The Code of Creation

for seeing and so on until all the sensibilities become pronounced.

The sense organs are the instruments of perception through which the eternal (divine) witness experiences temporal existence. This is how the unlimited, the universal becomes limited and individual.

The limitation is but a modality or pathway of illusion, wherein the eternal witness itself is temporal.

The difference between virtual reality and reality itself is also one of degree. The virtual reality that we have created technologically is a pale replica of the virtual reality of the divine, the universe that encompasses all that we know as real. The limits of reality are closer to those of the mind than to those of the body. The mind can travel to the stars while the body is hard put to even get to the moon.

Virtual reality provides the means to experience whatever one can imagine. With all of its limitations, one thing that this technology has shown, is that reality itself holds the same potential, to create whatever experience one can imagine. What ever can be conceived by the mind can be evoked in time.

Can you imagine a time without time, a Golden Age when humanity was close to divinity and in harmony with the spheres, a time when we molded reality by the undiluted power of the creative word? What was life for, but to be the entertainment of consciousness, the pleasure garden of divinity. Desire had only to be but called forth to be realized in paradise.

It is not so hard to imagine a time when instead of relying on the ‘magical contraption’ that we call a ‘telephone’, telepathy was employed for reaching out and touching somebody over long distances. Our inner gifts and supra-natural ability have in the present age become exteriorized and ‘technofied’. Twenty four hours a day we are surrounded by a virtual reality, one that our bodies are ill designed to accommodate. The illusion within the illusion is a reenactment of the play of the gods but like a third generation video, its quality suffers.

“The cerebral E corresponds to the French e, according to its definition by the ancient grammarians. Modern Indians, who cannot pronounce it precisely, call it ri which is clearly wrong since a vowel is defined as a prolonged, sustained sound.” 60 The [Ë] sound of the Mahesvara Sutra and the [RI] of current Sanskrit are both pronounced as the tip of the tongue touches the cerebral point on the roof of the mouth, (Figure 9). When sounding