Recidivism: The hidden thread in the tapestry of justice

RECIDIVISM: THE HIDDEN THREAD IN THE TAPESTRY OF JUSTICE BY: SHANUL SINGH AND SANJOLI SHARMA

ABSTRACT The purpose to study recidivism is essential for reforming the criminal justice system.

Recidivism refers to individuals who repeatedly engage in criminal activities. If someone has committed robbery & and does the same crime again after getting punishment & and after coming out of prison that person is termed a Recidivist. Basically, recidivists are often characterized as anti-social, aggressive & and indifferent to well well-being of others. These are those people who have embraced criminality as a mode of life & and commits crime with huge courage. Apparently, there are lesser chances of rehabilitation of such offenders as they commit crimes deliberately in a calculated manner. High recidivism rates suggest that the system may not be effectively addressing the root causes of criminal behaviour or rehabilitating individuals. By studying recidivism, policymakers and practitioners can identify areas for improvement and develop evidence-based policies and programs to reduce reoffending. Recidivism is closely tied to public safety. Individuals who re-offend may commit new crimes, potentially posing risks to the community. Reducing recidivism helps enhance public safety by lowering the number of repeat offenders and preventing future victimization. Recidivism, the relapse into criminal behaviour and re-incarceration, is a complex and pervasive issue within the criminal justice system. It has far-reaching consequences not only for those directly involved in the cycle of crime but also for society as a whole. In this comprehensive exploration, we will delve into the various aspects of recidivism, including its causes, consequences, and potential solutions. By understanding recidivism better, we can work towards implementing more effective and humane measures to reduce its prevalence.

INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND Before considering what recidivism is, let us first know who are recidivists. According to John W. Mannering, “Criminology literature is replete with descriptions of the personality and background characteristics of a recidivist or crime repeaters as to why they persist in crime”. In his view, individuals with a history of recidivism, those who repeatedly commit Criminology and victimology (including victimology): Prof. N.V. Paranjape 28th October Criminal Recidivism: Explanation, prediction and prevention by Georgia Zara (Author), David 2023 Farrington (Author)

1

crimes, are commonly described as having antisocial tendencies, being aggressive, highly competitive, showing little concern for the well-being of others, and displaying excessive self-centeredness. Generally, we can identify a "recidivist" as an offender with a lengthy criminal record who has frequently been incarcerated and demonstrates limited interest in adapting to institutional rules. Such individuals are clearly considered to be at a high risk of struggling with social reintegration.

From a socio-legal perspective, we can define "recidivism" as the pattern of criminals returning to criminal behaviour, and a "recidivist" is someone who repeatedly returns to a life of crime. This essentially means that someone who has been previously incarcerated reverts to their previous criminal behaviour, leading to their re-incarceration for a new offense.

During Classical Criminology (18th and 19th Centuries) there was earliest attempt to comprehend recidivism harkens back to classical criminological theories. Visionaries such as Cesare Beccaria and Jeremy Bentham during the 18th century played a pivotal role in shaping modern criminology. Their emphasis was on concepts like deterrence and rational choice theory, with the goal of diminishing criminal activities by increasing the severity of consequences for reoffending. These concepts laid the groundwork for discussions regarding recidivism. In the early 20th century, there was a significant shift in the philosophy of criminal justice. The focus moved from punitive approaches to rehabilitation and reformation.

This era emphasized that offenders could be reformed and reintegrated into society through education, vocational training, and therapy. Reducing recidivism became a central goal. The mid-20th century saw the emergence of systematic research into recidivism. Scholars and criminologists began conducting studies to understand the factors associated with reoffending. This period saw the development of risk assessment tools and a growing emphasis on identifying predictors of recidivism. Recidivism is a legal and criminological term that refers to the act of an individual repeating criminal behaviour, typically by reoffending or relapsing into criminal activity after having previously been involved in the criminal justice system. Jurists, legal scholars, and criminologists have examined recidivism from various perspectives, and it is a concept of significant concern within the criminal justice system.

They focus on understanding the causes, patterns, and prevention of reoffending. Key points from a criminologist's perspective include:

Criminology and victimology (including victimology): Prof. N.V. Paranjape 28th October Criminal Recidivism: Explanation, prediction and prevention by Georgia Zara (Author), David 2023 Farrington (Author)

2



Criminal Behaviour Patterns: Criminologists study the patterns and trends of recidivism to identify common factors contributing to reoffending, such as demographic characteristics, criminal history, and socioeconomic conditions.



Risk Assessment: Criminologists develop and use risk assessment tools to predict an individual's likelihood of recidivism. These tools incorporate a wide range of factors, including prior convictions, age, and substance abuse history.



Rehabilitation and Intervention: Criminologists explore and evaluate rehabilitation programs and interventions designed to reduce recidivism. This includes examining the effectiveness of programs like drug treatment, education, and job training in promoting desistance from criminal behaviour.



Policy Recommendations: Based on their research findings, criminologists often make policy recommendations to improve the criminal justice system. They advocate for evidence-based practices that focus on reducing recidivism through targeted interventions.

Jeremy Bentham: An English philosopher and jurist, Bentham made significant contributions to the philosophy of law and criminal justice. His ideas on utilitarianism and the concept of deterrence had an influence on legal thought related to recidivism.

Cesare Beccaria: An Italian jurist and philosopher, Beccaria's work, particularly in his book "On Crimes and Punishments" (1764), laid the foundation for modern criminal law and the consideration of the prevention of recidivism through proportionate and rational punishment.

Emile Durkheim: While not strictly a jurist, Durkheim was a sociologist who made important contributions to the understanding of criminal behavior and its relationship to society. His work explored the social factors that can lead to criminality and, by extension, recidivism.

Norval Morris: An American legal scholar, Morris was known for his work in criminal law and criminology. He made significant contributions to the study of sentencing policies and their impact on recidivism.

Robert Martinson: Martinson was an American sociologist and criminologist whose work on the effectiveness of rehabilitation programs, summarized in the "nothing works" doctrine, had a profound impact on criminal justice policies and the approach to recidivism.

The theory of recidivism and the theory of utilitarianism have some connections and similarities, primarily in the context of criminal justice and punishment. Utilitarianism is a Criminology and victimology (including victimology): Prof. N.V. Paranjape 28th October Criminal Recidivism: Explanation, prediction and prevention by Georgia Zara (Author), David 2023 Farrington (Author)

3

philosophical and ethical theory that focuses on maximizing overall happiness or utility, often associated with the reduction of harm and the promotion of well-being. When exploring the connection between recidivism and utilitarianism, the following similarities and links can be observed: 1. Deterrence as a Shared Objective: Utilitarianism: Jeremy Bentham in this theory of utilitarianism emphasizes the importance of deterrence as a means to reduce harm and promote the greater good. It suggests that individuals will be deterred from criminal behaviour if the potential punishment outweighs the benefits of the crime.

Recidivism: The theory of recidivism shares the goal of deterrence. Reducing recidivism implies preventing offenders from reoffending, which, in utilitarian terms, would reduce overall harm and increase societal well-being.

2. Proportional Punishment: Utilitarianism: This ethical theory argues that punishments should be proportional to the harm caused by the crime. The severity of punishment should be tailored to the gravity of the offense.

Recidivism: In addressing recidivism, it is often suggested that punishments should take into account an individual's criminal history. This aligns with the utilitarian principle of proportionality, as repeat offenders may receive harsher sentences to deter further criminal behaviour.

3. Cost-Benefit Analysis: Utilitarianism: Utilitarianism encourages a cost-benefit analysis of punishment. It posits that society should weigh the costs and benefits of different punishments to determine the most effective and efficient approach.

Recidivism: Strategies aimed at reducing recidivism often involve evaluating the costeffectiveness of rehabilitation and reentry programs. This aligns with the utilitarian focus on maximizing the overall good while minimizing harm.

4. Prevention of Future Harm: Utilitarianism: The utilitarian perspective emphasizes preventing future harm as a central objective. This can include preventing further criminal acts and the resulting harm to potential victims.

Criminology and victimology (including victimology): Prof. N.V. Paranjape 28th October Criminal Recidivism: Explanation, prediction and prevention by Georgia Zara (Author), David 2023 Farrington (Author)

4

Recidivism: The study and intervention in recidivism share the same goal of preventing future harm by reducing the likelihood of individuals reoffending and causing additional harm to society.

5. Focus on Social Utility: Utilitarianism: Utilitarianism evaluates actions and policies based on their contribution to social utility, seeking to maximize overall happiness and minimize harm.

Recidivism: Reducing recidivism is in line with the utilitarian idea of promoting social utility. Lower recidivism rates can contribute to a safer and more harmonious society, aligning with the utilitarian goal of maximizing well-being.

UNRAVELING THE PSYCHOLOGY OF RECIDIVIST The psychological aspects of recidivism are a critical component in understanding why some individuals repeatedly engage in criminal behaviour. Recidivism is not solely a matter of criminal actions; it is also deeply rooted in an individual's psychological makeup, which can be influenced by various factors. In this analysis, we will delve into the psychological aspects of recidivism, considering how factors such as cognitive processes, personality traits, mental health, and substance abuse contribute to the phenomenon.

One key psychological aspect of recidivism is cognitive processes. Cognitive factors encompass an individual's thought patterns, decision-making, and problem-solving skills. It's well-documented that some individuals who engage in criminal behavior may exhibit cognitive deficits or distorted thinking patterns. These may include cognitive distortions, where individuals rationalize their criminal actions, minimize the consequences, or blame external factors. Such distorted thinking can lead to a cycle of criminal behavior. Recognizing these cognitive processes is crucial for intervention strategies aimed at cognitive restructuring, which helps individuals develop healthier thinking patterns and decisionmaking skills, reducing the likelihood of reoffending.

Personality traits also play a significant role in the psychology of recidivism. Certain personality traits, such as impulsivity, sensation-seeking, and a lack of empathy, have been linked to criminal behaviour. Individuals with impulsive tendencies may have difficulty controlling their impulses and acting without thinking of the consequences, which can lead to criminal actions. Likewise, sensation-seeking individuals are more likely to engage in risky behaviours, including criminal activities, in search of excitement or thrill. Additionally, a lack Criminology and victimology (including victimology): Prof. N.V. Paranjape 28th October Criminal Recidivism: Explanation, prediction and prevention by Georgia Zara (Author), David 2023 Farrington (Author)

5

of empathy can contribute to a disregard for the well-being of others, making it easier to commit crimes without remorse. Identifying these personality traits can help in developing targeted interventions and treatment plans that address the specific psychological factors driving recidivism.

Mental health issues are another critical psychological aspect of recidivism. A significant proportion of individuals involved in the criminal justice system have mental health disorders. Conditions such as depression, anxiety, bipolar disorder, and schizophrenia can impact an individual's emotional and cognitive functioning, making them more vulnerable to criminal behaviour. Furthermore, untreated mental health issues can lead to self-medication through substance abuse, exacerbating the risk of reoffending. Providing mental health assessments, treatment, and support within the criminal justice system is essential for addressing this aspect of recidivism.

Substance abuse can impair decision-making, increase impulsivity, and reduce inhibitions, making individuals more likely to engage in criminal activities to obtain drugs or alcohol.

Breaking the cycle of substance abuse is vital for reducing the psychological drivers of recidivism. It necessitates comprehensive substance abuse treatment programs that address the underlying psychological and behavioural factors.

Moreover, the psychology of recidivism involves a complex interplay of these factors. For example, an individual with a substance use disorder may have co-occurring mental health issues, leading to a higher risk of recidivism. The cognitive processes and personality traits of this individual may also be influenced by their substance abuse. Understanding these intricate relationships is essential for designing effective interventions that address multiple psychological aspects simultaneously.

To bring it all together, the psychological aspects of recidivism are multifaceted and deeply interconnected. Cognitive processes, personality traits, mental health, and substance abuse all contribute to an individual's propensity to re-offend. Recognizing and addressing these psychological factors is crucial for developing effective rehabilitation and intervention strategies within the criminal justice system. By tailoring treatment to the specific psychological needs of individuals, we can work towards reducing recidivism and promoting healthier, law-abiding lives.

Criminology and victimology (including victimology): Prof. N.V. Paranjape 28th October Criminal Recidivism: Explanation, prediction and prevention by Georgia Zara (Author), David 2023 Farrington (Author)

6

BEHIND THE BARS AND BEYOND: PUNISHMENTS Determining appropriate punishment for recidivists is a complex endeavor that requires a careful balance between several key considerations. First and foremost, it's crucial to conduct a comprehensive risk assessment, taking into account the individual's likelihood of reoffending based on factors such as their criminal history, the nature of previous offenses, and specific risk factors like substance abuse or mental health issues. One should adopt an individualized approach, recognizing that the circumstances of recidivists can vary greatly. In essence, not all recidivists should receive identical punishments, as underlying factors contributing to their criminal behaviour may differ. The severity of the offense is also a critical determinant, as more serious offenses may warrant harsher punishments, balanced with the individual's risk of reoffending and potential for rehabilitation.

Moreover, it's essential to adhere to evidence-based practices and interventions that have shown effectiveness in reducing recidivism. Rehabilitation and support should be prioritized, especially if underlying issues play a role in criminal behaviour. Graduated sanctions can be employed to offer a structured response to recidivism, with increasingly severe consequences for repeat offenses. Exploring community-based alternatives to incarceration, such as probation, parole, or diversion programs, can be highly effective in reducing recidivism while maintaining connections to the community. Additionally, reentry and support services are vital for individuals leaving the criminal justice system, facilitating their successful reintegration into society and reducing the likelihood of reoffending. Judicial discretion, allowing judges to consider individual circumstances, enables a more flexible and personalized approach to sentencing. Lastly, an ongoing evaluation process is essential to assess an individual's progress and behaviour, modifying the approach as needed to ensure that it remains effective in reducing recidivism. Ultimately, the aim is to achieve a balanced approach that upholds accountability while working towards public safety and the long-term goal of reducing reoffending and facilitating successful reintegration into society.

CURRENT CONCERNS

Criminology and victimology (including victimology): Prof. N.V. Paranjape 28th October Criminal Recidivism: Explanation, prediction and prevention by Georgia Zara (Author), David 2023 Farrington (Author)

7

In the context of recidivism, current concerns revolve around the balance between rehabilitation and retribution, overcrowded prisons, and high recidivism rates. Striking a balance between rehabilitating individuals and holding them accountable is a central challenge. Overcrowding in prisons is exacerbated by high rates of reoffending, highlighting the need for effective interventions that reduce recidivism and alleviate the burden on correctional facilities. Accurate risk assessment is another pressing concern as it affects sentencing decisions and resource allocation for rehabilitation programs. Additionally, racial disparities in recidivism and sentencing must be addressed to ensure equity in the criminal justice system. Effective interventions for factors like substance abuse, mental health, education, and employment are vital. Supporting successful reintegration into society, especially among those leaving incarceration, is crucial. Policy and sentencing reform efforts aim to modernize laws and promote data-driven decision-making, while the juvenile justice system is undergoing reform to emphasize rehabilitation and support for young offenders.

Overall, the focus is on finding ways to reduce recidivism while maintaining accountability and public safety in the criminal justice system.

CONCLUSION The research on recidivism yields several important conclusions and implications for the current state of the criminal justice system. First and foremost, it is evident that recidivism is a highly complex issue, influenced by a multitude of factors. It is not solely a product of individual choices; rather, it reflects a web of interconnected variables, including the individual's background, social and economic conditions, and the effectiveness of the criminal justice system itself. Recognizing this complexity is critical to addressing recidivism effectively. A central conclusion drawn from research is the crucial role of rehabilitation in reducing recidivism. Studies consistently show that rehabilitation and reentry programs aimed at addressing the underlying causes of criminal behavior, such as substance abuse or mental health issues, are highly effective in helping individuals desist from criminal activities. These programs not only contribute to reducing recidivism rates but also align with a more compassionate and holistic approach to justice.

Accurate risk assessment is another key conclusion. Effective risk assessment tools are essential for determining appropriate sentences, parole decisions, and the allocation of resources for rehabilitation programs. A comprehensive understanding of an individual's risk Criminology and victimology (including victimology): Prof. N.V. Paranjape 28th October Criminal Recidivism: Explanation, prediction and prevention by Georgia Zara (Author), David 2023 Farrington (Author)

8

of reoffending is vital for informed decision-making within the criminal justice system. By employing these tools, policymakers and practitioners can better match individuals with interventions that suit their needs and risk levels. A critical takeaway is the necessity of balancing accountability with support and reintegration. While punishment and accountability are integral to the justice system, they are often insufficient in isolation. To prevent recidivism, individuals leaving the criminal justice system require support in their transition back into society, including assistance with housing, employment, and social services.

Balancing these aspects is essential for reducing the likelihood of reoffending.

Overcrowding in prisons is a pressing concern in many criminal justice systems, and reducing recidivism plays a pivotal role in addressing this issue. High recidivism rates contribute to prison overcrowding, placing strain on facilities and resources. To alleviate overcrowding, alternatives to incarceration, such as community-based programs and diversion initiatives, are being explored. These approaches not only ease the burden on the prison system but also offer individuals the opportunity to rebuild their lives in their communities. Addressing racial disparities in recidivism and sentencing is a moral imperative. Research consistently shows disparities in the experiences of individuals from different racial backgrounds within the criminal justice system. These disparities reflect systemic issues that must be addressed to create a more equitable and just system.

Furthermore, the conclusions underscore the importance of evidence-based policies and practices. Policymakers and practitioners should focus on implementing approaches that have been proven effective through research and data analysis. Evidence-based practices not only lead to better outcomes but also ensure the efficient allocation of resources in the criminal justice system. Ultimately, the conclusions highlight the need for a comprehensive, long-term perspective on recidivism. Reducing reoffending requires not only a focus on the immediate consequences of criminal behavior but also a broader view that considers the well-being of individuals and communities. Furthermore, data-driven decision-making in the criminal justice system is pivotal, as it enables the assessment of intervention impact and the formulation of policies guided by empirical evidence.

In conclusion, the current state of research on recidivism provides valuable insights for the criminal justice system. These insights emphasize the importance of rehabilitation, accurate risk assessment, balancing accountability with support, addressing overcrowding, reducing racial disparities, implementing evidence-based practices, and adopting a comprehensive, Criminology and victimology (including victimology): Prof. N.V. Paranjape 28th October Criminal Recidivism: Explanation, prediction and prevention by Georgia Zara (Author), David 2023 Farrington (Author)

9

long-term perspective. By heeding these conclusions, the criminal justice system can move toward a more effective, equitable, and compassionate approach to addressing recidivism while promoting public safety and successful reintegration into society.

Criminology and victimology (including victimology): Prof. N.V. Paranjape 28th October Criminal Recidivism: Explanation, prediction and prevention by Georgia Zara (Author), David 2023 Farrington (Author)

10