Pages from sergio zenere a pedlar a prig and a dolt part 3 of 4

Page 1

SERGIO ZENERE

ISBN 978-1-329-44282-5

identify the taboo or totem concepts or facts around which “the monitoring system” never “takes an holiday”:“ancient events continually held up for emulation” based on the schizophrenic “need to make the experience of the past into the present”.

Popular Yahoo France suggests what the “monitoring system” is on the lookout for:

Tout commentaire contraire à la réglementation en vigueur (et notamment tout commentaire à caractère raciste, antisémite ou diffamatoire) pourra donner lieu à la suppression de votre compte Yahoo! Le cas échéant, certains commentaires que vous postez pourront également donner lieu à des poursuites judiciaires à votre encontre. (Every comment going against the rules (especially racist, antisemitic or libelous comments) may lead to the termination of your Yahoo account. Whenever applicable, some comments of yours may trigger legal action against you). If you are accused of hate speech under the [Canadian] Criminal Code, you are presumed innocent. Not so under Section 13, where the onus is on you to prove your words hurt no feelings. While the truth and "fair comment" are defences in a criminal hate-speech trial - and the Crown needs to prove intent and show how your words actually led to discrimination - none of that is true at a human rights hearing. Nor do you have a right to face your accuser or cross-examine his or her testimony. What's more, whether or not your words or website expose an individual or group to discrimination is determined by what that individual or group feels has happened to them. There is no definition of hate and no objective standard of harm. Also, at human rights hearings, rules of evidence are much, much looser than they are in courts. Hearsay evidence, for instance, is often admitted. -...-The proof of just how stacked the tribunal process has been comes from the CHRC's conviction rate: From the time Section 13 was added to the human rights act in 1977 until it began to attract the ire of Storseth (and others, such as Sun News' Ezra Levant) in 2009, no person charged under Section 13 had ever been acquitted. In other words, the CHRC had a 100% conviction rate on hate-speech 901

A PEDLAR, A PRIG AND A DOLT


Turn static files into dynamic content formats.

Create a flipbook
Issuu converts static files into: digital portfolios, online yearbooks, online catalogs, digital photo albums and more. Sign up and create your flipbook.
Pages from sergio zenere a pedlar a prig and a dolt part 3 of 4 by sergio zenere - Issuu