IN THIS ISSUE
Halloween
Koret Scholars
Athletics
Explore local options for a safe and fun night. PAGE 6.
SSU faculty members win awards to assist with research projects. PAGE 8.
Jose Hilla fights to overcome budget deficits in new role at SSU PAGE 11.
SINCE 1979
VOLUME 85 // ISSUE 10 OCTOBER 27, 2020 - NOVEMBER 2, 2020
THE UNIVERSITY’S STUDENT RUN NEWSPAPER
@SONOMASTATESTAR
STAR // Isabelle Barkey Sonya Perrotti of Coyote Farms harvests lettuce while wearing a mask in Penngrove on October 23, 2020.
SEAN KENNEALLY
COVID-19 relief funds given to Sonoma County farmers
STAFF WRITER
C
OVID-19 continues its tremendous impact upon the backbone of Sonoma County: agriculture. The $1 billion industry is being pushed to its limits, as the county is still in the ‘purple’ tier--the most restrictive of COVID reopening. Because of COVID-19, according to Sonoma County Agricultural Preservation and Open Space District, up to nearly $64 million will be lost this year. As a result, the Sonoma County Agricultural Preservation and Open Space District, also known as Ag + Open Space, is offering up to $1 million in COVID-19 relief funds to farmers hit the hardest. “Our agricultural community has suffered significant economic impacts due to disruptions in the food system, supply chains, processing, and storage capacity,” said Susan Gorin, Chair of the Ag Open Space Board of Directors. The study was conducted by Dr. Robert Eyler, the president of Economic Forensics and Analytics Incorporated and professor at Sonoma State University. The study utilized projections based on Sonoma County, state-wide, and national losses in all factors of the industry, from crop to table, until the end of 2020. Eyler also analyzed recovery status, as well. Cannabis and winegrape production were not a part of the study. The study found that profits and loss occurred “... in retail and restaurant markets changing other parts of agricultural supply chains. Those effects then began to affect
farmers and supply conditions.” Because of delays in shipments, processing centers, and storage, farmers were unable to promote their goods, which led to an excessive surplus that no buyer wanted. According to the study, “The economic impact of COVID-19 on total agricultural values, following the crops and livestock used to calculate annual Crop Reports by the Sonoma County Agricultural Commissioner, range between lost value of 9.7% and 19.2% based on projected risk.” A full recovery will not occur until 2023. However, many folks, like Executive Director of the Sonoma County Farm Bureau Tawny Tesconi, fear incorrect projections from Eyler’s numbers. Tesconi stated, “Dr. Eyler’s study simply underscores what our members have been experiencing since March. So many of our agricultural producers were already struggling and this pandemic has exposed and exacerbated the challenges our multi-generational farming and ranching families were facing.” The Agricultural Support and Protection (ASAP) Emergency Grant Program aims to provide the necessary relief for farmers hit the hardest. The grants are to be awarded to operators “...who can commit to keeping the county’s diverse agricultural lands in production,” says Bill Keene, in an Press Democrat article.
see SONOMA COUNTY FARMERS on pg. 4
STAR // Sarah Ramos Karla cleaned a table in preparation for new customers at Luduka’s Cafe on September 6, 2020.
Sonoma County doubles testing centers in disproportionately affected areas MORAGH GRAF STAFF WRITER
O
n Oct. 19, the Sonoma County Administrator’s Office released a statement informing residents of new COVID-19 testing centers. These pop-up centers, which will double the amount already present in the county, are to be placed throughout areas in which residents are disproportionately impacted. According to the county’s statement, “The effort is a part of new County Department of Health Services initiative to address COVID-19 disparities, particularly within Latinx and indigenous communities in Sonoma County, and to reduce overall community spread, allowing the County to move out of the most-restrictive purple tier in the state’s Blueprint for a Safer Economy.” The county is advising residents in these particular areas to be tested, whether or not they are showing symptoms of the virus. The encouragement for all residents to be tested comes from the hope that the county can slow the spread of the virus and move out of restricted status. Doubling the amount of testing centers in high-risk areas will create a more controlled group. see SONOMA COUNTY DOUBLES TESTING on pg. 4
STAR // Isabelle Barkey Luke Crumpler casts his ballot while wearing a mask at Sonoma State University on October 25, 2020.
Mask or no mask, everyone is allowed to vote in California
KRISTINA SCHMUHL STAFF WRITER
A
cross the United States, masks are highly recommended, but not required, for in person voting. According to state election guidelines, California voters who show up at the polls on or before Election Day without masks will be permitted to vote. California Gov. Gavin Newsom has had a mask mandate in place for California since June. The mask mandate states that it is required for individuals to wear a mask in public places. Election officials are facing a delicate balance of how to both enforce mask mandates and not infringe on a constituent’s constitutional right to vote. Deva Marie Proto, Sonoma County’s Clerk-Recorder-Registrar of Voters said, “We are asking [voters] to wear a mask for inside polling. We will be providing options outside for those people who don’t want to wear a mask or can’t because of medical reasons.” see MASK OR NO MASK on pg. 4