The Review: October 2014

Page 1

ST. JOHN’S SCHOOL STUDENT NEWSPAPER · SJSREVIEW.COM 2401 CLAREMONT LANE · HOUSTON, TX 77019 · VOLUME 66 · ISSUE 2 · OCTOBER 20, 2014

‘WE OWE YOU AN APOLOGY’ Prefects reach out to students, self-report Homecoming theme bias JARED MARGOLIS

Taking Care of Business Head Prefect Akshay Jaggi, left, and Prefects Stephen Wang, Ben Bieser, and Gabe Bennett-Brandt, discuss Homecoming plans during a Students Affairs Council meeting, Oct. 10. Controversy arose when the Prefects published a letter on SJS Confessions II addressing confusion surrounding the Homecoming theme vote.

U

by Iris Cronin and Oliver Ruhl

sually, SJS Confessions is a hotbed of positivity: compliments, heartfelt advice and warm remembrances of school life are common fare on the Facebook page. But the controversial post that surfaced on Oct. 1 was not a declaration of affection. It was an apology. The open letter, addressed from the prefects to the student body, tackled accusations that the Homecoming theme vote was not entirely democratic. At issue: SAC’s [Student Affairs Council] apparent preference for the ‘Neon’ theme on the grounds that it fit with the Kinkaid Week theme. “The themes were “intended to align, and Spirit Club and SAC worked in secret to make sure that happened,” the letter read. During and after this year’s vote (conducted on the Review Online), allegations of SAC partiality abounded. “In the grand scheme of things, a high school vote on a Homecoming theme does not matter,” senior Elizabeth Elrod said.“This issue was important for the SJS community because it allowed us a chance to demonstrate that we don’t like having community organizations lie to us about the fairness of a vote.” The vote created the possibility of con-

flicting themes. “The homecoming dance theme and game theme have matched up for as long as we can remember,” the letter reads.“When the Homecoming theme poll was opened in 2013, the connection between the two was endangered.” Prefect Gabe Bennett-Brandt addressed the posting of the letter. “We on SAC felt guilty about the misconceptions surrounding the vote,” Bennett-Brandt said. “We understood that we had not provided a truly democratic system.” Overall, Bennett-Brandt said that SAC and the prefects were pleased with the reception of the letter. There were, however, some “road bumps.” “One issue was the formatting. The appearance of the letter was mangled in the transfer to Facebook; it got turned into this mass of text. We had many complaints of confusion and non-sequiturs,” he said. Bennett-Brandt also took umbrage with the word “rigged.” “Nowhere in the letter did we say we rigged the vote,” he said. “Anyone who gets that impression from the post has the completely wrong interpretation. I would say that’s been the main disappointment.” Former Head Prefect Sira Ntagha (’14) responded to allegations concerning the manipulation of the vote.

Center Whataburger:

Rubber Ducky: Alum Donovan Hohn tells the story of his adventures

MAVERICKS

An in-depth look at the fast food joint that defines our school

NEWS..................2 FEATURES...........3

CULTURE.............6 SPORTS.............7

“Spirit Club did advertise Color Splash, but they did that because they liked that theme, not because it would match up with Carnival,” Ntagha said via Facebook Messenger. “The voting isn’t rigged or fixed. Yes, it can be influenced, but that’s it.” The involvement of the Spirit Club in the theme selection was another point of contention brought up in the letter. “As in the past, Spirit Club collaborated with SAC when deciding potential themes for homecoming,” Spirit Club Captain Sarah Dyer said. “We wanted people to vote for their favorite and only once, but our advertising was simply promotion of the theme that we knew would work best with the Kinkaid Week theme.” The controversial vote was not the only issue addressed in the letter. “We were more concerned about the general discontent and worries people had about honor trials,” Head Prefect Akshay Jaggi said. “People were concerned about being judged not for what they had done in the classroom but what they’d done outside school.” The prefects’ letter responded directly to these concerns of impartiality at honor trials, assuring students that “during an honor trial, we dispose of any preconceptions.” “We think it is incredibly important for

IN FOCUS............8 BEYOND............11

OPINIONS..........13 ODD & ENDS......15

P11

sjsreview.com

you to be represented by your peers,” Jaggi said. “SAC is there in an honor trial to provide a student perspective on an event. We go in without any judgement. You have a clean slate.” Bennett-Brandt characterized the letter as primarily a response to “sudden dissatisfaction with SAC.” “We wanted to open the door to discussion about SAC as a whole, and we hoped to help people understand how important SAC could be,” he said. In addition to serving in honor trials and planning Homecoming, SAC members serve as student ambassadors, run the toy drive, organize Field Day, sell Valentine’s Day flowers and occasionally interview potential administrators. “SAC is not just something for a resume,” Junior Class President Joseph Hanson said. The prefects composed the letter with help from SAC faculty sponsors, but did not share a draft with other grade-level representatives. “We [non-prefects] found out about the letter the same way everybody else did, by looking at the page,” Hanson said. “I wish the letter had clarified that only prefects worked with the Spirit Club, but I mostly agreed with everything it said.” Continued on Page 3

Later this month: Photo galleries of Kinkaid Week festivities

@SJS_Review

Online

_thereview

SJS Review


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.