Operations report 2013 ii

Page 1

MCVP Operations 2013-II Report


Strategic Framework


Operations Report


GIP Global Rank 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

Entity INDIA BRAZIL GERMANY COLOMBIA CHINA, MAINLAND POLAND RUSSIA TURKEY ROMANIA MEXICO CZECH REPUBLIC UNITED STATES JAPAN HUNGARY BELGIUM

iGIP 567 164 216 125 212 120 74 144 66 78 82 33 99 75 74

oGIP 61 228 132 209 118 186 175 78 112 99 69 111 24 44 39

Total 628 392 348 334 330 306 249 222 178 177 151 144 123 119 113


oGIP 2013 2012 Absolut Growth Relative Growth

July 41 27 14 52%

August 29 15 14 93%

September 17 26 -9 -35%

October 34 19 15 79%

November December 18 34 18 19 0 15 0% 79%

TOTAL 173 124 49 40%

November December 7 5 7 3 0 2 0% 67%

TOTAL 99 71 28 39%

iGIP 2013 2012 Absolut Growth Relative Growth

July 12 15 -3 -20%

August 16 23 -7 -30%

September 39 14 25 179%

October 20 9 11 122%


July Executed 15 18 11

iGIP Raised Matched Realized

Planned 4 15 30

iGIP Raised Matched Realized

October Planned Executed 36 29 16 5 7 13

iGIP August Executed 14 16 15

% 375% 120% 37%

Planned 18 8 19

% 81% 31% 186%

November Planned Executed 43 18 41 5 11 4

% 78% 200% 79%

September Planned Executed 23 15 9 10 12 17

% 65% 111% 142%

% 42% 12% 36%

December Planned Executed 23 82 26 43 0 5

% 357% 165% 100%


oGIP Raised Matched Realized

oGIP Raised Matched Realized

Planned 35 30 35

July Executed 28 19 42

Planned 85 30 25

October Executed 65 30 34

oGIP % 80% 63% 120%

% 76% 100% 136%

Planned 45 35 40

August Executed 34 24 29

Planned 70 40 30

November Executed 66 41 18

% 76% 69% 73%

% 94% 103% 60%

Planned 75 25 35

September Executed 53 35 18

% 71% 140% 51%

Planned 40 45 30

December Executed 27 38 34

% 68% 84% 113%


GCDP Global Rank 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

Entity INDIA MAINLAND CHINA, BRAZIL GERMANY INDIA COLOMBIA EGYPT CHINA, MAINLAND RUSSIA POLAND RUSSIA INDONESIA TURKEY COLOMBIA ROMANIA TAIWAN MEXICO ARGENTINA CZECH REPUBLIC ITALY UNITED STATES GERMANY JAPAN UKRAINE HUNGARY TURKEY BELGIUM PERU

iGCDP iGIP oGCDP oGIP 567 832 2226 61 1478 164 1290 228 1497 216 132 475 125 511 209 761 212 935 118 315 120 777 186 446 640 74 175 563 144 577 615 78 335 66 112 618 472 78 375 99 340 82 376 69 33 17 111 619 338 99 221 24 195 75 353 44 220 74 320 39

Total 3058 628 2768 392 1972 348 1272 334 1250 330 1223 306 1203 249 1192 222 178 953 177 847 151 716 144 636 123 559 119 548 113 540


oGCDP 2013 2012 Absolut Growth Relative Growth

July 74 59 15 25%

August 61 57 4 7%

September 49 28 21 75%

October 51 29 22 76%

November December 73 237 75 118 -2 119 -3% 101%

TOTAL 545 366 179 49%

iGCDP 2013 2012 Absolut Growth Relative Growth

July 179 102 77 75%

August 73 67 6 9%

September 36 21 15 71%

October 20 10 10 100%

November December 15 164 17 101 -2 63 -12% 62%

TOTAL 487 318 169 53%


iGCDP Raised Matched Realized

July Planned Executed 40 34 60 37 140 180

iGCDP Raised Matched Realized

October Planned Executed 140 132 45 75 20 20

iGCDP % 85% 62% 129%

August Planned Executed 50 23 40 50 85 73

% 94% 167% 100%

November Planned Executed 170 114 145 136 45 15

% 46% 125% 86%

September Planned Executed 100 77 20 24 25 36

% 77% 120% 144%

% 67% 94% 33%

December Planned Executed 80 18 150 85 150 164

% 23% 57% 109%


oGCDP Raised Matched Realized

oGCDP Raised Matched Realized

Planned 30 60 80

July Executed 34 41 74

Planned 195 105 60

October Executed 160 135 51

oGCDP % 113% 68% 93%

% 82% 129% 85%

Planned 55 55 85

August Executed 69 60 61

Planned 220 221 129

November Executed 137 169 73

% 125% 109% 72%

% 62% 76% 57%

Planned 85 46 45

September Executed 115 77 49

% 135% 167% 109%

Planned 85 140 210

December Executed 45 94 237

% 53% 67% 113%


Customer Solutions & Innovation


CSI – Customer Solutions & Innovation Purpose: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7.

For OGX EPs: To get direct help from MC which is faster and more effective. For trainees: To handle conflicts with LCs in Colombia. Communications & Updating. Process Improvement & Innovation. For any stakeholder to consult about XPP. Structure and HR: How to make sure everyone’s committed and fast responding? Making sure everyone knows about this tool.

Cata Medina

CSI Chair

Edu Florez CSI oGIP

Pedro Pabón

CSI oGCDP

Lucho Medina

CSI iGIP

Sonia Sutta

CSI iGCDP


Firefighting The intern or the TN organization should inform each other and try to solve the issue privately. Step 1 Internal Level

Step 2 Local Level

Step 3 National Level

Step 4 International Level

NOTE: TN manager or EP manager MUST support this process.

If step 1 has been tried and failed, the intern or the TN manager should inform the Home & Hosting Local Entity in order to get the issue solved. NOTE: Hosting & Home entities’ VPs, Local CSI Teams, EP manager and TN manager MUST support this process.

If step 2 has been tried and failed, the TN manager or the EP manager should send request to CSI in order to get this case solved. NOTE: Hosting & Home entities’ MC, LCPs and EP/TN manager should support this process. CSI will ONLY accept a case when it’s proved that Step 2 has failed.

If step 3 fails at MC to MC level. CSI, together with the MCVP Responsible, is in charge of taking the case to ICB for international arbitrage. NOTE: Let´s try to keep our cases within the previous three levels. Reaching ICB is


CSI & NAT Monthly Reporting about Self Selected Issues together with clear next steps and follow up.

Process Improvement Tool in PODIO in order to assign responsibilities within the local entities.

Local Entities could lose full membership if this procedures are skipped.


Net Promoter System Report


iGCDP NPS Score

35

Promoters

54%

Detractors

19%

Responses

423

Detractors Self Selected Issues Job Description

30

Logistic Support

28

AIESEC Support

13

Promoters Self Selected Issues Personal Development

55

Cross Cultural Understanding

70

Integration by Hosting Entity

43


oGCDP NPS Score

32

Promoters

51%

Detractors

19%

Responses

427

Detractors Self Selected Issues

Communication

16

Logistical Support

22

AIESEC Support During X

17

Promoters Self Selected Issues Cross Cultural Understanding

46

Personal Development

42

Opportunity to create a Positive Impact

41


oGIP NPS Score

47

Promoters

59%

Detractors

12%

Responses

214

Detractors Self Selected Issues

Job Description

9

Integration by Hosting Entity

7

Logistic Support

11

Promoters Self Selected Issues Communication during Matching Process

28

Matching Support

23

Information Provided

23


iGIP NPS Score

50

Promoters

61%

Detractors

12%

Responses

139

Detractors Self Selected Issues

AIESEC’ Support

6

Matching Support

4

Communication during Acceptance Procedures

5

Promoters Self Selected Issues The Selection Process

20

Visa Procedures

22

Information Provided

24


Facts


Track

Methodology

Product Innovation Reports

Process Improvement

Education Plan

Timeline


Facts

GIP Summit Delivery Organizational Visit AIESEC EAFIT Organizational Visit AIESEC ECI Organizational Visit AIESEC Javeriana Organizational Visit AIESEC Manizales CEM Challenge Achieved! AIESEC In Colombia certified as a Customer Centric Organization at IC Egypt!  NPS & Steering Team Meeting Delivery  Re Planning documents creation & Agenda support  Innovation Model Creation      


Facts  Backwards Planning improvement & VPM download  Master Track platform for LCs. Platform downloaded.  International Cooperation plan for IC. We need to follow up the cooperation.  National Exchange Forecast.  GIP Summit wiki creation.  The LAST Stand challenge promotion & strategy creation.  Over 150 teams subscribed. That´s over 400 members involved.  Feedback on the LAST Stand used in order to create the Champions League!  Planning 2014 Guide for LCs.


Facts  Specific Knowledge about each region.  Profile analysis.  Download functional content for MM & TMPs.  Clear next steps.  Understand specific bottlenecks.  Innovate in Content Delivery.  Connection & Motivation.


Conclusions     

    

Connect the Commercial Strategies to the Operational Excellence Summits. Embrace implementation in administrative tools. Implementation for Tracking Tools takes time, we recommend to include the Master Track in the SONA. International Cooperation should be enabled through monthly report and constant tracking. The sense about Quality Management has increased in AIESEC in Colombia. Firefighting should become a habit. Strong measures about poor quality entities are happening through CSI. Commercial Strategies needs to be more inclusive, communicative and simple. AIESEC in Colombia should be driven by Innovation. The execution of our entities is slow. The commercial Strategies encourages the entities to get early to the peak. We need a stronger tracking upon financial goals.


Thank you!


Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.