Santa Monica Daily Press, August 10, 2012

Page 1

FRIDAY, AUGUST 10, 2012

Volume 11 Issue 230

Santa Monica Daily Press

LIFE AFTER THE OLYMPICS SEE PAGE 5

We have you covered

THE TECHNICAL DIFFICULTIES ISSUE

State high court takes Expo Line environmental suit

Paying up to live in town School bond would be 12th assessment

BY ASHLEY ARCHIBALD Daily Press Staff Writer

LOS ANGELES

The California Supreme Court announced Tuesday that it would take on a case by a group that accuses the Exposition Light Rail Authority of violating environmental laws and jeopardizing the safety of Angelenos. The organization, Neighbors for Smart Rail, appealed to the California Supreme Court after the Second District California Court of Appeal sided with the Expo Authority in April. The organization had sued to stop work on the second phase of the project that would extend light rail 6.6 miles from Culver City to Downtown Santa Monica, but lost at both the superior and appellate courts. “[Neighbors for Safe Rail] is gratified by the court’s decision to review these very important issues,” said Terri Tippit, president of the organization and the West of Westwood Homeowners Association, in a press release. “Blocking Overland (Avenue) and Westwood (Boulevard) 24 times per hour will have a devastating impact on traffic and public safety, and all evidence shows that Expo didn’t study it as required.” The organization holds that the Expo Authority erred in its environmental analysis by using projected traffic patterns from 2030 to estimate the project’s impacts on air quality and traffic rather than information from 2009 when the document was first drafted. Its arguments leaned heavily on a series of court decisions from the Fifth and Sixth districts of the Court of Appeal that rejected the use of future conditions as a baseline for an environmental impact report. Though the Second District Court of Appeal discounted that argument out of hand, the group hopes that the Supreme Court will take a different view. “You’re supposed to compare the existing environment to what will happen with your project,” said Michael Eveloff, a spokesperson for Neighbors for Smart Rail. “What Expo chose to do was instead of using ‘existing’ as it exists, they’d study as it will exist in 2030.”

BY ASHLEY ARCHIBALD Daily Press Staff Writer

ON THE HOOK

Fabian Lewkowicz FabianLewkowicz.com Richard Perez. 32, catches a shark off the Santa Monica Pier on Thursday.

SEE SUIT PAGE 10

Gary Limjap (310) 586-0339 In today’s real estate climate ...

Experience counts! garylimjap@gmail.com www.garylimjap.com

SMMUSD HDQTRS At the Aug. 1 meeting of the Santa Monica-Malibu Board of Education, Gus Hasselquist made a plea. The older man owns four properties that fall within district boundaries, which means the $385 million bond measure the board approved for the November ballot that night would impact him, drawing at his pension and Social Security check. Could the board include a senior exemption for the bond, Hasselquist asked, much as they had for the most recent parcel tax, Measure R, passed in 2008? His question illuminated two points. First, the confusion between a parcel tax and a bond — Hasselquist feared he would be charged on each parcel individually, whereas a bond charges the owner based on the assessed value of their property. The second will be a question facing voters in the district in November — what’s the tipping point? If approved, the new bond measure, which would be used to improve facilities and make needed seismic repairs to local campuses, could cost homeowners an average of $185 per month, depending on the value of their home. Because it’s a bond, the answer to Hasselquist’s direct question was a regretful “no” — no such senior exemption exists for a bond, unlike a parcel tax. If approved by voters in November, the bond would add to the 11 other local and regional assessments that already appear on Santa Monica tax rolls, including Measure R and a previous bond, Measure BB, approved in 2006. According to tax documents provided by the Los Angeles County Auditor-Controller’s Office, those two measures alone cost one homeowner on the 1000 block of Centinela Avenue $421.68 in the 2011-12 fiscal year, or slightly more than half of the $792.52 tacked on by the nine other assessments. SEE BOND PAGE 11 BACK OR UNFILED

TAXES? ALL FORMS • ALL TYPES • ALL STATES SAMUEL B. MOSES, CPA

(310) 395-9922

100 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1800Santa Monica 90401


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.
Santa Monica Daily Press, August 10, 2012 by Santa Monica Daily Press - Issuu