SIOUXCITYJOURNAL.COM
SUNDAY, FEBRUARY 1, 2015
1
ORDINANCE NO. 2015 - 0215 with attachments ORDINANCE REPEALING TITLE 25 ENTITLED “ZONINGâ€? AND CHAPTER 4.36 ENTITLED “SIGN REGULATIONSâ€? OF THE SIOUX CITY MUNICIPAL CODE AND ENACTING IN LIEU THEREOF A NEW ORDINANCE TO BE CODIFIED AS TITLE 25 ENTITLED “ZONING AND SIGN CODEâ€? OF THE SIOUX CITY MUNICIPAL CODE REGULATING AND RESTRICTING THE LOCATION AND USE OF BUILDINGS AND THE USE OF LAND IN THE CITY OF SIOUX CITY, IOWA; REGULATING THE DENSITY OF DEVELOPMENT; THE HEIGHT OF BUILDINGS; PROVIDING FOR YARD SPACES AND FOR OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING; ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES TO PROCESS PETITIONS FOR CHANGES TO ACCOMMODATE DEVELOPMENTS FOR THESE AND RELATED PURPOSES CONTAINED HEREIN; REGULATING SIGNS, AND DIVIDING THE CITY OF SIOUX CITY, IOWA INTO ZONES. WHEREAS, the provisions of the Code of Iowa empower the City of Sioux City, Iowa to enact a Zoning and Sign Code and to provide for its administration, enforcement and amendment; and WHEREAS, the City Council deems it necessary for the purpose of promoting the health, safety, morals and general welfare of the City to enact such an ordinance; and WHEREAS, the City Council pursuant to the provisions of the Code of Iowa has appointed the Planning and Zoning Commission to recommend the boundaries of the original districts and appropriate regulations to be enforced therein; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has divided the City into districts of such number, shape and area as are deemed best suited to carry out the purpose of this ordinance and has prepared regulations pertaining to such districts in accorGDQFH ZLWK D FRPSUHKHQVLYH SODQ DQG GHVLJQ WR OHVVHQ FRQJHVWLRQV LQ WKH VWUHHWV WR VHFXUH VDIHW\ IURP ÂżUH Ă€RRG SDQLF DQG RWKHU GDQJHUV WR SURPRWH KHDOWK DQG WKH JHQHUDO ZHOIDUH WR SURYLGH DGHTXDWH OLJKW DQG DLU WR SUHYHQW WKH RYHUFURZGLQJ RI ODQG WR DYRLG XQGXH FRQFHQWUDWLRQ RI SRSXODWLRQ WR IDFLOLWDWH WKH DGHTXDWH SURYLVLRQ RI WUDQVSRUWDWLRQ ZDWHU VHZDJH VFKRROV DQG SDUNV DQG RWKHU UHTXLUHPHQWV DQG WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission has given reasonable consideration, among other things, to the character of the area of the district and the peculiar suitability of such area for particular uses, with a view to conserving the value of buildings and encouraging the most appropriate use of lands throughout the City; and :+(5($6 WKH 3ODQQLQJ DQG =RQLQJ &RPPLVVLRQ KDV PDGH D SUHOLPLQDU\ UHSRUW DQG KHOG SXEOLF KHDULQJV WKHUHRQ DQG KDV WKHUHDIWHU VXEPLWWHG LWV ÂżQDO UHSRUW WR WKH &LW\ &RXQFLO DQG WHEREAS, the City Council has given due public notice of hearings relating to the Zoning and Sign Code, zoning districts, regulations, and restrictions, and has held such public hearings; and :+(5($6 DOO UHTXLUHPHQWV RI WKH &RGH RI ,RZD ZLWK UHJDUG WR WKH SUHSDUDWLRQ RI WKH UHSRUW RI WKH 3ODQQLQJ DQG =RQLQJ &RPPLVVLRQ DQG VXEVHTXHQW DFWLRQ RI WKH &LW\ &RXQFLO KDYH EHHQ PHW NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SIOUX CITY, IOWA: Section 1. That Chapter 4.36 entitled “Sign Regulationsâ€? and Title 25 entitled “Zoningâ€? of the Sioux City Municipal Code are hereby repealed in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Iowa. Section 2. That the Sioux City Municipal Code is hereby amended by adopting Title 25 entitled “Zoning and Sign Codeâ€?, attached hereto and incorporated herein, in accordance with the provisions of the Code of Iowa. 6HFWLRQ (IIHFWLYH 'DWH 7KLV RUGLQDQFH VKDOO EH LQ IXOO IRUFH DQG HIIHFW IURP DQG DIWHU LWV ÂżQDO SDVVDJH DQG SXEOLFDWLRQ DV E\ ODZ SURYLGHG PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL ON, AND APPROVED ON: March 23, 2015 /s/ Robert E. Scott, Mayor $77(67 V /LVD / 0F&DUGOH &LW\ &OHUN I hereby certify that the foregoing was published in the Sioux City Journal on March 28, 2015 V /LVD / 0F&DUGOH &LW\ &OHUN CHAPTER 25.01 AUTHORITY, JURISDICTION, APPLICATION, AND PURPOSES SUBCHAPTER 25.01-A AUTHORITY, JURISDICTION, APPLICATION, AND PURPOSES Sec. 25.01.010 Title The Sioux City Zoning and Sign Code shall be known as, and may be referred to as, “the Sioux City Zoning and Sign Code,â€? “the ZSC,â€? or “this Code.â€? Sec. 25.01.020 Authority 1. Generally. The provisions of this Code are authorized as provided in this Section. 2. City Charter. In general, this Code is authorized by Section 1.10.040, Powers and Duties, of the Charter of the City of Sioux City, Iowa (Chapter 1.10, City Charter, of the City of Sioux City). All provisions in this Code that affect the area within the corporate boundaries of the City and are not preempted by state or federal law are authorized by the City Charter. 3. Authority. This Code is adopted pursuant to the authority granted by the Iowa Code including, but not limited to: a. Chapter 372, Organization of City Government, Section 372.9, Home Rule Charter Procedure; and b. Chapter 414, City Zoning. 4. Iowa Code. Supplemental authority for the provisions of this Code is provided by the Iowa Code provided that they are either preemptive or not inconsistent with the provisions of this Code. The following provisions of the Iowa Code may be relied upon as authority for certain provisions of this Code: a. Chapter 18B, Land Use - Smart Planning; b. Chapter 101A, Explosive Materials; c. Chapter 113, Licensing and Regulation of Foster Family Homes; d. Chapter 135O, Boarding Homes; e. Chapter 162, Care of Animals in Commercial Establishments; f. Chapter 172D, Livestock Feedlots; g. Chapter 231B, Elder Group Homes; h. Chapter 237A, Child Care Facilities; i. Chapter 237B, Children’s Centers - Facility Standards; j. Chapter 306B, Outdoor Advertising Along Interstate Highways; k. Chapter 306CÇĄ —Â?Â?›ƒ”† ‡ƒ—–‹Ď?‹…ƒ–‹‘Â? ƒÂ?† ‹ŽŽ„‘ƒ”† ‘Â?–”‘ŽǢ l. Chapter 306D, Scenic Routes; m. Chapter 329, Airport Zoning; n. Chapter 368, City Development; o. Chapter 404, Urban Revitalization Tax Exemptions; p. Chapter 458A, Oil, Gas, and Other Minerals; q. Chapter 459, Animal Agriculture Compliance Act; and r. Chapter 459A, Animal Agriculture Compliance Act for Open Feedlot Operations. 5. Federal Law. The provisions of this Code are subject to all applicable federal regulations including, but not limited to: a. Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act of 1995; b. Federal Fair Housing Act; and c. Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA). 6. Additional Authority; Limitations. Should further authorizing legislation exist or be enacted, this Code is additionally deemed to be enacted or effective pursuant thereto, except: a. This Code shall be superseded by such legislation only to the extent of any irreconcilable …‘Â?Ď?Ž‹…– ‹ˆ –Ї ‹–›ǯ• Š‘Â?‡ ”—އ ƒ—–Š‘”‹–› †‘‡• Â?‘– •—„‘”†‹Â?ƒ–‡ •—…Š އ‰‹•Žƒ–‹‘Â?Ǣ ƒÂ?† b. This Code shall supersede inconsistent legislation if the City’s home rule authority so provides. ^ÄžÄ?͘ ĎŽĎąÍ˜ĎŹĎÍ˜ĎŹĎŻĎŹ :ĆľĆŒĹ?Ć?ÄšĹ?Ä?Ć&#x;ŽŜ All provisions of this Code apply within the corporate limits of the City of Sioux City, Iowa, as may be ‡š’ƒÂ?†‡†ǥ …‘Â?Â–Â”ÂƒÂ…Â–Â‡Â†ÇĄ ‘” Â?‘†‹Ď?‹‡† ˆ”‘Â? –‹Â?‡ –‘ –‹Â?‡Ǥ ^ÄžÄ?͘ ĎŽĎąÍ˜ĎŹĎÍ˜ĎŹĎ°ĎŹ ƉƉůĹ?Ä?Ä‚Ć&#x;ŽŜ 1. Generally. No land shall be used or developed except in accordance with this Code and the Sioux City Municipal Code, where applicable. All of the following are subject to the applicable requirements of this Code, and may require one or more development permits: a. The use of any building, structure, land, or water, including: 1. New uses; and 2. Structural alterations or enlargements of, additions to, changes in, and relocation of existing uses (which may be subject to Subchapter 25.06-C, Nonconformities). b. The construction, material alteration, repair, relocation, or demolition of buildings or structures (including, but not limited to, fences, retaining walls, and signs). c. Alterations of historic sites and buildings. d. Landscaping and buffering, but not including: 1. Routine landscaping or bufferyard maintenance; 2. Landscaping of individually-owned residential lots; and 3. Agricultural operations. ‡Ǥ ”‡…–‹‘Â?ÇĄ …‘Â?•–”—…–‹‘Â?ÇĄ ‡Â?Žƒ”‰‡Â?‡Â?–ǥ Â?‘†‹Ď?‹…ƒ–‹‘Â?ÇĄ ƒŽ–‡”ƒ–‹‘Â?ÇĄ ”‡Ž‘…ƒ–‹‘Â?ÇĄ Â”Â‡Â’ÂƒÂ‹Â”ÇĄ ‹Â?provements, demolition, maintenance, or conversion of signs, as set out in Subchapter 25.05-C, Signs. 2. Publicly-Owned Property. a. General Exemptions. Those portions of this Code that govern the location of allowed, limited, and conditional uses shall not apply to the governments of the United States of America or the State of Iowa and their agencies and political subdivisions, and the City in the performance of their governmental functions. All other provisions of this Code apply, (e.g. Chapter 25.03, Development Standards; Chapter 25.05, Site Development; and, as applicable, Chapter 25.06, Administration). b. Exemptions for Public Safety. Following a public hearing with notice provided as set out in Subsection 25.06.070.9, Public Notice, it may be determined that facilities and services essential for public safety may be exempt from the standards of this Code, ‡š…‡’– Ď?Ž‘‘†’Žƒ‹Â? ”‡‰—Žƒ–‹‘Â?•ǥ ‹ˆ –Ї ˆ‘ŽŽ‘™‹Â?‰ Ď?‹Â?†‹Â?‰• ƒ”‡ Â?ÂƒÂ†Â‡ÇŁ 1. Application of normal development standards will not allow the establishment of the subject public safety facility or service; 2. All reasonable alternatives have been reviewed to assure that the public safety facility or service is optimally located and developed; ;Ǥ Â?Ž› –Ї •’‡…‹Ď?‹… •–ƒÂ?†ƒ”†• –Šƒ– …ƒÂ?Â?‘– „‡ Â?‡– ™‹–Š‘—– …‘Â?’”‘Â?‹•‹Â?‰ –Ї integrity of public safety will be relaxed; and 4. Only the smallest increment of relief from development standards that will result in effective provision of essential public safety facilities or services will be allowed. c. Otherwise Applicable. All other provisions of this Code, including those that govern temporary, accessory, and supplemental uses, are applicable not only to private persons, agencies, corporations, and organizations, but also to all public agencies and organizations to the full extent that they may be enforceable under the United States Constitution and the Constitution and Statutes of the State of Iowa. 3. Relationship to Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions; Private Agreements. a. This Code is not intended to abrogate, annul, or otherwise interfere with any easement, covenant, condition, restriction, or other private agreement or legal relationship; provided, however, that where the regulations of this Code are more restrictive or impose higher standards or requirements, then the regulations of this Code shall govern. b. The City has no duty to search for the existence of private restrictions on property. c. The City will not interpret, apply, or enforce private restrictions unless it is a party to them. 4. Urban Renewal Plans. Requirements of any urban renewal plan –Šƒ– ƒ”‡ ‘ˆĎ?‹…‹ƒŽŽ› ƒ†‘’–‡† „› the City Council shall abide by the provisions of this Code. Additionally, the nonconforming use provisions of Subchapter 25.06-C, Nonconformities, shall be applied and enforced within each urban renewal area to regulate and limit the continued existence of uses, structures, and lots that do not conform with the use, space limitations, or off-street parking requirements contained in this Code. 5. ’‡…‹Ď?‹… š…‡’–‹‘Â?•Ǥ ’‡…‹Ď?‹… ‡š…‡’–‹‘Â?• –‘ –Ї ”‡“—‹”‡Â?‡Â?–• ‘ˆ –Š‹• ‘†‡ Â?ƒ› „‡ •‡– ‘—– ‹Â? individual Chapters, Divisions, or Sections. 6. Prohibited Uses. No use of any building, structure or land; no building or structure; and no lot of record, now or hereafter existing, shall be established, altered, moved, divided, or maintained after the effective date of this Code, under any circumstances, except as authorized by the provisions of this Code. Existing uses that are prohibited after the effective date are subject to Subchapter 25.06-C, Nonconformities. ^ÄžÄ?͘ ĎŽĎąÍ˜ĎŹĎÍ˜ĎŹĎąĎŹ WĆľĆŒĆ‰Ĺ˝Ć?ÄžĆ? ĂŜĚ &Ĺ?ŜĚĹ?ĹśĹ?Ć? 1. Generally. In accordance with Section 414.3, Basis of Regulations, of the Iowa Code, these regulations are established in accordance with a comprehensive plan and are designed to: a. Preserve the availability of agricultural land; b. Consider the protection of soil from wind and water erosion; …Ǥ Â?…‘—”ƒ‰‡ ‡ˆĎ?‹…‹‡Â?– —”„ƒÂ? †‡˜‡Ž‘’Â?‡Â?– ’ƒ––‡”Â?•Ǣ d. Lessen congestion in the streets; ‡Ǥ ‡…—”‡ •ƒˆ‡–› ˆ”‘Â? Ď?‹”‡ǥ Ď?Ž‘‘†ǥ ’ƒÂ?‹…ǥ ƒÂ?† ‘–Ї” †ƒÂ?‰‡”•Ǣ f. Promote health and the general welfare; g. Provide adequate light and air; h. Prevent the overcrowding of land; i. Avoid undue concentration of population; j. Promote the conservation of energy resources; k. Promote reasonable access to renewable energy; and l. Facilitate the adequate provision of transportation, water, sewerage, schools, parks, and other public requirements. 2. ’‡…‹Ď?‹…ƒŽŽ›. The regulations of this Code shall be implemented for the general purposes set out above and by using the City’s home rule, constitutional, and statutory powers to: a. Implement the City’s Comprehensive Plan and other adopted plans, which: ͳǤ ‡Ď?އ…– –Ї •Šƒ”‡† ˜ƒŽ—‡• ƒÂ?† Ž‘Â?‰nj–‡”Â? ‘„Œ‡…–‹˜‡• ‘ˆ –Ї ‹–› ™‹–Š ”‡•’‡…– to the character, form, and function of its future development; and ʹǤ ”‘Â?‘–‡ ’ŽƒÂ?Â?‡†ǥ ÂŽÂ‘Â‰Â‹Â…ÂƒÂŽÇĄ ƒÂ?† Ď?‹•…ƒŽŽ› ƒÂ?† ‡Â?˜‹”‘Â?Â?‡Â?–ƒŽŽ› ”‡•’‘Â?•‹„އǥ and orderly development and redevelopment within the City and other areas that may be subject to the City’s regulatory authority; b. Protect the social, economic, cultural, recreational, and aesthetic well-being of both private and public property; c. Promote, in the public interest, the utilization of land for the purposes for which it is most desirable and best adapted; d. Regulate the height, number of stories, and size of buildings and other structures; the percentage of lot that may be occupied; the size of yards, courts, and other open spaces; the density of population; and the location and use of buildings, structures, and land for trade, industry, residence, or other purposes, in accordance with Section 414.1, Building Restrictions - Powers Granted, of the Iowa Code; e. Preserve and enhance the character, quality, and integrity of established neighborhoods; f. Enhance the visual character and attractiveness of the City through regulation of site and building design; g. Promote a balanced, diverse supply of quality, affordable housing located in safe and
Sioux City Zoning and Sign Code – Final Draft 03.23.15
livable neighborhoods; h. Protect and conserve natural resources and promote responsible development patterns; i. Preserve, enhance, and protect the unique and special character of the City’s historic districts and properties and other areas of cultural, scenic, or architectural importance ‘” •‹‰Â?‹Ď?‹…ƒÂ?…‡Ǣ ŒǤ ‹Â?‹Â?‹œ‡ …‘Â?Ď?Ž‹…–• ƒÂ?‘Â?‰ ƒ†Œƒ…‡Â?– ŽƒÂ?† —•‡•Ǣ Â?Ǥ ”‘˜‹†‡ ˆ‘” ‡ˆĎ?‹…‹‡Â?– ƒÂ?† ˆƒ‹” †‡˜‡Ž‘’Â?‡Â?– ƒ’’”‘˜ƒŽ ’”‘…‡†—”‡• –Šƒ– ”‡•’‡…– ’”‘’‡”–› rights and ensure quality development; l. Provide regulations pertaining to pre-existing lots, structures, and uses which do not conform to the regulations, standards, restrictions, and limitation established by this Code; and m. Protect the City’s tax base by enhancing business opportunities and increasing property ˜ƒŽ—‡• –Š”‘—‰Š ’”‘Â?‘–‹Â?‰ Â“Â—ÂƒÂŽÂ‹Â–Â›ÇĄ •—•–ƒ‹Â?ƒ„އ „—‹Ž†‹Â?‰ ‹Â?’”‘˜‡Â?‡Â?–•ǥ ‹Â?Ď?‹ŽŽ †‡˜‡Žopment, and redevelopment. 3. Other Purposes. Other purposes of the various Chapters, Divisions, and Sections may be expressed therein. 4. †—Ž– Â?–‡”–ƒ‹Â?Â?‡Â?– —•‹Â?‡••‡•. a. Purpose. It is the purpose of this Code to regulate certain adult entertainment businesses in order to promote the health, safety, and general welfare of the citizens of the City, and to establish reasonable and uniform regulations to prevent the deleterious secondary effects of adult uses within the City. b. Intent and Effect. The provisions of this Code have neither the purpose nor effect of imposing a limitation or restriction on the content or reasonable access to any communicative materials, including sexually oriented materials. Similarly, it is neither the intent nor the effect of this Code to restrict or deny access by adults to sexually oriented materials protected by the First Amendment, or to deny access by the distributors and exhibitors of sexually oriented entertainment to their intended market. Neither is it the intent nor effect of this Code to condone or legitimize the distribution of obscene material. c. Findings. This Code is based on the City’s general police power, as well as on the evidence of the adverse secondary effects of adult entertainment businesses, which is within the common knowledge of municipalities and is widely reported in judicial opinions, media reports, land use studies, and crime impact reports made available to the City Council, several of which are set forth herein. Additionally, the City Council ”‡Ž‹‡• —’‘Â? ”‡’‡ƒ–‡† Œ—†‹…‹ƒŽ Ď?‹Â?†‹Â?‰• ‘ˆ Â?—Â?Â‹Â…Â‹Â’ÂƒÂŽÂ‹Â–Â‹Â‡Â•ÇŻ ”‡ƒ•‘Â?ƒ„އ ”‡Ž‹ƒÂ?…‡ ‘Â? –Š‹• body of secondary effects evidence to support time, place, and manner regulations of adult entertainment businesses. The City Council relies upon and incorporates –Ї Ď?‹Â?†‹Â?‰• …‘Â?…‡”Â?‹Â?‰ •‡…‘Â?†ƒ”› ‡ˆˆ‡…–• †‹•…—••‡† ‹Â? –Ї ˆ‘ŽŽ‘™‹Â?‰ Â?‘Â?ÇŚÂ‡ÂšÂŠÂƒÂ—Â•tive list of cases: City of Littleton v. Z.J. Gifts D-4, L.L.C., 2004 U.S. LEXIS 4026 (June 7, 2004); City of Los Angeles v. Alameda Books, Inc., 535 U.S. 425 (2002); Pap’ s A.M. v. City of Erie, 529 U.S. 277 (2000); City of Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc., 475 U.S. 41 (1986); Young v. American Mini Theatres, 426 U.S. 50 (1976); Barnes v. Glen Theatre, Inc., 501 U.S. 560 (1991); FW/PBS, Inc. v. City of Dallas, 493 U.S. 215 (1990); Sewell v. Georgia, 233 S.E.2d 187 (Ga. 1977), dismissed for want of a substantial federal question, 435 U.S. 982 (1978); Farkas v. Miller, 151 F.3d 900 8th Cir. 1998); Jakes Ltd. v. City of Coates, 284 F.3d 884 (2002); BZAPS, Inc. v. City of Mankato, 268 F.3d 603 8th Cir. 2001); SOB, Inc. v. County of Benton, 317 F.3d 856 (8th Cir. 2003); Green v. City of St. Paul, 1999 U.S. App. LEXIS 12057 (8th Cir. 1999) (unreported); Scope Pictures v. City of Kansas City, 140 F.3d 1201 (8th Cir. 1998); Excalibur Group v. City of Minneapolis, 116 F.3d 1216 (8th Cir. 1997); ILQ Invs. v. City of Rochester, 25 F.3d 1413 (8th Cir. 1994); Ambassador Books & Video v. City of Little Rock, 20 F.3d 858 (8th Cir. 1994); Alexander v. Minneapolis, 928 F.2d 278 (8th Cir. 1991); John Doe v. Minneapolis, 898 F.2d 612 (8th Cir. 1990); Thames Enters. v. St. Louis, 851 F.2d 199 (8th Cir. 1988); MRM, Inc. v. City of Davenport, 290 N.W.2d 338 (Iowa 1980); North Avenue Novelties, Inc. v. City of Chicago, 88 F.3d 441 (1996); World Wide Video of Washington, Inc. v. City of Spokane, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 10443 (9th Cir., May 27, 2004) (including exhibits cited therein), aff g 227 F.Supp.2d 1143 (E.D. Wash. 2002); Bigg Wolf Discount Video v. Montgomery County, 256 F. Supp. 2d 385 (D. Md. 2003); Z.J. Gifts D-2, L.L.C. v. City of Aurora, 136 F.3d 683 (10th Cir. 1998); Z.J. Gifts D-4 L.L.C. v. City of Littleton, 93 P.3d 633 (Colo. App. 2004); County of Cook v. Renaissance Arcade and Bookstore, 122 Ill. 2d 123 (1988) (including cases cited therein); and other cases; and on reports concerning secondary effects in and around adult uses, including, but not limited to, Summaries of Key Reports Concerning the Negative Secondary Effects of Sexually Oriented Businesses; Garden Grove, California - 1991; Los Angeles, California - 1977; Whittier, California - 1978; Austin, Texas - 1986; Phoenix, Arizona -1979, 1995-1998; Minneapolis, Minnesota - 1980; Houston, Texas - 1997; Tucson, Arizona – 1990; Indianapolis, Indiana – 1984; St. Cloud, Minnesota - 1994; Amarillo, Texas; Centralia, Washington - 2003; Seattle, Washington - 1989; Oklahoma City, Oklahoma - 1986; ƒÂ?† ÂƒÂŽÂŽÂƒÂ•ÇĄ ‡šƒ• ÇŚ ͳ͚͝͝Ǣ ‡™ ‘”Â? ‹Â?‡• “—ƒ”‡ •–—†› ÇŚ ͳ͜͝͝Ǣ ƒÂ?† ƒŽ•‘ ‘Â? Ď?‹Â?†ings from the Report of the Attorney General’s Working Group on The Regulation of †—Ž– —•‡•ǥ Č‹ —Â?‡ ͸ǥ ͳ͝ͺ͝ǥ –ƒ–‡ ‘ˆ ‹Â?Â?Â‡Â•Â‘Â–ÂƒČŒÇĄ –Ї ‘—Â?…‹Ž Ď?‹Â?†•ǣ 1. Adult entertainment businesses should be segregated from one another by a minimum distance and are further inappropriate for locations in close proximity to houses of worship, schools, day care centers, and residential neighborhoods because adult entertainment businesses, as a category of commercial uses, are associated with a wide variety of adverse secondary effects including, but not limited to, personal and property crimes, illicit and unsanitary sexual activity, illicit drug use, decreased desirability of and negative impacts on the use of surrounding properties, urban blight, litter, and sexual assault and exploitation. 2. The City has a substantial government interest in regulating the proper location of sexual enterprises and has a substantial government interest in preventing each of the aforementioned adverse effects. 3. The American Center of Law and Justice also completed a study on the secondary effects of such uses, dated March 1996. 4. Secondary effects of adult entertainment businesses may include any or all of the following, which have a material effect on the health, safety, and welfare of City residents: A. Particularly when they are located in close proximity to each other, adult entertainment businesses are indicias of urban blight, which downgrade the quality of life in the adjacent area; B. Adult entertainment businesses have a deleterious effect on both neighboring businesses and surrounding residential areas, as they are regularly related to an increase in crime and a decrease in property values; C. Adult entertainment businesses commonly require special supervision from public safety agencies in order to protect public health, safety and welfare, including that of the patrons of such businesses; D. Studies and experience show that in the absence of regulation ‘ˆ ƒ†—Ž– ‡Â?–‡”–ƒ‹Â?Â?‡Â?– „—•‹Â?‡••‡•ǥ •‹‰Â?‹Ď?‹…ƒÂ?– …”‹Â?‹Â?ƒŽ ÂƒÂ…Â–Â‹Â˜Â‹Â–Â›ÇĄ including prostitution, narcotics and liquor law violations, have historically and regularly occurred; E. Adult entertainment businesses are frequently used for unlawful and unhealthful sexual activities, including prostitution and sexual liaisons of a casual nature, and the concern over sexually transmitted diseases, including HIV, is a legitimate health concern of the City; F. Adult entertainment businesses lend themselves to ancillary unlawful and unhealthy activities that are often uncontrolled by the operators of the establishments; and G. Children and minors may be harmed by exposure to the secondary effects of adult entertainment businesses, including those encountered when children walk through or visit in the immediate neighborhood of such businesses. 5. The City wishes to minimize and control adverse effects and thereby protect the health, safety and welfare of the citizens; preserve the quality of life; preserve the property values and character of surrounding neighborhoods; deter the spread of urban blight and protect the citizens from increased crime. 5. ‡š—ƒŽŽ› ”‹‡Â?–‡† —•‹Â?‡••‡•. a. Purpose. It is the purpose of this Code to regulate sexually oriented businesses in order to promote the health, safety, and general welfare of the citizens of the City, and to establish reasonable and uniform regulations to prevent the deleterious secondary effects of sexually oriented businesses within the City. b. Intent and Effect. The provisions of this Code have neither the purpose nor effect of imposing a limitation or restriction on the content or reasonable access to any communicative materials, including sexually oriented materials. Similarly, it is neither the intent nor effect of this ordinance to restrict or deny access by adults to sexually oriented materials protected by the First Amendment, or to deny access by the distributors and exhibitors of sexually oriented entertainment to their intended market. Neither is it the intent nor effect of this Code to condone or legitimize the distribution of obscene material. c. Findings. This Code is based on the City’s general police power, as well as on the evidence of the adverse secondary effects of sexually oriented and adult entertainment businesses, which is within the common knowledge of municipalities and is widely reported in judicial opinions, media reports, land use studies, and crime impact reports made available to the City Council, several of which are set forth herein. ††‹–‹‘Â?ÂƒÂŽÂŽÂ›ÇĄ –Ї ‹–› ‘—Â?…‹Ž ”‡Ž‹‡• —’‘Â? ”‡’‡ƒ–‡† Œ—†‹…‹ƒŽ Ď?‹Â?†‹Â?‰• ‘ˆ Â?—Â?‹…‹’ƒŽ‹ties’ reasonable reliance on this body of secondary effects evidence to support time, place, and manner regulations of sex-related businesses. The City Council relies —’‘Â? ƒÂ?† ‹Â?…‘”’‘”ƒ–‡• –Ї Ď?‹Â?†‹Â?‰• …‘Â?…‡”Â?‹Â?‰ •‡…‘Â?†ƒ”› ‡ˆˆ‡…–• †‹•…—••‡† ‹Â? –Ї following non-exhaustive list of cases: City of Littleton v. Z.J. Gifts D-4, L.L.C., 2004 U.S. LEXIS 4026 (June 7, 2004); City of Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc., 475 U.S. 41 (1986); Young v. American Mini Theatres, 426 U.S. 50 (1976); Barnes v. Glen Theatre, Inc., 501 U.S. 560 (1991); FW/PBS, Inc. v. City of Dallas, 493 U.S. 215 (1990); Sewell v. Georgia, 233 S.E.2d 187 (Ga. 1977), dismissed for want of a substantial federal question, 435 U.S. 982 (1978); Farkas v. Miller, 151 F.3d 900 (8th Cir. 1998); Recreational Developments of Phoenix, Inc. v. City of Phoenix, 83 F. Supp. 2d 1072 (D. Ariz. 1999); IDK, Inc. v. County of Clark, 836 F.2d 1185 (9th Cir. 1988); United States v. Evans, 272 F.3d 1069 (8th Cir. 2002); United States v. Mueller, 663 F.2d 811 (8th Cir. 1981); BZAPS, Inc. v. City of Mankato, 268 F.3d 603 (8th Cir. 2001); PHE, Inc. v. State, 2004 Miss. LEXIS 269 (2004); Yorko v. State, 690 S.W.2d 260 (Tex. 1985); SOB, Inc. v. County of Benton, 317 F.3d 856 (8th Cir. 2003); United States v. Frederickson, 846 F.2d 517 (1988); ILQ Invs. v. City of Rochester, 25 F.3d 1413 (8th Cir. 1994); MRM, Inc. v. City of Davenport, 290 N.W.2d 338 (Iowa 1980); North Avenue Novelties, Inc. v. City of Chicago, 88 F.3d 441 (1996); World Wide Video of Washington, Inc. v. City of Spokane, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 10443 (9th Cir., May
27, 2004) (including exhibits cited therein), aff’ g 227 F.Supp.2d 1143 (E.D. Wash. 2002); Z.J. Gifts D-2, L.L.C. v. City of Aurora, 136 F.3d 683 (10th Cir. 1998); Z.J. Gifts D-4 L.L.C. v. City of Littleton, 93 P.3d 633 (Colo. App. 2004); Bigg Wolf Discount Video v. Montgomery County, 256 F. Supp. 2d 385 (D. Md. 2003); County of Cook v. Renaissance Arcade and Bookstore, 122 Ill. 2d 123 (1988) (including cases cited therein); and other cases; and on reports concerning secondary effects in and around adult uses, including, but not limited to, Summaries of Key Reports Concerning the Negative Secondary Effects of Sexually Oriented Businesses, Garden Grove, California - 1991; Los Angeles, California - 1977; Austin, Texas - 1986; Phoenix, Arizona – 1979, 1995-1998; Centralia, Washington - 2003; Minneapolis, Minnesota - 1980; St. Cloud, Minnesota - 1994; Houston, Texas - 1997; Indianapolis, Indiana – 1984; Tucson, Arizona – 1990; Oklahoma City, Oklahoma - 1986; and DalÂŽÂƒÂ•ÇĄ ‡šƒ• ÇŚ ͳ͚͝͝Ǣ –Ǥ Ž‘—†ǥ ‹Â?Â?‡•‘–ƒ Č‚ ͳ͜͝͝Ǣ ƒÂ?† ƒŽ•‘ ‘Â? Ď?‹Â?†‹Â?‰• ˆ”‘Â? –Ї ‡’‘”– of the Attorney General’s Working Group on The Regulation of Adult uses, (June 6, ͳ͝ͺ͝ǥ –ƒ–‡ ‘ˆ ‹Â?Â?Â‡Â•Â‘Â–ÂƒČŒÇĄ –Ї ‘—Â?…‹Ž Ď?‹Â?†•ǣ 1. Sexually oriented businesses should be segregated from one another by a minimum distance and are further inappropriate for locations in close proximity to houses of worship, schools, day care centers, and residential neighborhoods because, inter alia, sexually oriented businesses, as a category of commercial uses, are associated with a wide variety of adverse secondary effects including, but not limited to, personal and property crimes, illicit and unsanitary sexual activity, illicit drug use, decreased desirability of and negative impacts on the use of surrounding properties, urban blight, litter, and sexual assault and exploitation. 2. The City has a substantial government interest in regulating the proper location of sexual businesses and has a substantial government interest in preventing each of the aforementioned adverse effects. (Ord. 2004-1059) 3. The American Center of Law and Justice also completed a study on the secondary effects of such uses, dated March 1996. 4. Secondary effects of sexually-oriented businesses may include any or all of the following, which have a material effect on the health, safety, and welfare of City residents: A. Particularly when they are located in close proximity to each other, sexually-oriented businesses are indicias of urban blight, which downgrade the quality of life in the adjacent area; B. Sexually-oriented businesses have a deleterious effect on both neighboring businesses and surrounding residential areas, as they are regularly related to an increase in crime and a decrease in property values; C. Sexually-oriented businesses commonly require special supervision from public safety agencies in order to protect public health, safety and welfare, including that of the patrons of such businesses; D. Studies and experience show that in the absence of regulation of Â•Â‡ÂšÂ—ÂƒÂŽÂŽÂ›ÇŚÂ‘Â”Â‹Â‡Â?–‡† „—•‹Â?‡••‡•ǥ •‹‰Â?‹Ď?‹…ƒÂ?– …”‹Â?‹Â?ƒŽ ÂƒÂ…Â–Â‹Â˜Â‹Â–Â›ÇĄ ‹Â?…Ž—†ing prostitution, narcotics and liquor law violations, have historically and regularly occurred; E. Sexually-oriented businesses are frequently used for unlawful and unhealthful sexual activities, including prostitution and sexual liaisons of a casual nature, and the concern over sexually transmitted diseases, including HIV, is a legitimate health concern of the City; F. Sexually-oriented businesses lend themselves to ancillary unlawful and unhealthy activities that are often uncontrolled by the operators of the establishments; and G. Children and minors may be harmed by exposure to the secondary effects of sexually-oriented businesses, including those encountered when children walk through or visit in the immediate neighborhood of such businesses. 5. The City wishes to minimize and control adverse effects and thereby protect the health, safety and welfare of the citizens; preserve the quality of life; preserve the property values and character of surrounding neighborhoods; deter the spread of urban blight and protect the citizens from increased crime. 6. Â?ƒŽŽ ‹Â?† Â?‡”‰› ›•–‡Â?•Ǥ Ї ‹–› ‘ˆ ‹‘—š ‹–› Ď?‹Â?†• –Šƒ– ™‹Â?† ‡Â?‡”‰› ‹• ƒÂ? ƒ„—Â?†ƒÂ?–ǥ renewable, and nonpolluting energy resource and that its conversion to electricity will: 1) reduce dependence on nonrenewable energy resources; 2) decrease the air and water pollution that results from the use of nonrenewable energy sources; and 3) provide the potential for citizens to reduce the cost of electricity they use. Small wind energy systems also make the electricity supply market more competitive by promoting customer choice. The State of Iowa has enacted a number of laws and programs to encourage the use of small-scale renewable energy systems, including net metering, sales tax exemptions, property tax exemptions, production tax credits, and the Small Wind Innovation Zone program. ^ÄžÄ?͘ ĎŽĎąÍ˜ĎŹĎÍ˜ĎŹĎ˛ĎŹ ÄŤÄžÄ?Ć&#x;ǀĞ ĂƚĞ The effective date is the adopted date or most recent amended date of this Code. SUBCHAPTER 25.01-B TRANSITIONAL PROVISIONS ^ÄžÄ?͘ ĎŽĎąÍ˜ĎŹĎÍ˜ĎŹĎłĎŹ WĞŜĚĹ?ĹśĹ? ƉƉůĹ?Ä?Ä‚Ć&#x;ŽŜĆ? 1. Generally. Except as provided in Item 2, Applications, below, each application for development approval shall be evaluated by the regulations that were in effect at the time the application was submitted. 2. Applications. Applications pending on the effective date of this Code shall be decided in accor†ƒÂ?…‡ ™‹–Š –Ї Žƒ™ ‹Â? ‡ˆˆ‡…– ‘Â? –Ї †ƒ–‡ •—…Š ƒ’’Ž‹…ƒ–‹‘Â? ™ƒ• Ď?‹Ž‡†ǥ ‡š…‡’– ĥ •’‡…‹Ď?‹…ƒŽŽ› ’”‘˜‹†‡† in Section 25.01.120, Existing Planned Developments. Applications for development approval that were not pursued with due diligence may expire pursuant to Subsection 25.06.070.6, Termination of Inactive Applications. 3. —–› ‘ˆ ‹–› ˆĎ?‹…‹ƒŽ•Ǥ ‹–Š‹Â? ʹͲ †ƒ›• ˆ‘ŽŽ‘™‹Â?‰ –Ї ‡ˆˆ‡…–‹˜‡ †ƒ–‡ ‘ˆ –Š‹• ‘†‡ǥ ƒÂ?› ‹–› ‘ˆĎ?Â‹Â…Â‹ÂƒÂŽÇĄ department, agency, board, or commission then considering an application that is applicable to this Code, as set out in Item 2, Applications, above, shall transmit a copy of the application to the Administrator. 4. Duty of Administrator. Within 30 days of the effective date of this Code, the Administrator shall inform the applicant(s) in writing that the application is subject to and will be processed in accor†ƒÂ?…‡ ™‹–Š –Ї ’”‘˜‹•‹‘Â?• ‘ˆ –Š‹• ‘†‡Ǥ ‹–Š‹Â? ;Ͳ †ƒ›• ‘ˆ –Ї Â?ƒ‹Ž‡† Â?‘–‹…‡ǥ –Ї ƒ’’Ž‹…ƒÂ?– Â?ƒ› ”‡Ď?‹Ž‡ the application, without fee, on the basis of this Code. If the applicant †‘‡• Â?‘– ”‡Ď?‹Ž‡ –Ї ƒ’’Ž‹…ƒ–‹‘Â?ÇĄ the application may be denied for noncompliance with the provisions of this Code. 5. Duty of Applicant. Notwithstanding the provisions of this Section, it shall be the responsibility of each applicant having an application pending on the effective date of this Code, to modify the application in accordance with the standards, procedures, and regulatory provisions of this Code. Any Â?‘†‹Ď?‹…ƒ–‹‘Â? ‘” ”‡Ď?‹Ž‹Â?‰ ‘ˆ ƒÂ? ƒ’’Ž‹…ƒ–‹‘Â? •ŠƒŽŽ „‡ ’‡”Â?‹––‡† ƒ– ƒÂ?› –‹Â?‡ ’”‹‘” –‘ –Ї Ď?‹Â?ƒŽ †‹•’‘•‹–‹‘Â? of the application, and shall be permitted without payment of any additional application fees. ^ÄžÄ?͘ ĎŽĎąÍ˜ĎŹĎÍ˜ĎŹĎ´ĎŹ ĞǀĞůŽƉžĞŜƚ Ć‰Ć‰ĆŒĹ˝Ç€Ä‚ĹŻĆ? ĂŜĚ ĆľĹ?ĹŻÄšĹ?ĹśĹ? WÄžĆŒĹľĹ?ĆšĆ? ƚŚĂƚ WĆŒÄžÄšÄ‚ĆšÄž ƚŚĹ?Ć? ŽĚĞ 1. Generally. It is the intent of the City to respect existing development approvals and building permits. Approved development and building plans may be carried out within the scope of the approved plans, including applicable standards and codes in effect at the time of approval, provided that the approval is valid and has not expired as set out in Subsection 25.06.070.6, Termination of Inactive Applications. 2. Right to Complete Construction. Nothing in this Code shall be deemed to require any change in the plans, construction, or designated use of any structure in the event that: a. A building permit for a structure was lawfully issued prior to the effective date of this Code; and b. The building permit had not by its own terms expired prior to the effective date of this Code, as set out in Subsection 25.06.070.6, Termination of Inactive Applications; and c. There has been a substantial change of position, substantial expenditures, or substantial obligations incurred by the permit holder in reliance on such permit; d. A change of position, expenditures, or incurred obligations occurred prior to the time the permit holder had actual or constructive knowledge of this Code which would, upon adoption, make the issuance of the building permit illegal; and e. Construction pursuant to the building permit was commenced prior to the expiration of the permit and within 90 days of the effective date of this Code and is thereafter diligently pursued to completion. 3. Right to Occupy. Upon completion pursuant to Item 2, Right to Complete Construction, above, a structure may be occupied by, and a …‡”–‹Ď?‹…ƒ–‡ ‘ˆ ‘……—’ƒÂ?…› shall be issued for, the use designated on the building permit, subject thereafter to the provisions of Subchapter 25.06-C, Nonconformities. 4. Duration of Approvals. Development approvals that are valid on the effective date of this ‘†‡ ƒ”‡ ˜ƒŽ‹† ˆ‘” –Ї †—”ƒ–‹‘Â? •’‡…‹Ď?‹‡† ‹Â? ‘” ƒ– –Ї –‹Â?‡ ‘ˆ ƒ’’”‘˜ƒŽǤ ˆ Â?‘ †—”ƒ–‹‘Â? ™ƒ• ‹Â? ‡ˆfect at the time of the approval, the respective approval shall expire in accordance with Subsection 25.06.070.6, Termination of Inactive Applications. 5. Scope of Approvals. This Section shall not be interpreted to confer rights upon an applicant that are not set out within the approved documents associated with each permit. ^ÄžÄ?͘ ĎŽĎąÍ˜ĎŹĎÍ˜ĎŹĎľĎŹ sÄ‚ĆŒĹ?ĂŜÄ?ÄžĆ? ĂŜĚ >Ĺ?ĹľĹ?ƚĞĚ ĂŜĚ ŽŜĚĹ?Ć&#x;ŽŜĂů hĆ?Äž WÄžĆŒĹľĹ?ĆšĆ? 1. š‹•–‹Â?‰ ƒ”‹ƒÂ?…‡• ƒÂ?† ‹Â?‹–‡† ƒÂ?† ‘Â?†‹–‹‘Â?ƒŽ •‡ ‡”Â?‹–•Ǥ Any variance, limited use permit, or conditional use permit lawfully issued for a lot or parcel of land prior to the effective date of this Code, which could be lawfully issued pursuant to the provisions of this Code shall be deemed to be valid. Any structure or use of land lawfully authorized by any variance, limited use permit, or conditional use permit, which could not be issued after the effective date of this Code shall be allowed to continue subject to the provisions of Subchapter 25.06-C, Nonconformities. In all cases, variances and limited and conditional uses run with the land, not an applicant or owner. 2. š‹•–‹Â?‰ •‡• ‘ˆ ‹‰Š– –‘ ‘Â?†‹–‹‘Â?ƒŽ ƒÂ?† ‹Â?‹–‡† •‡•. Any existing structure or use of land established as of right for a lot or parcel of land under any previous regulations in which it is listed as a conditional or limited use in this Code shall be a lawful conditional or limited use of land upon the adoption of this Code; provided, however, that any such existing structure or use of land that is vacated, abandoned, or for which there is a change of ownership shall be null and void. Such conditional or limited use status is subject to the provisions of Subchapter 25.06-C, Nonconformities. ^ÄžÄ?͘ ĎŽĎąÍ˜ĎŹĎ͘ĎĎŹĎŹ WĆŒĹ?Ĺ˝ĆŒ ŽŜĚĹ?Ć&#x;ŽŜĆ? ŽĨ Ć‰Ć‰ĆŒĹ˝Ç€Ä‚ĹŻ 1. Generally. Conditions of development approvals that were granted prior to the effective date remain in force, regardless of the standards of this Code. 2. ‘†‹Ď?‹…ƒ–‹‘Â? ‘” Ž‹Â?‹Â?ƒ–‹‘Â? ‘ˆ ‘Â?†‹–‹‘Â?•Ǥ Conditions of approvals that were imposed prior –‘ –Ї ‡ˆˆ‡…–‹˜‡ †ƒ–‡ Â?ƒ› „‡ Â?‘†‹Ď?‹‡† ‘” ‡Ž‹Â?‹Â?ƒ–‡† ’—”•—ƒÂ?– –‘ Â?‡™ ƒ’’Ž‹…ƒ–‹‘Â?• –Šƒ– Â?‡‡– –Ї procedures and standards of this Code. ^ÄžÄ?͘ ĎŽĎąÍ˜ĎŹĎ͘ĎĎĎŹ ŜŜĞdžĞĚ WĆŒĹ˝Ć‰ÄžĆŒĆšÇ‡ 1. Generally. Zoning of annexed land or land in the process of annexation is an initial zoning. The standards and procedures that apply to zoning of annexed land are the same as those applied to a rezoning of property within the City limits. See Subsection 25.06.090.15, Zone Change (rezoning).
page 1