Vestnik 1968 01 17

Page 1

HERALD Official Organ Of the Slavonic Benevolent Order Of The State Of Texas. Founded 1897. BENEVOLENCE

VOLUME 56 — NO. 3

HUMANITY

BROTHERHOOD

Postmaster: Please Send Form 3579 with Undeliverable Copies to: SUPREME LODGE SPJST, POB 100, TEMPLE, TEX. 76501

JANUARY 17, 1968

FROM THE EDITOR'S DESK THIS, THAT, AND THE OTHER

A CREED

Delegates and alternate delegates are not paired off. EVery four years, during the elections preceding a convention year, there arises some confusion about the relative position of delegates and alternates. There are some who believe that they are paired off, that is, that a certain alternate replaces a certain delegate if and when it becomes necessary. This is not the case.

There is a destiny that makes us all brothers; None goes his way alone: All that we send into the lives of others Comes back into our own. I care not what his temples or his creeds, One thing holds firm and fast That into his fateful heap of days and deeds The soul of man is cast. —Edwin Markham

Let us take the case of a lodge with 4 delegates, and of course, 4 alternate delegates. The alternate receiving the highest number of votes is the first to replace any one of the four delegates who is not able to go to the convention. Let's call all the delegates A, B, C, and D. Let us assume that delegate D cannot go to the convention. The first alternate (one with the highest number of votes) replaces him. He does not necessarily replace the delegate who received the highest number of votes. Then if delegate B is unable to go, the alternate who received the second highest number of votes replaces him. In other words, alternates are not paired with delegates. Article 7 c of our by-laws states, in part, "The alternate with the highest number of votes fills in the first vacancy." which

may or may not be the delegate with the highest number of votes. Some of this misunderstanding may stem from the form sent out by the Supreme Lodge for the listing of delegates and alternates. Brother Urbanovsky tells us that the form was originally drawn up for those lodges with just one delegate and one alternate. The form lists the delegate at the top and the alternate at the bottom, giving the impression that the alternate replaces the delegate named above. That, of 'course, is true where there is only one delegate and one alternate, but is not the case where there are more than one. • • Our by-laws. While on the subject of our by-laws, we should like to make

a few observations. By-laws, rules, regulations, charters, and constitutions should not be difficult or impossible for the person of average intelligence to comprehend. Some people feel that you are supposed to include a lot of fancy gobbledygook that is supposed to be beyond the comprehension of the average person. All that is really required is some good, common, literate English. If the average person can't understand it or make heads nor tails out of it, it's not of much value. They are not supposed to be difficult and unwieldy. There is nothing mysterious or sanctimonious about our by-laws and such. Laws are written for people because they deal with people. The sentence structure in some places could stand a little remodeling. I believe this stems from attempts to sound "legalistic." In thumbing through our by-laws at random we came upon Article 19. This is a good example of putting the cart in front of the horse, the predicate ahead of the subject. This style is used in Czech and in German, but not in English. In Art. 19 the rather long sentence should have been started with line 8 thusly: "Delegates of every district will conduct nominations and elections . . . (now back to the beginning) for the purpose of arranging," etc., etc. There is likewise no special


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.