















EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
Jason Fettig, President
Matt Temple, President-Elect
Elva Kaye Lance, Vice-President
Randall Coleman, Immediate Past President
Scott Tobias, Executive Secretary-Treasurer
Jason Fettig, President
Matt Temple, President-Elect
Elva Kaye Lance, Vice-President
Randall Coleman, Immediate Past President
Scott Tobias, Executive Secretary-Treasurer
Al & Gladys Wright Distinguished Legacy Award, Rebecca Phillips
Alfred Young Band Composition Contest, Audrey Murphy Kunka
AWAPA Commission, David Gregory
Citations & Awards, Heath Nails
Constitution & By-Laws, Jason Fettig
Corporate Relations, Gary Smith
Foster Project NBA Representative, Wolson Gustama
Hall of Fame of Distinguished Band Conductors Board of Electors, Thomas Fraschillo
Inclusion, Diversity, Equity, & Awareness, Ingrid Larragoity & Elizabeth Peterson
Marching Band Committee, Adam Dalton & Bobby Lambert
Merrill Jones Composition Contest, Matt Smith
National Programs of Excellence, Myra Rhoden
NBA Foundation, Susan Creasap
Nominating Committee, Rebecca Phillips
Research Grants, Brian Silvey
Selective Music List – Concert, Arris Golden
Selective Music List - Jazz, Steve Shanley
Selective Music List – Marches, Col. Don Schofield
William D. Revelli Composition Contest, Matthew McCutchen
Young Composer Jazz Composition Contest, Richard Stichler
Young Composer Mentor Project, Frank Ticheli
Young Conductor Mentor Project, Linda R. Moorhouse
To promote and empower band performances throughout the world.
To encourage and promote the commissioning and performance of new wind band music.
To provide inclusive and authentic professional development opportunities and resources for everyone.
To acknowledge and celebrate the diversity of bands, educators, performers, and band support organizations.
To promote pride, commitment, and enthusiasm among band directors and performers.
To encourage lifelong involvement in music and to support interested students in pursuing musical careers.
To promote an inclusive community among directors, performers, the music industry, and all other band support organizations.
NBA Journal Editor, Matthew D. Talbert
NBA Journal Layout & Design, Nash P. McCutchen
Articles presented in the NBA Journal represent views, opinions, ideas and research by the authors and are selected for their general interest to the NBA members. Authors’ views do not necessarily represent the official position of the National Band Association, nor does their publication constitute an endorsement by the National Band Association.
New year, new me! They say that most New Year’s resolutions end on the second Friday of January. That sounds about right, but I am determined to make some of mine last this time around. I am still in my “new” phase in my current job and learning tons about myself, my strengths and weaknesses, and most importantly, how our processes evolve as the scenery around us changes. In a sense, we probably take it too far too often; forming resolutions for something “new” doesn’t need to be completely new. Perhaps a better way is to take a look at the things that are already ingrained in us and help them evolve just one step at a time. Not only does that validate the good stuff in who we already are and how we operate, but it also feels a whole lot more sustainable than trying to start something over-over and over again.
I’ve been trying to apply this approach in my own growth as a teacher and to encourage my students to do the same. It is very much aligned with the pedagogical aim to “scaffold” new ideas and fundamentals so that they can grow into something substantive. But the key to scaffolding is to arrange it and care for it so that it doesn’t come tumbling down! What sticks is what we see works, which is what then builds confidence, which is
then what motivates us to keep at it. But if we move too fast or try to change too much before each element has a chance to take root, we can easily slip back into status quo.
As a teacher, I have discovered that this is pretty difficult to navigate, because you are not only charged with curating this process in your individual students from where they are, but we must also model it ourselves so that it has a meaningful impact on our own growth at the same time. So, in the spirit of “taking care of yourself so you can take care of others,” I’d like to offer a few areas I’ve been working on, and a few tips to try out this year:
At the heart of the work for those of us who conduct and teach band is the music we choose, and how we choose to present it—to our students, our colleagues, and our audiences. The ever-challenging process of programming is both easier and harder in 2025 than it ever has been. Easier because there is more music than ever to choose from, and harder because there is more music than ever to choose from. Challenge yourself to pick at least one piece for each program that is markedly different in style or construction than anything you’ve done
... Perhaps a better way is to take a look at the things that are already ingrained in us and help them evolve just one step at a time.
President’s Message, Jason K. Fettig, cont.
before and find a creative way to elegantly weave it in to a concert. Bonus points if that piece is by a composer you had previously never heard of.
As a conductor like many of you, I am at the mercy of those who regularly play in the ensemble— every “signature” gesture, catch phrase, pet peeve, and idiosyncrasy of any kind is noticed and likely referenced (lovingly, I’m sure) when I am out of the room. I have also recently been made aware that I wear quarter zip sweaters to almost every rehearsal. I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: we are at our best as musical leaders when we mix it up and keep the energy in the room a bit unpredictable. That takes some effort on our part, and seems to get harder the older we get, so start with just one change that will definitely get noticed in the room. That change—whether it’s a new warm-up routine, a wildly new gesture, different vocabulary, or an uncharacteristic emotional share—could end up being the new norm. For the record, though, there’s nothing wrong with my quarter zips.
One of the important lessons I learned in the Marine Corps is that everyone wants/needs to be heard and validated, including those who
are in charge. But the process of listening and making empathetic resolutions is especially important when you are the one in charge. Opening that door can be scary and sometimes frustrating, but once you have felt validated about the work you do, it becomes easier to hear about the parts that could be better. I invite us all to lean into the listening, and then change just one thing about how we regularly relate to each person in our lives. It doesn’t really matter what it is but make it a point for that change to be deliberate and generous.
Before we know it, it will be time for those resolutions once again. But this time, they won’t be the same, because we won’t be the same.
Thank you for being a part of the National Band Association. I look forward to partnering with each of you in this new year to continue to keep this organization a relevant, evolving, and empowering community. As I said to our present members at Midwest in December, this is the place where everyone is in, and no one is out.
That is what band is all about.
Warmest wishes,
Professor Jason K.
Fettig
President National Band Association
Welcome to 2025! Even though the New Year happens right in the middle of our “school” year for most of us, it is nonetheless exciting to think about turning the page from an old calendar year to a new one. Fresh starts, new beginnings and opportunities for positive change all make the “new” year in the middle of the “school” year a time for both reflection and projection ... all in hopes of making 2025 the best year yet for us all.
From my perspective as a veteran teacher, I keep returning to one trait of a successful, top-tier program that seems to be missing in so many good programs. This trait has nothing to do with how well the students play their instrument, how well the ensemble plays in tune, or what commission consortium the program has joined. It deals with something altogether different. I tell my students all the time that there are three groups that we are responsible for “educating” … the students, the administration and the parents or community. Of course, the job of educating our students is the most time consuming and involved of the three groups … but the other two are extremely important as well. A large part of establishing a quality program is working to help our
community, our administrators, colleagues and parents … most of whom are not musicians … understand what we do and why it is important. It is about creating a positive and educational culture for our program.
Culture is defined as “a system of shared beliefs, values, practices, and behaviors that define a group of people”. As you reflect on your own program, do all three groups … your students, your administrators, and your parents/ community … share and display your beliefs, values, practices and behaviors that you would like? Many times, when we perceive that a program doesn’t get the support it should from the administration or parents, it may have a lot to do with a lack of understanding rather than a lack of support. For our students, building a positive culture is one of the key aspects of a well-rounded and healthy program. As the director, we have access to a multitude of books and resources on building culture in our organization…but I have found one of the most effective tools for instilling a strong and healthy culture in your program is for YOU as the director to demonstrate those qualities that we want our program to reflect. Professionalism, dedication, honesty, commitment, and a positive attitude from the director each day will soon “catch on”. As
Continued on next page
Randall Coleman
... Many times, when we perceive that a program doesn’t get the support it should from the administration or parents, it may have alot to do with a lack of understanding rather than a lack of support ...
Immediate Past President’s Message, Randall Coleman cont.
one of my wonderful mentors always reminds me “the program is a direct reflection of the person on the podium”. Your administrators, parents and most importantly your students, look to you for “the norm” …what to do; how to act; what to say; what NOT to say…. your actions, as the leader of your program, matter. I encourage you to focus on the tremendous responsibilities of our profession that might not have anything to do with music…but have everything to do with helping our students be successful in life. We all know that only a small percentage of our students will move on to a career in music, so providing those educational experiences that transcend the boundaries of subject matter will be the lessons that our students will always remember, no matter what their chosen profession might be. Perhaps this quote sums it up best:
“What a teacher is, is more important than what they teach.” - Karl Menninger
I hope you enjoy a healthy and successful “new” year! Please do not hesitate to reach out if I can be of assistance to you or your program.
Randall Coleman Immediate Past-President
The National Band
Association
BY
The mission for directors of school bands is understood inherently by those who think of themselves more often as instrumental music teachers rather than simply as band directors. The basic objective of instrumental music education is that students will learn performance skills in order to understand musical language and to experience the joys of recreating music in the expressive medium of their choice. Music education should prepare students also for a fuller understanding and appreciation of the music they will be hearing the rest of their lives regardless of its style or venue. Efforts to address the National Standards for Music Education in band class by including music theory, music history, improvisation, and composition will help the students be better listeners in adulthood and will make better musicians of those who wish to pursue musical careers or practice music as an avocation in adult life.
The National Band Association would like school administrators, teachers, and parents to recognize that students elect to study instrumental music for a variety of reasons, including: as an outlet for creativity, a source of social interaction with like-minded peers, a possible career choice, gratification that comes from recognition by responsive audiences, discipline through study and practice, and service to school and community. The evaluation of instrumental music programs should be grounded in a review of the educationally and aesthetically justifiable objectives that are explicit in this mission statement.
The long-respected model for learning to play a musical instrument based on the role of artist-teacher with a studio of private students applies as well to school bands. Band class must provide these same foundations: a correct concept of characteristic tone quality, development of technique based on a graded course of study, a formal system for counting rhythms, practice in developing good intonation, and the sure goal of playing expressively.
An instrumental music program should offer a broad range of musical experiences: an extensive solo and chamber music repertory that provides subtle opportunities for nuance and other systems of expression; a school jazz ensemble that stresses rhythmic precision, understanding of harmonic progression, and creative improvisation; a concert band, the core of the program, where our musical heritage is transmitted through inspirational compositions by the most creative composers.
Service activities such as marching band are often important to the school and community, and students who participate gain social, educational, and musical values. Because evaluative competition can raise standards and motivate progress, NBA strongly recommends that all bands participate in festivals or contests sponsored by district and state music education associations, especially when a rating rather than a ranking is the goal. However, the integrity of the instructional program can be threatened by a disproportionate emphasis on competitions and servicerelated performances. Marching band activities that require extra rehearsals and travel time should be scheduled with concern for the many responsibilities that students have in addition to their musical studies, and must never be the focus of the instrumental music program. Excessive demands on students, parents, and community––financial and otherwise––bring about consequences harmful to the essence of the instrumental music program.
History demonstrates that those who cultivate a special intelligence in an area of personal interest make great contributions to the way we live. Efforts by legislators or educators to emphasize one area of study alone stifle the pluralism that has been one of this country's strengths. Rather, schools should provide a broad base of knowledge for students and also encourage development of the special abilities of those who demonstrate the capacity to excel. Instrumental music studies provide a laboratory of artistic and social opportunities for individual development that contributes to the collective good.
The arts provide unique forms of knowledge, present a basic means of communication, and produce lasting works that are the hallmarks of a civilization. President Abraham Lincoln reminded us that education is not for the purpose of learning to earn a living, but for learning what to do with a living after it has been earned. Whether in the arts or other areas of interest, students who are encouraged to develop their talents and interests participate in the continuous regeneration of our democratic ideals.
The National Band Association was founded on September 11, 1960. This new organization was the dream and brain child of Traugott Rohner, the editor and founder of The Instrumentalist magazine. Rohner set up a meeting with two of the most capable leaders among America’s band directors, Dr. Al G. Wright, who was at that time Director of Bands at Purdue University, and John Paynter, Director of Bands at Northwestern University, and these two very able leaders established a new, inclusive band organization which grew into the largest band organization in the world.
Al Wright was the NBA’s first president, and he soon became aware of a need to establish a special, high level award program to recognize excellence and exceptional service to bands. The result of this was the establishment of The Academy of Wind and Percussion Arts (AWAPA). This award was established for the purpose of recognizing those individuals who have made truly significant and outstanding contributions to furthering the excellence of bands and of band music, and it was not to be limited to band directors, but to anyone who’s contributions were determined to be so outstanding that they deserved and warranted honor and recognition.
The nine-inch silver AWAPA figure is designed to be the “Oscar” of the band world. Elections to the academy are made from time to time by the Board of Directors acting upon nominations from the AWAPA Commission. Presentations of AWAPA awards are made at band performances or meetings of national significance. The new recipients of the award are announced at the annual National Band Association Membership Meeting at the Midwest Clinic in Chicago each December, and the honorees from the previous year are invited to attend that meeting for a formal presentation of the award.
If the recipient is not able to be present at that meeting, the award is presented at another prestigious band event where the recipient is properly honored and recognized. The award consists of a silver statuette, a silver medallion, and an engraved certificate. The Academy of Wind and Percussion Arts represents the highest honor which the National Band Association can confer on any individual.
The NBA represents the best there is in a great, proud profession. When we honor our very best, we bring honor on our organization and on our profession. A list of the past recipients of the AWAPA Award is literally a “Who’s Who” list of some of the greatest leaders involved in the band movement during the past six decades. The list includes an international cross section of important individuals representing all aspects of the band world, who have rendered remarkable service to bands.
William D. Revelli
November 25, 1961
Karl L. King November 10, 1962
Harold D. Bachman January 9, 1965
Glenn Cliffe Bainum February 21, 1965
Al G. Wright March 7, 1969
Harry Guggenheim August 18, 1969
Paul V. Yoder December 18, 1969
Toshio Akiyama December 13, 1970
Richard Franko Goldman July 23, 1971
John Paynter March 5, 1972
Roger A. Nixon July 12, 1972
Traugott Rohner
February 11, 1973
Sir Vivian Dunn March 2, 1973
Jan Molenaar July 11, 1974
Frederick Fennell August 3, 1975
Harry Mortimer August 3, 1975
George S. Howard December 16, 1976
Mark Hindsley March 2, 1978
Howard Hanson December 13, 1978
James Neilson December 13, 1978
Vaclav Nelhybel December 13, 1978
Leonard Falcone December 12, 1979
Alfred Reed December 12, 1979
Arnald Gabriel December 16, 1980
Nilo Hovey December 16, 1980
Trevor Ford December 16, 1981
Vincent Persichetti December 16, 1981
Clare Grundman December 15, 1982
Morton Gould December 15, 1982
Karel Husa December 15, 1982
Harry Begian December 14, 1983
Francis McBeth December 12, 1984
Normal Dello Joio December 12, 1984
J. Clifton Williams December 18, 1984
Frank W. Erickson December 17, 1986
Neil A. Kjos December 17, 1986
Merle Evans
December 20, 1986
Hugh E. McMillen
December 17, 1986
Claude T. Smith December 16, 1987
Warren Benson December 14, 1988
John Bourgeois December 14, 1988
Donald Hunsberger December 19, 1990
Edgar Gangware December 19, 1991
W J Julian December 16, 1992
Geoffrey Brand
December 20, 1995
Harvey Phillips December 21, 1995
Richard Strange
December 20, 1995
L. Howard Nicar, Jr. October 16, 1996
Kenneth Bloomquist December 18, 1996
H. Robert Reynolds December 18, 1996
Elizabeth Ludwig Fennell December 17, 1997
Arthur Gurwitz December 17, 1997
Russell Hammond December 14, 1999
William F. Ludwig December 14, 1999
John M. Long December 20, 2001
Raoul Camus December 19, 2002
Paul Bierley June 14, 2003
William J. Moody
December 18, 2003
Earl Dunn
December 16, 2004
Victor Zajec
December 16, 2004
James T. Rohner
December 15, 2005
Frank Battisti
December 21, 2006
David Whitwell December 20, 2007
Frank B. Wickes
December 18, 2008
Ray Cramer December 17, 2009
James Croft
April 16, 2011
Paula Crider
December 15, 2011
Mark Kelly
December 15, 2011
Bobby Adams
December 19, 2013
Richard Floyd
December 18, 2014
Edward Lisk
December 17, 2015
Linda R. Moorhouse
December 15, 2016
Thomas V. Fraschillo
December 21, 2017
John Whitwell
December 20, 2018
Richard Crain
December 19, 2019
Loras John Schissel
December 15, 2020
Bruce Leek
December 16, 2021
Julie Giroux
December 20, 2022
Frank Ticheli
December 20, 2022
Gerald Guilbeaux
December 21, 2023
John Stoner
December 21, 2023
Tim Lautzenheiser
December 19, 2024
Research relevant to the field that you would like to share?
Professional advice or tips that might help other band directors?
Something to say?
The National Band Association welcomes and encourages members to submit articles for possible inclusion* in future editions of the NBA Journal. Peer-reviewed** and non-peer reviewed articles are accepted. The NBA Journal is published quarterly and deadlines/ instructions for submission are as follows:
Winter Edition (published in February)
Spring Edition (published in May)
Summer Edition (published in August)
Fall Edition (published in November)
*Articles are published at the discretion of the editor and may appear in a later journal edition or not at all.
**For guidance on how to submit a peer-reviewed article, please see page 56.
Please submit your article in Word document format to NBA Journal Editor Matthew Talbert: talbertm@ohio.edu.
Al G. Wright
1960 - 1962
Honorary Life President
John Paynter 1962 - 1966
Honorary Life President
James Croft 1986 - 1988
Frank B. Wickes 1988 - 1990
Edward W. Volz 1966 - 1968
William J. Moody 1968 - 1970
Edward S. Lisk 1990 - 1992
George S. Howard 1970 - 1974
F. Earl Dunn 1974 - 1976
William D. Revelli 1976 - 1978
W J Julian 1978 - 1980
Kenneth Bloomquist 1980 - 1982
James Neilson 1982 - 1984
James K. Copenhaver 1984 - 1986
Robert E. Foster 1992 - 1994
John R. Bourgeois 1994 - 1996
James Keene 1996 - 1998
Thomas Fraschillo 1998 - 2000
Paula Crider 2000 - 2002
David Gregory 2002- 2004
Linda Moorhouse 2004- 2006
Bobby Adams 2006- 2008
Finley Hamilton 2008- 2009
John Culvahouse 2009- 2012
John M. Long 2010 Honorary President
Roy Holder 2012 - 2014
Richard Good 2014 - 2016
Scott Casagrande 2016 - 2018
Scott Tobias 2018 - 2020
Rebecca Phillips 2020 - 2022
Randall Coleman 2022 - 2024
BY MATTHEW MCCUTCHEN
It gives me great pleasure to announce that the NBA’s William D. Revelli competition is going strong. We received 62 entries this year, including several by international composers, and the most diverse group of composers since I have been involved with the committee. Following an exhaustive screening process the selection committee, consisting of accomplished directors from throughout the United States, determined through a thorough discussion that David Biedenbender’s “Enigma” is the 2024 winner.
Dr. Biedenbender teaches composition in the College of Music at Michigan State University. His pieces often explore the expressive power of combining strange and unusual elements— often timbres and textures—with things that are more familiar— like harmony and melody. He often embeds the resonance of
imagined spaces into the music itself, using acoustic instruments to emulate electronic processes. He composes for practically all mediums, but the wind band world likes to claim him as one of our own. His wind ensemble works are widely performed and have been programmed by the world’s preeminent wind bands.
Biedenbender writes:
I am a composer because of my experiences in band. Playing in my high school concert band, jazz band, marching band, pep band, pit orchestra, and several related chamber ensembles pulled me into arranging music, which, in my senior year, led me to write my first piece: a thirteen and half minute fantasy for band containing every musical idea I’d ever had, strung together with transitions… :-) – and I got to the conduct the premiere. I was hooked. I also got lucky: "the composer just down the street” was David Gillingham –
himself the 1981 winner of this award – and he became my first composition teacher. I went on to study with him at Central Michigan University.
In the summer of 2022, my other composition teacher from CMU, José Luis-Maurtua, passed away far too young after battling pancreatic cancer. José was into details. I remember one lesson spent on one bar of music –considering every possibility of orchestration, every nuance, and then notating it all with absolute clarity. When we were done, he said “now apply this level of care and attention to every bar in the piece.” It’s a lesson that stuck with me. He also taught me the importance of deeply knowing music that you love. We spent many hours dissecting and analyzing pieces in order to understand how they worked – "this forms the foundation of your compositional
Continued on next page
Continued on next page
David Biedenbener's Enigma ..., Matthew McCutchen, cont.
toolbox,” he said. Now, I often ask my students, “What do you love and how does it work? Start there.” This ethos has become the starting point for every piece I write.
J.S. Bach’s “Passacaglia and Fugue in C minor” has long been one of my desert island pieces, and I had been mulling over the possibility of writing some sort of homage to it, perhaps built on the same passacaglia theme, for years. After José passed, I decided that it was time. In “Enigma” I wanted to hide Bach's theme at first, revealing it gradually over the course of the entire piece. There is a long tradition of building a piece on someone else’s materials – in fact, this is how composition was taught for a long time, through counterpoint exercises. But I also think of this as an opportunity to converse with the past – to sort of write a love letter to music and a musician that I greatly admire. For me, there’s a paradox in this – that in building on something old we often discover something new. That was my hope with “Enigma”, and perhaps, in some small way, to commune with and remember José, thanking him for teaching me so much.
Enigma is scored for standard wind band instrumentation with the additions of soprano
saxophone, and optional piccolo trumpet and organ. It does not call for an extensive percussion section – just marimba, vibraphone, glockenspiel, crotales, chimes, tam-tam, suspended cymbal, bass drum, and timpani, but conductors should know that the mallet parts are crucial to the success of the work and that strong players are require on marimba, vibraphone, and piano. Five players are required to cover the parts. The work is 12 minutes long and employs several modern techniques that balance the familiarity of Bach Passacaglia and Fugue in C minor. The piece begins by utilizing delayed echo techniques that seem to mimic a reversed tape effect. While this isn’t an overriding feature of the piece, it is a compositional technique the returns several times, and is at times used to obfuscate the emergence of the familiar. Also interesting is his frequent use of a variety of Baroque-inspired grace notes, embellishments and ornamentations that are a clear nod to Bach, but used in manners that feels fresh and new. These appear most often, but not exclusively in solo passages and conductors will want to make sure the players know how to approach them.
Matthew McCutchen is the Director of Bands at the University of South Florida. He is also the founder and conductor of the Bay Area Youth (BAY) Winds and the Artistic Director and Conductor of the Florida Wind Band. He is the chair of the National Band Association’s William D. Revelli Band Composition Contest, is on the John Philip Sousa Foundation Legion of Honor Selection Committee and is a member of the American Bandmasters Association.
With each piece he releases Biendenbender’s mastery of color becomes more apparent. One
of the most brilliant aspects of Enigma is that once the Passacaglia begins, the listeners’ ears are drawn to the familiar theme, while different choirs of instruments dance around it. This is not a piece that is tremendously rythmically difficult, but Biendenbender’s frequent use of hemiolic passages create a consistent sense of motion through resistance so players must be rhythmically independent in order for the piece to work.
Continued on next page
In addition to paying clear homage to Bach, there are also echoes of Holst’s Hammersmith. Once the passacaglia is introduced roughly a third of the way into the piece (although it was hinted at long before), the theme is not consistently present, but is never far away. While both composers dance, dart, and distract from the themes, their respect for the familiar is at the core of the pieces. In both works the passacaglia provides a steady grounding, and each of them ends with one final, soft, solemn statement that bring the pieces to deeply satisfying conclusions.
The piece requires strong, but not virtuostic, players, which will make it accessible to a more ensembles that other pieces of its artistic equivalent. Once the parts are under the fingers the key to a successful performance lies in executing the dynamic contrasts. This is not a piece that thrives in the mezzo world, and the frequent substantial changes are magical when accomplished. Conductors should consider the dynmaic markings more about energy than volume.
Enigma was originally composed for brass choir and organ for the dedication of the Red Cedar Organ in the Michigan State University Alumni Chapel. The version for wind ensemble was commissioned by Henry Dorn, the conductor
of the St. Olaf Band, who studied conducting and composition at Michigan State. Dorn premiered this version of “Enigma” with the St. Olaf Band in January, 2024.
Enigma is available for purchase from davidbiedenbender.com, where you can also view a perusal score and see the video of the St. Olaf performance. It is worthy of mentioning that Dr. Biedenbender has been a finalist in this contest for the past two years and is also the recipient of this year ABA/ Ostwald Prize for his trumpet concerto “River of Time”. If you don’t know his work, now is a great time to start listening to his music.
The contest’s mission statement includes:
“It is the desire of the National Band Association that the winning compositions from this contest reflect its mission in helping further the cause of quality literature for bands in America. The winning works should be those of not only of significant structural, analytical, and technical quality, but also of such nature that will allow bands to program them as part of their standard repertoire.”
The members of the committee feel strongly that “Enigma” fits these criteria and is a piece that bridges the gap between audiences and performers. This
is a work that is worthy of joining our wonderful canon.
The remaining finalists for the 2024 contest are listed below. Each of these are interesting and compelling pieces well-deserving of performance and academic study.
A Hokusai Triptych – Ben Barker Boom Goes the Dynamite – Paul Dooley Forged by the Sea – Stacy Garrop Sunflower Studies – Nicole Piunno Declaration – James Stephenson Butterfly Cluster – Oliver Waespi
A note of thanks to all who served on the screening and selection committees and to JW Pepper for sponsoring the $5,000 prize. The caliber of entries this year was outstanding, and it is clear that wind band music continues to experiment, grow, and thrive.
DR. TIM LAUTZENHEISER
has been named the newest recipient of the National Band Association Academy of Wind and Percussion Arts award and will be formally recognized at the NBA General Membership meeting during the 2025 Midwest Band and Orchestra Clinic. The Academy of Wind and Percussion Arts (AWAPA) award was established
for the purpose of recognizing those individuals who have truly made significant and outstanding contributions to furthering the excellence of bands and of band music.
Tim Lautzenheiser serves as Senior Vice President of Education for Conn Selmer, Inc. His career spans ten years of college band directing at Northern Michigan University, the University of Missouri, and New Mexico State University. After serving as Executive Director of Bands of America, he created Attitude Concepts, Inc. to accommodate the many requests for student leadership workshops, convention speaking and professional development presentations for educators. Tim's books, produced
by G.I.A. Publications, are bestsellers in the music profession. He is also co-author of Hal Leonard's popular band method, Essential Elements.
Tim is a graduate of Ball State University and the University of Alabama. He was awarded an Honorary Doctorate Degree from VanderCook College of Music. Additional awards include the distinguished Sudler Order of Merit from the John Philip Sousa Foundation, Mr. Holland’s Opus Award, and the Music Industry Award from the Midwest Clinic Board of Directors.
Congratulations, Dr. Tim, on being the newest recipient of the AWAPA award!
JOHN A. THOMSON
received his Bachelors and Masters degrees in trombone performance and music education from Carnegie Mellon University, where he studied with Richard Strange and Philip Catelinet. While completing course work towards a PhD in Music Education at Northwestern University, he served for two years as a Teaching Assistant in both the Departments of Conducting and Performing Organizations and Music Education, where he studied with John Paynter and Bennett Reimer.
Mr. Thomson was the Director of Bands at East Allegheny High School near Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania from 1967 to
1981. Under his direction, East Allegheny bands presented feature performances at the 1976 Mid-West International Band and Orchestra Clinic, the 1975 Music Educators National Conference Eastern Regional Meeting, two Mid-East Instrumental Music Conferences in 1973 and 1977, and three Pennsylvania Music Educators Association Conferences in 1970, 1975 and 1980.
From 1982 to 2007, Mr. Thomson was Director of Bands at New Trier High School in Winnetka, Illinois. During these years, his ensembles regularly performed with established guest conductors, accompanied well-known solo artists, and collaborated with various contemporary composers leading to sixteen world premiere performances. In 1984, the wind ensemble completed a successful concert tour of Switzerland, Germany, and Holland. He conducted a New Trier Honor Band on a concert tour of Hawaii and Australia in 1998. Under his direction, New Trier wind ensembles performed at the l985 and l990 Mid-West International
Band and Orchestra Clinics, the 1994 Music Educators National Biennial In-Service Conference, the l989, l993, 1998 and 2007 Illinois Music Educators Association All-State Conferences, the l990 Western Illinois University Band “Showcase”, the 1996 Atlanta International Band and Orchestra Conference, the 1999, 2000 and 2001 Superstate Festivals at the University of Illinois and the 2003 Chicagoland “Invitational” Concert Band Festival. The wind ensemble received the Downbeat Magazine Award for best classical instrumental ensemble (band) in 1999, 2001, 2002 and 2004.
For twenty-three summers, Mr. Thomson conducted student and staff bands at the Blue Lake Fine Arts Camp in Twin Lake, Michigan, and conducted the camp’s 1992 International Band on their four week performance tour in Europe.
In addition, Mr. Thomson was a Contributing Editor and New Music Reviewer for THE INSTRUMENTALIST Magazine Continued on next page
2024 NBA Al & Gladys Wright Distinguished Legacy Award, cont.
and was active as a clinician, guest conductor and adjudicator. Following his New Trier retirement, he served for 10 years as an adjunct professor in music education at Roosevelt University in Chicago and has observed student teachers in the field for Northwestern University and the University of Illinois.
Personal awards include several National Band Association Citations of Excellence, the American School Band Directors Association Stanbury Award, the Mr. Holland’s Opus Award (sponsored by Bob Rogers Travel), the Chicagoland Outstanding Music Educator Award (sponsored by Quinlin & Fabish Music Company), the Phi Beta Mu Outstanding Illinois Bandmaster Award and the Phi Beta Mu Illinois Band Directors Hall of Fame at Northwestern University. Additionally, Mr. Thomson was inducted into the Pennsylvania Music Educators Association Hall of Fame.
Mr. Thomson was an elected member of the American Bandmasters Association and serves as that organization’s Goldman Memorial Citation Committee Chair. Additional professional affiliations included the National Band Association (Revelli Composition Award Committee), American School Band Directors Association (Past Illinois
State Chair), National Association for Music Education, Illinois Music Educators Association (Past District VII Band Chair and All-State Selection Committee), Phi Beta Mu and Phi Mu Alpha.
Mr. Thomson passed away in 2024 and is lovingly survived by his wife Susan, and two sons, Brian and Will.
johnathomson.com
is an internationally recognized clinician, conductor, and author. He is a graduate of Syracuse University School of Music with graduate studies at Ithaca School of Music, Eastman School of Music, Syracuse University, and Oswego State University. Mr. Lisk served with distinction for many years as the band director at Oswego High School (NY). His many contributions to music education include authoring The Creative Director series published by Meredith Music Publications, and coauthoring the highly
acclaimed 11-volume publication by GIA, Teaching Music Through Performance in Band. He is also the editor for the Edwin Franko Goldman March Series for Carl Fischer Music Publications, which include, On The Mall March, The ABA March, Bugles and Drums March, Onward-Upward March and On Parade March.
Mr. Lisk’s service to the profession includes having served as Vice President (Emeritus) of the Midwest Clinic Board of Directors and as a Past President and CEO of the John Philip Sousa Foundation. He is also a past- president of the National Band Association and served NBA as Executive Secretary Treasurer from 19972002. Additionally, Mr. Lisk was one of the original founders of the New York State Band Directors Association. Mr. Lisk is an inducted member of the prestigious American Bandmasters Association and in the year 2000, served as the 63rd President of this distinguished organization founded by Edwin Franko Goldman.
Called a “unique leader in the profession” and “a dynamic force in music education,” Edward S. Lisk has been invited to speak and conduct throughout the United States and abroad. His active guest-conducting schedule includes all-state bands, honor Continued on next page
bands, university, and professional bands. Since 1985, Mr. Lisk has served as an adjunct professor, appeared as a clinician/lecturer, adjudicator, and guest conductor throughout 85 universities in 46 states, five Canadian Provinces and Australia. He has served as guest conductor for the U.S. Air Force Band, Australian Wind Symphony, U.S. Interservice Band, U.S. Army Field Band and the U.S. Army Band “Pershing’s Own.”
Mr. Lisk’s many honors include the 2009 Midwest Medal of Honor, the 2012 Phi Beta Mu International Outstanding Contributor to Bands Award, the Sudler Order of Merit from the John Philip Sousa Foundation, the New York State Band Directors Association “Outstanding Band Director Award”, the “Key to the City of Oswego”, the Oswego School District “Administrator of the Year”, the Phi Delta Kappa “Area Educator of Year”, the Oswego Classroom “Teacher of the Year”, the A. R McAllister “Distinguished Bandmaster of America”, the Greater Oswego Chamber of Commerce “Civic Award”, the 2009 Syracuse Symphony Outstanding Music Educator Award, the 2015 NBA Academy of Winds and Percussion Award (AWAPA), and distinguished member of the National Band Association Hall of Fame for Distinguished Conductors.
2024 NBA Al & Gladys Wright Distinguished Legacy Award, cont.
(b. 2001) is an Oregon-born composer of wind ensemble, orchestral, and chamber music. His works fuse styles of the 18th, 19th, and 20th Century with modern techniques and contemporary instrumentation. Ryan currently pursues composition and wind conducting at the University of North Texas (UNT), where he has studied
with Dr. Sungji Hong, Dr. Kirsten Soriano, and film composer Bruce Broughton.
Ryan has earned several awards and accolades, showcasing his increasing popularity as an emerging composer. In 2024, he was named the winner of the Pennsylvania Symphonic Winds 2023 Composition Contest. Also in 2023, Ryan was recognized as the winner of the Austin Symphonic Band 2023 Young Composers’ Contest. He was a finalist in the ASCAP 2022 Morton Gould Young Composer Awards, and also earned second-place of the Florida Bandmasters Association 2021 Young Composers Competition. Ryan has received performances from several ensembles including the Royal Australian Air Force Band, the Pennsylvania Symphonic
Winds, and ensembles at UNT including the Wind Orchestra, the Wind Ensemble, the Concert Band, and the Symphony Orchestra. Ryan also frequently collaborates with student and faculty chamber ensembles at UNT to produce exciting and dynamic new chamber works.
Ryan’s passion and dedication as a composer has garnered recognition from many, who call him “one of the most promising young composers of his generation”, and one “[whose] fresh voice will undoubtedly craft a wonderful new addition to the wind band repertoire.” (Austin Symphonic Band)
ryanfillinger.com/about
(b. 1999) is a Korean-American composer who has been recognized by ASCAP and National Federation of Music Clubs and has been on the rise composing meaningful and exciting music meant for a variety of audiences in the Concert Hall. He also has been an enthusiastic supporter for bringing diversity into the Concert Hall. Minoo grew up in Suwanee, Georgia, where he was a passionate member of the music community, which eventually led him to develop his aspirations for becoming a composer.
Throughout his years of composing, he has been awarded the Donald Martino Award for Excellence in Composition,
Senior Composition Competition
Winner by MTNA, two NEC Honors Ensemble Composition Competitions, and a Finalist of the ASCAP Foundation Morton Gould Young Composers Awards Competition. Minoo’s pieces also have been performed at locations such as Carnegie Hall, Busan Cultural Center, Jordan Hall, and the Midwest Clinic.
Minoo earned his Bachelor of Music in Composition from New England Conservatory, where he studied under the tutelage of Michael Gandolfi. He is currently earning his Master in Music in composition at University of Texas at Austin’s Butler School of Music where he is under the tutelage of Omar Thomas.
minoodixon.com/about
ARBOR CREEK MIDDLE SCHOOL (CARROLLTON, TX)
Kimberly Beene, Sarah Ayoub, and Ben Koch, Directors
KILLIAN MIDDLE SCHOOL (LEWISVILLE, TX)
Trevor Ousey and Jenna Lenhard, Directors
LIGON MAGNET MIDDLE SCHOOL (RALEIGH, NC)
Renee Todd, Director
CUTHBERTSON HIGH SCHOOL (WAXHAW, NC)
Todd Ebert, Samantha Liddle, and Katie Ebert, Directors
SICKLES HIGH SCHOOL (TAMPA, FL)
Keith Griffis and Heather Lundahl, Directors
All winners of the following awards are listed at NationalBandAssociation.org/Awards-Recognition
Academy of Wind and Percussion Arts (AWAPA) Award
Al & Gladys Wright Distinguished Legacy Award
NBA Hall of Fame of Distinguished Conductors
Programs of Excellence Blue Ribbon Award
The NBA/Alfred Music Young Band Composition Contest
The NBA/Merrill Jones Memorial Band Composition Contest
The NBA/William D. Revelli Memorial Band Composition Contest
The NBA Young Composers Jazz Composition Contest
Mentor Award
Citation of Excellence
Outstanding Jazz Educator
Citation of Merit for Marching Excellence
Outstanding Musician Award
Outstanding Jazz Musician Award
Music Camper Award
Band Booster Award
It’s my pleasure to report that community bands in 2024 continued to rebound from the pandemic, and their audiences continued to increase as well. Players are returning to community bands as pandemic restrictions have been reduced or eliminated, and the fear of illness has abated. Likewise, concert venues have reopened to pre-pandemic levels.
The Association of Concert Bands (ACB) is the largest organization dedicated to supporting community bands, with members throughout the United States, in Canada, Germany, Ireland, Spain, Australia and the United Kingdom.
ACB supports community bands throughout the year on social media, including ACB Connects, a regular podcast focusing on issues all community bands face. The colorful ACB Journal is published three times a year, with
information and updates of interest to all community band members.
In a departure from past years, ACB held three events titled Regional Connections, which were two well-attended days of collaboration and discussion, education, and performance. Each event featured roundtable discussions of issues facing community bands, and an opportunity to exchange ideas and do regional networking. In addition, educational sessions included a new music reading session, guidance on grant-writing, information on jazz performance, concert band instrument history, and software for online collaboration. Concerts by ACB member bands as well as university ensembles were a highlight. The events were held in: Omaha, Nebraska (April 26-27) Richardson, Texas (June 14-15) and Carrollton, Georgia (September 20-21).
In 2025 the association will return to its single annual
Michael Burch-Pesses, the President-Elect of the Association of Concert Bands, is Distinguished Professor of Music and Director of Bands at Pacific University in Forest Grove, Oregon, where he conducts the Wind Ensemble and Jazz Band, and teaches courses in conducting and music education. He enjoyed a distinguished career as a bandmaster in the United States Navy before arriving at Pacific University. During his Navy career he served as Leader of the Naval Academy Band in Annapolis, Maryland; Assistant Leader of the Navy Band in Washington, DC; and Director of the Commodores, the Navy's official jazz ensemble. Dr. Burch-Pesses also is the Conductor of the award-winning Oregon Symphonic Band, Oregon's premier community band. In 2006 the band performed at the Midwest Clinic, and in 2007 the John Philip Sousa Foundation awarded the band the Sudler Silver Scroll, recognizing them as one of the outstanding community bands in the nation. He is the author of “Canadian Band Music: A Qualitative Guide to Canadian Composers and Their Works for Band,” and is a regular contributor to the “Teaching Music Through Performance in Band” series. He also is a Conn-Selmer Educational Clinician
convention format. This will take place at Fort Smith, Arkansas, June 4-8.
Continued on next page
2024 Community Bands Report, Michael Burch-Pesses, cont.
Last year at this time the ACB had 645 member bands, and that number has grown to 679. Individual memberships number 448, fewer than previous years, and the Association is working to increase individual memberships further in 2025.
ACB Corporate memberships, including music publishers, number 22, an increase over last year. Although this number is smaller than before COVID, the Association is working to increase these memberships now that bands are more active and are ordering even more music and other equipment.
I’m delighted to announce the winner of this year’s ACB Young Composers Composition Contest is Trenton Rhodes with his work, "Symphonic Mountain Fantasy." For the first time in the contest’s history, the judges came to a unanimous decision that this was the clear winner among the submissions. That should give you an indication of just how good it is! The winning composition will premiere at the 2025 ACB Convention in Fort Smith, AR.
THE NEW HORIZONS INTERNATIONAL MUSIC ASSOCIATION
The New Horizons International Music Association (NHIMA) provides music-making opportunities for adults, including those with no musical experience, and those who were active in school music programs but have been inactive for a long period.
Founded in 1991 by Roy Ernst, a professor at the Eastman School of Music, NHIMA represents more than 163 New Horizons bands, orchestras, choral groups and planning groups throughout the USA, Canada, Ireland and Australia. It has 11 business members.
In 2024, NHIMA hosted two camps in Cincinnati Metro and Lakeside Chautauqua, Ohio. Next year the Association will host three camps, in Rochester, NY; Cincinnati Metro, OH and Mt. Tremblant, Quebec.
NHIMA held 19 virtual classes in 2024, many of which were 4-6 weeks in length, including ukulele instruction, separate classes on the music of the Beatles and Louis Armstrong, a percussion class, and how to use MusicCloud.
The Association’s informative newsletter, New Horizons News,
combines with Music Forever, a bi-weekly podcast in which players and conductors from New Horizons bands and orchestras share their musical journeys and their passion and love of playing in New Horizons ensembles. Music Forever can also be found on Spotify and Apple Podcasts.
There are many other community bands that are not members of ACB or NHIMA, and anyone wishing to join a local band can find an abundance of information on the web or by contacting ACB or NHIMA.
We offer our congratulations to numerous community band members who have been recognized by the American Prize this year. As of this writing: Conducting
Community Band Division
• Ken Bagley, Avon CTPlainville Wind EnsembleThe American Prize winner
• Christopher Ward, WestBloomfield, MI – Five Lakes Silver Band – 2nd Place
• Nicolas Propes, LeClaire, IA
- Big River Brass Band - 3rd Place
Composition
Band/Wind Ensemble
• Lee Hartman, Kansas City, MO - "Emerald" - 3rd Place
2024 Community Bands Report, Michael Burch-Pesses, cont.
Major Choral Works
• Augusta Cecconi-Bates, Cape Vincent, NY - "We Have a Dream"
Band/Wind Ensemble Performance Community Division
• South Jersey Area Wind Ensemble, Egg Harbor Township, NJ; Keith W. Hodgson, conductor - The American Prize winner
• The Allentown Band, Allentown, PA; Ronald Demkee, conductor - 2nd Place (tie)
• Cleveland Winds, Lakewood, OH; Birch Browning, conductor – 2nd Place (tie)
• East Texas Chamber Winds, Miami, FL; Roy Mclerran, conductor- 2nd Place (tie)
• Big River Brass Band, LeClaire, IA; Nicholas Propes, conductor – 3rd place (tie)
• Arizona Winds, Surprise, AZ; Rich Shelton, conductor - 3rd Place (tie)
Congratulations to the three community bands selected to perform at the 2024 Midwest Clinic:
• Cedar Park Winds from Leander, TX, Jeremy Spicer, conductor
• Naulu Winds of the University of Hawaii West Oahu, from Pearl City, HI, Chadwick Kamei, conductor
• Springboro Wind Symphony from Centerville, OH, Josh Baker, conductor.
2024 NBA Membership Report (one day snapshot – as of 12-15-24)
The horn’s reputation for being a difficult instrument is firmly set in the legends of band lore. With a “home base” setting that is higher up on the overtone series than the middle register of other brass instruments, the horn presents unique challenges for accuracy fairly early on in the hornist’s journey. Horn players also face other challenges of tone production, range development, pitch awareness, dynamic control, and the need to learn different marching band instruments. Although hornists have to navigate these slippery challenges more often than other brass students might have to, the technical passages they face are often not as numerous as those their trumpet, trombone, and euphonium-playing colleagues have to deal with.
Nevertheless, the large ensemble, solo, chamber music, and state-wide band and orchestra contest music hornists play in high school demands some advanced technical skill, even if these
abilities are less often called for than in other brass parts. In fact, the lack of technical passages for horn students at younger levels is partly why they might struggle with technique when more challenging repertoire is set before them in high school. However, without having to invest a lot of time into method books and extensive practice regimens, I believe a student and/or horn section could improve their technique to be ready for high school repertoire, or to catch up if they are a little behind, by practicing two basic exercises in the band class and/ or at home. I call these exercises the Rhythmic Accelerando and the Five Note Scale Exercise. They have helped my own beginner through collegiate-aged students immensely in the development of their technical abilities.
In isolating technical issues, we essentially have two main challenges to overcome: tonguing speed and coordinating the air, tongue and fingers. There are also occasional challenges of flexibility, but these challenges are more
Continued on next page
Matthew Haislip is Assistant Professor of Horn at Mississippi State University. He also teaches at Blue Lake Fine Arts Camp and is a member of Quintasonic Brass, Missouri Symphony Orchestra, Starkville Symphony, North Mississippi Symphony, and Meridian Symphony. He was previously a member of the Midland-Odessa Symphony (TX) and Kentucky Symphony and has performed with such ensembles as the Cincinnati Opera, Opera Naples (FL), Omaha Symphony, and the Billings Symphony (MT). He has published articles with the International Horn Society, British Horn Society, and Bandworld Magazine. Haislip’s book and music are published by book Mountain Peak Music, WaveFront Music, BrownWood Publishing, and the International Horn Society’s Online Music Sales. He led the composition consortium for Anthony Plog’s Horn Sonata and performed the world premiere in 2023. He holds degrees from the University of Missouri-Kansas City, University of Cincinnati, CCM, and Texas A&M University-Commerce. Matthew is a Yamaha Performing Artist.
Technique Tips for the Student Hornist ..., Matthew Haislip, cont.
rarely seen in high school music. (Flexibility can be addressed by working on exercises associated with range development of the air speed along the overtone series. Slurring and then tonguing arpeggios across the range of the horn can aid in developing sufficient flexibility for young hornists. Tension and rigidity are the enemy of flexible brass playing. The approach should be air-driven; not muscled.) With a coordinated approach to tonguing speed and finger dexterity, they will be ready for so much of what comes their way in the high school band experience.
SKILLTONGUING SPEED
Tonguing speed can and should be addressed sooner rather than later in the school band brass class. If it’s only in high school when students start to work on this skill, they will be left behind in faster passages. It takes months to develop incremental improvements in one’s tonguing speed, as the physical muscle of the tongue needs to get conditioned “up to speed” over time.
• a focused sense of subdivision is necessary to be productive in developing tonguing speed
• if the air stops, the forward momentum stops, so blowing a long tone and interrupting
it only with the tongue is the way forward
• a lighter tongue is a faster tongue
• a heavier tongue is a slower tongue
• lighter articulation involves more of a “doo” articulation than a hard “too”
• faster twitch muscle allows some people to tongue faster than others, but players with faster twitch muscle actually often have trouble tonguing slower, so students with an easy fast single tongue should also work on tonguing at much slower tempos
Continued on next page
TONGUING SPEED EXERCISERHYTHMIC ACCELERANDO
*play in two or three different keys each practice session
The Rhythmic Accelerando exercise asks the student to play just one pitch while articulating the rhythmic division of each beat one unit smaller (faster) each measure from quarter notes to eighth notes, triplet eighth notes, and sixteenth notes. Similar exercises have been used by countless teachers to instill good subdivision. It requires focused concentration to switch between the simple and compound division of the beat, which can be quite challenging for younger students. The growth benefits in personal musicianship and tonguing speed make this a time saving exercise for junior high school and high school-aged hornists. Students would benefit from working on both of the exercises in this article by working with a metronome, including placing the beat of the metronome on the upbeat so that the student is providing the downbeat with their internal pulse. I recommend adding a crescendo to the end of the line to keep the air consistently blowing forward even as we start to run out of air.
A good starting tempo for this
Technique Tips for the Student Hornist ..., Matthew Haislip, cont.
exercise would be quarter note=72 or slower, if necessary, working up to quarter note=120, if possible. Tonguing speed is limited by the muscle twitch speed capabilities of each person, so some students will not be able to single tongue at even quarter note=110, while other students may be able to single tongue as quickly as quarter note=176 or faster! After a well-grounded footing in single tonguing has been gained, it will be time to slowly introduce double tonguing. This could start as early as the second year of playing for students with solid fundamentals. The same principles apply for fluidity in double tonguing (lighter tongue, air-driven approach, etc.).
Experimenting with a “koo” or “kah” or “goo” or “gah” syllable will help each student find what works best for them. The ability to work on coordinating the tongue and air on just one pitch without having to involve the valve changes as well will keep the student from information overload and frustration with the process. The ideal sound produced for both single and double tonguing will be a beautiful immediate tone with a clear but light front moving rapidly and not changing tone color as the front and back of the tongue are
employed. This will be challenging to execute, so practice involving isolating the “kah” or “gah”, etc. in simple eighth notes will help train the back of the tongue.
This exercise does not take very much time out of a band rehearsal but packs quite a pedagogical punch. It could be useful for the entire band, including the percussion section. I appreciate that my own high school band director in northeast Texas worked daily with the band on single, double, and triple tonguing exercises and modeled them for us beautifully on his own trumpet. It paid off immensely in the level of repertoire the band could play.
After working on the tongue’s overall fluidity and speed, now comes the challenge of coordinating the air, tongue, and fingers with some speed as well. Students often struggle with producing a complete system of timing within their musical “engine”. They can grapple with flams and blips on notes if one or more aspects of this engine
are not lining up with the others. Coordination is the key to solving these technical problems.
A few tips:
• as with tonguing speed, a focused sense of subdivision is necessary for synchronous air, tongue, and finger coordination
• working slowly and gradually increasing the tempo helps ensure command of all aspects at an easier pace instead of attempting to put everything together at an uncomfortable quick tempo
• isolating two of the three
aspects at a time can help with coordination - for example, slurring through the passage first to coordinate air and fingers and then adding the tongue when the passage is slurred smoothly - or just using air sounds with the valves to line up the air and fingers before actually playing the instrument
• getting the air right at the front of the note, not separate from the tongue, is the key to a beautiful nuanced front to each note
• curving the fingers over the valves allows for a more
efficient range of motion instead of flattening the fingers out across the levers
• learning and memorizing all standard fingerings across the range of the horn is a must for execution of technical passages (and helps when marching instruments and new fingerings are introduced)
• mastering all twelve of the major scales from memory across two or more octaves with a good all-around sound and clear articulation is a helpful goal to build solid technique
Continued on next page
FIVE NOTE SCALE EXERCISE
*play in every key - perhaps around the circle of fourths through different octaves
The Five Note Scale Exercise tasks the student with tonguing the first five notes of a major scale up and back down with another rhythmic accelerando through quarter notes, eighth notes, and sixteenth notes. As this exercise consists of the first five notes of a major scale, students of a wide variety of ability levels can approach it and benefit from it. If it is played with clear articulation and a characteristic sound by employing a coordinated system of air, tongue, and fingers, the student can develop a greater connection to their instrument and a technical fluidity that all great players demonstrate. A crescendo to the end of the line is helpful to keep the air in motion to the end. If students cannot make it through the exercise in one breath, they can breathe at the end of measure two, changing the final quarter note to an eighth note. It is helpful to slur through the line with a great sound and a smooth connection between the notes first before adding articulation.
I recommend similar tempo guidelines (quarter note=72 to 120) in this exercise as in the rhythmic accelerando exercise, but it may need to be taken a bit slower for younger players. Students can and should take these tempo markings faster than 120 if they can play it cleanly at 120. This exercise, too, can serve as an approachable opportunity for working on double tonguing. An advantage of this exercise is that if students play it in every key, they will encounter some challenging cross fingerings (Concert A or Concert B, for instance) that can develop their overall fluency on the instrument. This exercise can be a good stepping stone to playing full one, two, or three octave scales at quick tempos if the student keeps the clarity and connection they learned with this exercise. This is an exercise I often practice myself in my own daily fundamental practice routines.
*note: a full packet of these two exercises is available on my personal website: matthaislip.com/teacher
Ideally, we want our concert band horn students to produce a beautiful heroic sound for the lyrical “Hollywood” horn moments, have a good sense of time for Sousa marches, and be able to call up a bit of flash for the technical passages that good writing for the horn employs. The Rhythmic Accelerando and Five Note Scale Exercise would be beneficial for the entire brass section and possibly the entire band. By working on their tonguing speed in isolation and then coordinating their air, tongue, and fingers, students will be more than comfortable to face whatever technical acrobatics come their way. From there, they can be freed from the burden of limitations to have FUN playing the exciting moments wind band students enjoy.
Ibelieve in mentorship. Mentorship has created and still creates the most impactful musical scenarios in music. Whether a person is in your rehearsal room or you were inspired by their book or recording, you learned from that person; mentorship is fluid and takes many forms. Anytime we hear a less than stellar performance, especially at an adjudicated event, we hear, “Did they ask anyone if they should have played that? Did they have anyone listen to the group before the festival?” Those questions are saying that someone, a mentor or maybe just a good friend, might have helped.
Has mentorship taken an odd turn? When I began teaching in 1977, we heard new music on sound sheets (“place nickel here”, if you remember), then we moved to cassette recordings which offered excerpts of pieces. It was a challenge to find a complete recording. Word of
mouth, recommending pieces, was crucial. Sometimes I played a piece at contest that I had never heard. We actually studied scores! Next came the cd which opened a whole new world of resources. All of the publishers began producing high quality recordings; no more excuses, we now had terrific models of almost any piece. You know what came next: The Internet! I have always been a literature hound. Some of us are relentless when it comes to searching out new music. The Internet brings everything to our fingertips. All we need is a Smartphone.
With all these tools at our fingertips, I am frustrated by the lack of initiative that many directors take to creatively program for their students. Unlike English teachers, we are given free reign over the literature we bring to our students. Most states use an extensive list of prescribed or suggested music and we have the luxury of choosing our music, yet the number of social media
Gary Barton retired from the La Porte, Texas Independent School District after thirty-seven years of teaching in five states. He received the Bachelor of Music Education from the University of LouisianaMonroe and the Master of Science in Education from Indiana University. A Past President of the Arkansas School Band and Orchestra Association and Past 2nd VicePresident of the National Band Association, he has written for numerous publications and has done clinics and presentations in sixteen states. He may be reached at bartonglp@gmail.com.
posts asking, “Please tell me what to play” are growing at, in my opinion, and alarming rate. “Here’s my instrumentation, tell me what to play” is not an unusual post. In many geographical areas, this has created a small number of “go to” pieces that are passed around and I see a piece played up to six times on a given day at an event. Some states publish data each year as to what pieces are played most
Continued on next page
We Don't All Like the Same Music ..., Gary Barton, cont.
frequently and which pieces tend to get a superior rating. While I believe there are no “first division pieces” this strategy does at times produce results, but is the growth of the director sacrificed?
The best practice I have seen comes from a young man in Texas. The Texas PML (Prescribed Music List) is a treasure chest of music at all grade levels and it is constantly growing and evolving; many states use the PML. He normally plays from the Grade 3 and 4 lists. He has scoured those two sections and made a list of the pieces he would like to use at some point. His list is also constantly changing. It’s a simple process. Go through the lists, go to the websites and listen. Often the score is displayed as well. It’s research, self-development, and it’s demanding of time. After all this effort, he decides what he would like to play and then asks opinions from colleagues. “Do I have the woodwinds for this?”
“Will it fit with this other piece?” “Is the program going to be too long for our endurance?’ This is when the mentorship begins. Yes, this takes a long time and you must invest. When you go to a doctor or dentist or lawyer, if they are using the latest techniques, they have researched, studied, and trained. Do you really want to go to a middle-aged doctor who hasn’t studied past his medical school graduation?
I have a few observations that usually tell me if directors are playing what they were told to play or if they chose the obligatory “you can make a 1 with this” piece. The performance is clean, in tune, first division, but there is little conviction, passion in the performance. A conductor’s passion for the music will be apparent. A lack of passion will also be apparent. Another “tell” can be embarrassing:
“Congratulations on your first division performance! What did you play?”
“I don’t remember.”
“Who wrote it?”
“I don’t remember.”
This is absurd, but if you try asking these questions you may find it more troubling than you expect.
We do not all enjoy the same music any more than we enjoy the same food. I live on the Gulf Coast and there are seventeen Tex-Mex restaurants on my street but I don’t eat seafood or avocados. It is also acceptable that you may not identify with every piece by your favorite composer. We are very fortunate to have the opportunity to present music to our students that we can be passionate about in every rehearsal. I substitute
Continued on next page
We Don't All Like the Same Music ..., Gary Barton, cont.
teach and I can attest to the fact that English teachers do not have our autonomy. They will teach that novel and their opinion may not be a concern. Or maybe they are forbidden to teach a particular novel. We are charged with producing technically and intelligently competent musicians, but I think musically excited student musicians must be the ultimate trophy. I have dozens of biographies of great conductors and I can promise you that they have surprising opinions about the validity of some of our greatest masterpieces. You will find it difficult to present a musically “on
fire” performance of a piece that does not speak to you. Do your own research, the rewards will last your whole career.
"If You Like Everything I Write, I’m Not Doing a Good Job." – Robert W. Smith
"Only the Mediocre are Always at Their Best." – Oscar Wilde
"Give a Man a Fish and You Feed Him for a Day. Teach Him How to Fish and You Feed Him for a Lifetime." – Lao Tzu
RECOMMENDED READING
Pierre Monteux, Maitre by John Canarina (Amadeus Press, 2003)
The Composer’s Advocate by Erich Leinsdorf (Yale University Press, 1981)
Erich Leinsdorf on Music by Erich Leinsdorf (Amadeus Press, 1997)
Boulez – Composer, Conductor, Enigma by Joan Peyser (Schirmer Books, 1976
When I consider what makes ensembles exceptional, I think not of the lofty goals we set but of the systems we use to reach them. A quote from James Clear’s Atomic Habits resonates deeply with me: “You don’t rise to your goals. You fall to your systems.” Success in music education—and life—depends less on the grand destinations we aspire to and more on the daily habits and systems that pave the way.
Building a successful ensemble requires navigating both the PROs and CONs of development— embracing systems that enhance performance while addressing challenges that arise in the process. Below, I explore the foundational principles (the PROs) of ensemble success, the obstacles (the CONs) that educators and students must address to achieve meaningful growth, and simple systems that
can be installed to help move us forward.
Exceptional ensembles don’t focus solely on the final performance product. Instead, they prioritize the processes that lead to consistent progress. To shift from what is possible to what is probable, rehearsals should follow a structured approach:
I. READ ("What?"): Begin with the basics—notes and rhythms.
a. Members are presented with material for the first time, or it is the first time the ensemble is working on the material with all members present.
b. Ensemble focuses on developing an understanding of the fundamental blueprint of the material.
c. Members should leave the rehearsal with answers to all “WHAT” questions
Dr. Adam J. Gumble is the Director of Athletic Bands at West Chester University. Dr. Gumble’s primary responsibilities include directing the “INCOMPARABLE” Golden Rams Marching Band, “Sixth Man” Basketball Band, Concert Band, and undergraduate conducting courses. Since arriving at West Chester University, the “RamBand” has performed in featured exhibitions at the Bands of America Grand National Championships, was named the recipient of the prestigious Sudler Trophy (the “Heisman Trophy” for collegiate marching bands), and has performed halftime shows at National Football League Playoff games. Most recently, the RamBand was honored to perform in the 2024 Rose Parade® in Pasadena, California.
Dr. Gumble is an active guest conductor, clinician, producer, adjudicator, and presenter across the United States. He serves as the Director of Educational Programming for Vivace Productions, Incorporated. Before his appointment at West Chester University, Dr. Gumble taught for 13 years in Pennsylvania public schools.
in the chunk/segment and be equipped with the tools to perform the notes and rhythms involved in the chunk/segment at the ensuing rehearsal.
d. Key Questions:
i. What is the key/tonal center?
ii. What technical demands are presented?
iii. What is the marked tempo?
iv. If the material is beyond my current ability, what “check patterns” or “target notes” exist that will allow me to participate in ensemble without developing bad habits?
v. What STRATEGIES can I employ to ensure that I’m eventually able to perform the material?
II. ROUGH-IN ("How?"): Shape dynamics, articulations, and tempo.
a. Members are expected to attend rehearsal prepared to perform notes and rhythms at a tempo approaching the performance requirement.
b. Ensemble focus is on building group awareness of role (see: Layering Balance) and shape (notes, phrases, and dynamics).
c. Members should leave the rehearsal with answers to all “HOW” questions present in the chunk segment and equipped with the tools to perform the Articulations and Dynamics (in addition to Notes and Rhythms) involved in the chunk segment at the ensuing rehearsal.
d. Sample Questions
i. What role(s) do I play during this segment? (See LAYERING)
ii. Who is the listening point for note length? What syllables are we using?
iii. Who is the listening point for dynamic growth? Are there any dynamic adjustments I need to make based on context? (Geography/Texture Register/Personnel)
iv. How does performance practice dictate my approach?
III. REFINE ("Why?"): Connect with the musical intent and artistry.
a. Students are expected to attend rehearsal able to perform all WHAT and HOW elements approaching performance tempo.
b. Ensemble focus is on fine tuning elements and realizing the emotional intent of the material.
c. Members should leave the rehearsal with answers to all “WHY” questions in the chunk\
segment and equipped with tools to connect with the material emotionally.
d. Key Questions:
i. What is the composer saying?
ii. How does my role evolve throughout this piece?
iii. Where is the emotional climax?
iv. Why is this music important?
v. What does this music mean to me?
This system ensures that every rehearsal builds toward a shared vision. Educators can implement this by mapping rehearsals, blocking time, chunking material, and creating a roadmap to keep progress intentional.
A goal without a plan is just a dream. While setting goals is vital for any ensemble, achieving them requires well-structured systems to turn aspirations into reality. Too often, we focus on the end result—whether it’s mastering a challenging piece or delivering a polished performance—without establishing the necessary steps to get there. This lack of planning can leave rehearsals feeling rudderless and students unclear about how to reach the goal.
Example in Context: A band
director sets a goal to perform a technically demanding piece but skips the foundational work of breaking it into manageable sections or teaching the musical concepts needed to interpret the composer’s intent. Students become overwhelmed, and the result is a performance that feels strained and unfinished.
The key to success lies in teaching students not only to set goals but also to develop action plans that connect their daily work to those goals. These plans should break big objectives into smaller, achievable steps, empowering students to take ownership of their progress.
1. Define the Goal Clearly: Encourage students to articulate their goals with precision, whether it’s mastering a specific phrase, improving tone quality, or aligning rhythms with the ensemble. A vague goal like "play better" doesn’t provide direction, but a focused goal like "play the sixteenth-note run in measure 32 at tempo without tension" sets a clear target.
2. Break the Goal Into Steps: Teach students to deconstruct their goals into actionable tasks. For instance, mastering
a tricky rhythm might involve slowing it down, clapping it out, isolating notes, and gradually building speed. Help them see that small wins along the way lead to big achievements.
3. Create a Timeline: A goal without a deadline often leads to procrastination. Encourage students to set realistic timelines and assign specific milestones to measure progress. For example, “By the end of this week, I’ll play this passage at half tempo with accuracy.”
4. Reflect and Adjust: Systems are dynamic and require reflection. Teach students to assess their progress regularly, celebrate successes, and revise their plans as needed. If something isn’t working, they should adapt rather than abandon the goal.
5. Connect to the Bigger Picture: Help students understand how their individual goals contribute to the ensemble’s success. When each member is working systematically toward personal goals, the ensemble’s collective progress becomes unstoppable.
Students focus on individual responsibility, mastering elements like notes, rhythms, and tempo. By asking, “What is my responsibility?” students develop accountability for their Simple Systems for Better Ensembles ..., Adam Gumble, cont.
In Practice: Imagine a clarinetist struggling with a difficult run. Instead of simply asking them to "practice more," guide them to set an action plan:
• Slow down the passage to focus on finger coordination.
• Isolate the trickiest intervals and play them repeatedly until they feel natural.
• Gradually increase the tempo, using a metronome to track progress.
• Reflect on improvements and identify areas that still need work.
Educators instill lifelong skills that extend beyond music by teaching students to create and follow their own systems. These systems drive success in rehearsal and prepare students to tackle challenges in other areas of life with confidence and clarity. Aspirations are important, but systems make them achievable. With thoughtful planning and intentional actions, students can turn their dreams into tangible successes and reach heights they never thought possible!
Proactivity is essential in building high-performing ensembles. It operates across three levels:
1. Level 1: Intrapersonal ("I/Me")
contributions.
2. Level 2: Interpersonal ("We Us")
Collaboration is key here Students align articulations, shape phrases collectively, and balance dynamics. This level fosters teamwork, encouraging students to ask, “How can we work together effectively?”
3. Level 3: Extrapersonal ("They Them")
The ensemble’s focus shifts outward, asking, “How does our work impact the audience?” Students learn to connect emotionally with listeners, making their performances memorable and meaningful.
By addressing proactivity at all three levels, educators create an environment where every musician feels empowered to contribute.
Building consistency requires embracing repetition, yet it’s often undervalued or overlooked. In a rush to achieve progress, we may settle for fleeting moments of success—a single flawless phrase, a perfectly tuned chord—without realizing that these moments might be luck or coincidence rather than true mastery. Consistency, however, is born from deliberate, repeated success that transforms isolated victories into reliable
patterns.
Once is luck. Twice is coincidence. Three times builds a pattern.
Repetition is the key to solidifying these patterns, but it demands intentionality and focus.
Repeating an exercise without engaging in its purpose does not lead to consistency; instead, it risks mechanical, uninspired performances.
Example in Context: A section nails a tricky rhythm during one run-through of a piece. On the next attempt, the precision slips, and the students chalk it up to a great moment rather than an achievable standard. Without deliberately repeating the success—again and again—it remains a coincidence, not a consistent habit.
1. Focus on Intentional Repetition: Revisit challenging passages with a focus on why it was successful, ensuring students understand and replicate the techniques that led to the initial success.
2. Celebrate and Reinforce Patterns: Once a pattern emerges—three successful repetitions in a row –acknowledge it and connect it to the ensemble’s broader goals.
3. Vary Contexts: Consistency isn’t just about repetition; it’s about adaptability. Practice the same skills in different musical contexts to ensure they transfer beyond a single piece or exercise.
By reframing repetition as a pathway to mastery rather than a chore, educators can inspire students to embrace the grind required to build consistency. Luck and coincidence may spark success, but repetition turns those sparks into a dependable flame.
Imagine your ensemble as a dynamic movie scene. Just as every element on screen contributes to the narrative—characters, actions, settings, and effects—every instrument in an ensemble plays a vital role in crafting the musical story. The beauty of an ensemble lies not just in its cohesion but in the fluidity of its roles; any instrument can shift its focus at a moment’s notice depending on the context of the music.
1. Melody: The Main Character
The melody is the protagonist, commanding the audience’s attention and delivering the emotional core of the
scene. This role requires clarity, confidence, and expression, much like an actor delivering a pivotal monologue.
2. Melody...ish: The Supporting Character
The countermelody is the sidekick, enhancing the story without stealing the spotlight. These parts weave texture and nuance into the narrative, like a best friend offering depth to the lead’s journey.
3. Rhythmic Accompaniment: The Action Rhythm drives the scene’s momentum, like footsteps in a chase or the ticking of a clock. These parts maintain the energy, ensuring the story unfolds with precision.
4. Static Harmonic Accompaniment: The Background Harmonic support provides context, much like the setting of a scene. These roles are understated but essential, grounding the melody and rhythm in a rich backdrop.
Dynamics in music are not absolute; they are relational and depend on context. A common misconception is that written dynamics dictate how loud an individual should play. In ensemble music, dynamics indicate how loud a musician should be heard by the audience, which varies based on several factors:
• Geography: Musicians positioned farther from the audience may need to project more than those closer to maintain balance.
• Personnel: The number of players in a section affects balance.
• Texture: The instrumentation at any given moment shapes how dynamics are perceived.
• Register: High-pitched instruments (and high pitches in general) naturally carry differently than low-pitched ones.
students, taking the time to assess their work not only reinforces learning but also encourages a growth mindset. Questions like “What did I learn today?” or “How did I contribute to the group’s success?” shift their focus from simply playing the right notes to understanding their role in the ensemble’s overall performance.
Ensemble directors play a critical role in fostering this reflective culture. By modeling reflective practices and asking targeted questions during rehearsals, they encourage students to think critically about their performances. For example:
• “What went well in that section, and why?”
• “What could we improve, and how can we make that happen next time?”
• “What adjustments can you make to balance better with the ensemble?”
By teaching students to recognize and adapt to these roles, educators foster an ensemble that listens, balances, and performs intentionally—bringing the story to life!
OVERLOOKING CONTEXT
Educators should emphasize these contextual elements during rehearsals, teaching students to listen actively and adapt their playing. By aligning dynamics with how the audience perceives sound, ensembles can deliver balanced and expressive performances, regardless of the setting.
Reflection is the bridge between practice and progress. For
Encourage students to extend this reflection beyond rehearsals. After a concert, engage the ensemble in group discussions or assign journaling activities with prompts like:
• “What did you feel most confident about during the performance?”
• “What challenges did we face, and how might we address them in the future?”
Improvement comes from continuous reflection and adjustment. When students regularly evaluate their contributions, they develop a deeper understanding of the music, their ensemble’s goals, and the actions required to achieve greatness.
The journey of ensemble development is a delicate balance between embracing the PROs and overcoming the CONs. Educators can elevate their ensembles by implementing systems that prioritize processes, proactivity, and fundamentals. At the same time, addressing challenges like consistency, context, and connection ensures that every musician grows individually and collectively.
Educators and students can navigate this balance through intentionality and reflection, making the possible achievable and probable. With these tools, ensembles can create meaningful, memorable music while cultivating a culture of growth and excellence.
Is what we do as wind band conductors and music educators important? Assuming your answer is a resounding “yes,” what do we need to do to ensure the wind band remains relevant today and in the future?
Many dramatic events have occurred in recent years, such as a global pandemic, widespread social and political unrest, economic and environmental uncertainty, and conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East. Historically, events on this scale served as catalysts of profound cultural and societal change, and there is clear evidence society is changing in ways our generation has rarely witnessed.
In the face of such upheaval, how do we music educators make sure that music, specifically the wind band, remains relevant in the face of a rapidly changing society with widely differing
cultural and artistic values? It is important to remember at its core music is an artform that helps make us human and connects people. In Ancient Greece, Aristotle believed music was an important part of society and education, and that music affects our souls and positively influences character.
The wind band grew out of the instrumental music of the late Renaissance, so it is a discipline deeply rooted in centuries of history, tradition, and evolution. Wind bands have evolved to look and sound a certain way, programming has developed to meet certain traditions and expectations of performers and audiences, conductors often approach the wind band in similar ways, concerts are typically structured similarly, and the way we engage audiences has largely remained unchanged until the recent use of digital and remote viewing formats. In the United States, today’s wind band remains mostly the same as it was when it first gained popularity in the late 19th century; its primary evolution includes instrument refinements,
instrumentation, and of course, the availability of a large body of new, original repertoire for the medium.
Have we become stagnant or complacent in the wind band profession? Is the wind band becoming less important in society, especially in the face of recent seismic social, political, and cultural events and changes? If so, how should we respond to strengthen our engagement with the broader community?
Unless we strive to meet the ever-changing interests of our constituents, ensemble members and audiences alike, it is safe to assume the wind band will eventually become much less important within our schools, and society. A broad, honest assessment of our current state is necessary to guide our path forward to maintain our relevance to performers, audience, and the larger community. The important foundational considerations for this discussion include the performers, audience, access, and support.
The performers include composers, conductors, and ensemble members. Artistically and educationally, experiences in music performance should be expressive, engaging, and rewarding, encompassing the diversity of world history, cultures, ethnic groups, and identities, as well as reflecting current events and trends. Often, the approach to wind band can be limited to a much too narrow scope out of tradition, comfort, complacency, or a lack of initiative and creativity.
What should be offered the performers to keep the wind band relevant in their lives? For composers, we should engage the widest possible cross section of artists, so our repertoire continues to expand in exciting new directions and represent all segments of society. Young composers should be encouraged to compose for our medium through commissioning consortiums. Remember, not every composition is going to be a stunning masterpiece. Composers that are new to our medium need to be afforded repeated opportunities to compose, practice and hone their art and craft, and eventually find their compositional voice. It will likely require time, patience, and a good amount of trial and error while a composer is en route to mastery of composing for the wind band medium.
Conductors grow by encountering music that is unfamiliar and challenging. There are advantages to falling back on the proven cornerstone works and compositions we have conducted previously, but that can be a great recipe for becoming stagnant if done too frequently. Conductors should both honor the history of the wind band by programming
standard works and expanding the repertoire with innovative new compositions.
Ensemble members deserve to experience a wide variety of music that offers appropriate artistic and technical challenges, and represents the world in which we live. The current wind band
Continued on next page
community is arguably at the forefront of championing new music, and it is a disservice to the musicians if conductors continue to rely only on the “golden oldies” for their concert programming. Further, it is possible to move beyond the tradition of conductors unilaterally making the programmatic decisions to include input from ensemble members about repertoire choices. Also, ensemble members should perform in a variety of settings such as chamber ensembles, with soloists, guest conductors, guest composers, etc., and in different venues including concert halls, community centers, parks, etc.
What does the wind band offer a typical audience member today? What efforts are made to engage audience members that are new and beyond the “typical” concertgoer? What do our concerts look and feel like to the audience? Is there good variety of repertoire, emotional range, types of ensembles, etc.? Do our concerts feature a high-quality presentation that is intellectually stimulating and aesthetically pleasing? Can the audience relate to or connect with the music? Has the nature of our concerts become too formulaic, predictable and stale?
Concerts are first and foremost musical experiences, but they
Heidel,
are also social activities for audiences. Let us hope concerts are never moved to completely online experiences! For centuries, audiences have enjoyed socializing before and after concerts as well as during intermission. This has been a wonderful way of connecting people through a performance venue. Consider methods for nurturing human interactions during these occasions by having refreshments, live performances for added ambience, or pre- and post-concert access to the performers. Are there other ways to enhance the audience’s interactivity with our events?
Engaging people through social media platforms before and after concerts is already ubiquitous. How can these platforms be harnessed for audience and performers to engage during the concert? Additional ideas include the use of multimedia presentations, diverse staging of performers for new visual and aural effect, different performance venues (indoors and outdoors), unique collaborations with unusual soloists or groups within the band, partnerships with other artforms (dance, visual art, popular music artists), etc. It is important to imagine the full range of possibilities to better connect with current and new audiences; one’s creativity is the only limit here.
It is only fair and right that people have access to music whether they are performers or audience members. However, there are factors that might affect accessibility. For students, there could be barriers to program entrance such as an audition, the cost of purchasing an instrument or materials, or the requirement of taking private lessons. There may also be challenges related to time demands, class scheduling, the need to work instead of attending extra rehearsals, or even the cost of concert attire.
For audience members, taking time to attend a concert or paying an admission fee may present significant challenges. The expectations that audiences wear nice attire or sit quietly through a formal concert could be unattractive to some people. The length of the concert as well as the type of music that is programmed could also affect audience accessibility.
In the end, it is important to lift or minimize any potential barriers for students and/or audience members so an experience in live music is accessible to everyone. People with widely different backgrounds and interests should have uninhibited access to musicmaking opportunities.
Continued on next page
Relevance ..., Mark Heidel, Kara Metzger, Myron Peterson, Tyler Strickland, cont.
Administrative and public support is essential at every level. Administrators are faced with difficult decisions on a daily basis, so it is important to cultivate relationships with them and educate them about the value of music. The need for this type of engagement has not changed in the past 50 years, and it will not change in the next 50 years. It is imperative that we, as advocates for our programs and the wind band in general are able to articulate a deep, cohesive, and comprehensive philosophy about the importance of music and the wind band to supporters at every level.
Arts organizations should connect with the broader
community through publications, social media, promotion of events and activities, digital platforms (YouTube, Spotify), live streaming concerts, etc. We should aspire to keep the arts in front of people, and be strong, visible, and vocal advocates for music programs.
Booster organizations are important. They serve to expand our reach to additional audiences and networks, synergize efforts to raise financial support, and provide important and necessary logistical support for active and complex music programs. Be sure they are healthy and engaged, and that there is excellent communication between faculty and the booster organization to ensure program goals are aligned.
Ultimately, the student and the music-making experience should be central to the mission of support organizations.
Efforts should be undertaken to demonstrate to the public the benefit of experiences in music.
Social media, print media, and public performances that are outside of educational settings can help promote the value of music to many segments of society.
In closing, there is absolutely nothing wrong or undesirable about presenting a traditional band concert featuring classic wind band repertoire performed in a convincing manner. The music of Holst, Vaughan Williams, Grainger, Sousa, King, Persichetti, Chance,
etc. has been an important part of the lifeblood of the wind band for decades, and it will continue to be at the core of the wind band experience for years to come. Our standard compositions should not be forsaken for the newest, shiniest work that was just released. However, thinking outside of the box to include innovative new repertoire, creative presentations, unique collaborations, and inventive partnerships could result in new and meaningful experiences for both performers and audience members.
We need to ensure music is accessible to all performers and consumers of the art form, and we must endeavor to nurture support for the activity from many different segments of society. Regardless of the strategy, a balanced approach to most things in life works well. Determining the path forward for the wind band requires that we are reflective, introspective, and above all that we bring our collective creativity to bear. A willingness to change with the times could result in exciting new directions for the wind band in its artistic service to society that will ensure it relevance now and well into the future.
How do I get my band to play in tune? It starts with characteristic tone quality established in the first year of playing an instrument. Utilizing individual tuners can not only revolutionize your ensemble’s intonation issues, but can also diagnose common beginner embouchure mistakes made in the first year of band.
In the Grisham Band Hall all of our6th-8th grade musicians are required to purchase their own Korg TM-70 Tuner with the clip on microphone. This is one of the required supplies on their supply list as they enter 6th grade band. Having taught previously in Title I schools where purchasing extra supplies such as a tuner was not in reach for our families, I had purchased a class set to allow students to still have access to this vital classroom tool.
Before we make sounds on our instruments for the first time, our students are taught how to use and understand the mechanics of the tuner. They will know prior to making first sounds what sharp, flat, and in tune are. They also know what the goal is: to get that wonderful green light on the tuner. Then on the first day of making sounds on our mini-instruments (mouthpieces, headjoints, clarinet mouthpieces and barrels, saxophone mouthpieces and neck), our students have a visual representation of what we’re looking for on the tuner--the green light.
The first few weeks of band at Grisham is focused on producing quality sounds on our miniinstruments to ensure correct establishment of the embouchure. Utilizing individual tuners is one of the quickest ways for our students to check if they are doing the right things. With our flutes for example, a consistently flat A tells our
Mason England is the Director of Bands at Grisham Middle School in Austin, Texas. Prior to coming to Grisham, Mr. England served as the Director of Bands at Manor Middle School in Manor, Texas and in Brownfield ISD in Brownfield, Texas. His teaching responsibilities at Grisham include directing the Honors Band, the Saxophone Ensemble, assisting with the Symphonic Band, and teaching the beginning Flute, Double Reed, Clarinet, and Saxophone Classes.
Since beginning his career in music education, ensembles under Mr. England’s baton have received consistent sweepstakes ratings in the Texas University Interscholastic League (UIL) Concert and Sight Reading Evaluations, as well as earning Best in Class and Outstanding Performance awards at festivals around the state of Texas.
Under Mr. England’s direction, the Grisham Honors Band placed 3rd in the TMEA CC Honor Band Finals, and has been a consistent recipient of the National Mark of Excellence Award for Wind Band Honors. The Grisham Honors Band was also recently invited to perform at The 78th Annual Midwest Clinic.
Before moving to Texas, Mr. England received his undergraduate degree from Grand Valley State University in Allendale, Michigan. In addition to his teaching at Grisham Middle School, Mr. England is an active clinician for band programs in both Michigan and Texas.
students that the air speed may not be fast enough or that the aperture size isn’t quite correct yet. For our brass buzzing a Concert F (or Concert C for our Horns), they are Continued on next page
also able to find the sweet spot for air speed, aperture openness, and mouthpiece placement utilizing the tuner and an individual mirror. Our brass players also have a visual to show them if they are buzzing lip slurs or sirens correctly. While buzzing lip slurs they can also aim for specific intervals such as a fifth. Not to mention how helpful the new transpose feature is for our horn players so they can now see the actual note they are playing on their instrument.
As we continue to develop the embouchure and start playing actual music it is easy to incorporate early ensemble skills into our beginner classes. Even while playing simple songs such as Jingle Bells we teach our students the first goal with the tuner is to look at your tuner on the long
notes--in this case the whole notes. Setting a small achievable goal such as glancing at the tuner once or twice in a song for a beginner is one of the ways they will continue to develop their aural skills with a visual aide.
So how does this translate into an ensemble setting? As we go through our beginning band year we set more achievable tuner goals that increase our students’ awareness of their intonation tendencies. By the time they have become a 7th grader and earned a spot in our Honors or Symphonic Bands, they already know how to consistently play in tune.
They are able to, without being asked, at least look at their tuners and make adjustments on long tones. Then as we increase the level
of repertoire, our young musicians are able to not only play with a beautiful, characteristic sound, but are able to make advanced musical adjustments with their intonation.
But if the students are always using a tuner how do they truly develop their ear? It’s simple--the majority of our students don’t have an ear until we show them how to listen. Utilizing a visual aide is the first step in doing so. In my rehearsals I am able to have them go back and forth between looking at their tuner on a complex chord, and not looking at the tuner and merely listening for waves. The tuner shouldn’t be the only way they know if they are in tune--but it is a great way to start developing the ear in young musicians.
How do our beginners truly learn what it is like to be in an ensemble? How do we transition them from beginning band into young musicians who can balance, tune, match articulation, identify melodies, and contribute as members of next year’s ensemble? How can we expect them to know how to truly contribute in an ensemble setting? My answer: utilize the veteran members of your current ensemble to help them develop the skills they will need before they finish their beginning band year.
At Grisham Middle School our students spend their beginning band year in homogenous classes.
Just like most beginners, as they finish their first year of band they are about to enter an ensemble class next fall. Having a new ensemble in the fall for us involves lots of fundamentals, but really we are calibrating our new ensembles.
We are teaching them how to listen, to adjust, to collaborate with their peers in a much different setting than what they are used to in beginning classes.
From January-March our beginners complete their Band Olympics. This fun competition involves receiving points for passing off songs, fundamentals, etudes, and their end of year solo. Students who reach 1,000 points earn a spot in our “Platinum Band.” Students that reach at least 400 points earn a spot in our “Gold Band.” At the end of Band Olympics, we begin our Platinum and Gold Band Rehearsals once per week before and after school. Our Platinum Band is made up of these select beginners and our current Honors Band members. Our Gold Band is made up of select beginners and 8th grade members of our current Symphonic Band.
In these once per week rehearsals our beginners have the unique opportunity to hear characteristic tone qualities from our more advanced 7th and 8th graders. They also get to see what it’s really like
to be a member of an ensemble. We are able to provide them with an opportunity to learn how to be in an ensemble with the comfort of having the best models to learn from and be mentored by--their peers.
In these rehearsals we will spend time on fundamentals and learn a more challenging piece of music than they would normally play at their Spring Concert, as the older players will help them through it.
Having our mentor students in this ensemble allows us to isolate characteristic tone qualities. We can play “Concert F around the Room” where we have just our current Honors Band members play, having the beginners listen to them before we have our beginners then play the same exercise with the goal of “try and sound like the Honors Band students.” Even utilizing Chicowicz Flow Studies in the full ensemble setting to demonstrate air flow and note connection is a great way for our beginners to begin to develop
lyricism. This way they always have a tone and technique model from the veteran players.
We are able to also utilize our Honors Band members to address issues related to technique, balance and intonation. Giving sections time to discuss with their “Beginner Buddies” what to listen for, which section to listen for or fit their sound inside, how to adjust, etc. By the Spring Concert our beginners have had the time to develop their ears more, learn how to be in an ensemble, and perform a piece at the Spring Concert with the Honors Band. Then in the Fall when those beginners are new members of the advanced
ensembles, they have already had a prerequisite experience in the ensemble. We are able to “hit the ground running.”
Younger students often look up to their older peers as role models, and these interactions can build confidence and a sense of belonging. Advanced students, on the other hand, develop leadership skills and a sense of responsibility as they help nurture the musical growth of their younger counterparts. This dynamic can create a more cohesive and supportive band environment, where every member feels valued and motivated to contribute their best efforts.
Growing Together ... Mason England, cont.
This experience every spring has helped create a vibrant and enduring tradition within our program that our students look forward to each year. We often spend so much time focusing on the lessons we plan to teach we can forget we have a team of aspiring young musicians who are willing to help us as they graduate and leave their legacy in our Band Hall. The young musicians that enter our doors every day ready to create beautiful music can be our greatest assets. They are a reminder that music is not just about notes on the page, but about the connections we make and the lives we touch along the way.
"So long as the human spirit thrives on this planet, music in some living form will accompany and sustain it ..."
–Aaron Copland
Be part of the world’s largest professional organization for bands, dedicated to promoting the musical and educational significance of bands and the attainment of a high level of excellence for bands and band music. The NBA is open to anyone and everyone interested in bands and stands ready to serve all members of our thriving musical community.
BY MATTHEW TALBERT
The difference between a peerreviewed research article and the articles traditionally published in the NBA Journal is best described as a difference in the vetting process and source material. To have an article appear as “peer-reviewed” in the NBA Journal means recognized researchers and scholars in the field of music/music education will read, evaluate, and then recommend whether or not an article should be published, revised or rejected. This process is widely recognized as an indicator of quality scholarship in a particular discipline or field. Other names for these types of articles are “scholarly” or “refereed.”
A traditional NBA Journal article is most often written from the perspective of the author’s unique experiences in life, music, and/or the profession. These
articles are of extraordinary value, as they often present a number of ideas that have been effective for the author and may also be effective for the reader.
A research article is most often written as a continuation of ideas presented in previous articles, with the motivation drawn from combining the findings of those previous articles and the author’s own experiences, experiments, or observations. In building the article in this way, the validity of the information is heightened beyond the traditional article. These articles are also of extraordinary value as they may also impact the way the reader approaches the subject material in a potentially more generalizable way. When incorporating the peer-review process, the an author’s article now has a final layer of review (for accuracy) utilizing other experts within the same subject matter.
Matthew Talbert, Associate Professor of Music Education and Director of the School of Music, joined Ohio University in the fall of 2016. Talbert earned a Ph.D. in Music Education from the University of South Carolina (2012), a Master of Music in Music Education from Appalachian State University (2005), and a Bachelor of Music in Music Education from Appalachian State University (2004).
Dr. Russell Gavin, former chair of NBA’s Research (and Editorial) committees, shares his thoughts on the layout and value of these types of articles:
A number of peer-reviewed research articles may read like other articles found in the NBA Journal, with the author outlining their thoughts on a subject while using citations to support the premise of the issue being discussed. Other research
articles will take on a bit more of a scientific approach. These articles begin with a review of literature summarizing the research on the topic that already exists, while simultaneously presenting the reader with the rationale driving the current article. A method section follows, describing what actually happened in the research, then a results and analysis section(s) describing what the researcher found, if anything. The article closes with a discussion of the findings and how they may relate to the world. The article concludes with a list of references from which the author drew information and ideas.
If you are inexperienced at reading research articles, you may want to read the discussion section first. This part of the article will explain how the information found in the rest of the article may impact you and others in the article subject community. Oftentimes this is the place where practical ideas will be most clearly expressed; however, taking in the entire article will always give a much clearer view of what the author was attempting to express.
As mentioned above, an ideal research article is adding to the research that came before it. This continuation and growth of
Continued on next page
knowledge is one of the defining characteristics of this kind of inquiry. At the end of the article, the reader is left with information that is not only new to them, but simultaneously new to the world. This level of investigation is of paramount importance in all areas of music and education, and the NBA is proud to present this new avenue for such exploration and thought.
for Submission of Peer-Review Research Articles
A. Submission Method: Manuscripts should be submitted as Microsoft Word attachments via email to the Editorial Committee Chair: silveyba@missouri.edu
B. Length: The manuscript should not exceed 25 pages and should include an abstract of 100-150 words in length on a separate page. We encourage the submission of short form articles (4-10 pages) as well as full-length articles.
C. Cover Page: To ensure anonymity in the review process, the manuscript should contain no clues as to the author’s institutional affiliation or identity. Author’s name(s), address, institution affiliations, and pertinent information should be listed on a separate cover page at the beginning of
How to Submit Peer-Reviewed Research to the NBA Journal, Matthew Talbert, cont.
How to Submit Peer-Reviewed Research to the NBA Journal, Matthew Talbert, cont. of Chicago Press Editorial Staff, 2018). Note: Authors may not combine and/or mix styles within a single manuscript
the submission. The cover page should also include up to five keywords/phrases that describe the contents of the manuscript.
D. Style Guide: Manuscripts should conform to one of the following style manuals:
(1) Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (7th edition, 2019),
(2) The Chicago Manual of Style(17th edition, 2017), or
(3) A Manual for Writers of Term Papers, Theses, and Dissertations (K. L. Turabian, 9th edition, revised by Wayne C. Booth, Gregory Colomb, Joseph M. Williams, and the University
E. Tables and Figures: Tables and figures may be included with the manuscript, however, these must be publishable in black and white. It is the author’s responsibility to make sure any tables/figures are checked for accuracy before submission. Additionally, if any copyrighted materials are submitted, it is the author’s responsibility to provide documentation allowing the reproduction of these materials.
F. Ethical Requirements: It is the author’s responsibility to ensure that no copyright issues have been violated by the submission, including images, charts, etc. Manuscripts already published in other journals can be submitted for consideration in the NBA Journal providing the author has permission to do so.
Questions about submitting a peer- reviewed article? Email Research Chair Brian Silvey at silveyba@missouri.edu