a passion for learning. We need to stress these elements and rediscover the joys of a genuinely broad and balanced curriculum alongside the academic and vocational basics. There is a ‘back to the future’ irony in that the 21st century seems to require a flavour of a classical, ancient education. But I do think this is what young people need to flourish and fulfil their potential in this most demanding of eras. 2. What priorities for education would you have for the first six months in office? A lot of our early energy will be taken up ‘bolting the wheels back on’ as it were and ensuring our education system does not fall apart. Teacher shortages, rising class sizes, uncertainty over qualification reform – we will inherit multiple acute crises that require urgent attention. We will have to move to begin our recoupling of AS and A levels almost immediately as we have made it clear to Ofqual and the DfE that our intention is to reactivate the old 2014/2015 specifications, pause, and then take a more sensible timetable for reform. However, I do fear that this message is just not cutting through to teachers and pupils. So there will be a lot of housekeeping issues like that. On the more positive side of things I think we will be able to move quickly on our plans to reform childcare and Sure Start,

LEADERSHIP FOCUS l MARCH/APRIL 2015

28-33 manifestos.indd 30

27/02/2015 08:16


as well as swiftly reinstating a requirement for all teachers to be qualified. We will also very clearly set out our long-term strategy for reforming the vocational education system. 3. What nature of relationship with head teachers and NAHT would you foresee? How would you engage and win over head teachers? If I receive a vote of ‘no confidence’ at your conference like Michael Gove did back in 2013 then something will have gone seriously wrong! Of course, we won’t agree about everything and if we did, it would be entirely unnatural. I believe in a healthy amount of contention. However, I hope teachers and school leaders will respect that a Labour administration will be coming from a very different place to the current government. We believe that you are the agents of change in terms of raising pupil achievement. Not an aggressively interventionist DfE that forces schools to change their governance status, nor a free market in terms of school places. What is more, something quite interesting is beginning to happen. It all comes back to technology because the profession is beginning to look at itself and think: “Well, actually we can change ourselves, we don’t need government.” That is music to my ears because on many issues – curriculum, accountability and teaching quality – we need to have different actors in the system looking to push sensible reforms. So we will work with the profession, both teachers and school leaders, on issues like the College of Teaching, reforming Ofsted, future curriculum and qualifications, as well as tidying up some of the mess we look likely to inherit. If we are to strike the right balance between school improvement and challenge on one hand, and the sort of frenzied, high stakes culture we have at the moment on the other, we are all going to have to work together. 4. Which proposals in NAHT’s manifesto do you think could have most traction? The College of Teaching is something we want to happen. It is going to be a challenge because it is an easy thing to get wrong – we all remember the General Teaching Council. But if I say that this has the most traction then people might worry I want to push it too far, too fast! So, I will go for early years. Labour is the party of Sure Start and we know how crucial that policy was at starting to narrow the attainment gap and we desperately want to see it restored and built back up again. No child should be left behind when they take their first steps inside a classroom and yet we know that 80 per cent of the key stage four attainment gap is present at the age of seven. NAHT is right to argue for prioritising early years and Labour is right to protect funding for it. It is the progressive thing to do and it disappoints me that the other main parties have not committed to protecting all early years funding including, crucially, the early intervention grant. www.labour.org.uk

David Laws, Liberal Democrat schools minister 1. What outcomes for children and young people do your education policies aim to deliver? The overriding priority for Liberal Democrats will continue to be to narrow the attainment gap between richer and poorer pupils so that every child has the opportunity to succeed, whatever their background. This is of course the same mission that brought so many people into teaching. Our pupil premium, taken from the front page of the last Liberal Democrat manifesto, has put £2.5bn extra cash into schools to support the children who need the most help and – in the hands of so many excellent school leaders – is starting to make a real difference. 2. What priorities for education would you have for the first six months in office? The first decision for the next government will be to decide how education should be funded over the next five years. For us, it is simple: you can’t recruit great teachers, raise standards and give more children a fair start in life without cash. So, while all parties will have to make savings in the next parliament, we will not cut the money the DfE spends on early years, schools and 16-19 education. Conservative plans for a real terms cut to the schools budget is a real threat to schools’ financial security. Liberal Democrats insisted on protecting school budgets in real terms in this parliament and will do so again in the next. 3. What nature of relationship with head teachers and NAHT would you foresee? How would you engage and win over head teachers? Head teachers are the backbone of the education system; government needs to have a professional, respectful and constructive relationship with school leaders. All politicians say that heads should have more freedom to use their professional judgement but the Liberal Democrats have a plan to make it happen. We will continue to insist that heads should decide how best to spend their pupil premium. We will create a new Educational Standards Authority to monitor school standards over time and remove the curriculum from the hands of politicians. And we will support head teachers who choose to take on struggling schools or share their expertise across the system. Some decisions will always, rightly, have to be taken by elected politicians, but our plans will reduce the extent to which politicians can meddle in what happens in the classroom. 4. Which proposals in NAHT’s manifesto do you think could have most traction? The proposal to invest properly in high quality early years

MARCH/APRIL 2015 l LEADERSHIP FOCUS

28-33 manifestos.indd 31

31

27/02/2015 08:16


GENERAL ELECTION WE NAHT manifesto

owning what is ours education is critical. It can’t be right that, in terms of their development, poorer children are falling behind their wealthier peers before they even reach the school gates. In coalition government, Liberal Democrats have secured a massive expansion of early years education to reach the poorest two year olds, as well as introducing the Early Years Pupil Premium to help disadvantaged three and four year olds. The next challenge is to ensure these measures really start turning around children’s lives, by focussing on quality, skills and status in the sector. www.libdems.org.uk

In May 2014, general secretary Russell Hobby brought NAHT’s annual conference to its feet with his commitment to a bold manifesto designed to put the profession in the driving seat of education reform. The applause signalled the assent of a proud profession ready to rise to the challenge. His message was simple: if we don’t want to be told what to do by successive governments, we need to crowd out the interference by setting our own high standards and accountability measures. Mr Hobby said: “It is time for the profession to lead – working with parents and politicians to put an end to the drama and to create change with reach and endurance. We are ambitious for our schools; we should not allow others to supplant our ambitions with their soundbites. When aspects of our education system are not working, we should be the first to admit it and the first to address them. “If we uphold the highest standards, there is no excuse for others to intervene. Our schools contain some of the most dedicated professionals and talented leaders in the country. Teachers are listened to whenever they speak honestly about the system. We will be stronger, and reform will be more effective and enduring, if we make it ourselves.

Paul Nuttall, UKIP education spokesperson 1. What outcomes for children and young people do your education policies aim to deliver? “Consequently, this is not just a set of demands or a wishlist of We want to ensure that young people, from policies to make our lives easier. This begins as a project for the whatever background, have the chance to profession. It is partly a plan for how we will make things better, succeed. We believe that the system should how we intend to deliver real lasting change that reaches every provide greater parental choice over schooling, child in every school. so that children go to the schools which best meet their needs. Geography should never be the sole criterion. We want more children from working class backgrounds (who have the academic ability to do so) to be able to access the top universities. 3. What nature of relationship with head teachers and NAHT We want a system which better meets the needs of those who would you foresee? How would you engage and win over head teachers? prefer a vocational option, and there should never be a stigma We believe that the best people to run schools are those who attached to those who don’t go to university. In that respect we can learn from Germany. have experience in that area, not career politicians. Our vision In short: a system which is better tailored to the individual is that schools learn best practice (and next practice) from each child and substantially less bureaucratic. other and there should be greater freedom for head teachers to innovate. Our policies would give more autonomy to schools 2. What priorities for education would you have for the first so engagement would be more about listening to the views of six months in office? the profession than imposing more changes. Yes, changes are A lot of time needs to be taken up laying the groundwork and needed but equally there’s a need for stability. Teachers need talking to the profession – including NAHT. In terms of areas time to adjust to a new curriculum and teach it, rather than where visible progress could be made within six months, have it constantly changing. Change where necessary but not change for change’s sake. streamlining the school inspection process to ensure that short, frequent inspections are focused more on what is going on in the classroom than on the paperwork. We would seek to provide 4. Which proposals in NAHT’s manifesto do you think could greater flexibility on admissions quickly, for example where have most traction? there is a science academy we should be giving children with There are many that appeal to us: an independent complaints an aptitude for science more opportunity to attend that school. procedure for Ofsted is overdue, capping the number of hours teachers should work during term time (though in our view, that That said, we recognise the practical implications for schools to would be a function of reducing paperwork) and giving parents implement this so we’re also realistic about the pace of change.

32

LEADERSHIP FOCUS l MARCH/APRIL 2015

28-33 manifestos.indd 32

27/02/2015 09:46


“We could certainly use help, so we invite members of all parties to support us. And we provide suggestions for how. The prize – a profession properly engaged with reform – is surely worth the effort of building a new partnership.”

too heavily on rigid exam-based assessment of pupils’ ability to regurgitate information, we aim to implement a learning environment that helps children develop critical-thinking skills to prepare them for later life.

Key themes of NAHT’s manifesto: 1. Restoring the pride in teaching 2. Refining accountability 3. Rebuilding relationships between the profession government and the public 4. Strengthening the bonds between schools Key proposals to make the above happen: 1. The establishment of a college of teaching

2. What priorities for education would you have for the first six months in office? Our priorities are to bring academies and free schools under local authority control and to replace Ofsted with a supportive and collaborative system of assessment. We would also implement Green Party MP Caroline Lucas’s bill to make PSHE a required component of education in schools, abolish the year one phonics test and Sats testing.

2. The introduction of an Office of Education Responsibility to plan and manage reform

3. What nature of relationship with head teachers and NAHT would you foresee? 3. Priority for early years in funding and status How would you engage and win over head 4. A move by school leaders to lead critical reviews of schools teachers? 5. Fairer admissions policies which fast-track pupils from lowWe are committed to involving teachers and income families school staff in the development of our education policies. The current system has focused on Read the full NAHT manifesto setting targets, forcing schools into competitive www.naht.org.uk/manifesto markets and penalising those who fall short. We believe this does the teaching profession a great disservice and are determined to put teachers and children at the heart of how our policies are developed. the opportunity to demand a place at a special school where Our approach to education is focused on enabling teachers to have greater autonomy over how and what they teach, based appropriate. The most interesting could be the proposal for the on the logic that children deserve an education tailored to establishment of a College of Teaching. While the balance needs to be more in-school training than university, a specialist College their needs and their teachers are the best qualified people of Teaching might help to improve standards of those coming in to understand this. We do not believe it is matter of needing to the profession and also assist with professional development. to ‘win over’ head teachers because our aim is to restore the teaching profession to a position of respect. www.ukip.org

Samantha Pancheri, Green Party education spokesperson 1. What outcomes for children and young people do your education policies aim to deliver? We envisage an education system that enables children and young people to reach their full potential, whether that’s in academic terms or with more practical or creative skills. We recognise the spectrum of skills and abilities that make up a healthy society and believe it should be reflected in the education system. Where the current system focuses

4. Which proposals in NAHT’s manifesto do you think could have most traction? All the proposals in NAHT’s manifesto reflect the changes we need to see in our education system. However, the key to improving the overall learning experience for children lies in supporting teachers to deliver the best quality education they can, which can only happen through changing the way in which schools and teachers are assessed. Reformation of this assessment process and a move away from Ofsted towards evaluation by parents, teachers and the local community benefits everyone. www.greenparty.org.uk

MARCH/APRIL 2015 l LEADERSHIP FOCUS

28-33 manifestos.indd 33

33

26/02/2015 16:53


SEIZING THE INITIATIVE

There is a better way… NAHT is seizing the education agenda and taking change out of the hands of politicians. Susan Young reports on how and why THE JOB OF BEING A SCHOOL LEADER HAS CHANGED dramatically over the past few years. This means that the role of professional association for school leaders has had to move with the times too. Union representation, legal advice, training and campaigning are all still vitally important. But so now are a host of new services for school improvement and support, encouraging better working conditions, bringing on the next generation of leaders, and alternative accountability measures – all driven from within the profession. Or, to quote general secretary Russell Hobby in full flow at last year’s annual conference: “Being critical is not enough. We can construct an alternative and, within reason, we can get out there and do it… and make our points through action. “We must take ownership of standards. We should be the

ones talking loudly about what we want to change and how far we can take our schools. We must demonstrate that the most ambitious people in the country for our children are the ones who work with them. This will not be easy. It means some difficult choices and addressing uncomfortable truths. “We must also take responsibility for each other. As the old structures of education fade away in the face of austerity and ideology, schools will need to rely

EE “Taking ownership of standards and taking responsibility for each other; these are the twin principles behind the recent work of NAHT” 34

LEADERSHIP FOCUS l MARCH/APRIL 2015

34-37 sieze the agenda.indd 34

26/02/2015 14:17


on other schools. We cannot let each other fall behind. Taking ownership of standards and taking responsibility for each other; these are the twin principles behind the recent work of NAHT. In following them, we build an education system we can be proud of and we can take pride in our professionalism.� Hence the creation of NAHT Aspire (improving schools), Instead (inspecting schools), NAHT Assure (supporting schools), NAHT Edge (supporting middle leaders), the Leadership Compact (creating a good working environment E

IMAGE: ADAM HOWLING

34-37 sieze the agenda.indd 35

MARCH/APRIL 2015 l LEADERSHIP FOCUS 35

26/02/2015 16:50


SEIZING THE INITIATIVE

W for heads) and the newest creation, alternative league tables. The association is backing all these projects for the long haul, seeing them as fundamental requirements for school leaders in an increasingly atomised system with less support and rigorous, often punitive, accountability. ‘For leaders, for learners’, adopted as the association’s vision in 2013, is more than a slogan: it underpins every new initiative. As Louis Coiffait, chief executive of NAHT Edge, points out, no matter who wins the next election, these services will still be needed. “There used to be training programmes for leadership development in local authorities, and national sources of support such as the National College for Teaching and Leadership; they’re all contracting. There’s no more money in the system. It doesn’t matter who wins in May, we know there will be no more money. It’s down to school leaders and middle leaders to help themselves and each other, and it’s down to associations like NAHT to step up to fill the gap.” Clare Cochrane, NAHT director of commercial and member services, adds: “While we will continue to offer traditional forms of union support for individuals – which we’ve done through representation and advice and professional development – we will also be looking at how we help schools. It goes back to ‘For leaders, for learners’ and making sure everybody has all the fundamentals in place to help them get the right outcomes.” The initiatives are wide-ranging but linked by the common threads of professional ownership, supporting school leaders, and ultimately working for the children and teenagers learning in members’ schools and colleges. As Paul Whiteman, NAHT director of representation and advice, says of the leadership compacts, now signed with local authorities and academy chains on behalf of around 150 schools: “The compacts should deliver for learners as much as delivering for members. Good standards of employment should result in good professional practice.” It could be argued that anything that’s good for school leaders must be good for professional standards and learners, but NAHT’s initiatives go far beyond this. While the union’s leadership is convinced this is the correct direction, there is an

acknowledgement that this may not be so obvious to everybody else. “We must always juggle the demands of being a trade union and being a professional association,” says Russell. “I believe this tension is creative – improving our protection by being proactive, improving our campaigning and influencing by retaining a harder edge. “This is hard work. It stretches NAHT beyond its comfort zone. We know our members are being stretched to their limits, so we want to be there each step of the way, taking responsibility for each other and taking ownership of standards.” So how do all the initiatives fit together? How are they going? And how can NAHT members take advantage of them?

NAHT’s initiatives While all provide professional support for heads, and there are many overlaps, the initiatives can be roughly divided into groups. NAHT Assure and the Leadership Compact make life better for head teachers, leaving them free to concentrate on their core purpose of education, while NAHT Aspire, Instead and the alternative league tables are more about school improvement led by the profession. NAHT Edge falls between the two in some ways, developing and encouraging the next generation of school leaders to benefit the system in general and the leadership teams they support in particular. Many of these initiatives are hugely ambitious. When the association launched the current three-year pilot for NAHT Aspire, working initially in four regional clusters to bring 30 schools up to ‘good’ or better, it effectively became the seventhlargest academy chain in England – without replacing a single head teacher. So, what is emerging from these ambitious schemes? NAHT Aspire, the pilot of which is part-funded by the DfE, has proved so successful that there are expansion plans. “The feedback has been so positive that we’re looking at how we can extend it without it having an adverse impact on the pilot. There’s a lot of interest in this model of working,” says Clare. The NAHT Aspire model brings together clusters of schools needing to improve with peers and support from

EE “The feedback on NAHT Aspire has been so positive that we’re looking at how we can extend it without it having an adverse impact on the pilot. There’s a lot of interest in this model of working”

36

LEADERSHIP FOCUS l MARCH/APRIL 2015

34-37 sieze the agenda.indd 36

26/02/2015 14:18


EE “The profession holds the answers and has the resources. It is trust, collaboration and inspiration that will trigger the innovation we need”

NAHT and its commercial partner EdisonLearning. Just months after launch, 14 of the pilot schools, all originally rated as ‘requires improvement’, were at ‘good’, nine were in their original category and three were inadequate. When the schools were asked for their selfevaluation last year, there was a 48 per cent increase between March and December in those rating themselves as ‘good’. The improvement model included encouraging distributed leadership; some teachers told researchers they felt they were being “reprofessionalised”. Now, 97 per cent of those involved have “a lot of confidence” their school will change for the better, and 99 per cent have a high level of confidence that teaching and learning will improve as a result. One participant notes: “We have struggled for a long time with people waiting to be told to do stuff rather than people thinking: ‘I need to do this.’ People are now starting to take it forward themselves.” Russell says: “This shows that no-one is more ambitious for the young people of our country than those who work in our schools. The profession holds the answers and has the resources. It is trust, collaboration and inspiration that will trigger the innovation we need.” Instead, announced at annual conference in 2013, is another profession-led innovation currently being piloted, with working heads inspecting schools and independent evaluation of the results. And the newest school improvement project of all is the alternative school performance tables launched last year by NAHT, ASCL, the PiXL Club and United Learning, promising to give parents “stable, accurate and neutral information” and allow schools to “plan ahead with more certainty”. The website asks users, including parents, what type of information they would most like to see and urges schools to sign up.

Rest assured Equally important are NAHT Assure and the Leadership Compact. Assure provides support services, including HR, payroll, property maintenance and health and safety. “Given the reduction in local authority support, many schools appreciate help with the procurement of services of which they may have had little experience,” says Clare. “The key components of a successful school – in addition to excellent teaching – include well-maintained buildings, support services such as HR and payroll working effectively and a school improvement programme is needed. All are crucial to running a highly effective school,” she says. It means school leaders – who enter the profession because they

want to teach and end up as chief executives of a small- to mediumsized enterprise – can concentrate on teaching and learning. Similarly, leadership compacts outline expectations for leaders and employers. Employers are asked to treat leaders with respect, clarity and fairness; to back them in difficult decisions; look after their wellbeing; and get a rounded picture of their work. Leaders are expected to hold themselves accountable for pupil progress with high expectations of each one, to try to create good places to work, have the courage to speak out, be transparent and be responsive to feedback. So far it has been signed by several academy groups and local authorities and, says Paul, NAHT isn’t signing with just anybody. “We have had a couple of authorities where we don’t think their conduct has been sufficiently supportive, or they’re not raising standards as we would expect, so we won’t enter into a compact with them at this stage. It’s not just a badge for people to have and then forget they signed it.” The compact is not a traditional trade union/employer agreement but a “sense of an agreed atmosphere we want to create” which “should be delivering for learners as much as delivering for our members,” he says. “Good standards of employment should result in good professional practice. If members ever come to us and say they’re applying for a job in a certain local authority and what are they like to work for, we can say they’re signed up to the compact so this employer should respect you as a leader and strive to look after you properly.” The final element is NAHT Edge, aimed at the country’s 200,000 middle leaders, which fulfils a mix of ambitions for the parent union. As Louis explains, it’s a good technology testbed for NAHT and attracts members earlier in their careers. “A lot of middle leaders are struggling to get development and training, and I think we need to step up there and help them. It’s important we get this right and serve their needs,” he says. www.nahtaspire.co.uk www.nahtassure.co.uk www.nahtedge.org.uk www.naht.org.uk/assets/TheLeadershipCompact.pdf www.schoolperformancetables.org.uk bit.ly/NAHTmanifesto bit.ly/Edge_course_calendar

MARCH/APRIL 2015 l LEADERSHIP FOCUS

34-37 sieze the agenda.indd 37

37

26/02/2015 14:18


SPECIAL NEEDS

Susan Young looks at the changing landscape of SEND provision through the eyes of speakers at NAHT’s SEND conference

Making sense of complexity FOR MANY NAHT MEMBERS, THE ANNUAL SEND conference is a highlight of the year, bringing together school leaders who can sometimes feel isolated, to compare notes and hear the latest thinking from expert speakers. And as schools implement the various changes to SEND regulations, assessment and curriculum – adding up to a complete rethink on how pupils are taught and supported, and how progress is measured – the event this month took on particular significance. The programme is tailored to the two current preoccupations among special needs staff: how to cope with the increasingly complex needs of pupils (see panel) and how schools and

38

local authorities are tackling the changes to the SEND system. “The implementation is incredibly patchy,” says Rona Tutt, one of the conference organisers and former chair of NAHT’s SEND committee. Even among pathfinder authorities, school progress is variable for all sorts of reasons, she says, including the huge number of other changes being grappled with by schools and local authorities. The fact the SEND code of practice didn’t arrive until the summer holidays last year also contributes to the disarray. Even now, the final version was delayed because sections on youth offending and children in custody were still being completed.

LEADERSHIP FOCUS l MARCH/APRIL 2015

38-41 SEND.indd 38

26/02/2015 16:00


WE Teaching children

with complex needs As an increasing number of children survive previously fatal medical conditions, the demands on teachers, particularly in special schools, are increasing. Many children have complex learning needs, and Rona Tutt’s presentation at the SEND conference was designed to help teachers working with them. “The change in the school population is something we have to get to grips with,” she says. “Medical science has moved on, which is wonderful, but it can make teaching increasingly challenging. Teachers specifically trained in profound and severe learning difficulties are coming up to retirement age and we need to provide something to help current staff. “Teaching children at the complex end of need doesn’t necessarily mean they have severe or profound requirements. Complexity goes across the ability range and is caused by co-existing needs such as ADHD and autism, or dyspraxia and dyslexia.” There is plenty of specifically created material on the internet, she says, much of it commissioned through Professor Barry Carpenter’s work with complex learning difficulties and disabilities: the ‘complex needs training materials’ (see link, below). “This is a huge resource and not necessarily well known despite the enormous effort that went into writing it. Barry had 40 module managers writing this information but it’s very user-friendly. You can dip in and out, read it at home and get links to other things of interest.” Rona and the other conference speakers will also talk about the National Forum for Neuroscience and Special Education, which moved to the NAHT last year and which aims to bring together SEND teachers and researchers to discuss children’s underlying conditions.

Rona, along with Matthew Dodd from the Special Educational Consortium, This year’s SEND conference is the first time it has been combined a network of the National Children’s with the annual neuroscience conference, and Rona says the title, Bureau, see several areas of difficulty. Leading the changes, engaging learners, came about partly through One is the SEN information Professor Carpenter’s work in creating an engagement profile that report, which must appear on school gives teachers a starting point with children who have special needs. websites. “This is the government’s Internationally renowned autism expert Professor Francesca Happé starting point, whereas having a will also give an overview on the latest research and how it can be SEND policy is where schools tend relevant in the classroom. to start,” says Rona. “I’ve had several conversations with DfE officials www.complexneeds.org.uk and they say schools don’t need a www.sendgateway.org.uk/resources bit.ly/NCTL_training_resources specific policy, although this came as a surprise to me, as I think would to most schools. “I’m not saying don’t have a policy but try not to duplicate work. Once you’ve answered the should at least have something there saying the report is being questions in the information report, that can be part of a developed. We’re in the first stage of implementation, but the earlier you get things sorted, the better you’re covered for policy.” However, she adds, there are slightly different versions Ofsted,” says Rona. of what’s required in the regulations that go alongside the Both Rona and Matthew, who led a seminar at the Children and Families Act and the code of practice, which are conference on the changes, believe Ofsted is likely to be “minor but annoying: they make it difficult for schools to know sympathetic when inspecting schools this academic year but they’ve done the right thing.” will expect to see progress being made. For Matthew, the Schools should have had access to the report since September, major problem is the removal of levels. While the P levels E but leeway is being given because of the code’s delay. “You

PHOTOGRAPH: GETTY

38-41 SEND.indd 39

MARCH/APRIL 2015 l LEADERSHIP FOCUS 39

26/02/2015 16:00


SPECIAL NEEDS WE Pupil Premium Awards: Belmont School, Gloucestershire “How would I describe our children? Wonderful is my first thought, followed by diverse, challenging, vulnerable, caring and happy,” says Kevin Day (pictured), head of Belmont School in Gloucestershire. What the school does for its pupils is pretty wonderful too: it has closed the achievement gap between children eligible for the pupil premium and their more advantaged peers. As a result, it’s one of the special school finalists in the national Pupil Premium Awards. Belmont supports children aged five to 16 with moderate learning difficulties, often with additional needs including social, emotional and behavioural difficulties (SEBD). Some pupils have been excluded from secondaries; while others transfer from a specialist primary. There is a mix of academic ability. With around 60 per cent eligible for the pupil premium, it has been a priority for the school to close the achievement gap. “We’re really proud, and now the pressure is on to keep it closed,” says Kevin. He credits his staff, particularly assistant head Katy Sherwood (also pictured), who leads on pupil premium, interventions and inclusions. At the start of each year she identifies each child’s area or areas of weakness by looking at their statement; their personal, social and emotional scores; their reading and maths test results; and their progress. “We look at what we can do

W are still in place for the earliest stages of learning, there is a large gap between the top of those and the lowest of the new performance descriptors. “Our members have been quite unhappy about the performance descriptors. The gap raises questions about how teachers are expected to measure progress, with a load of knock-on questions about Ofsted inspections and how special educational needs are identified. That’s a context to think through with delegates at the conference: it’s a mainstream change which has some very big effects on the SEND system.”

to support their needs by programming interventions for their areas of weakness and regularly evaluating the impact,” she says. Every six weeks she reviews and tweaks each child’s plan, if necessary. The school spends some of its pupil premium on its own speech and language support worker and therapeutic social play for younger pupils. There is also is a sharp focus on academic achievement with one-to-one reading intervention programmes, numeracy work using Numicon all the way through the school and Mathletics. Daily sessions in maths and literacy are grouped by ability and achievement rather than age. Every child has a mini iPad (free to the pupil premium children) on which the school has put carefully selected apps to build skills and learning. “We find the iPad apps really help their learning. Katy led our steering group to look at the most appropriate apps. The children get instant recognition when they’re successful and the work can be tailored to their level. It’s a great motivation.” In addition, says Katy, using the iPads gives the pupils more independence and encourages fine motor skills. Other benefits include building of parental engagement: as the iPads go home, the parents can be more aware of what their children are learning.

He adds: “We’ve informed officials they are missing out a huge group of children. They’ve responded by saying they’ll take into account what people have said, but have yet to announce what they’ll come up with.” National Children’s Bureau surveys of local authorities have yet to find a single local offer meeting all the requirements, with the biggest gaps around post-16, housing and apprenticeships. Rona and Matthew also see tensions between schools and local authorities. Some authorities talk about “the schools’ offer”, but the local offer is a local authority responsibility

EE “I’ve been badgering DfE officials to explain how the SEND information report, the code of practice and the schools’ contributions to the local authority offer fit together. It seems to be up to schools to make sense of it.” 40

LEADERSHIP FOCUS l MARCH/APRIL 2015

38-41 SEND.indd 40

26/02/2015 16:01


WE Assessment post-levels “We’re looking to replace the traditional diary as a way of communicating with the parent body and children can link home to school much better. We’re finding it a great motivation. They feel empowered,” says Kevin.

“It’s exciting, isn’t it?” says Jan Martin of the disappearance of levels from the assessment of pupils with special needs. The independent school improvement adviser for mainstream and special schools is not just being optimistic: she’s been working with special schools as they grapple with life after levels, including eight working as a group in Harrow and Brent in London.

He adds: “We challenge children relentlessly; it’s the backbone of the school. We have a history of supporting children permanently excluded from mainstream. The first few months are rocky and challenging but after a period of time they improve and we try to get them into a good place by, or before, key stage four to support them into college and further learning. It’s rewarding to see children who failed in other settings get a second chance to turn their lives around.” Belmont is spending some of its Pupil Premium Award prize money on running workshops and sharing its practice with other schools. www.belmont.gloucs.sch.uk bit.ly/Pupil_premium_course

to which schools must contribute, says Rona. “I’ve been badgering DfE officials to explain how the SEND information report, the code of practice and the schools’ contributions to the local authority offer fit together. It seems to be up to schools to make sense of it.” Some local authorities are also trying to put responsibility for transition reviews – moving children from statements to education, health and care plans (EHCPs) – on to schools, sometimes paying them. “This is fine so long as everyone understands the responsibility remains with the local authority,” says Rona. “They have to come up with the paperwork. It’s not simply changing the heading and calling it an EHCP, it’s a different format, a different way of working and it has caused some confusion.” Matthew is positive about the process overall: “We are only six months in. Do we have evidence of any beneficial change yet? No. But there are very few schools that haven’t looked at these changes positively. It has to be embedded across the subject teacher and the class teacher and within the context of the wider changes, the challenge is making this change a priority.” bit.ly/NAHT_SEND

PHOTOGRAPH: BELMONT SCHOOL

38-41 SEND.indd 41

www.naht.org.uk/SEND2015

She enthuses: “It’s thinking-outside-the-box stuff and it can hurt your brain but the schools are excited because it’s making them go back to their curriculum and think: is this really what our children need and does our assessment reflect the outcomes we want for our children?” Jan shared insights on the process in a seminar called ‘Assessment: developments and best practice for SEND students’ at the NAHT SEND conference, based on the practical work she’s been doing with the schools. Her group of schools realised early on they had to concentrate on formative assessment in school, summative assessment linking to the P scales, and levels one to three on the old national curriculum. Plenty of work needs to be done to move to ‘can do’ statements within the P scales, she says, and she and her client schools have identified “a very big gap” between the top of P8 and the performance descriptors for year one in English and maths. “Schools need a set of performance descriptors in English and maths and other subjects to cover that gap and ‘can do’ statements up to the old level three, but without having national curriculum pieces of work to go to. As a group of special schools we’ve got our English and maths leads working together to try to develop some of those statements.” Special schools should consider how to set targets and assess progress for their children working up to the current level three, including developing ladders of progression and thinking about how to collect data. “The schools realise whatever model you have needs to be directly related to your curriculum model. There is now a lot of flexibility. We can tailor our curriculum to meet our pupils’ needs – so for instance we don’t have to teach straight English or maths, but think about their needs which might be financial numeracy, or understanding shape and space to meet their independent living needs and then you build your assessment ‘can do’ statements linked to the content of your curriculum.”

MARCH/APRIL 2015 l LEADERSHIP FOCUS

41

26/02/2015 16:01


PEER MENTORING

42

LEADERSHIP FOCUS l MARCH/APRIL 2015

42-45 mentoring.indd 42

26/02/2015 16:01


School counsels Peer mentoring and peer coaching are increasingly being used to improve confidence and reduce behavioural issues, reports Carly Chynoweth

Left: Children learn about coaching at Woodlands Park primary in Ivybridge, Devon, overseen by head teacher Heather Hanrott (above)

PHOTOGRAPHY: WOODLANDS PARK

42-45 mentoring.indd 43

AYNSLEY WELLING HAS GOT USED TO TEACHERS stopping him in the corridors to ask him about a year 10 student with a history of disruptive behaviour. The vice principal at Neale-Wade Academy in Cambridgeshire tells LF: “We have conversations where they say: ‘He has been great in my lesson, what’s happened?’ And then I reveal that he has been working with a peer mentor.” The mentor is a year 12 student, Louis. “There was an opportunity for Louis to get this particular child to step back and think about the situation a bit more, about why a teacher had asked him to respond in a certain way,” says Aynsley. “It seems he’s benefited from having a different outlet to let his feelings be known.” Peer mentoring and peer coaching programmes (the terms are broadly similar, see page 44) link students and pupils with schoolmates, usually younger, who need a bit of extra help with confidence, behaviour or another aspect of school life. It’s an effective way to help young people help each other, says Stuart Newberry, who trains schools in coaching skills. “Coaching is about asking questions that help people work out solutions for themselves. Children find it engaging and confidence-building.” Also, says Liz Aspin, who leads the peer-mentoring programme at Woodlands Park Primary School in Ivybridge, Devon, pupils sometimes simply respond better to other children than to adults. The scheme, which connects E

MARCH/APRIL 2015 l LEADERSHIP FOCUS

43

26/02/2015 16:02


PEER MENTORING WE Coach or mentor? Wchildren from years three and four with schoolmates from year six, has also benefited the coaches. “We wanted the year six children to have the experience of being a coach, of learning leadership skills and of working with younger children who perhaps need a little bit of extra support,” she says. The school’s head teacher, Heather Hanrott, adds: “I think we tend to underestimate the abilities of children of this age in terms of their depth and understanding of other’s social and emotional development. The coaching has built up a trust between the children and if you give children a voice, it develops their self-esteem which means they are better able to learn, which is the end point.” There has been a big change in the year six students’ confidence and in how they interact with other children, says Liz. “Also in how they communicate with their class teacher and adults and how they have really become leaders. I can see future head teachers in some of them.” Interestingly, a number of the year 12 student mentors at Neale-Wade Academy got involved precisely because they are considering careers in education. That was a driving factor for Louis and his fellow students Lucy and Natasha. “I wanted to help students and I am thinking about possibly going into teaching in the future,” says Louis, who has mentored the year 10 boy since November. “We have a good relationship so we can talk about more than his work and behaviour,” he says. “When I first started with him he got a lot of negative marks and bad behaviour but in the past three weeks there has been only one bad behaviour mark out of so many good marks.” Natasha, who hopes to become a primary school teacher, mentors two pupils, spending between five and 20 minutes with them every two weeks. “I like to take quite a relaxed and friendly approach. When I first met one of my students it was quite an awkward situation because the pupil was quite shy. I was talking to them about their everyday life and listening and suggesting advice… based on my past experience of how to listen in lessons and ignore distractions.” She advises other mentors to be friendly and not too uptight, but it is also important not to be patronising, says Lucy. “The student I work with is in year 11, so only a year below me, and I know a lot of people would not respond well to someone their own age telling them about their behaviour. If their behaviour that week has been bad, I talk about what caused the issues to arise and what their lessons are for the future. “The most helpful thing about it is that it gives people a chance to talk to someone who isn’t a teacher.” It is also useful for the individuals involved to recognise that not that all mentoring relationships are successful; she

44

Sometimes these words are used interchangeably, but there is a difference, according to Stuart Newberry of Liz Scott Coaching, which helped to implement Woodlands Park’s peer coaching programme. “Mentoring is much more directive and is usually done by an expert offering advice based on their experience,” he says. “Coaching is about helping the individual to find solutions for themselves, which means that they are much more likely to act on them.” Neale-Wade Academy’s vice-principal, Aynsley Welling (pictured), has a slightly different take. “For me, peer mentoring is using peers to offer support and guidance in a variety of situations. With coaching you are looking at how to be successful in a certain activities whereas mentoring is perhaps a softer approach looking at all-round achievement that would create the foundation for success,” he says.

had one mentee where “it just didn’t work at all… I think that they had been misbehaving for so long that it would take more than a year 12 student to change their ways.”

The evidence base Heather calls Woodlands Park’s first year of peer coaching a great success and says that the current year – the scheme’s second – is also going well. “Little if any research has been done in this field at primary schools so it was something of an experiment and we didn’t know what to expect,” she says. This brings up an interesting point in these days of evidencebased everything: while teachers and pupils have plenty of positive stories to tell about mentoring and coaching, hard evidence of what it delivers is still somewhat thin on the ground. “There has not been a massive amount of research,” admits Val Barritt, head of training and quality assurance at the Mentoring and Befriending Foundation (see link, right). “We know that it takes place and people say it is helpful, but there has been very little formal evaluation.” Even the research that does exist acknowledges this gap; for example, an academic report commissioned by the DCSF, Formalised peer-mentoring pilot evaluation, found “much positive evidence given which is anecdotal and qualitative… [however] schools are much less able to provide quantitative evidence of impact on mentors or mentees in terms of attendance, attainment and behaviour.” Another piece of research, this one conducted by academics from the universities of Sussex and Brighton, found that

LEADERSHIP FOCUS l MARCH/APRIL 2015

42-45 mentoring.indd 44

26/02/2015 16:02


WE Top tips schools which used an anti-bullying mentoring programme developed by BeatBullying, a charity that collapsed late last year, saw a “significant drop” in the proportion of pupils experiencing intentional and persistent bullying. In Evaluation of the BeatBullying peer-mentoring programme, Dr Robin Banerjee, Dr Carol Robinson and David Smalley write: “Case studies indicated that the availability of peer mentors was perceived as particularly important for younger pupils, suggesting that BeatBullying programmes may be a crucial support for ensuring positive transition from primary to secondary school. “In addition, the introduction of anonymous online mentoring by peers was seen as an important avenue of confidential support for pupils who are dealing with bullying or other related social problems.” The research also suggested that the mentors themselves found their experience “highly positive”. The Sussex study found that successful implementation was connected to the involvement of staff members who had status, influence and dedicated time and resources to coordinate and manage the programme. Val agrees. “Having buy-in from the top and having someone specifically designated to manage it – and with the time to do so – makes all the difference,” she says. “And make sure there is clarity about who you are recruiting, how you are supporting and supervising them… and how you will check whether the programme is actually working.” She advises schools to build evaluation into their programmes from the outset. “Be clear about your overall aims and the outcomes that you are expecting, then move towards them,” she says. It’s also helpful for peer coaches to be given a bit of background about the children or young people they will be working with, say the Neale-Wade coaches who spoke to LF, while Aynsley advises making sure parents are on board too. Choosing the right young people is vital, he adds. “You need to know your students and be able to work out who will be an excellent mentor,” he says. This year it was Lucy who approached him with the idea as something she could do for the enrichment element of her year 12 studies. “Students are supposed to contribute to the wider community or their own learning,” he explains. “When Natasha saw what Lucy was doing she got involved as well.”

• Be clear about your overall aims and outcomes • Schemes need senior-level buy-in • Have someone designated to run the scheme • Make sure they have the time to do this • Make sure parents are on board • Ensure there is clarity about who you recruit • Ensure there is clarity about how you support and supervise them • Ensure you have checks to ensure the programme is working • Choose mentors and mentees carefully

This year’s mentors may step back when they enter year 13 – they will have plenty of other work on their plates by then – but Aynsley hopes that some members of the next class coming through will step up to the challenge. But making mentoring work is not just about choosing the right mentors, but about selecting the right mentees as well. “I would not put a 16-year-old student with a student who had child protection issues or anything along those lines, for example,” says Aynsley. He also makes sure mentors are given basic training in what to do if such issues come up. “The students I find mentors for are those who exhibit problems with low-level disruption. Students who really should be on the right track but have made the wrong choices.” Stuart hopes more schools will roll out peer coaching programmes: “It should be available to all children and I would like to see more teachers and school leaders develop their own coaching abilities. It’s about asking questions that will help the other person find the best way forward. Children can use it to help each other find answers and become more confident in themselves while doing so… but it is also brilliant when teachers use it with children and with their colleagues.” www.mandbf.org

EE “When I first started working with him he got a lot of negative marks and bad behaviour but in the past three weeks there has been only one bad behaviour mark out of so many good marks” MARCH/APRIL 2015 l LEADERSHIP FOCUS

42-45 mentoring.indd 45

45

26/02/2015 16:02


PAN-EUROPEAN ISSUES

THE EUROPEAN SCHOOL HEADS ASSOCIATION IS AN umbrella organisation that represents national organisations, such as NAHT, from more than 30 countries across Europe. Our offices are in Utrecht in The Netherlands and our aim is twofold: firstly to develop views on innovative education and school leadership; then to promote these at European level to the commission, teaching unions, parent bodies and organisations such as the OECD, that can influence education outcomes. We also support national organisations that are just setting out, especially in the accession states and promote international exchange and cooperation. It’s clear to ESHA that the range of knowledge required by those leading schools throughout Europe today is absolutely daunting and it’s well documented that the cumulative demands undermine the capacity of schools with regard to societies’ expectations of them. ESHA wants principals to be leaders of learning and to have the autonomy to do their job properly. We want to ensure that appointment procedures to recruit the best people for the job are in place and we want everyone to recognise the day of the ‘Lone Ranger’ is over. Distributed leadership, which shares the load of headship, needs to take place. Continuous professional development is necessary, but another phrase that fits CPD is continuous professional dialogue. It is those schools where there is a culture of professional dialogue where most teachers react favourably to the needs of the students.

At the chalkface

ESHA president Clive Byrne tells Leadership Focus about the challenges facing school leaders across Europe 46

LEADERSHIP FOCUS l MARCH/APRIL 2015

46-49 ESHA.indd 46

26/02/2015 14:19


WE Teaching seen as ‘cushy number’ “One of the biggest challenges for European nations is attracting teachers and maintaining staff morale, then – as school leaders – dealing with the performance management agenda that seems to know the cost of everything but the value of not very much.

The OECD tends to receive a bad press for the Pisa league tables, but it does undertake meaningful research. “We also need to improve the public perception that teaching is a In its activity on improving school cushy number and to discuss the merits of a broad liberal education leadership, it’s quite clear the challenges versus a vocational/training model at a national level, then harness and pressures affecting school leaders in the vision that we have for our education system. all OECD countries are enormous and it’s a major dilemma that school leaders “Do we want to educate for society or do we want to educate for the are expected to be the managers for the economy? The challenge for school leadership is to work within the municipalities or the local authorities as system to minimise the number of losers. well as leaders of learning. “We need to accept that, because teachers are our best resource, But how to promote instructional their working conditions are important – it is the environment in leadership and learning? A key aspect which students learn – and effective teaching can be facilitated or is through effective planning and can be constrained by some of the issues that arise there. consultation with the key figures in the “We also have to recognise that teachers’ perceptions of their schools school community. But if the head is seen are the reality they operate in and that the conditions created by the as autocratic – using what I call a cardioleadership of the principal make a contribution to setting a positive visual approach, where he or she looks school climate. If we want to create that positive climate, we need into his or her heart and decides policy to put into practice the goals of our teachers so their work is clear, without consultation – it is not going to explicit and shared. be the best way forward. From our point of “We need to encourage teachers to know their work is appreciated view, the key elements of school planning and valued and they need to be clear about what it is they are are to do with the context of the school expected to do. If we want to make sure we are operating to best and the setting of realistic goals for the practice then collaboration among teachers and among subject development of all students. departments is to be encouraged.” An effective school plan incorporates Clive Byrne a wide range of school policies to do with teaching and learning but also with possible care structures, governance and so on. At its heart is school improvement and there needs to be and how they can contribute to school and school awareness. He feels that engagement of the students must come first. the recognition across Europe that it will not take place without The phrase that ‘learning should be social and collaborative’ staff development and the effective deployment of resources. is key. Learning must be fun. It must be fun for the teacher Without this, the change needed to raise the bar and also narrow and it must recognise where the students are in terms of their the gap will be very difficult to achieve. With this in mind, I want to pay tribute to the OECD’s Centre knowledge and the context of where they are in terms of their for Educational Research and Innovation and its senior analyst mood or motivation on a particular day. E But how widely are teachers engaged in leadership David Istance. He talks about innovative learning environments

WE ES ESHA’s priorities and focus Clive Byrn Byrne is president of ESHA and director of the National Association of Principals and Principals in Ireland. As ESHA president, his priorities are to promote school leadership Deputy Pri and expand the number of cross-border exchanges made possible as a result of the Erasmus+ scheme. He will foc focus on continuing ESHA’s involvement with the European Policy Network on School Leadership; Fly Higher, a project with the European aeronautics industry; Q4I, which focuses on Leadership management approaches for innovative schools; Iguana, which is designing tools to reduce quality ma stuckness) in schools; and developing entrepreneurial skills in schools. stasis (or st

IMAGE: GETTY / STEVE SMETHURST

46-49 ESHA.indd 47

MARCH/APRIL 2015 l LEADERSHIP FOCUS

47

26/02/2015 14:19


PAN-EUROPEAN ISSUES WE ESHA Conference 2014 Imagine a walled city on the sea with open education discussions and you have a cameo of the conference held in Dubrovnik, hosted by the Croatian education ministry last November.

W decision-making about learning – and to what extent are students involved? If we don’t consult The conference venue was modern and the facilities were with the student bodies how will we be able to picturesque, welcoming and appropriate. The hosts pulled make sure that they’re getting the information together an impressive programme of speakers and workshops they need? And is it only school based? Should to meet all aspects of the points raised within the conference. other partners be involved in the locality or The Croatian education minister spoke municipality? What about the school community, with passion about his government’s parents or local industry? Should they be involved wishes for the direction of education. in setting the direction for the school as a learning Finnish Professor Pasi Sahlberg spoke environment? about their achievements and global We need to establish a shared view of what is education. It is worth pointing out that going to be involved in the school and how this Finland has been riding high in the is going to be put in place. And to be continually Pisa tables for many years. For all of us questioning whether the existing vision is listening it was about aspiration on our adequate to meet the means. parts tinged with envy at their wellOn that subject, have we made organisational established success. Could we learn from them? changes in schools so we can put our vision into Croatian professors Pero Lučin and Vedrana Spajić-Vrkaš practice? Is the school organised to suit the staff talked about smart specialisation and inclusive participation or is it organised to suit the student? respectively. Topics that had relevance yet questioned enough When we know we’re running schools to suit practice to involve discussions in groups. the students, we have to ask what evidence have we got that learning is taking place and how are The workshops allowed all 500 delegates to get involved and had we gathering that evidence? Is it just a hunch or subjects as diverse as ‘data-rich schools’ and the ‘holistic future’. do we have data to back it up? Bringing everything together was Toby Salt, whose keynote I know in the UK people are complaining bitterly speech to close the conference gave notes of optimism coupled about data overload. I thought it was relevant that with reinvigoration about our roles as leaders and what we could Toby Salt, former head of the National College, said take away to our schools for the future. This was an exact and recently that people may “hit the target but miss relevant ending to a successful conference in a dream setting. the point”. And even if we have information that’s Anything that strengthens resolve yet questions the methodology meaningful, how accessible is that information? of school leadership is a privilege to attend. You feel less isolated I can’t emphasise enough the importance I attach and more able to return to your school with renewed vigour and to the climate and culture of schools. Do I know ability to re-stimulate the tired aspects of school that need your what’s expected of me when I go to work? Will I as a direction. Well done and thanks to ESHA and Croatia. teacher have all the equipment and materials I need Roy Tedscoe, NAHT delegate and will I have the opportunity to do what I do best? Will somebody in the senior leadership team care about me as a person and will they encourage my • being committed to improving teaching and learning. development? Will my opinions count and will my co-workers In each and every European country, we need to work on the be as committed as I am to producing quality work? Someone who influenced my thinking was David Hopkins, basis that every student can improve and we have to ensure that a senior adviser in the Blair government when education, personalised learning and personalised teaching – raising the education and education were seen as priorities. He was good qualities of all of our staff – are delivered to ensure that very much into system leaders, where school leaders had this will happen. The key role played by the school leader can have a massive responsibilities to their community to raise the standards in all impact on improving teaching and learning to enable students schools. I was taken by his view that system leaders measure to progress and develop and reach their potential. their success in terms of: • improving outcomes – raising the bar and narrowing the gaps; www.esha.org • developing schools as personal and professional learning www.eshaconferencedubrovnik.com communities; • striving for equity by acting through the context and culture This is an abridged version of a speech Clive Byrne gave at the of the schools; and School Leaders’ Summit at the Bett Show in January

48

LEADERSHIP FOCUS l MARCH/APRIL 2015

46-49 ESHA.indd 48

PHOTOGRAPH: ESHA

26/02/2015 15:57


Challenge Yourself to Lead and Mentor Young People NCS With The Challenge Youth and Community Mentors and Leaders Salary: Up to ÂŁ1,540 per 3 week programme Location: London, Surrey, Berkshire, West Midlands or North West England Length of role: 2-14 weeks between June and September We are looking for dedicated individuals, with an interest in working with young people to strengthen their communities, working both residentially and in the local community in London, Surrey, Berkshire, the West Midlands or the North West. A single programme lasts three weeks and includes outdoor activities, skill development and community service. We have paid positions available working with young people, through to experienced Project Managers. We have positions lasting from 2 weeks through to 14 weeks throughout summer. The Challenge is a fast-growing social enterprise that connects and inspires people across Britain to strengthen their communities. NCS with The Challenge is a programme that brings together young people from different backgrounds, builds their conďŹ dence, and challenges them to make a difference in their local community. In summer 2015, 23,000 young people across our regions will take part in NCS with The Challenge for an intensive three-week summer programme followed by four weekends in September. Please visit our website for an in-depth breakdown of all roles available.

Applications Now Open To apply online simply visit www.ncsthechallenge.org/jobs

LFO.03.15.049.indd 23

20/02/2015 10:02


WE T E L L U S A B O U T Y O U R S C H O O L We ’d l ove to share your stories with LF re a d e rs . Ema il Su s a n E educationhack@gmail.com

FINALLY… B

righton head Marcelo Staricoff appears slightly embarrassed that his school has won an award for being among the most improved in the country for the attainment and progress of children entitled to the pupil premium. “It represents a fairly small cohort here at Balfour Primary,” he says, glancing at the letter from David Laws, proudly pinned alongside children’s work on his office wall. “So, statistically, I’m less sure about this award than I would have been at my previous school when 30 or 40 per cent of my pupils were eligible. But I am delighted that these children are doing so well, as they still represent a significant group for us.” Balfour, the school Marcelo took over a year ago, is one of the largest primaries in the country. Since arriving, he has further developed the educational philosophy he has worked on for years, encouraging children to celebrate what he calls the ‘joy of not knowing’ ( jonk). This is one of the things that he believes has helped all the children to become successful, enthusiastic learners.

SUSAN YOUNG

THE JOY OF NOT KNOWING

The only rule is ‘don’t worry’ The starting point is that children ‘need not to know’ before they can learn. “This takes away all their worries about not knowing, or finding things hard. The only rule we have is that you are not allowed to worry: jonk equips children with all the strategies, tools and attributes that enable them all to feel successful as learners and fulfil their potential. “It gives them the values that enable them to learn and interact respectfully and thoughtfully; opportunities to develop the dispositions of a lifelong learner; and the tools that enable them to structure their thinking. It also lets them develop their metacognition and personalise the way they access their learning that best suits them. So a child may wish to start with a mind map, notes, bullet points or concept lines, for example.” It also contributes to a school culture based on challenge and enrichment, motivating children to learn and do their best without ever feeling there are ‘ceilings’ to their learning. Communication, debate and philosophical dialogue are encouraged; learning objectives are usually phrased as philosophical questions to encourage discussion and engagement. This, he says, lets children’s interests and ideas 50

drive the learning and encourages a classroom atmosphere where everyone, including the adults, is finding things out together. “I think it is key to develop an inclusive culture where every child can – and feels that they can – fulfil their potential and where the children are always encouraged to see how far, wide and deep they can take any concept,” he says.

Promoting self-esteem Balfour intervenes as early as possible to ensure children can access all aspects of the curriculum, while Marcelo has created a new support infrastructure, with two inclusion mentors and a learning mentor who work closely with an ‘Every child a reader’ teacher and the school counsellor. Regular tracking meetings enable the school to support and challenge all pupils according to need or interests, whatever these may be. The school ensures that the children eligible for pupil premium can have subsidised access to clubs and to activities that may promote self-esteem. Marcelo says: “We work hard to create close links with the parents to ensure their needs are met as a family. Developing a very strong triangular relationship between the child, their family and school helps enormously with changing the perception of school. It also promotes family involvement in their child’s learning, so for example exciting them with open-ended home-learning tasks or sharing with the families how learning happens at school, which is really important. “If anything, the award reflects our commitment to developing a strong relationship with families, which enables us to make the most of the supportive infrastructure in school. This then enables all our pupils to feel motivated to learn and achieve their best within a very inclusive learning environment.”

LEADERSHIP FOCUS l MARCH/APRIL 2015

50 And finally.indd 50

26/02/2015 14:19


Proven to reduce burglaries by up to 83% • •

Used by over 80% of UK Police Forces to combat theft, burglaries and robberies. Identifies property and links criminals to crime scenes immediately.

www.selectadna.co.uk

Permanent Visible Marking

Over 25 million items marked worldwide • •

Instant identification of property Recommended by the Police and Insurance companies as a proven theft deterrent

www.selectamark.co.uk

www.selectalabel.co.uk

UK’s leading Police approved Cycle Database • •

Instantly makes bikes less attractive to thieves. Independently tested and police approved.

www.bikeregister.com

registered trademark of:

Selectamarkplc Advanced Asset Protection

LFO.03.15.051.indd 51

Selectamark Security Systems plc, 1 Locks Court, 429 Crofton Road, Locksbottom, Kent, BR6 8NL. UK. DA0260/1

20/02/2015 09:10


SEPARATING AND

CAN BE DIFFICULT TO DO. SO OUR AND INSURANCE WORK AROUND YOU. We understand that it’s not always easy for education professionals to separate work and home life. That’s why in addition to covering the usual things you’d expect:

Up to

£70*

Amazon .co.uk Gift Certific ates**

s our home insurance covers you for school equipment you take home or personal possessions you take to work, and s our car insurance covers you whilst you drive between educational sites with either pupils or colleagues, ensuring you can travel easily and with increased peace of mind. Plus as a thank you for taking out these policies, we’ll give you up to £70* in Amazon.co.uk Gift Certificates**

Call us for a quick quote and see what we can do for you: 0800 656 97 16^ Little things matter *Available to new customers only. Offer may be withdrawn at any time. Policies subsequently cancelled within 4 weeks of cover start date or with payments not up to date will not be eligible to receive offer. Gift Certificates will be sent by mail within 6 weeks of the commencement date of your policy. £35 Amazon.co.uk Gift Certificates available to customers taking a new car insurance policy. £35 Amazon.co.uk Gift Certificates to customers taking out a new combined buildings and contents policy or a contents-only policy. Buildings-only policies do not qualify for this offer. Not available in conjunction with any other offer. We reserve the right to offer alternative Gift Certificates of the same value in the event that Amazon.co.uk Gift Certificates are unavailable. **Amazon.co.uk is not a sponsor of this promotion. Amazon.co.uk Gift Certificates (“GCs”) may be redeemed on the Amazon.co.uk website or affiliated website Javari.co.uk towards the purchase of eligible products listed in our online catalogue and sold by Amazon.co.uk or any other seller selling through Amazon.co.uk. GCs cannot be reloaded, resold, transferred for value, redeemed for cash or applied to any other account. Amazon.co.uk is not responsible if a GC is lost, stolen, destroyed or used without permission. See www.amazon.co.uk/gc-legal for complete terms and conditions. GCs are issued by Amazon EU S.à r.l. All Amazon ®, ™ & © are IP of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates. ^Lines are open 8am-6pm Monday to Friday, except bank holidays, 9am-12.30pm Saturday. Calls from UK landlines are free. Calls may be monitored and/or recorded.

Insurance underwritten by Aviva Insurance Limited. Registered in Scotland No. 2116. Registered office: Pitheavlis, Perth, PH2 0NH. Authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority. CFPMPA0194 01.14 BD34799.

LFO.03.15.052.indd 52

20/02/2015 09:11


Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.