Discuss the leading sociological theoretical frameworks

Discuss the leading sociological theoretical frameworks DOWNLOAD INSTANTH SOLUTION

https://www.solvedcollegepapers.com/product/discuss-the-leadingsociological-theoretical-frameworks/

Choose one out of the 4 approved articles for the essay assignment. Please note that each article varies in length, but your papers are expected to be 3-4 pages double spaced. If you do not choose one of these you will not get credit for the assignment. Please choose the article you will analyze wisely, and e-mail Professor Henderson with any questions you may have.

Readings to choose from for Essay 1 New Solution-discuss the leading sociological theoretical frameworks quantity Category: Assignments Help Experts Tags: Are the author's goals, Are you convinced by the arguments? If not, Do the authors have a stated or unstated point of view?, Does the author present convincing evidence to support his/her views?, or agendas revealed in the introduction or preface of the articles?, viewpoints, wealth or health disparities?, What are the author’s theoretical arguments concerning racial, What are the central issues being discussed concerning racial, What evidence do the author’s provide to support their arguments and is it persuasive?, what is the nature of your reservations? 

Description

Description Discuss the leading sociological theoretical frameworks Choose one out of the 4 approved articles for the essay assignment. Please note that each article varies in length, but your papers are expected to be 3-4 pages double spaced. If you do not choose one of these you will not get credit for the assignment. Please choose the article you will analyze wisely, and e-mail Professor Henderson with any questions you may have.

Readings to choose from for Essay 1

Discuss the leading sociological theoretical frameworks 1. Bonilla-Silva, Eduardo. 1997. “Rethinking Racism: Toward a Structural Analysis.” American Sociological Review 62:465-480.

2. Risman, Barbara J. “Gender Matters: Bringing in a Gender Structure Analysis. A Comment on “Paternal and Maternal Gatekeeping? Choreographing Care-giving in

Families” by Tina Miller and “Rethinking Family Socialization to Gender through the Lens of Multi-local, Post-separation Families” by Laura Merla.” Sociologica 12, no. 3 (2018): 67-74.

3. Barrera, Mario. 1979. Race and Class in the Southwest, Chapter 7. South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press. NOTE: IF YOU ANALYZE THIS ARTICLE YOU MUST ANALYZE BARRERA’S THEORY! 4. Conley, Dalton. 2001. “Decomposing the Black-White Wealth Gap: The Role of Parental Resources, Inheritance, and Investment Dynamics.” Sociological Inquiry 71, no. 1: 39-66.

Discuss the leading sociological theoretical frameworks The essay is not only for summarizing the readings but more importantly for commenting on some aspect that you found interesting or thought-provoking. The ultimate goal is to discuss the leading sociological theoretical frameworks that are used to help explain various aspects of stratification and inequality in society.

The primary goal of critical reading is to understand the author’s argument, identify key assumptions, and evaluate the evidence and influences leading to that conclusion. Never assume a “passive” position when reading a text. The (3-4 page) essays will need to answer the following questions:

Discuss the leading sociological theoretical frameworks 

What are the central issues being discussed concerning racial, wealth or health disparities?,



What are the author’s theoretical arguments concerning racial, wealth or health disparities?,



Are you convinced by the arguments? If not, what is the nature of your reservations?,



Do the authors have a stated or unstated point of view?,



Are the author’s goals, viewpoints, or agendas revealed in the introduction or preface of the articles?,



What evidence do the author’s provide to support their arguments and is it persuasive?,



Does the author present convincing evidence to support his/her views?,



Are you convinced by the arguments? If not, what is the nature of your reservations?,



What competing explanations could be put forth? Would they be more valid?

Why/why not?



Additional data, theories and or insights beyond the reading being analyzed.